John Hess4:55
Okay, well first, even though he knows this and he is a great leader for our country, President Trump wants to be energy dominant. He is the greatest champion of that. But I think the first point is just to remind him, his administration, and all of us in America that oil and gas are going to be here for decades. Oil and gas are a strategic industry for our country. You talked about the 11 million jobs, more jobs than the automotive industry and aviation industry, that's direct and indirect. Lower electric costs than most parts of the world by a factor of two to three, maybe even four when it comes to Europe in terms of what we pay for electricity here. And that we're totally energy secure. Our national security, we're independent of other countries. We're a net exporter, where China imports 70% of their oil and Europe imports 70% of their oil. So it's a real strong point. We're the largest oil and gas producer in the world, mainly because of shale. So at the end of the day, that energy dominance is a theme that we need to build around. And specifically, there are three suggestions I would make to President Trump. The first is putting a priority on making our country AI dominant in the world. And to do that, you need to focus on natural gas. Some people talk about nuclear. Nuclear is 10 years away from having an impact. To be the fuel that we need and the energy that we need to supply the electric generation in our country, it's got to be natural gas. So we need to streamline permitting, whether it's for electric plants, for transmission, for pipelines, or for distribution. So let's be AI dominant, and you can do that by being natural gas dominant. That's number one. Number two, and you know the API and you personally, Mike, along with Amanda and your team, have been outspoken on this: we need to focus on repealing and revising the tailpipe rules that the Biden administration put in, and also the CAFE standards. They are way tilted to electric vehicles, to where there's almost an EV mania. It's gotten to the point of ridiculousness where the Ford F-150, instead of pricing at about $80,000 a vehicle, is pricing at about $48,000 to meet the CAFE standards. So basically Ford is discounting their price just to meet their EV mandates. That's stupid. We're all for EVs, we're all for consumer choice. One of your five points that we need to get out there, but hybrid vehicles have a great role to play, and internal combustion engines. Let consumers make their choice. So at the end of the day, we won't be so dependent on EVs. China, most people don't realize, in terms of batteries, controls 75% of critical materials in the world for batteries, as well as the processing for those critical materials. So actually, if we were all EV vehicles in our country, we would be more dependent upon China for the EV vehicles, instead of using our liquid gold, as President Trump talks of the oil, to be our energy security. So at the end of the day, that's another area where repealing and revising both the CAFE standards and tailpipe standards, I think, would play to our energy dominance. And the last but not least is the SPR. The leader was just talking about not wanting to be dependent upon others. Henry Kissinger put the SPR in place in 1974 and the IEA in place in 1974 to deal with energy interruptions, oil interruptions. And what most people don't realize is, while it was absolutely right for us to use the SPR to deal with the vertical risk that we had in prices when Russia invaded Ukraine, we took our SPR reserves of crude from 600 million barrels to 400. Now we need to refill that, and the Biden administration was asleep at the wheel in terms of doing that. Two years ago, I found out that while we could take a million barrels a day out of the SPR, we only could put 150,000 barrels a day back in. Do the American people know that? I think it's very irresponsible that the Biden administration put us in that position. I said, you know, you got to do something, change your piping, change your engineering so you can put the million barrels a day back in that you took out. And they said, yeah, we're working on it. Well, a year later, I went back to them and talked to them about it, and they hadn't done one thing. So I think it's irresponsible. I think that's an area that we need to get on right away to refill the SPR to 600 million barrels for energy security, not just for our country but also the world. At the end of the day, energy policy is about three things: energy security, energy affordability, and energy transition. And most people don't realize that while well-intended targets and you have this in the climate policy for the API have been to reach net zero, at the end of the day, the carbon budget that the world needs to reach net zero is going to be used up in 2030. So we need to be clear-eyed to understand that we need to balance the three factors that I just said. And when you conclude from that, oil and gas are going to be needed for decades.