Back
Simon Hu
Former CEO, Ant Group

State of Fintech 2025: Everything You Need to Know - Rex & Simon Talk Fintech SPECIAL

🎥 Dec 24, 2024 📺 Rex Salisbury ⏱ 54m 👁 18081 views
In this episode of “Rex & Simon Talk Fintech,” we explore Simon's new 113-page deep dive into the state of fintech in 2025.
Watch on YouTube

About Simon Hu

In a late 2024 appearance on the podcast "Rex & Simon Talk Fintech," Simon Hu discussed his 113-page report on the state of fintech in 2025. He described the current period as "the age of the fintech hyperscaler," stating that these companies can become larger than incumbents by playing on margin and growing faster. Hu said that fintech is "only 3% finished," having captured a small share of a $30 trillion services market. He commented that AI can push much of the work in financial services into software, making a large portion of that market addressable by software and AI agents. Hu also noted that Apple's opening of NFC access turned every iPhone into a payment terminal, beginning "the wallet wars." He described stablecoins as a "hottest category" that threatens legacy rails like SWIFT, and referred to a "'scam demic'" in which the industry lost over a trillion dollars to scams in 2023. Hu said that banks had a good year but that comfort should free up investment to transform, otherwise incumbents risk being overtaken by hyperscalers. He suggested that some fintech hyperscalers could be as big as Visa within five years and that AI agents on devices could materially shift market share by choosing which financial service to use.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Simon Hu's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (46 segments)
R
Rex0:00
Today we have a special episode. Simon just published a 113 page report on the state of fintech in 2025. If you love charts and you want to go deep on the biggest trends and why they matter, then this is for you. We talk about how hyperscalers like Robinhood, Revolut, and others are starting to take on the big banks. We talk about AI and how it unlocks 90% of the $30 trillion market for financial services. We talk about the wallet wars and who's going to win – is it Apple, Google, Visa, or someone else entirely? And that's really just the tip of the iceberg. I think my big takeaway and reflection from this conversation is seeing how in 2025 fintech is really only just getting started, but you can see how we're at the cusp of a lot of really exciting changes. So I think you're really going to enjoy this conversation. Let's dive in.
Simon, you're looking pretty amazing considering you just dropped a 113 page slide deck on the state of fintech in 2025.
S
Simon Hu0:52
I'm feeling pretty amazing. And thank you so much to Jeff for being like an absolute hero and helping us get through this, to the GU at Aperture, and of course to Sardine for giving me the space to do this, because this was – I'm not going to lie – a fun one to put together. I'm excited for going through it with you, Rex. And you might even spot a couple of things that you mentioned when we were draft reviewing it right at the end. Some Rex comments made it in there for sure.
R
Rex1:19
I love it. Well, I'm excited. This is going to be kind of a special extended version of Rex and Simon Talk Fintech, where we're basically going to walk through the slide and the trends. We've got a whole bunch of stuff to unpack: trends, fintech x AI, banks, embedded fintech, the scandal epidemic, the list goes on. But why don't you just take us up from the top and kick us off with the main and biggest trends?
S
Simon Hu1:44
Welcome to the State of Fintech 2025. And the state of fintech is good. We are in the age of the fintech hyperscaler. Yes, we have Nubank with over 100 million customers, Klarna at 85 million, and Revolut – yes, those guys – snapping at the heels. And I think the infrastructure is shifting. We are seeing those hyperscalers coming after the incumbents, and for the first time they're threatened. So today we're going to talk about the broader trends: fintech and AI, embedded finance, some of the banks (because hey, they're still around), neobanks, payments, open finance, big tech and wallets, stablecoins (because they're a thing this year), and of course the scamdemic. So let's get to it.
R
Rex2:29
Right, a coffee, a cocktail, get away from the kids for the holidays, go into some dark hole and just listen to the soothing tones of Simon talk fintech for the next hour or two. I hope you interrupt me a lot more than that, because there's only so much I can listen to one voice, especially my own.
S
Simon Hu2:48
Goodness. All right, let's do this. So the biggest trend is the fintech hyperscaler. These are fundamentally companies who can be bigger than the incumbents by play some margin. When you think about hyperscalers, you're thinking about Microsoft and Amazon and all of those guys. Stripe – could they be that? Could Nubank be that? But for retail, well, these are not small numbers. They're on the way to hundred billion dollar market caps in some cases, and they're continuing to grow. So this is going to be fascinating to watch, as fintech is only 3% finished. We only have 3% market share. And the market narrative has really shifted. It's crazy how now fintech is back as a consensus. For us who are fans of the space, it should never have really gone away. Maybe it was overbought in 2021, but if you look at the publicly traded stocks, they're all heading back up and they're all doing pretty well.
R
Rex3:54
And I think with that, I love the first slide on the hyperscalers. Framing the services revenue $30 trillion market; fintech only captured like 1%. One of the biggest most successful incumbents, let's say Visa, is like a $500 billion company. What you're looking at right now is a slide of companies with about $200 billion in combined market cap. So all together, not as big as JPMorgan Chase, but they're really just getting started. And so to your point, these hyperscalers – one of them, and there's some other ones not even on this slide that are north of $30 billion companies – could one of them be as big as Visa? Not in 2025, but in the next 5 years, and that's on the menu in a way that wasn't before. I think that's the big moment, that's the market shift. And growth rate matters. We'll come back to that point, but it's not just about how big are you, it's how fast are you growing. And we know that those growth rates are going to continue to matter if they can be sustained. You've got a 35% TPV CAGR for Stripe – it's going to be very hard to grow that fast going forward where they are, but there are opportunities.
S
Simon Hu5:06
Right. How long could you keep that up for? I mean, JPMorgan's doing 15%, so if they can stay ahead of that number for long enough, they're doing pretty well. I think this is going to be the next big trend of 2025 and 2026: the IPO window opens. Klarna and Chime have laid their cards on the table, saying that they're looking to go for it. But who's next? I think that's going to be interesting, because it starts to change the perception of fintech in the eyes of the broader investment market and it recycles capital back into the ecosystem. We need those stories. And it's a trickle started right. We talked about Bridge selling for $460 million to a public company, MoneyLion already public but got acquired for another for a billion dollars, Stripe made their largest ever acquisition Bridge also a billion dollars. So these are trickles – these aren't massive IPOs – but these are chunky outcomes, and that builds confidence towards maybe unleashing the fintech IPO flood wave or breaking the dam. So we'll see that. One acquisition has probably made stablecoins the hottest category, if not the second hottest category in all of finance right now. It's crazy how that happens. Neobanks on a pure customer basis are now as big as some of the biggest banks if you just look at their pure customer numbers, and they are just opening up to cross-selling.
R
Rex6:36
Historically viewed with a very US-centric perspective, neobanks were ultra low cost, ultra low revenue per customer. But that's not the case when you look at Nubank and Revolut and you look outside the US. I mean, look at Kazakhstan's Kaspi, listed on NASDAQ. You've probably never heard of this company, but this is a stock trading at a $21 billion market valuation. Outside the US, these companies are massive and meaningful market takers. So I think looking at this as a Brit, looking at it internationally, it's a different conversation. You didn't used to be able to see these on the same Y-axis as say a Bank of America or JPMorgan, but at least on the consumer banking – Bank of America has 38 million monthly actives, they have over 100 million customers total. Nubank has 100 million customers, 91 million monthly actives. So these companies, they're showing up on the Y-axis, and again maybe headed above some of the big guys. And they've got time – some of them are already profitable. The big trend of the year that I've seen is that international expansion is now something these hyperscalers are looking to grow their muscle in. And if you look at what really unlocked the cloud service providers, it's how many regions are you in. Adela talks about they're in 60 data residency markets – that's a hard infrastructure to build. But Robinhood's launching in Europe. A firm now, and this is a crazy stat: 40 million of Revolut's customers are based outside of its home market. Really crazy. You see this a lot with Klarna as well, companies that started in a smaller country that go on to larger ones and do well. And we've seen JPMorgan are planning to expand into Continental Europe now, so this is not just a fintech thing. That international expansion is a massive trend to watch in the next 12 months.
S
Simon Hu8:30
You're probably more bullish on Europeans expanding to the US than I am.
R
Rex8:35
Well, here's the thing that happens: once a European expands into the US and does it successfully, they just become a US company and nobody thinks of them as European. You use Spotify and don't think it's European, you use Klarna and you don't think it's European – if you know it is, then you think about that later. Wise as well – you just think it's that company that I use. So that's the trick to pull off here: you don't brand as European.
S
Simon Hu9:02
Without question. This was the AI in finance. Everybody has a story but very few have real value capture, especially in the incumbents. The amount of death by sort of PowerPoint and pilot is unbelievable. But Klarna are talking about their chatbot that does the work of 700 agents. Just created a massive PR value. And there are a few examples where it's really working and lots of examples where it's really not. We talked a little bit earlier about Bridge's acquisition, but this is the tip of the iceberg of payments companies getting really serious about this space. Just a couple days ago, we saw Nuvo now doing direct settlement to merchants in stablecoins. I've seen three stablecoin-based neobanks this week. It's become a really hot category. And the payments world has gone from no never to how quickly can I get this. That shift is dramatic. Embedded finance – great slide from BCG. Still the single fastest growing net new opportunity despite the bad moon music. And of course 2024 was the year the wallet wars began, when Apple was forced to open up NFC in Europe. It then decided it was going to open up NFC access. And if you're not familiar with NFC – near field communication – it's how they do tap to pay, but it's also how you tap into sports stadiums, it's also how you authenticate passports sometimes. There's a whole bunch of things that become unlocked just from that one piece. And now, whether it's Apple Pay or Google or PayPal, it's open season for who gets to be your wallet. And that's going to be a major trend.
R
Rex10:48
Two things here. One is now every iPhone is a payment terminal because it can receive a tap to pay payment. The other thing is every payment terminal – well, not every, but a large percentage of them – now accept tap to pay in a way that you couldn't before. I've been going around using only my Apple Watch. And so that between Apple and Google, to your point the wallet wars, things are moving onto these digital platforms where it's not high enough like, oh I have to get out my card, I have to swipe it. And that's going to have implications.
S
Simon Hu11:18
Europe's been ahead of us.
R
Rex11:20
I know that's not – yes and no. I think we'll come to the open finance story, but in a lot of ways yes and in a lot of ways no. We adopted it first, but did we adopt it best? TBD. So this is my big story: the last 10 years, we bundled the simpler products, sometimes lower revenue sometimes lower margin. It was mostly debit cards, not credit. It was mostly financial inclusion, not the prime customer segment. We did some digital only banks and spend management. We did some mobile brokerage. But was it disrupting that sweet spot, that heartland? Maybe not. But I think that's really shifted. The wallet wars and open finance mean we are seeing the great rebundling of finance. Nowhere's that more evident than with somebody like a Robinhood. Yes, they started as the stock trading app, but now they're so much more than that. They're taking over somebody's entire retirement, their savings, their IRA, their credit card with the X1 card. This is meaningful rebundling that you're starting to see. And I think that will become much more common as well in the commercial space, as the Ramps, the Breezes, and everybody else starts to rebundle.
S
Simon Hu12:40
I think it's hard to overstate how important this is to watch. Nubank when it started, they came for little table scraps, and now they're showing up for the main meal. To your point about Robinhood, great case study. Free trading, average account balance years ago was in the hundreds of dollars, now it's about $5,000. But they did their match program and the average balance coming in via match is $81,000. So that moves you very clearly from like the customers that banks don't care about into the mass affluent. So that's going from the scraps to the dinner table. And that's where you start to feel pressure on the incumbents. And that is going to be so interesting. And that happened this year right, the match transfer program, Robinhood doing card. But lots of other examples outside of just Robinhood. Completely.
R
Rex13:29
And then the second thing was this kind of home turf. The core of a lot of the big banks was that their global corporate franchise, their institutional franchise, that was safe space, that was never going to be threatened because it was too complex. But AI is attacking those complex workflows and reducing the cost of doing them. And that has two opportunities: one, reducing the cost for the incumbent, but two, reducing the cost to be a disruptor in that space. And I think that's going to be really interesting to watch. Complex KYB, private credit analysis, equities analysis – all of those workflows suddenly become much more achievable.
S
Simon Hu14:08
Should we do fintech and AI?
R
Rex14:10
We should. I feel like we did enough just with the trends, but yeah, fintech and AI, let's do it.
S
Simon Hu14:14
All right. Yeah, we've covered it in the trends. I'll try and skip through it a little bit. But the application layer I think we can now agree is booming. It was always going to. The initial meme was, does everything end up at the chip manufacturers and the foundation models? Far from it. There are companies generating revenue across the entire value chain. And if you double click on financial services, every bank employee has an AI agent equivalent. These were just the logos I found trying to quickly put together a slide. And you know, not every logo fits in every category perfectly, but whether it's frontend developers or your customer communications or your engineers or your compliance workflows, there's a company that's doing gen AI in that category. But doing the labor piece of it – doing what the humans had to do and the software couldn't.
R
Rex15:22
And that's let's talk about the labor and human versus software. And this is playing out everywhere with AI, but in financial services, $30 trillion market, most of that gets spent on humans – call it $27 trillion. In your software spend, it's like sub a trillion dollars a year. It's hard to break out because a lot of these are proprietary systems. With AI, you can actually attack the labor part of the category. So the market for what can be done by software is way bigger than it used to be. And so that is now on the table too. And now whether or not the price point collapses if you replace a compliance agent or to what extent it does, we're going to find out. But it means so much more of the work being done in financial services can now be pushed into software. 100%.
S
Simon Hu16:08
There's a few incumbents that have got into production with gen AI, but it's by exception. These were the two I found. There are probably others, but it's like a slice of a slice of what they do versus Klarna, who says that they are sort of pretty much shutting down most of their large software as a service providers to replace them, and that they're not hiring anymore because AI is now doing so much for them. And that fundamentally comes from the fact that they've done the hard work on having the data science and the software capability to get the advantage from AI. And most incumbents just don't have that setup in the first place. So they're a long way from being able to use it, and it just takes some longer to kind of execute. So they're left in a very different space.
R
Rex17:04
Another way of articulating it: if you look at incumbents, specifically banks, probably the metric that AI relates to best that you might be able to observe is expense ratio – what percentage of your revenue gets spent on expenses generating that revenue. A good expense ratio is 50%, meaning half of your revenue goes out the door to like people. A lot of – I think it's about 60% on average. So to what extent can the incumbents pull that down? Well, right now they haven't. You've got Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan who've done like a little bit of work. Maybe we're going to start to show that up. But if you looked at the equivalent – it's not apples to apples – of an expense ratio for Klarna, they said we just reduced our customer service staff by two thirds. They're moving way faster into that implementation, as are some of these other scale-ups or hyperscalers as you called them. And so pace of change is a power law, pace of revenue growth is a power law. Those who can adopt fastest, can adapt fastest, will grow fastest, and they'll make a meaningful difference and begin to pull away. And I think this inflection point in the age of the fintech hyperscaler is really just supercharged by AI. So it's one thing to be able to get something to production, it's another thing to pivot your entire organization around a technology.
S
Simon Hu18:16
If you feel like you've fallen asleep with fintech, wake up in 2025 because it's going to be exciting. It really is. And the thing as a nerd for capital markets that really excites me is this was untouched. You were never going to get near Wall Street. It's just too complex, the jargon is too deep, it's too wide. And yet private credit and equities workflows – you can now make a meaningful difference to those workflows. The sort of entry level team of analyst stuff – AI is going to get you a lot of the way. And there's a lot of people in production with this. In fact, the fastest adopters are all the hedge funds and the buy side firms and the private credit funds. They're making a real difference. So this is kind of not like a consumer app that everybody can relate to, but it's what really runs the world of the financial markets, and that's where it's going to rubber hits the road. So I love this use case as well, which is I don't think anybody is thinking enough about what happens when there's an agent sitting inside my phone and I ask it, hey Google, please book me a flight to Antarctica for $300, and it goes, okay, processing your request. I'm pulling your information out of your secure on-device wallet because Apple's made that available. I'm finding you a flight. Okay, I found this one. Would you like me to pay for it? Yes. And all I've said is yes, and then it pays for it using the credential that's on my device, and then it stores the booking inside of my wallet and got the tickets sitting right there. You want that user journey? I want that user journey. But why would that agent select Robinhood versus Chase versus somebody else? If that happens, really these LLMs, these AI agents are starting to make a real meaningful difference to market share. And who's going to lean into that trend? I think is going to be interesting to watch.
So let's talk about banks a little bit, because they're still here. And they had a great year. They outperformed the S&P 500. And there's a lot of doing that like deposit repricings normalized, investment banking fees are back, credit card loan balances continue to rise, base rates are still high, and the US economy's been roaring. And heck, it's even been a good time to be in a European bank, which five years ago would have been the worst thing in the world. So they're feeling comfortable. And I think that's a dangerous place to be, to feel comfortable as an incumbent given what's coming. But what this does hopefully is free up some space for investing in the future and really transforming how you do things. So deposit flight has ended. But what's fascinating is consistently JPMorgan is the one that ziggs when everybody else zags. They're betting on international expansion, they're betting on adding branches when everybody else is closing them. And it's been interesting to see PNC's now followed that. I think you can also say that investment banking fees are following a pick up in overall markets activity. And if markets do continue to pick up through 2025, you can expect those to come back. So it's a pretty good time to be an incumbent bank at the moment.
R
Rex24:44
If you were going to invest, of course private credit is probably the big game in town if you're a bank CEO. That's the thing that's going after your core heartland, lending into the commercial space. So Citi and Goldman and JPMorgan and Societe Generale, they're all partnering to try and get into that private credit space. And we've talked about doing an entire show on that because it's a fascinating topic. And with a new administration, are we going to see that the Basel 3 rules are lighter or not implemented at all? Are we going to see that they're loosened a little bit in Europe? This could make banks more profitable in time. And then there's really the ever-present threats which are now still absolutely true and getting a lot, lot worse. The quiet part out loud is we're in a scamdemic, and everybody's worried about fraud risk. And there's just real effort under the surface to deal with that. And of course FedNow just makes it 10 times worse. But I think this is the key stuff about why they've done well is macroeconomically oriented, because they're highly correlated to that. One of the things we were concerned about was are we going to have a hard landing, go into recession, and it seems like that has been priced down. So they've been able to do well. But then there are some of these more kind of banking specific trends around the scamdemic.
S
Simon Hu26:02
And I want to also call out JPMorgan. I think they've done a great job for some of their infrastructure stuff. If there's one bank's developer platform that I hear from founders I've backed – they're like, I want to use this thing – it's JPMorgan. You can go to developer.payments.jpmorgan.com, and they say we have API docs. And you can go and you can see their API docs and you can see what products they have. They have checkout, they have global payments, they have online payments. Probably the one I hear about the most from entrepreneurs is they want access to JPMorgan's global payments capability. So I just want to give them a shout out in terms of actually getting developer docs up online, showing up, having a head of developer relations. That seems to be interesting. If anyone has a chance of capturing a decent amount of volume from some of the fintechs, I think they're pretty well positioned to do so.
R
Rex27:07
If we ever end up with the polar ice caps melting and it turns into the movie Waterworld where you've got to find the high ground for any land and everybody lives on boats, JPMorgan would be the last incumbent standing because they have definitely done the right things consistently that you would do as an incumbent.
S
Simon Hu27:19
So kind of – I think the CEO says he hates blockchain, but I saw on their dev portal blockchain deposit account balances in their API registry. So they're not completely sleeping on it.
R
Rex27:32
Oh, far from it. But I think the punchline from this section is the unbundling has led to a fragmentation. Yes, they're still in place for a consumer, but most consumers are now using three or more apps. One in five is using a lot more. And the unbundling happened, and the rebundling has started. And the banks are having to spend billions and billions to try and keep up, and they're not necessarily marketing where a consumer is watching. I haven't found a bank on YouTube yet, but I'll find plenty of Robinhood and the creator ecosystem that lives around Robinhood on there and many others. So what should the banking app of tomorrow look like? Maybe a Revolut, Robinhood, Nubank are kind of interesting examples of what rebundling does look like for the future.
S
Simon Hu28:33
So that leads me neatly on to our friends at the neobanks. And as mentioned, retail banking is massive and it's growing. LatAm has Nubank, Europe has Revolut. Where's that for the US? Well, maybe it's Nubank themselves. They are in the Americas and they're looking to do international expansion. Maybe it's Revolut. They have a stated strategy now of getting a license or a charter as quickly as possible when they enter a market. They've just got one in Mexico, they've just secured one I think in Dubai or the UAE. They will potentially show up. And I've better not bet directly, but I've counted against Revolut multiple times. I've been a naysayer and they keep proving me wrong. So I would not bet against these guys to get a charter in the US and become a massive company in the US at some point. They're not going away and they're just going to keep going. And Robinhood moving into more banking – they have high yield credit card, doing the asset transfers. Maybe it's Chime – maybe they're able to move up market. Maybe it's a Cash App or a Venmo with new leadership under Alex Christ. Or SoFi, you know, has been doing some acquisitions and expanding there. So we've got a lot of people, and SoFi kind of goes after that more prime lending base because they start with the student refinancing. But that kind of follows the Gen Y folks that they got as their first cohort. They're wrapping other products around them. They could become the hyperscaler. Could Cash App now go and get a charter? Will we go look at the Bank Holding Company Act under a new administration? Will that start to change what people are doing? Will we see the OCC start granting new charters? Does that change the conversation? Will it be Robinhood as you say? We've seen MoneyLion get acquired, but the financial inclusion space is bigger than a niche, but it's probably not the prime segments that the banks really care about. Chime, they're on the way to IPO, but then they're not trying to compete with Chase still. Will they get a charter? And I think this is the big story for this section. A firm go get a charter, because Klarna has one in Sweden and it gives them a different type of balance sheet. So who's going to get charters? And then will that go after the heartland? Klarna launched a credit card. So you've got all these people who are waiting in the wings to move in against the banks. I'll also call out Upgrade, the founder of Lending Club, Renaud Laplanche. His new company is five, six years old now, originating $10 billion a year and growing. The pandemic set them back a little bit, but they're in a great position. You've also got Walmart and Ribbit Capital – Walmart has some absurd amount, something like 30 million Americans interact with Walmart on a monthly basis. Massive distribution channel, not something you hear about a lot in the press, but where could that be in three years? So there are a lot of people who can scale dramatically in a way that recently, and I want to give a shout to the guys at Wise who don't get a lot of attention. But now if you look at them, they are moving a meaningful amount of cross-border volume. Citi is the biggest money center bank in the world, and Wise is moving a serious amount of money across borders. They got 7.2 million customers, half a million small businesses. But here's the thing I didn't know: they have 92 banks. So if you are a small bank, if you are a neobank using Wise for the infrastructure, it actually makes a lot of sense for cross-border. So the unbundling and the rebundling is the theme that enables the hyperscalers to sort of happen.
R
Rex32:39
And of course payments, payments, payments. For smaller banks, partnering with fintechs might be their best way to take on the big five banks. If you look at a lot of community credit unions, they're not going to build Wise in-house. But if you look at a lot of their net outflows, especially for ones that focus on certain demographics and populations, there can be a lot of remittances. And you should probably integrate and support that natively, and Wise will help you do that.
S
Simon Hu33:03
Speaking of payments, JPMorgan is still the 900 pound gorilla. They are massive, they're continuing to grow. And processing payments for Amazon really, really helps. However, Amazon now also processes with Stripe and with Adyen, who are growing faster. So if this was a straight race, if we ended it here today, JPMorgan no contest, hands down they win. But if you play this forward a decade, what does this chart start to look like with those growth rates? And I think that's going to be the big story for payments – it's an all-out fistfight for market share at this point. Now Stripe, what makes them special is because they are indexed to growth companies. Those companies become massive enterprise clients incredibly quickly, so they get this spike in volume. 82% of tracked AI companies from by Y Combinator are Stripe customers already. OpenAI is on track for $3.7 billion of revenue in 2024 and will do $11.6 billion in 2025. That's a massive client that started as a tiny little thing. What is that as a total of the previous chart? Like 1% or something? To go from 0 to 1% of the entire payment processing of JPMorgan in one year for a new customer is pretty crazy.
R
Rex34:24
It's wild, isn't it? Adyen has gone in-store. These used to be the e-commerce providers, but now they're going after Toast, Shift4, and Square. Adyen is now bigger on the in-store payment volume than Shift4 or Toast. What does that mean for that sweet spot of the in-store checkout? So they're coming for that too. And Stripe just launched its terminal. So I think there's a haves and have-nots reality of who's growing and who's growing payment volume. And the difference is your technology stack. Do you have a single API or multiple platforms? Do you have that uniform offering across in-store and online or not? Do you support everything through the same platform? And can you grow via direct sales or is M&A your only way to grow? These are fundamentally different businesses. Getting to where these hyperscalers are is very, very difficult. They're now at a point where their tech platform enables them to grow faster. Big story of the year: accelerated checkouts. I don't know if you've used Shop Pay or if you've seen Fast Lane in the wild or Apple Pay, but you have to support this. And traditional acquirers typically don't. It's the year of the accelerated checkout. Apple Pay, Google Pay on mobile work incredibly well. Shop Pay works incredibly well. All of these accelerated checkouts are doing great. Link – I'm seeing Link show up a lot more.
S
Simon Hu36:04
Exactly. It's an accelerated checkout, but it also supports pay by bank that they can connect into as well. This was crazy: Stripe Link represents nearly half of the outgoing traffic from Stripe.com. That means if you're hitting a checkout page, half of that is hitting the accelerated checkout. It's just wild. And part to play in that in terms of helping connect those bank accounts and making it frictionless for folks to plug in multiple payment credentials. Especially, it's going to be interesting to watch PayPal in the next year as well, because they didn't necessarily shock the world, but my goodness did they get their mojo back. They're not necessarily as profitable as they used to be, but they are pushing in a big way. Look, they became an alternative processor for Shopify. That was the banner Stripe client is now processing with Adyen and with PayPal. And those are sort of your big three of the hyperscalers. And then of course, if we're in payments, let's not forget that Visa and Mastercard did settle an antitrust suit, but they might have more coming in. The card networks, they've got their own battles to fight at this point, especially with an administration that looks after small businesses maybe a little bit more and might come back after that space. And of course, Capital One potentially with Discover could be in the conversation.
R
Rex37:30
Let's talk about open finance if you get to dive into that one.
S
Simon Hu37:33
Let's do it. And all these things are related, right? Because part of what's powering all the payments and all the wallets are the developments around open finance and open banking. And I think open banking has found its killer app. It used to be nice that you could sign up a little bit faster and you could do some fraud checks because you had accelerated KYC because you could pull existing information through. But really payments is where it's happening. And you're seeing pay by bank in the wild. And of course payments are getting the realtime payments rail. There is RTP that's been around for some time, but FedNow is rapidly growing. Look at that quarterly growth. Realtime payments are going to be a reality in the US very, very quickly. And of course if you look at Europe, it took a little while, but you see in the data now this is a major part of what makes open banking – the payments experience. And what happens if you start to decouple the payments rail from the line of credit? In Brazil and India, it's now common for pay by bank to be the rail for a line of credit. So rather than having a credit card, I'd have a credit wallet and I'd pay via FedNow. That would be disruptive to Visa and Mastercard.
So stablecoins are having a renaissance. Stablecoins were a big deal a few years ago, and then they felt like they weren't that stable when Terra Luna happened. But now we've realized that most of them are Treasuries backed and people like them. And that shifted the vibe in crypto dramatically over the last 3 years. In 2022 we were talking about FTX and crypto crash and Elizabeth Warren's anti-crypto army, and now we have banks in Europe who are issuing stablecoins and doing repo facilities on a public blockchain. We got a new US administration, so this means institutions and even banks can start to move forward and feel more confident about moving into the space. But the payments companies are leading. Sneaked in the Gary Gensler open to work in the top right there – it's the meme that just won't die, nor should it. But the Stripe acquisition of Bridge really got everybody excited. But the questions that always come up are, isn't this just for trading and bots, and isn't it just kind of not really about the supply? People are buying the stablecoins, but that's not payments volume. But there's a lot of apples to oranges data. So the best thing when you double click on it is look at some of the Visa data. They estimate that there's $677 billion of adjusted transaction volume using the stablecoin rail across 2024. It's not the biggest rail in the world, but its growth rate certainly is there. And remittance flow, look at that chart, you're sort of getting over $100 million per month. Extrapolate that growth rate and it would go – well, you can't assume the growth rate will extrapolate, you could say it could all go horribly wrong. There are a bunch of caveats. But don't forget that SpaceX does treasury management using stablecoins. A US company is doing dispersements. Nigerian consumers are holding USD all through stablecoins. These things aren't going away. And this one is possibly my favorite slide in the whole deck, because we are now finally seeing institutional payments where global corporates are making cross-border payments using a stablecoin. Imagine I'm in Kenya and I'm importing oil from the Middle East. What I would do historically is do that via Swift, and it might take me two weeks, and then there's money, there's oil on a ship, and there's payments, and these things are completely disconnected. What stablecoins give me is the ability to automate all of that if I have a bank that would take the stablecoin messaging and the stablecoin layer as settlement and do the underlying settlement on its books and records on its systems. And there are banks out there doing this. This is not a crazy idea that you could buy oil with stablecoins. It is happening. And it's not all a bad thing. In fact, most of it is just because it's a better cross-border rail. The vast majority of this is legitimate, it's been fully sanctions checked, it's legitimate trade. Swift is an amazing way to let 80s mainframes communicate with each other across multiple hops to send international wires. There's no reason why we need to keep using it to do global payments.
R
Rex44:59
Indeed. I think Swift is one of the most threatened by stablecoins by far. Good time to launch a podcast all about stablecoins, available wherever you get your podcast.
S
Simon Hu45:16
This is Simon's podcast, I should add. You should check it out, Tokenized, wherever you get your podcast guys. The scamdemic. I think this is going to be another big theme for 2025. We lost over a trillion dollars to scams in 2023 according to the Global Anti-Scam Alliance. 70% of those go unreported. And the loss per capita in the US is $3,250, which is absolutely crazy, absolutely massive.
R
Rex45:56
That's crazy. Is that the actual amount scammed or does that include all the compliance probably big spend which would be the fair way of calculating that?
S
Simon Hu46:02
Yeah, it's all in. And one thing on the scams: we talk a lot about replacing interchange or Visa or Mastercard, but they ensure consumers against this. So if we're going to move into a real-time payment rail, it's not just figuring out incentives and rewards, it's also figuring out all of these questions about if someone does get scammed, who pays for it? Zelle got hammered for this. What the reimburse – and I'll come to the reimbursement methodology in a second. But the other thing that's happened in this space is deepfakes at KYC are up something like 2,000%. It's crazy now – it's from a low base. But the problem with deepfakes is they're so cheap, they're so easy to do. There's a report I saw earlier today that something like 50% or 45% of scams are now AI generated. It's just crazy. And you can beat most KYC with even liveness detection. So if I'm holding up my phone and doing a liveness detection, the deepfake can beat that too. And we've done it with Sardine – we can KYC as Tom Cruise to most institutions around the world quite easily with a deepfake. And it's crazy how much of a leaky bucket this is, because that's our most important protection for the entire financial system. And if you think you might be getting scammed, always get off the phone and reconnect with that person. I had a founder recently, sophisticated individual, gets a call and it sounds like it's his mother's voice in the background, she's been kidnapped, and they're demanding payment. And then the only reason it didn't actually end up sending the payment was he texted his dad and it's like, oh that's not – crazy, isn't it? Like you get this stuff is insane. It will trick you. This stuff is getting very good and adversarial.
R
Rex50:21
I think my big takeaway is where are we in the current technology implementation cycle in financial services. And I think we're getting to the end of the beginning. If you think about where fintech started 15 years ago, it's like come for the scraps. Now 10, 15 years later, these hyperscalers are looking to actually come after incumbents and create whole new product bundles. So that's the end of the beginning. That's not a final completion. They have a lot more work. Of those 10ish hyperscalers, maybe half of them aren't going to be very successful, or maybe not all 10 of them are going to be worth more than Visa. But now you can see a world in which one, two, three are – maybe someone's worth more than JPMorgan. So that's the end of the beginning. And then I think the other part about the end of the beginning is all of these individual kind of platform shifts and regulatory shifts are starting to hit around open banking, around wallets, and just complete mobile penetration with Apple and Google. All right, so there's just all of these currents that are starting to form. And you can see that we're on the cusp of a lot of the changes, but it is not clear exactly how all these things are going to recombine. The age of the fintech hyperscaler is here, and it's not clear how that is going to play out. But it's fascinating that the tech trends are coming. I also think it's fascinating that it's temporarily a really good time to be an incumbent, and your reaction to that could be to use that capacity to invest and make a difference, or it could be to go, okay, the threat's gone, we're good, fintech went away, we can just keep doing what we're doing. And I think that would be dangerous, because this is not going away. And that's to say nothing of AI. We talk about how AI can automate labor and you can take these markets that are small and make them even bigger because your software can do more work and therefore can charge more. That's great. Financial services, a $30 trillion industry, most of that is labor cost. And in financial services, AI agents can monetize in invisible ways. So I think the ability of agents within financial services to monetize is going to be stronger than a lot of other categories. So not only is financial services one of the largest categories of economic activity, I think it's also the place where you can have the most scalable, defensible business models for agents. And that can simply be bundling them into some of these hyperscalers just to make them way more efficient, or could be creating whole new products of things. So just the AI wave I think has more applicability and interest than some of the other sectors, which it will get applied to as well. And I'm excited about that too. But that's another huge area of opportunity. I'm excited for 2025. I hope we get to do a lot more chatting about stuff, we'll be reacting to the stories. But it was fun doing a Simon Talks Fintech, Rex React episode, Rex and Simon Talk Fintech. Thanks for having me, dude.
S
Simon Hu53:17
Yeah, thanks for coming. That was awesome. And thanks for all the work you did to put that together. Thanks to Jeff as well. Shout out to those guys. And Aperture and Sardine. So appreciate you, Rex. Thank you.
R
Rex53:38
All right, takes a village. Thanks, Simon. So that's a wrap for the state of fintech in 2025. I think after listening to Simon and I discuss some of the big trends, you can get a feeling for how we're on the cusp of so many interesting things starting to happen. And that's why I think fintech is going to be so exciting to pay attention to next year and beyond. If you like this conversation, Simon and I also do a weekly podcast where we talk about the biggest topics and happenings in fintech. And on this channel, I also interview some of the most important founders, operators, and investors working in and around fintech and financial services. So if that sounds interesting to you, feel free to like, subscribe, and until then, catch you next time.