Back
William Mcmorrow
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, KENNEDY-WILSON HOLDINGS INC

Commercial Real Estate Outlook with Kennedy Wilson's CEO Bill McMorrow

🎥 Feb 27, 2025 📺 The Spatial Show ⏱ 86m 👁 74 views
Join hosts Elliot Golan and Vladimir Bosanac as they sit down with Bill McMorrow, Chairman and CEO of Kennedy Wilson ...
Watch on YouTube

About William Mcmorrow

In a July 2025 podcast, McMorrow discussed Kennedy Wilson's growth from a small auction company he purchased in 1988 into an international real estate firm. He highlighted the company's recent acquisition of a $5.7 billion loan portfolio, which he described as a transformative move that put the firm "back in banking in a big way." McMorrow also noted that Kennedy Wilson is one of the largest construction and bridge lenders in the country and is expanding its affordable and senior housing portfolio, which he called "the biggest issue in the world." McMorrow has been critical of the Federal Reserve's handling of interest rates, stating in a November 2024 interview that the Fed was "slow to react" and that he would have "started lowering rates early this year" based on ground-level data on rent growth. He has also expressed concern about rent control, arguing that it "discourages development and capital investment." McMorrow emphasized the importance of mentorship, contrarian thinking, and building a business on handshakes and long-term relationships, crediting his mentor George Graziadio for teaching him these principles.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from William Mcmorrow's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (73 segments)
V
Vladimir Banas0:07
All right, welcome back to the special show here. My name is Vladimir Banas, one of the co-hosts. In my daily life, I'm also the co-founder and publisher of The Registry, a West Coast commercial real estate news organization.
E
Elliot Golan0:25
Vlad, my man, always good to be back with you. I am Elliot Golan, one of the other, well, the only other co-host here. During the day, I help lead the real estate practice at a global PR and communications agency.
V
Vladimir Banas0:39
Yeah, Elliot, where are you? Are you still in Seattle?
E
Elliot Golan0:45
Yeah, from the last time. Well, I know this is going to shock you, man, but like, a lot of rain. What do they call it? Atmospheric river, which, of course, someone who grew up in Los Angeles, I'm like, what the heck is that? What's an atmospheric river? But yeah, we got some serious rain last week or so. How are things over by you in the Bay?
V
Vladimir Banas1:11
We can certainly use it here in the Bay, that's for sure. Although there has been some rains apparently down in Southern California that have now caused landslides and that kind of thing, so they're getting a double whammy of natural disasters over the last 60 days. But other than that, things are good, things are busy. I feel, even though I think our conversation today is going to venture into some slightly negative territory, I think the mood seems to be relatively good throughout the industry, at least here in Northern California.
E
Elliot Golan1:49
Yeah, no, I agree. People I talk to are, I mean, it's kind of cliche to say it at this point, but cautiously optimistic.
V
Vladimir Banas1:55
Yeah, and speaking of being cautiously optimistic, we have an interview today with a gentleman who's been around for quite a bit of time. We are going to be speaking with William McMorrow, the Chairman and CEO of Kennedy Wilson, a Beverly Hills-based global real estate investment firm that he acquired back in 1988. From a single office and 11 employees, he created this multinational entity that now has a publicly traded company in Japan, a publicly traded company in the UK, as well as here in the US. So an interesting conversation about the industry and the firm in general. That's coming up. Then Elliot and I will venture into a couple of news headlines, talk a little bit about what's happening with the latest consumer sentiment and confidence numbers which just came out recently. Then we'll talk a little bit about some acquisitions that Blackstone has done, and then we're going to venture into some deeper thoughts about things that are on the top of our minds.
E
Elliot Golan3:18
Yeah, I mean, it's just a little bit more than a marble bouncing between the ears.
V
Vladimir Banas3:25
Yeah, I have a little more space in between the ears, so I would argue there's a little more. I like it. All right, so let's dive into this consumer sentiment, consumer confidence. Wells Fargo put out a study just this week which is actually something that I think others have studied and put out similar reports. There's definitely some news that the consumer confidence numbers are down in the last month. Obviously, a lot going on with what's happening around our DOGE efforts in Washington DC and the new leadership. I think that's certainly playing a role, not the only reason confidence is down, but I think there are some numbers around unemployment and inflation that are persistent, and I think people are just concerned that this might affect them as well. Elliot, have you heard these rumblings?
E
Elliot Golan4:26
Yeah, I mean, it makes sense, right? Last year the entire conversation was interest rates are going to start coming down, we're getting inflation under control, job market is great. All three of those things have turned out to be as far from the truth as humanly possible. So you know, I see it. Interest rates are not going to go anywhere, inflation is nowhere near under control, and then you add in the nervousness around tariffs and some trade issues that could arise, and I get it. I totally understand why these figures are where they are.
V
Vladimir Banas5:08
Yeah, there's a polite term around inflation which I hear often, and it's 'normalized,' 'stabilized.' That's the right word that I hear. But the number that Wells Fargo put out is that basically the consumer confidence, and I think they measure it in percentages, which I'm not sure is going to make a whole lot of sense, but the headline from that analysis is that it's its lowest number since February of 2021, so almost a decade here. It also seems to correspond very closely with investor sentiment. I listened to a podcast actually just today which referenced the University of Michigan study, which is a fairly even-keel analysis. Both consumer confidence and investor sentiment, that one also is indicating there are fewer bulls around in terms of what the expectation is around employment. I learned a long time ago in this industry, jobs drive everything. They certainly drive retail, certainly drive housing, certainly drive how many people are occupying commercial space. That's going to impact what they're buying, how much they're buying, which is going to impact industrial now too, right? It's going to impact travel, which means hospitality and other sectors. If there's a fear that unemployment is going to bump up, I think there's a lot of narrative around inflation and interest rates, but I think unemployment is really another one that probably is more worrisome for the economy than those other two.
E
Elliot Golan6:49
Sure. You see people turning into, rightfully so, fiscal hermit crabs. Consumer spending is the fuel of the economy. If you want to be, was it for 18 months, maybe two years ago now, people were saying we're headed for a recession, we're headed for a recession. I made the argument to colleagues that the more you say it, the more likely we will, because the fear of it will put people's hands back in their pockets. When they stop spending money, all they're doing is taking us there quicker.
V
Vladimir Banas7:29
I think you're absolutely right. It can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Given the national news that we're experiencing here on a daily basis, I definitely think it's beginning to scare people. Certainly federal jobs are being reduced, to say the least. Whether they're going to be recalled back and these people will be rehired, we don't know. That's not something we're going to figure out anytime soon. But that means other people are also going to be worried what the downstream effects of these lost jobs might be on the rest of the economy. Therefore, Wells Fargo is now reporting inflation expectation is surging from around 5.2% to 6% this month in February. That's not good for this industry.
E
Elliot Golan8:30
Definitely not. It's going to be interesting. I still think, maybe this was two weeks ago you and I were talking, the uncertainty, I think chaos is an appropriate word, it fuels a lot of this stuff. Literally just people not knowing what the heck is going on, what's going to happen next. If things stabilize, hopefully a lot of this just goes away. Whatever another terrible cliche, whatever the new normal looks like.
V
Vladimir Banas9:09
Right. We know the new normal is not going to be the old normal, that's one thing for sure.
E
Elliot Golan9:17
Yeah, well, the new normal, that terrible cliche, really started around the office market. I know it's our favorite thing to talk about, but there's some new data out I wanted to talk about related to everyone's favorite real estate topic: are we going back to the office? I'm now in my head, I think this is the biggest game of chicken. This is quasi-Cold War chicken as far as I'm concerned. FDI Consulting put out a report: 74% of fully remote workers said they are likely to seek new employment if they are required to go back to the office full-time. 74%. Before you react to that astonishing number, the reason I say playing chicken is we just talked about a kind of unstable job market. So where the heck do y'all think you're going? I say this as a work from home guy, so I'm not against them by any means, but where do you think the jobs are that you're going to leave for?
V
Vladimir Banas10:35
It is very worrisome. I think that worrisome for the people that think that they have leverage, I think that leverage is quickly dissipating. I think we might be entering a phase where employers are now beginning to have a little bit more ability to bring people back into the office. I think it's going to affect people across the board. But we are already seeing some, in one market, Seattle, your hometown. There has been some reporting from the Downtown Seattle Association that the mandate for Amazon employees to be back into the office is beginning to trickle into the numbers they're seeing in terms of activity throughout the city. In January of this year, the DSA recorded nearly two million unique visitors to the city, which is about 94% of where it was in 2019. It's a big bump, about a 14% increase compared to January of 2024. Even so, in just one year, it's gotten really close to where the numbers were back in 2019 pre-COVID. Whether this is causal or not, I think we need some more data, but at least it's beginning to show that people in Seattle, even with weather, are congregating more in the downtown areas. I am curious what this means for other markets, but that's one anecdote we can reference.
E
Elliot Golan12:41
Yeah, and I think there's something that's talked about just not nearly as much as it should be: workplace and workspace as an amenity. Now developers and architects use that a lot, but they're usually referring to ping pong tables and natural light. No, I'm talking about sweatpants, being at home drinking good coffee. When you look at the data, 45% said being able to work remotely or flexibly was one of the most important aspects of their employment. So we have the big things: salary, bonuses, health insurance, all the things you expect from your employer. I think this is something that's just added to the same list. I'm curious, do you think that going forward, as employees are looking for new work and companies really want to bring them on board, this will become a negotiating tactic? This will be a little bit of leverage they can push and say, 'Hey, Fridays I want to be able to work remotely.' I don't think it's a new concept, but I am curious if it's going to become something that's used more frequently now, or if it might be going away.
V
Vladimir Banas14:03
I think it's just going to be another one of the poker chips. When you're in your negotiations, sometimes companies want to reduce salary but increase bonus opportunity because the math just works out better for them. Now it's pretty industry standard that vacation time is three weeks or more in serious corporate professions, but there was a time when it was two weeks and you negotiated for three. It's this extra 'come on, give me something, you really want me.' I think this is just the next thing. 'Okay, three weeks good, we've come to the best compromise we can on all the financial aspects, but I want to get one more thing out of the employer to really have them show me how valued I am: I'm not going to the office every day.' Whatever the arrangement is, it's dependent on sector, company, employee, probably market, myriad topics. But I just think it's the next thing on that list you negotiate.
E
Elliot Golan15:05
Yeah, and there's enough technology these days that you can deploy to understand whether somebody's productive or not. A lot of these meetings, like you and I are doing this show virtually, it's become the norm these days. I don't necessarily think that it's looked down upon as much as maybe it was 10 or 15 years ago. If you were to come in and say, 'I want to work from home on Fridays,' typically if you requested something like that, it was for some extraordinary circumstance, like you're a caretaker or you had some arrangement where you traveled out of the region on a regular basis. I do wonder, as companies do require people to go back into the office, what this does for female workers. Moms tend to carry the brunt of some of the household oversight. I wonder if this may impact that part of our population more so than male workers.
V
Vladimir Banas16:27
Yeah, I remember seeing all kinds of stories when everyone started working from home about how moms were really flourishing and appreciating this flexibility so that they could continue in their role as parent and primary caregiver as well as contribute financially at a large scale to the family. That's always been a challenge. Elliot, I think you mentioned there was a study also that you saw that a good number of parents with kids under 18 wanted to go to the office.
E
Elliot Golan17:03
Yeah, it's from the same research. I just found it one of those funny things. Workers with children under the age of 18, like 40% of them were excited to return to the office. I think I know why. There's all kinds of demographic and psychographic stuff in this research that's kind of obvious, like baby boomers are more likely to be okay with the RTO mandate as compared to Gen Z. I didn't need a research report to know that, I'm human. But sticking with the office, the last thing I want to talk about very briefly, but then I want to get into 'Inside Your Mind,' the office market again. Everything is about office. Blackstone has been in the news quite a bit in the last few days, which is nothing new for their real estate group. I believe two days ago now, they dropped $5.6 billion on a marina company to own marinas. Probably safe, recurring revenue model, I'm guessing that's a lot of the calculus. And just today, Goldman Sachs has moved to foreclose on an office building that Blackstone owns in Chicago. Of course, everyone around the industry knows this is all just a game. It's not like Jon Gray ran out of cash, they could pay the loan if they wanted to. But like a lot of office landlords, they've sort of decided that the juice is not worth the squeeze. Goldman has apparently asked a Cook County Circuit Court judge to order that the property be sold at foreclosure.
V
Vladimir Banas19:11
Yeah, I think you're absolutely right. I don't think Blackstone is running out of money anytime soon. One of their perspectives likely, and I've heard them speak and be interviewed over the last couple years, they're looking at how does this asset perform. They're probably looking at one by one to understand what is the opportunity here, what's going to happen. I imagine with this River North Point property, they're basically cutting their losses and trying to move on to areas with more opportunity, like the marinas, which is a very interesting acquisition in many ways. It's a very limited asset when you think about it. I don't know what the production of new marinas is on an annual basis, I don't think very many are made. They're probably difficult to do. You have a population of people that if you have a boat, you need to use a marina, there's no other way around it. Typically there are years of waitlists to get a slip in the marina. It could be a very nice business. What else about this have you found out?
E
Elliot Golan20:29
Well, I think the thing that I find the most interesting is the concept of two things. One is being theoretically recession-proof, and the second is the topic of recurring revenue, and this actually touches our industry substantively. It was not too long ago that most of the major brokerage houses did a little bit of property management, but it wasn't a big part of their business. They were deals, transactions. But transactions go up and transactions go down in the cycle, and things like property management are just recurring revenue. The property needs to be managed. I'll always use the anecdote I tell friends: my father was a plumber, and he used to joke all the time, 'I'm completely recession-proof because it does not matter what inflation is when your bathtub stops working.' Your garbage disposal stops working, I don't care if you got laid off, you probably want to fix it. I think that's what this marinas thing is. I think that's really the play they're making here. I'm sure there is some portion of people that own a boat and in bad times may have to sell their boats, but I'm guessing that's the exception to the rule. The type of people that own boats and regularly store them in marinas, good economy it's in the marina, bad economy it's in the marina.
V
Vladimir Banas22:00
I think that's what it comes down to. Again, Blackstone is the most opportunistic real estate group we've seen. They get it. We've seen this with their investment in the data center space as well. They've announced in 2024 and some of it also this year, they're making a big play there in Europe and also here in the states. They're basically looking at where the economy is going to go, and they're looking at how they can be part of that economic evolution. Data centers certainly are not going anywhere. Everything we touched today is a digital device that's connected to something, so data passing through servers is going to be something that for the rest of our lives and our grandkids' lives will just be going on.
E
Elliot Golan23:00
It seems so obvious. We see it as brilliant, rightfully so. Blackstone is again going to perform well with their decisions, but it seems so obvious. A few years ago, they went hard into student housing with some big acquisitions, self-storage big acquisitions, BTR big acquisitions. These are sectors that anyone in real estate, if you ask them, 'What do you think about?' Well, no one can buy a house, so they might as well rent it. This isn't rocket science. Data centers, are you ever going to find anyone that says data centers are near a bubble? No, man, we've just begun. They also own or co-own BioMed Realty, so they're in life sciences as well. Similar with Link Logistics on the industrial side. This is a company that will continue to be a major player in commercial real estate through all different sectors. So more to come from them, I'm sure.
V
Vladimir Banas24:09
Oh, yeah. So Elliot, should we go deep inside my mind and see what's happening there, or should we just sort of skim the surface and not bother people with the deals that I'm dealing with in my head?
E
Elliot Golan24:27
I've been waiting my whole life for the chance to crawl through your eardrum and find out what is hiding deep inside of it.
V
Vladimir Banas24:40
So these days, interesting stuff, but one item that I thought we should bring up, which is kind of interesting. There's been some news obviously around what's happening with our efficiencies and reduction in force across the federal government. The way that this news is directly impacting commercial real estate is that the GSA, or the General Services Administration, is looking to offload something along the lines of 500 buildings that it owns across the country. Locally here, the impact of that has been felt through a couple of buildings that are downtown San Francisco, but there are many others obviously. The narrative is that we need to be more efficient and these are outdated properties, or at least that's a narrative for some of them. I'm not 100% sure that it makes a ton of sense, to be perfectly honest. If you were to talk to any commercial real estate person, you would see that on a long-term basis, owning an asset is going to be a much cheaper position than leasing it. Of the two properties that are in San Francisco, one is actually fairly new, it's called the Nancy Pelosi Federal Building, which I wonder if that had anything to do with it being put on this chopping block. The other one is a lot older, but still, these buildings are occupied. If these employees are going to go anywhere, I imagine they're going to go to private landlords. Who does this benefit? The cynic in me thinks that this is a bit of a ploy. Elliot, I would love to hear what you think about this. From a pure efficiency standpoint, since that's the word that seems to be in vogue related to this topic, I don't know if the math makes sense.
E
Elliot Golan26:47
The lease rate to hold on to, to sell, I mean, over a 10-year lease, which let's pretend we're in a world where 10 years is still kind of the normal office lease, I have to imagine that the carrying cost of owning the property is less than the hundreds and hundreds of thousands of square feet that you'd be leasing. Also, there are two other aspects of this I want to see what happens. One is the narrative that these are kind of old, shoddy buildings. Does that mean the government agencies are going to go into nicer buildings? Because then the math definitely doesn't make sense. If they want to lease Transamerica or prime Brookfield properties in LA, the price per square foot is going to crucify them. The second thing is, I thought the federal government was all in on RTO. It's not like you can just condense people. I don't think there are enough layoffs that you don't need 500 buildings worth of square footage anymore. That's not real.
V
Vladimir Banas28:10
I think the counterargument, and I'm not advocating for the counterargument, but let's say that there is one. I would imagine them saying, 'Well, we're not going to have as many employees, so we're going to be more efficient, therefore we're not going to need as much space. So perhaps we should get rid of some of these buildings, and we don't really need 500 of them.' That makes a lot of sense. I don't know if that makes a lot of sense, but I can see that argument. Again, we don't know once a lot of these people are laid off, at what point will they realize, 'Wait a second, I think we've cut to the bone, we probably need to bring a bunch of them back,' and then what does that mean? I don't think the easy math is being done to say, 'Oh, it's 200 square feet per employee, we're going to get rid of this many employees, therefore we have this much in terms of square feet, which equates to 500 buildings.' These are all made-up numbers. Another thing that I'd like to bring up, which is why this has been bouncing around my head: three years ago we wrote a story in our Puget Sound market. In Olympia, there is an owner that put on the market about 24 of these properties, 95% occupied, mind you, like 94.5% occupied by various state and federal agencies. They've been on the market since. This is a private owner, not a federal or state owner. A private owner arguably probably took care of these buildings really well because it's in their interest to do so. In terms of occupancy, I don't think you can find better than 94.5% in any good market, even in great markets. Olympia will continue to be the capital of the state of Washington, as far as I know, and they're having a really hard time moving these. On top of that, my understanding is that even if they decide to sell these properties, this is not just 'oh, let's put out a flyer and see what happens.' Because they're under federal ownership, there will need to be some kind of formal valuation of these assets, most likely some kind of public notices, given the bureaucracy, and then possibly even legislative approval. You can't just pick a price, who are you going to hire, which broker is going to do this? This is not going to be something they can decide in a conference room in one week. This process is going to take a lot longer than maybe some of our new administrators in Washington think it is going to take.
E
Elliot Golan31:23
Yeah, I mean, I think the appetite thing also can't be overlooked. There aren't many people buying office buildings. There is no market for this level of investment in commercial office right now, in any class: Class A, CBD, Class C, rundown infill, doesn't matter. There's just no market. So the thing that runs through my head, and let me preface with this: it wouldn't be a terrible thing overall, but it just financially doesn't make sense for the government, so it would shoot down the entire argument about efficiency. Can some of these be sold at a very low valuation for complete redevelopment? Because especially a lot of these properties that the GSA sits in, they're GSA buildings. It's not like there's a government agency on the first floor and a lawyer on the second floor. No, they're usually occupied exclusively by these government entities. So I'm wondering, with some incentives from the government, probably some very sweetheart deals, will we actually see converting office to residential become more than an overblown headline? As far as I'm concerned, that's all it is. Maybe there's a play there. Now, financially, it still doesn't make sense for the federal government. They still need to put people in chairs.
V
Vladimir Banas33:02
And let's not forget zoning. That's a huge issue. There are probably all kinds of infrastructure things that need to be updated and changed to allow for housing development. I know certainly in our two states, there's always concern about water and energy and where that's going to come from. We'll see how it's all going to play out, but my concern is that this is going to take a very, very long time. Maybe some of these assets will be cherry-picked for their appeal for either alternate uses, or maybe they can be quickly converted to some really cool offices that might be rented to tenants. But I don't think this is going to be an easy process. I wonder if four years from now we will still have this memo out that 500-plus buildings are on the market, and it wouldn't surprise me if none of them have been taken. Especially if there's an honest valuation of them. What we've been talking about around the industry, the whole misconception between what a building was last appraised for and what the heck it's actually worth. If there are no comps for federal buildings that are going to be empty now, if you close these agencies, you're going to sell somebody an empty asset. What's your expectation in terms of the value of that asset?
E
Elliot Golan34:53
We'll see. It's an interesting dilemma we're dealing with, and I'm curious how it's going to play out. We'll be following it for sure.
V
Vladimir Banas35:05
So Elliot, as I'd like to say, another great half hour wasted here.
E
Elliot Golan35:11
And for the people listening, I'm sure they're shaking their head wondering why they didn't do something more productive. But hey, because they were waiting for our interview now with Bill McMorrow, that's coming up. So stay tuned for that conversation. Elliot, it's always great to see you, and look forward to our conversation again next week. Talk soon.
V
Vladimir Banas35:35
Thank you.
W
William Mcmorrow35:35
Man, okay. Bill, good morning, how's it going?
V
Vladimir Banas35:42
Morning, Vlad. Going great, thank you. Where do we find you today? Where are you?
W
William Mcmorrow35:48
You find me at our HQ here in Beverly Hills. We built two buildings here in Beverly Hills about 10 years ago, and we're in one of those.
V
Vladimir Banas35:56
Okay, and clearly they're not becoming obsolete post-COVID.
W
William Mcmorrow36:01
No, I think we really did it the right way. I'd really like to think that they did something that was built to last. We've got everybody back in the office. Wasn't the easiest thing I've ever done, but they're all here.
V
Vladimir Banas36:27
I am curious, obviously you're in the real estate industry, most of the people in the industry want people back into the office. Not going into specific deals, but how hard was it? Were people hoping to be there sooner? Culturally, what did it do to you guys to not be together, and then how did that evolve as you got back into the office again?
W
William Mcmorrow36:50
I would say anecdotally, it was probably the hardest period of leadership for many people and many companies. You go through this period where we're shutting down in 2020 or 2021, and nobody had ever done that before. I got everybody in the company together and said, 'Look, there's going to be unintended consequences for these actions because we've never done it before.' There were so many unintended consequences of this, but the biggest one was that all of us learned to love being remote. We could be anywhere and we were still doing well in our business. But I don't think anybody that's a leader of anything doesn't think that you have to have people together to generate ideas, to create your culture. I'm just a huge teamwork person, and I believe that some of the best ideas come from walking down the hallway and having a simple conversation with somebody. Once you've gone remote for what turned out to be a couple years, and everybody kind of adjusts their lifestyles around that, then now you're bringing everybody back. I didn't want to be the dictator of writing a memo that everybody has to come back to the office because I really felt that was stupid, to be honest with you. We started three days a week, we graduated to four days, and that's what we're doing now. At the beginning, we were providing lunches, dinners, time for beer in the afternoon, whatever it was that we thought would make people want to be at the office. But I think now that everybody's back, they're in the mode where they want to be here. The big $64 question is whether you go to five days next year. So we'll see on that one.
V
Vladimir Banas39:11
It'll be interesting. It's evolving. If there's one thing that I've learned in the 17 years that I've been in this industry, it's always evolving, it's never static. Even in the pre-COVID days, the workplace was always evolving, how you set it up, how you program the interiors, it was always something new. That will definitely continue to happen.
W
William Mcmorrow39:38
Well, you are making an interesting point about that because we spent a lot of time planning this building that really revolved around a couple things: making it a great place to want to come to work, but also setting it up in a way where hopefully it encourages communication with everybody. We went through many, many different iterations of this before we finally settled on what we did. It was some of the simplest things. We created a stairwell system here that I saw in one of the Apple stores, and it forces everybody to walk up and down this three-story building and talk to each other. Just simple things like that.
V
Vladimir Banas40:36
Yeah, interesting. Bill, I would like to kind of start at the beginning, if you will. We'd like to hear a little bit about you, your background personally, how you got into this business, how you got interested in commercial real estate in the first place.
W
William Mcmorrow40:55
Well, how I got into the business was really pretty circuitous. I had the very good fortune of growing up in a great family, one of nine, had to learn to be independent in that kind of environment, and got taught the virtue really young in my life of how to work hard. When I got out of school at USC, I thought the world was mine. I went to undergraduate and graduate school there, but then I learned quickly after 50 job interviews, I got one job offer. People will say, 'What did you do?' I said, 'You're kidding me, I took it.' But it set me on a career path that I never dreamed of. I didn't want to go to work at a bank, and I had to move out of Southern California to Northern California at that time, which was like a big deal. I was working in a bank, and I got thrown into some early projects that really were in a certain way life-changing for me. In my 17 years in the banking industry, I had three people, maybe four, that were either bosses or mentors.
Of mine that gave me a lucky break to do something I wasn't ready for. In my case, when I went to work for Crocker Bank, which is now part of Wells Fargo, they asked me to write a report on the airline industry. What did I know as a 23-year-old about the airline industry? But the bank had a big exposure to it, and so one of the older guys said, 'Would you like to go visit the manufacturing plants of the people that are building these aircraft?' I said sure. It was such an eye-opener to me to be involved in financing these manufacturing facilities. It really launched me, as I got off this training program, into the corporate lending world where we were lending money to big companies here in California and midsize companies. In those days, there wasn't a business development part of it; it just didn't exist. But I started calling on big companies here in Los Angeles, and my simple pitch was, 'I have money to lend. Would you like me to come and see you to see if you want to borrow it?' So early on in my career, I was able to start developing business. When I was 25, I got hired by what was the ninth largest bank in the country to run their corporate lending group. I was 25 years old. I moved to Philadelphia, got to see what was going on in New York, got to travel all over the United States to every inch of this country to visit clients' manufacturing facilities. We were a big lender to the public utility industry. Most of the people working with me at that time were sometimes twice my age, so that's where the hard work part came in. I'm giving you the long-winded answer. Then when I was 30, I got hired by a bank here in Los Angeles to essentially run a bank that had lots of issues related to the real estate industry because in 1980 the interest rates were 21%. You could have been the smartest person in the world, but you were not going to make money in the real estate business; in fact, you were going to lose your real estate. We started taking back real estate into ownership. We decided to bring in 35 people that were not bankers and take over the real estate that wasn't bad real estate but was a victim of these high interest rates. That was where I really learned the real estate business. I was fortunate to be working for one of the great entrepreneurs here in Southern California who was the primary owner of the bank. He was in his 60s, I was 30, and he became kind of my father figure in my career. As we got the bank cleaned up and it became very successful, the bank was sold to Cerica Bank. I wanted to do something on my own; I didn't want to work for a bank in a big organization any longer. I came across this company Kennedy Wilson, which had already been started and was in different businesses, and I was able to purchase that company in 1988. The business we were in was a real estate auction business, primarily auctioning real estate for financial institutions. That was an interesting time to do that too. That's where the luck part came in because what happened from 1990, the S&L crisis came, and the regulators, particularly the FDIC, started taking over all these S&Ls. They needed a way to liquidate real estate, so the auction business, which was this tiny business at Kennedy Wilson, actually turned into a really great business. Off of that, we became principals buying real estate. The whole idea was to have a fee-generating business alongside an acquisition equity business. Because of my banking background, a lot of what we were doing on the acquisition side focused on buying things at bargain prices from the banking industry, in some cases the same banks that we were doing auctions for. That principle that we started with in 1988 has never changed. If you think about Kennedy Wilson, we started a business from scratch in Japan in 1994 that revolved around their banking and economic downturn. We went to Europe in 2010, to the United Kingdom and Ireland, where nobody wanted to go, but everything we were doing there related to us being a counterparty with the banking system. Because there was nobody in the United Kingdom or Ireland with capital, we were able to become the largest real estate owner in the country during that period of time, and probably still are in the top three. It was all of these circumstances that allowed us to do the things and create these great careers.
V
Vladimir Banas49:13
I'm curious over this period of time, Bill. If you look back over the last 30 years, there were a number of milestones throughout that period that sort of defined the company. Maybe you can give us a little bit of insight into how some of that came about on its own versus how some of it was planned. I'm sure there's a combination of each, but I would love to get a bit of a perspective in terms of how life running a company like this can evolve, sometimes in unexpected areas.
W
William Mcmorrow49:51
A lot of it was foundational that I learned in the banking industry and from people in the banking industry. I've always had this concept or idea that you have to say yes at the beginning of any idea because if you say no, you foreclose every opportunity. In 1994, I had to make a trip to Japan because we had to get approval from one of the Japanese banks to do an auction for their client here in Southern California. I had never been to Tokyo in my life. When I got over there, I said, 'I've traveled 6,500 miles, why don't I talk to a bunch of banks?' So I went around and made appointments on my own to see people in the various real estate departments in these Japanese banks. I came to the conclusion that the type of lending they were doing to their clients, which was primarily focused on coming to the United States and buying real estate, was not a very sound practice. The first week I was there, we opened an office in Japan. Of course, everybody thought I was out of my mind, but it actually turned into an unbelievable career moment for Kennedy Wilson. We hired this extraordinary person to start our business. In 2002, we grew to a point where we took our company public in Japan. We were the first US real estate company to ever go public in Japan on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. That little idea of just going to Japan led to that. Then in the Great Recession, we viewed that as a period of time where there was going to be extraordinary opportunities, but there was no ability to raise capital anywhere. I had a thousand meetings in 2009 and 2010 trying to raise capital. I was at a Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting and met the CEO of Fairfax Financial, one of the largest property and casualty insurance companies in the world. I met the CEO for a half-hour meeting. He said, 'I really like your idea, and if you're ever on the East Coast, can you come and see me?' I dipped a little bit and said, 'I'm planning on being there next week. Would you be available?' He said, 'Come and see me Thursday.' So I go and see Prem Watsa, who is just one of the most extraordinary business leaders I've ever been around. I go to see him, there are like 10 people in the room. We're making this presentation. He says, 'Can we go in the other room?' I go in the other room with him, and he said, 'I really like your ideas here. How do we make this happen?' I said, 'I'd like you to have an ownership interest in KW, and then I'd like you to give us capital alongside that to invest.' He said, 'Sounds like a great idea. How much?' I told him, and he said, 'That seems like a lot.' But we closed that in three weeks. Now, 14 years later, Kennedy Wilson has done 15 billion dollars of joint ventures together. That first 350 million turned into 15 billion. That was a defining moment for us. Going to Europe was a big defining moment for us, and we created a public company on the London Stock Exchange in 2014. Those two things I had learned from my time in the banking business: every once in a while, if you can roll these companies out from underneath your own umbrella, it didn't make sense to do that. The last piece of this was in 2023 when we had the meltdown in the banking system here in the United States. Another opportunity raised its hand. That was to buy a 5.7 billion construction loan portfolio from a regional bank, but it had to be done in 30 days. That was a big challenge. We got that done, and fast forward, that is our incredible credit business that we have today. All of these things were very transformational for the company, but it took a lot of great teammates who were willing to see through it. I should also say the other thing I'm leaving out: we bought a real estate asset management business in Ireland in 2011. We only had 14 people, but I learned from Japan that if you can have your own team on the ground, you can really do amazing things.
V
Vladimir Banas56:14
Fast forwarding to what happened over here in the last few years, tell us a bit about your perspective on the market now in this post-COVID days. Obviously, the interest rate environment has played a major role in commercial real estate over the last couple of years and probably continues to do so. There seems to be some glimmer of hope that the commercial real estate industry is ending 2024 on a bit of a lighter higher note. I'd like to hear your perspective on how you see things in 2024 as we go into the next year.
W
William Mcmorrow56:49
I've had the advantage of going through seven or eight cycles. I told everybody when the Great Recession started that this was going to be the greatest opportunity we ever had if we could raise capital, and it turned out to be that way. Everybody thought, 'Here he goes again.' But I think the issues... look, the unintended consequences of COVID were the printing of money everywhere in the world by every government, which led to inflation. I knew from my time in 1980, when inflation was 14% in the United States, that the only way you could slow it down was to raise interest rates. We got the triple whammy: everything went remote, everybody printed money, we got the highest inflation rate in 40 years, and we got the highest interest rates in 22 years. That was the deck that everybody in the real estate industry got delivered. Fortunately, office is not a big part of our core business. But then nobody wants to go back to the office, so obviously if you've got floating rate debt and it's the highest it's been in 22 years, and nobody wants to go to the office as companies' leases mature, they're not going to renew. This was self-inflicted by the various governments around the world in my opinion, and you had to deal with it. When I think about five and a half or six percent interest rates compared to 21%, you figure out a way. It's not that far from the long-term average. If you look at the last 20 years, you might be conditioned to thinking they should be closer to 1% or zero, but that's not normal; it's absurd. The hundred-year US bond rate touched over a hundred years around 6%. We were doing a financing in 2007, and I had to make a decision whether to let it float or fix it. The prime rate in 2007 was 8%. I made the dumb choice of fixing it, and we ultimately ended up paying it off because the interest rate was 9%. But I thought, 'Wow, if I could get 100 basis points above a short-term rate, that's amazing.' But we got spoiled by the 10-year going down to 1.40%, thinking that was going to last forever. We were fortunate because our credit business has been such a dominant part of our capital deployment the last 15 months. Including what we have in closing, we've done a billion dollars of new construction loans, all to multifamily or student housing. We're probably the largest student housing lender now in the United States. The average loans are about 100 million and generally 55 to 60% loan to cost. The number of banks doing it shrunk to nothing, and the number of borrowers with that kind of capital shrunk to a small room. That means if you are the lender that had the capital, you got the best borrowers and the best projects. That's been a good space for everyone who got into the credit side. The equity investing we've done over the last year and a half has been modest compared to our credit business, but I think it's going to get better next year. People are finally having to be realistic about what values are, which is more than anything what drives equity investing. I do believe that particularly in the United States, because I travel all over the world, the appetite for capital to come here is huge. Everybody wants to invest in the United States. I'm optimistic. I think it will be another challenging year in the real estate business, but once you get past 2025, you're going to see tremendous opportunities. You've got to recognize that and get in front of it. You've got to be willing to take chances. We just formed a venture with CPPIB, the big Canadian pension plan, and we're buying single-family homes to rent in the United Kingdom. We have almost $400 million of homes that we purchased from the big builders in the UK, all generally in the same community. That's what I'm saying: you still have to move forward and try these things.
V
Vladimir Banas1:03:19
I do want to touch on some of the development stuff, but before we do, because we touched a little bit on the banking and interest rate environment, I would like to talk a little bit about your credit business just a little bit more in terms of how you think that's going to evolve in 2025 and maybe more generally where you think lending in general might go in terms of potential interest rates. I know a lot of that is still kind of undetermined depending on White House policies and that kind of thing, but I'm curious about some big drivers that you think might impact that industry in the next 12 to 18 months.
W
William Mcmorrow1:04:09
Generally speaking, although it's not as true today as it was a year ago, the highly regulated banking industry stepped back from the real estate industry unless you're already an existing customer of that bank that you had a relationship with, because they were under this whole specter of what's going to happen to our office portfolio. You've seen every private equity firm, the biggest growth parts of their business has been credit, but credit of all kinds. They're not just doing real estate lending; they're doing unsecured lending, they're buying bonds, and credit-rated companies. One of the big private equity firms just did a big financing for Intel in Ireland. That would normally be business that would be done in the banking industry. It's really gravitating away from the regulated banks to the private sector. How that's all going to turn out, because the speed at which it's all growing is almost unrecognizable. When lending tends to grow fast, that can sometimes have speed bumps. But the credit business for us has been in two narrow platforms: multifamily and student housing. Over time, we plan to add some other products to that, all related to the real estate industry. For us, we're in the information business. Real estate is our product, but information is really the key. We have a national business across the United States on the lending side. We have a view into every market. We had a really good year raising capital globally, in Canada and Asia particularly. I'm an optimist by nature, but I'm optimistic that once we get through the first half of next year, we're going to really see this turn. Clearly, we've got a more business-friendly environment here in the United States. I don't want to get into politics, but I don't think the business community was exactly the favorite of some of the politicians over the last four years.
V
Vladimir Banas1:07:28
Going back to some of the development initiatives you were talking about, the multifamily and student housing and even the single-family housing for rent, tell us about that. How do you see that evolving for you guys specifically and then more broadly as an industry over the next 18 months?
W
William Mcmorrow1:08:05
You said it exactly correctly: there's a shortage of housing everywhere in the world. It's not just here in the United States; it's in Ireland, where we have a rental business, and in the United Kingdom. It's everywhere. It's not only housing, but affordable housing. We decided 20 years ago to lessen our reliance on California because it was clear that with the taxation structure, the costs, and the barriers to build here, it was pricing people out of the market. We started going to Seattle, which became a very big part of our apartment business, suburban Seattle, not downtown. In order for housing to really work for the equity, you have to have a great jobs market and a great education system that produces younger people that want to work at these companies. If you think about Seattle, Microsoft, Safeco, Nordstroms, I can go on and on. There aren't a lot of those companies here in Southern California anymore; they've left or been purchased. The cost of living is driving a lot of this migration to Boise, Idaho; Salt Lake City; Las Vegas; Albuquerque, New Mexico; and some of these other towns around the United States. I believe that housing is certainly the best risk-adjusted returns, the safest investment you could make in real estate because you're not looking for a single tenant in an office building. That's really our focus over the next three years: how do we grow from owning or financing 65,000 units to 100,000 units over the next three to four years? Alongside that, we want to grow our investment management business, which is a fee-driven business where we're managing capital alongside ours for big institutional clients. That's what we're really focused on.
V
Vladimir Banas1:10:48
Other than in the UK, are you participating in the US in any investments around single-family for rent housing?
W
William Mcmorrow1:10:57
We're financing some friends of ours that are building it, but we don't own any single-family homes for rent right now. We're financing people.
V
Vladimir Banas1:11:08
Do you think it's going to continue to grow and be a significant segment of the market?
W
William Mcmorrow1:11:15
100%. Most people prefer to live in a house with a yard rather than a vertical building. That whole idea is here to stay. It's a question of whether you can find a big enough piece of land and get it through all the approval processes. It's a great business. We have one project like that in Albuquerque, New Mexico. We have 10 assets in Albuquerque now, and it's by far one of the best performing assets.
V
Vladimir Banas1:12:08
Are you concerned in the student housing sector at all, given that some universities have had challenging enrollments over the last few years and some smaller schools have been forced to shut down? I don't know the makeup of your portfolio; maybe you're more focused on higher-end brand name schools. But I am curious how that product might evolve.
W
William Mcmorrow1:12:39
Our lending in that world is dictated by where the developers want to put it. We just did a very big loan at the University of Michigan. We've done several at Texas A&M. If you look at the enrollments of these bigger schools, like University of Southern California, Cal, the big name schools, their student populations are growing. They have not had any issues. The number of applicants is growing. There's going to be a consolidation in the higher education system, just like there was in the banking industry. When I started, there were 14,000 banks; now there are 4,000. My guess is 10 years from now, there will be 2,000. The same thing will happen, but it will all benefit these bigger universities in the end. Then you have the whole overlay of the international student population that really wants to come and get educated in the United States. The big ones, if you go back and track their 10 years of applicants and admissions, they're all growing.
V
Vladimir Banas1:14:25
One of the things you mentioned was senior housing and affordable housing as one of the sectors in which you guys play. That obviously has to do with affordability across the board. Tell us a bit about that and how important that is to your business.
W
William Mcmorrow1:14:43
We got very lucky in 2015 when we got introduced to a company by the name of Vintage Housing Partners, which is based here in Southern California. The company at the time was controlled and owned by a company in Boston, and they wanted to sell their ownership interest. We had just sold 50 apartment buildings that we owned in Tokyo, so we had some capital from that. Matt Wendish was the president of the company, and Kurt Zack and I went and visited with them and the principals of Vintage. We made a deal to buy half of that company in 2015. The two principals of that company, who were still running it, are just incredible people, partners, and talented at what they do. The idea was to take those 5,000 units we started with and see how we could grow it, primarily in the Western United States, mostly through new construction ground-up. In the last nine years, we've been able to build another 7,000 units, so we have now 12,000 units in the senior and affordable space. These properties generally lease up 100% in 90 days when you finish them. The reason is that we're building communities that look just like a market-rate property, but the rents are rent-restricted at a lower level. You're developing and providing a product that you can rent for less than a market-rate unit. We just finished a project in Camarillo, California, that was a big undertaking. We have about 700 market-rate units, and on the same property, we built 170 senior and affordable units. If you walked onto the property, you could not tell the difference; they all look alike. The myth is that you don't build high-quality communities. This is very much a centerpost of what we're trying to do in the multifamily business, and we're trying to expand that business away from entirely the Western United States. It'll be a big part of our business going forward.
V
Vladimir Banas1:17:41
Shifting gears a little bit, if I can cite one of your colleagues, a land developer here in the Bay Area called Chop Keenan, I've heard him say something along the lines of growing a forest: you plant these seeds, and then years later it becomes something. I'm curious, in your perspective, as you look at growth and risk and balancing that, you've been in the industry for almost 40 years plus with your banking experience. How do you look at that for your organization?
W
William Mcmorrow1:18:25
You mean the risk or the long-term aspects? I assume you're continuously trying to grow the business. The hardest thing that takes the longest seed planting is capital raising. It's not the product you're investing in or financing, but the capital. Like I said earlier, I travel the world, and we're always in a capital raising mode. You don't just attract capital overnight; you have to plant the seed and nurture it over long periods of time. As long as you have the right teammates and the right culture, you're always able to originate opportunities. It's really about how you attract capital to that opportunity. Capital is attracted by your track record, but also by the people in your organization. Do they trust you? They have to trust you with their capital. We've been lucky; we have great people here at the company. A lot of the people at our company have been with me for 15, 20 years or more, but they started as interns. If you look at our senior management team, almost everybody started as an intern. That has always been our philosophy: bring younger people into the business, train them in the culture of our company, turn them loose, and then keep them. That's been the whole simple idea. The projects always seem to come if you've got the right team out there looking for it, but capital raising is the key to the whole thing.
V
Vladimir Banas1:20:48
I'd like to switch gears here a little bit as we close the conversation and turn this around a little bit towards your personal experience and perspectives. The last few years have been tough for the industry, and I think it's been really tough for people working in the industry too. As a result, perhaps it hasn't attracted a lot of new talent that maybe some other places have. I'm curious from your perspective, what would be some advice you'd like to give people looking for a career, maybe considering commercial real estate as a viable option? Maybe even tie that into some advice you'd like to give your younger self. Why is this such a great place?
W
William Mcmorrow1:21:48
We're competing against the technology world that seemingly is going up exponentially every day. Young people see that and think, 'I could go work for some AI company and two years from now when I'm 24, I'm going to be a billionaire.' That's one side of it. We started about eight or nine years ago with a summer intern program. At first, it wasn't really well received by senior management, but the wonderful person that runs that part of our business made it important to everybody. We bring 15 younger people into the business every summer, but now we're getting 600 to 700 applications every summer from every possible school in the country. It's not that we're not attracting people. You have to create an environment where they think they can have a meaningful career and be challenged. Every year, we're still continuing to add as we grow. The key is adding younger people to your team. We make a really conscious effort. I don't see any shortage of people interested in the business, but you have to go work at it to find them. You've got to make sure you've got the right person. You're going to have some failures, but frankly, our failures have generally been in the older crowd. The younger people we have a very high batting average with.
V
Vladimir Banas1:23:49
What advice would you give to somebody coming into the industry? Things to look out for, things to consider as they grow their career and move around the industry?
W
William Mcmorrow1:24:09
It's really simple, Vlad. You have to be willing to work hard. There is no substitute for success. If you're not willing to sacrifice your personal time and work hard, that doesn't mean I don't want everybody to play hard too, but you have to work hard. Then it really gets back to what I said earlier: you have to have a willingness to say yes. I could take you through a dozen friends of mine who are running companies today because they said yes to something. I have one friend who is big in the private equity world. When he was in his mid-20s, they said, 'We'd like somebody to go to South America to start our business there. Who wants to go?' There were like 10 people, and he raised his hand. He went. I went to Philadelphia, which I thought was like the other part of the world when I was 25. You've got to be willing to say yes no matter what it is. The young man that is 30 years old who runs our business in Japan could barely speak English when he came to the company. He was in the property management business, but then we had this idea to regrow our business in Japan. I said, 'Robert, I want you to go run that business for us.' He was like, 'What?' But he's doing an amazing job. It's really hard work, saying yes when there's an opportunity, and then being a really good teammate, being willing to do any job you're asked to do. Then you get recognized. That's the simple thing.
V
Vladimir Banas1:26:00
Bill, that was some great advice. Thank you for taking the time to chat with us. Fight on.
W
William Mcmorrow1:26:12
All right, Vlad. I'll see you later. Thank you for your time.