Stanley Tang6:00
Yeah. So after meeting Starship, we decided this is something I want to look into. We started this group called DoorDash Labs. In the beginning, the main thing was really just trying to understand what the world of autonomous delivery even looks like, what are we even trying to build here. I think that's the most important thing I learned from starting one of these moonshot bets or any new businesses or new products within an existing company: it's super important to understand what's the use case you're solving for. In the beginning, it's very easy to get distracted by 'oh this is a shiny toy' or 'this is a cool technology trend, let's just use this for the sake of it because it's a cool tech thing.' I see this in AI right now. Everyone's like 'oh let's just use AI,' but what does that even mean? So in the beginning, it was really a lot of just figuring out the use case, how do we actually use autonomous deliveries. Start with the problem, the use case, and then work your way backwards to figure out what the right solutions are. In our case, I'll show you some slides from the early days of DoorDash Labs and explain what's going on here. In the beginning, it was really just trying to understand what is the use case. It turns out delivery is actually pretty nuanced. There are no two deliveries that are the same. We've done over 10 billion deliveries. We have short distance delivery, long distance, urban, suburbs. What we realized was there's not a one-size-fits-all solution. You have the sidewalk robot, the Starships of the world, which is really good for deliveries that are less than a mile. We started experimenting with drone deliveries as well, which we found really good for rural areas where road infrastructure isn't as good. But then there was this big gap where a lot of DoorDash deliveries fall under. About 50% of deliveries fall under what I call the dense suburbs. Think of cities in the US like Phoenix, Arizona, Dallas, Texas, where it's much more spread out. Our average delivery is typically between 3 to 6 miles, yet the delivery still needed to be completed in under 15-20 minutes. There weren't any existing solutions for those. When we actually took a deeper look at understanding the use case, the problem for DoorDash, we worked our way backwards from first principles and asked ourselves: what's the ideal autonomous delivery solution that suits DoorDash? There wasn't anything out there, and that's when we decided maybe we need to invest in this ourselves. Only after that we decided this is the time to start our moonshot bet around autonomous deliveries. We went through a whole process of building our own delivery robot, which we'll show at the end, called DoorDash Dot. Here are some early days pictures. The cool thing about this is that the robot on the bottom left side of this slide pretty much was when we joined forces in 2022. We actually flew to SF and met Stan for the first time. One of the coolest things we wanted to see was what was happening on the DoorDash Labs side, because we've been dreaming of doing that on the Wolt side but we were so focused on expansion and had a lot less funding to focus on this. One of the coolest things of us getting together, outside of this kind of really having a similar culture of customer obsession and operational excellence, was the cool stuff we could build. I love cool robots. When I first saw Dot was pretty much in 2022, roughly in this shape at the labs, it was a really cool thing to see. Also, when you think of innovation at scale, what companies tend to often do is just kind of love them to death with your current organization. But when I came to your labs, it was a pretty scrappy operation, a handful of engineers in a warehouse, very startup style, just figuring out how to do something meaningful for your customers rather than trying to do cool tech for tech's sake. It was one of those really beautiful moments to see. We have yet to test this in Finnish in the icy weathers outside, so let's see how well that works. But looking forward to getting to that point.
Yeah, totally. And maybe this is a good segue to talk a little about operating philosophy. How do you actually, let's say you start off wanting to launch a new product, new business line, or a new moonshot bet, or a new innovation lab? How do you actually set that team up? I'll show some more slides. I think one of the mistakes a lot of these companies, especially big companies, make when they start a moonshot lab is they ironically overfund it. It's like 'oh, it's autonomous, it's robotics, it must be really expensive, so you have to give it a ton of capital.' When in reality, you actually want to do the opposite. You actually want to set constraints. Constraints turn out to be one of your biggest advantages because constraints force creativity and innovation. In the beginning, you don't really know what you're doing. So if you just give a team $100 million and say 'go do whatever you want,' guess what? They're going to blow all that money and just do whatever they want because they don't really know what they're trying to do. You've got to set constraints in the beginning. We actually kept the team really scrappy. The first two or three years, we probably funded this team like it was low single-digit millions. It was really just about understanding what the use case is, what is a product, let's do some prototypes first, let's validate the idea. In the beginning, it wasn't 'let's just go build a robot.' It was 'let's go build a prototype, let's build a mockup.' You can see here on the bottom right, initially the first version was literally a foam mockup of what we think this robot is. Then we brought that to the restaurants, to the customers. We put it on the street to see if this is even the right size, the right vehicle profile. Then the next step was okay, we have a phone mockup. Maybe let's build a prototype version of the vehicle. But in the beginning, there was no autonomy. It was a remote-controlled car. You can see on the top right side, it was literally someone on a steering wheel driving. That picture is actually Tony, our co-founder CEO, doing a kind of remote control driving of the robot. Again, you could start testing real deliveries without even building the full autonomy by remote driving. Then it's like okay, let's build a basic V1 autonomy, it goes on fixed routes. Then eventually, once we have certainty that this is the right form factor, we went through a couple of iterations, three or four or five iterations, before we really landed on the actual solution that we need. Again, it's very nuanced. Autonomy for delivery is different than autonomy for rideshare, let's say. You can't just take what Waymo's built, plop it into DoorDash, and then everything magically works because there's a lot of nuances. The vehicle is very different, the profile is very different, the speeds at which you drive are very different, the pickup and drop-off problem is very different. You have to go right up to a restaurant to a customer. So setting these constraints is really important. The team has to earn their way to unlocking budget. It's almost like we're a VC within DoorDash. You've got to get your series seed round, your series A, series B, and then prove things out. We have a mantra at DoorDash: dream big but start small. That's been our philosophy, frankly, with not just autonomy but most of our moonshot bets. They all start very, very small.