About Forrest Norrod
Forrest Norrod, executive vice president and general manager of AMD’s Data Center Solutions Business Group, presented the company’s first rack-scale AI system, Helios, in a July 2026 CNBC exclusive. Norrod described Helios as a 7,000-pound, $5 million system containing 72 GPUs and 18 CPUs per rack, and stated it is shipping to customers including Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, and Oracle later this year. He characterized Helios as an open system built on industry standards, contrasting it with Nvidia’s proprietary approach, and said the system performs better, is more efficient, and is more customizable than Nvidia’s Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin systems. Norrod also noted that optical interconnects will become prevalent within racks in the next two to three years, and said AMD would comply with regulatory regimes regarding sales to China.
Norrod expressed confidence in AMD’s competitive position, stating that “there’s a serious case in which AMD does great and can get to 20 and 25%” market share, and that “it’s absolutely our aspiration to be able to gain market share.” He also observed a shift in the AI market away from “token maxing” toward practical token utilization, adding that if AMD architectures deliver better throughput and higher memory at a rationalized cost per token, “that stuff will start to win attention.”
Source: AI-verified profile updated from Forrest Norrod's recent appearances.
Browse all interviews →
Transcript (19 segments)
H
Host0:07
The 65 is on the road at AMD's Advancing AI event, and there have been some huge announcements all the way from the data center to the client computing and everything in between. Dan, it's great to see you.
D
Dan0:20
Yeah, it's great to be here today. Today was a high-energy day. Right off the first five minutes, Lisa Su, CEO of AMD, was on stage and she was moving. She covered a lot of ground. But this isn't just about today, Pat. This is a day that the market's been waiting for. A lot of people out there have been waiting for it in the AI and silicon space. This may be one of the biggest days of 2023.
H
Host0:44
Yeah, and it's incredible on a lot of things. If nothing else was reinforced, it was the need for openness. Open models, foundational models, open software, open networking lanes that I know you and I have talked about networking a lot as that missing piece that not enough people were talking about. But we got it all today. And I'm really pleased to introduce Forrest Norrod, who runs the data center business at AMD. Forrest, great to see you.
F
Forrest Norrod1:12
Great to see you, Pat. Good to see you, Dan.
H
Host1:14
Yeah, it's good to have you here. You must be smiling ear to ear, even though you might look a little stoic. Pat, we've been around enough events to know the amount of tension, the buildup, the excitement. He was rocking on stage. I'll tell you the education that I got. I even took a little notes. As an analyst, sometimes you don't admit when we take notes, but I was particularly on the open networking, so I appreciate that. As a modern young millennial myself, I note things by tweeting and then I go back and look at them later, and then we do the long form like analysts do. But we did put a lot out there. I'm joking. I know. All right, we're good. So AI is at this massive inflection, and it was a theme of the day, the theme of the year really since about November 30th, 2022. But you've been working on it a lot longer than that, right? And it's at this inflection point, and here you are entering a market. You're sort of being looked at as the rising competition in the data center. Very compelling numbers, very compelling metrics. How are you viewing this moment in time, and how are the conversations with your customers? Are they feeling confident? Are you feeling confident that you're prepared to compete and that they're really willing to go all in? It seemed that way from today, but I'm interested in how you're seeing that.
F
Forrest Norrod2:29
Yeah, we definitely think today was an incredible day. It was a culmination from our point of view, not just of what's been going on this last year, but quite candidly, we introduced MI300. We've been working on it for over five years. People sometimes don't appreciate the complexity of these chips and what we're trying to do, so that these multi-generational roadmaps get set in place years in advance. Particularly for the MI300A, which has some really interesting technology—the chiplets, the mix of processes, the large package, the combination of CPU and GPU together—we've been working on it for a long time. So for us, it was an incredible day to have that culminate not just in a launch, but in really strong customer acceptance and the excitement of our customers. We've gotten not just the silicon, but all the work we've been doing on the software as well has come together at one point where the excitement of AI is there. That's the thing: we didn't know five years ago. We believed that this AI inflection point would happen at some point, but you don't know when. So when we started this journey, we didn't know that the whole world would be revolving around generative AI today, and the whole world would be saying, 'Thank heavens that AMD is offering us a really solid, complete AI solution—hardware and software—that gives me choice and also helps foster innovation across the industry.'
H
Host4:17
Yeah, Forrest, a couple thoughts there. First of all, thanks for reinforcing what I'm trying to reinforce when it comes to silicon, which is that software ideas are really hard, but you don't start five years and plan it. With semiconductors, locking in an architecture five years in advance, and then once you get the silicon back, you've got another year to get it in high volume at least. But then you add the complexity of chiplets and then you layer on the software, it really is a big day. So I talked a little bit in the run-up about a lot of discussion about openness. Everybody has their definition of open. Some people might say, 'Well, when it's not open, it goes faster.' When you look at full stacks, some people go in. But can you talk about the value of open in the context of what you said on stage? Dan and I are both of the opinion that more competition is better.
F
Forrest Norrod5:29
Well, I think first off, we think open is absolutely crucial. As a company that's long been the underdog, we've always been open, we've always been partnering. The reason is that quite frankly, we think that's where the most value and the most innovation flows—from open ecosystems where others can come together and add value and add new ideas to your platform. So we think, to my mind, open versus completely proprietary and locked down: if you're proprietary and locked down, that's a statement that you believe that your engineers are smarter than everybody else's in the entire industry combined. That's right. And we certainly have never been arrogant enough to think that. So we think open is critical. We also hear that in spades from our customers. They want open platforms so that they can add value, so that they can add their own innovations around the ecosystem, and also so that they're not locked into something proprietary that maybe has unfavorable economics.
H
Host6:47
Yeah, no, I hear you. And again, AMD's hallmark for a long time. The reality is sometimes open doesn't go as quickly, but it absolutely looks at least, you know, in the end. The response from your customers and your partners was really a tour de force today that reinforced that. If you look at just yesterday ahead of your event, AMD is part of this new IBM, Meta-led AI Alliance, which is not just tech companies, it's laboratories, institutions, universities, up and down the stack, security, SaaS companies. That really does come down to the fact that people understand the critical nature of getting this right, and that having too few control too much would be like having one or two companies ending up controlling the entire internet. I'm sure someone will argue that that did in some way happen, but it's been more and more democratized as time has gone on. AI is going to be similar. It's going to change the world. It's changing our path. Like I said, Lisa alluded to how much it's changed everything in the past year. Something else has changed a lot for us in the past few years: the packaging conversation. A little pivot there. We were real deep, and now we're going to get back to packaging. We like doing chip guys. We'll go from being big picture guys to chip guys. But packaging, in terms of bringing together memory, compute onto a single package, seems to be a trend line in the industry. Today seems to definitely be something that you're leading with. Talk about how that's enabling you to advance, to innovate, to drive next-generation designs, and of course to stay competitive.
F
Forrest Norrod8:32
For us, people have talked for most of the last decade about how Moore's law is under threat and it's slowing down, and that the traditional way we used to get more capability and more price performance was just to rely on the process—just get more transistors. They've been talking about how that's been slowing down. At AMD, I'd say we looked at it very dispassionately almost a decade ago and said, 'Yeah, you're right.' And therefore—and that's a step that a lot of people didn't take—therefore we have to do it differently. We have to embrace chiplets. We have to look at how certain types of logic and other functions scale differently as the process generations continue. So we're going to want to have chiplets of different processes mixed together in one package in order to continue to deliver the most performance, price performance, and power efficiency. Once you accept that you're going to have to do that, packaging becomes the obvious new critical thing that you have to focus on. It was almost an afterthought in years past, but now it's central to how you design these chips, how you design these systems. So we invested massively. I think we're generally four or five years at least ahead of most of the industry in terms of embracing this technology. You see Intel now with Sapphire Rapids going to a four-die topology very similar to what we did in the first generation EPYC products back in 2017. They're going to advance it rapidly as well, but they've begun that journey. We think everybody doing high-performance parts is going to go after advanced packaging—2D and 3D over time—but we think we're ahead.
H
Host10:27
Yeah, it was well. First of all, even when I was in the business, I remember 13 years ago, packaging was an afterthought. It was something you threw over the wall. Was it organic? PGA, BGA? That was almost the extent of it. But now it is kind of equal partners with chip design. The big bet I remember on Ryzen was that there was this discussion about MCM always being slow because you just couldn't get the interconnect fast enough and you couldn't have it sucking too much power. So hats off to you. I think it started with Ryzen, with Infinity Fabric, pulling this together. You've changed the topology and improved it with EPYC for data center applications. Then with the Xilinx acquisition, they had a lot of HBM multi-die designs as well, so you pull that capability in. Then here on the data center GPU and accelerator side, I think you did a really good job with the MI300A and the MI300X showing all the different pieces and how they come together. So you took the huge bet a decade ago, and it has paid off in spades. You've increased market share with EPYC, you've increased market share with Ryzen, and we'll see about data center GPUs. I want to shift the conversation a little bit to high-performance computing. You have won some very major national labs contracts. These things get won off a piece of paper and a belief in the technology. You were chosen—AMD was chosen, the solution was chosen—to power these. Can you talk a little bit about these two exascale-class compute wins?
F
Forrest Norrod12:30
So the first one that we're super proud of is Frontier, which took over the number one position on the Top500 about a year and a half ago. That was MI250 in a third-generation EPYC derivative part. You're right, we really won that deal three or four years earlier. You're working with the labs, you're working with your design partner. In this case, for both Frontier and El Capitan, it was HPE—well, actually it was Cray to begin with at that time, and then Hewlett Packard Enterprise. But you're doing advanced design, and the customer has to bet on the credibility of what you're saying long before anything exists. We viewed both projects as incredibly important for AMD in terms of our ambitions on HPC, our ability to have flagship design wins to anchor our roadmap, as well as drive us quite frankly, and getting partners, particularly in the HPC realm, aligned to our software ecosystem to help flesh out the overall solution. So we were super proud of Frontier. Seeing it still number one on the Top500 a year and a half later—the first opportunity, it'll be number one for at least two years. I haven't seen that before, but maybe I'm not paying attention long enough. Something has been there for so long. But that's a little unusual. We think the next big system from us is El Capitan, based on MI300A. That's a really cool part because it combines both the CPU and the GPU together in one package. The strong feedback from the HPC customers was that that really can help speed up their applications. I think that's why they entrusted that design to us. We're building it now, and I can't wait to see it go live next year.
H
Host14:57
Yeah, I love to see the AMD spearheaded an issue called HSA, which was sharing. This was 13 years ago. It was amazing for me. By the way, I wrote a white paper on it—I think it was my second that I did as my analyst company. But seeing that concept of shared memory come to fruition is pretty cool. By the way, it's been adopted even by smartphone vendors too. So congratulations on that.
F
Forrest Norrod15:25
Thank you.
H
Host15:26
Yeah, it was interesting. Out in Denver at Supercomputing this year, the show was all the rage. People were kind of talking about pre-2020 when everything kind of got shut down, that the show had been very limited, a bit narrower—researchers, institutions. This year, you couldn't get in the door. It was jammed wall to wall. My joke was 'flops to tops.' This was the year that it all... no, it has become the de facto AI hardware conference as well as supercomputing conference. It's been great to see the pivot was palpable this year. So as we wrap up, for someone that sits in a position like you, leading a lot of the charge from a development standpoint, also oftentimes in front of customers working closely with this partner ecosystem—you had some really impressive names on stage with you. Where does it go? How fast does it move? I know the law of diffusion of innovation would suggest that these periods continue to get shorter, but there's not much half-life left. Humans like, I'm watching the machines, but we need more. Our GPUs need to slow down a little bit.
F
Forrest Norrod16:35
I'd say the pace is incredible. By the way, it is a challenge for many institutions. You see the pace of AI hardware picking up. You'll see annual introductions now of new AI hardware, which is akin to the PC industry. But the machines, the systems that these are going into, are fantastically more complex than that. It's difficult for many organizations, customers, and partners to absorb that rate of change. What I think you'll see is that many customers will skip a generation. They'll still deploy every other year, but they'll be out of phase with each other overall. Customers are struggling to deal with this rate of innovation, but they're so excited at the promise of what AI can bring to everything and the productivity enhancements that we can see. It's an absolute imperative for everybody across the industry to move as fast as they possibly can. The things we've seen from the productivity even internally—we've got about a hundred AI projects underway internally. By that, I mean where AMD is using AI. We're seeing massive things like hiring, sales, all of those, but also on the engineering side for design, for validation, for compatibility checks. There are all sorts of different applications, and we're seeing massive productivity enhancements which is helping us design faster to maintain this fast rate. It also gives us a lot of confidence that this is not a bubble, not a flash in the pan. The productivity enhancements that are being promised out of AI really are coming and justify increased investment in it. So I think it's going to be an exciting few years for sure.
H
Host18:43
Well, Forrest, thanks so much for sitting down with us today.
F
Forrest Norrod18:46
Well, thank you guys. Really appreciate it. Thanks for coming.
H
Host18:49
Thanks. All right, everybody, hit that subscribe button. Join Patrick and myself for all of the episodes here at the AMD Advancing AI event in San Jose, California. Big day, Pat, for AMD. Big day for the AI space. We appreciate you all tuning in. We'll see you all soon.