Back
Michelle Mcmurry-heath
Former President & CEO, BIO

Advancing Science Through Biotech: With Dr. Michelle McMurry-Heath - Steve Forbes | Forbes

🎥 Feb 10, 2021 📺 Forbes ⏱ 11m
With around 191 Covid-19 vaccines in development there is still room to advance science through Biotechnology, because you can never predict which vaccines will cross the finish line. Steve Forbes sits down for a conversation with Dr. Michelle McMurry-Heath, President and CEO of Biotechnology Innovation Organization, to talk about her work and commitment to diversity in her industry, the COVID-19 crisis and the vaccine rollout, as well as her hopes for the future of biotechnology and medicine. Check out the full podcast episode: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevefor... Podcast Page: https://...
Watch on YouTube

About Michelle Mcmurry-heath

In a February 2021 interview with Steve Forbes, Dr. Michelle McMurry-Heath, then President and CEO of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), discussed the role of the biotech industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. She described BIO's function as a "voice" and "platform" for scientists and a "bridge to the broader cultural conversation about what science can do." McMurry-Heath stated that "science is the social justice issue of our age," arguing that communities like the one she grew up in need access to clean water, nutritious food, clean air, and effective medical solutions. She criticized the U.S. vaccine distribution effort, saying "there is no excuse for where we find ourselves today" and noting that vaccines were being disposed of due to organizational failures. McMurry-Heath praised Operation Warp Speed for its foresight but emphasized the industry's collaborative efforts, including a BIO-facilitated platform that allowed companies to share resources. She called for a new approach to clinical trials, questioning why national trial networks are not more easily mobilized and why it remains difficult to include diverse patient populations. She also advocated for sustained flexibility at the FDA, stating that the agency's rapid-response approach during COVID should not be abandoned, but that this would require proper resourcing.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Michelle Mcmurry-heath's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (8 segments)
I
Interviewer0:11
This industry is critical to the betterment of their lives. You said a lot of policy makers have unfortunately played political football with our industry. Scientists aren't best at telling their stories, I'll give it to them. We were sitting ducks in many ways. Explain how you see, as part of your mission, getting the word out about what an extraordinary industry this is.
M
Michelle McMurry-Heath0:38
Well, scientists are single-focused. That's what makes them such amazing scientists. They are focused on that problem that keeps them up at night, and they're passionate about finding it. But they often forget to look up and figure out how the broader social context is impacting them. So I really see the social justice issue of our age. It is so critically important because when I think about those communities I grew up with in Oakland, what they needed was access to clean water, nutritious foods, clean air, and they needed to know that not only did they have access to health care, but once they got in the door of the doctor's office, they would actually have solutions in the medicine cabinet that would help them. And you only get all of those things through applying biotechnology to all of those problems and working without relenting. So this is what's so critically important. We've seen this year with COVID that the rate of speed of developing a new COVID vaccine or therapeutics has a disproportionate impact on some lives than it will others, although it's important for all. So it's not to say that it's more important for one community than the other, but it's to say that it's not enough for us just to focus on access to health care, although that is critically important. When we're talking about social justice, it's also important that we're talking about not slowing down, not giving up on that innovation engine, because that innovation engine is life-saving.
I
Interviewer2:39
Before we get to that, can you give one of the things that BIO did? The tracker on when the COVID-19 crisis came, keeping track of therapeutics and vaccines. Tell us a little bit about that.
M
Michelle McMurry-Heath3:11
Companies mix and match resources. One company had lab equipment, the other had manufacturing capacity. How could we pool those resources to get to the end goal? That was very successful. From there, we built a COVID tracker which globally tracked all of the research and development programs aimed at stopping or preventing COVID, and we still have that tracker going today. At our height in December, we had 838 research and development programs aimed at COVID underway around the globe, many of them by BIO member companies. That's amazing to see that rate of focus on one disease. A bit more than we need sitting here today. I'll tell you, three or four months ago when it was unclear if any of them would be successful, I was so happy that we had that many shots on goal, because you can never predict with science what will actually cross that finish line. So we needed as many different intellectual approaches to the problem as possible.
I
Interviewer4:32
Well, this touches on what you mentioned earlier, and that is the Coronavirus Collaboration Initiative that BIO took early 2020. Quickly go through that, because it was absolutely unprecedented in enabling us to be where we are today, where we can see a vaccine in a matter of months rather than years.
M
Michelle McMurry-Heath5:12
The great foresight and focus that it placed on the efforts, but the industry as a whole also had lots of dedication and the ability to overlook competition and overlook how they could maybe not work together in the past, to find new ways to collaborate. So we really helped them on that collaboration front, particularly when it came to finding manufacturing capacity and making sure that we were sharing the scientific information as it was coming, which was fast and furious, to try to speed everyone's progress along the route.
I
Interviewer5:52
It's quite something. And now we have the challenge today. You'll have a problem, but that seems to slow down the distribution. Some are saying that if somebody doesn't show up for an appointment, just make sure somebody gets it. That helps to hurt immunity. Give us your thoughts on the distribution and trying to get that going with the kind of warp speed that led to the development of the vaccines.
M
Michelle McMurry-Heath6:34
Well, let's be clear: there is no excuse for where we find ourselves today. My mother-in-law lives in Germany, and she had an appointment in the middle of December for when she was going to get her first COVID vaccine. This is unbelievable that we would put this much attention into developing the vaccines, because all of the content of the vials cannot be used because we cannot organize our response. It is astounding, and it is heartbreaking to watch this. There's no excuse for this. This is not rocket science. We've done mass vaccination programs before, and the CDC has been saying for months what would be necessary for the states to be able to actually deliver the vaccine, get shots in arms. But they weren't given the resources, they weren't given the attention it deserved. So states are just now this week getting their hands on the resources they need. We've been speaking to governors across the country, and we heard from one governor who said, 'Well, I have boxes of the vaccine delivered on...' All the doses of the vaccine, particularly important in a two-dose vaccine situation, you need to be able to track who's had the vaccine. But it's also critically important because, lest we forget, these vaccines are authorized under Emergency Use Authorization, which by definition means we don't yet know everything about what we'll see when the vaccine goes into the majority of the population. So it's important to track all of that information so that we can fully understand it. Now, that being said, I don't want anyone to mistake my words. These vaccines have been under more scrutiny than any vaccines in history. They've been in tens of thousands of people before they were ever released across the country, and we have the utmost confidence in BIO in... We have learned a tremendous amount. So when it comes to preventing the next pandemic, when it comes to even preventing the next iteration of COVID because we know it's constantly mutating and evolving, we are incredibly prepared. The platforms that have shown success, for example the mRNA platform that has been used in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, are revolutionary in that they will forever change how we think about developing new vaccines. We also, I think, have learned a lot about early warning systems and how seriously we need to take those early calls and the public health measures that work and don't work. But the things I think we've learned that are most impactful don't even have to do with... on the solution and having a market for that solution at the end of the day that will deliver cures faster and better to patients. That's what I hope we don't lose sight of. The FDA showed amazing flexibility in the context of COVID. Manufacturers said, 'What normally takes me two to four weeks to get a response to FDA in a formal letter, now I'm able to get them on the phone and really able to work in real time towards adapting our plans to make sure they meet FDA's demands.' We should never settle for less again, but that's going to take resourcing the FDA to be able to have that high-touch and rapid response approach. We've also seen, interestingly enough, that we need a... one did not, and the federal approach didn't necessarily save time. So we need to look at our national clinical trial networks and ask ourselves why they are not more easily mobilized for these massive public health concerns, and why is it so hard to get diverse patient populations through them. These are critically important questions that we are just starting to ask, but they'll be very important not just for infectious diseases but for every disease out there that's awaiting a cure.