Back
Les Moonves
Former CEO of CBS, Independent

Les Moonves — Charlie Rose Interview

🎥 Mar 23, 2020 📺 Remembrance of Things Past ⏱ 54m 👁 362 views
Watch on YouTube

About Les Moonves

Les Moonves resigned as chairman and CEO of CBS in September 2018 following a New Yorker article that included allegations of sexual misconduct by six additional women, bringing the total number of accusers to twelve. The allegations included claims that Moonves forced women to perform oral sex, exposed himself without consent, and used physical violence and intimidation. In a statement, Moonves said the allegations were "untrue" and "not consistent with who I am," and that he was "deeply saddened to be leaving the company." His resignation was part of a settlement with CBS. Prior to his resignation, Moonves had discussed the company's financial performance and strategy on earnings calls. He stated that CBS was growing its subscriber base and average revenue per subscriber, and that content licensing and affiliate fees were becoming a larger share of revenue. He also commented on industry trends, saying that cord-cutting was occurring but that CBS was positioned to benefit through its direct-to-consumer services like CBS All Access and by being included in "skinny bundles." Moonves described the allegations against him as "untrue" and stated that they were "from decades ago."

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Les Moonves's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (92 segments)
C
Charlie Rose0:05
From our studios in New York City, this is Charlie Rose. Les Moonves is here. He is chairman and CEO of CBS. Eight years ago, he joined a network that in his own words was in shambles. He is responsible for turning the Tiffany network around by bringing in such hit shows as Survivor and CSI. He is considered one of television's most powerful executives. CBS has been on the air for 75 years and will celebrate with a three-hour special airing this Sunday evening. I am pleased to welcome Les Moonves back to this table. And of course, I have to say that in fact I worked for him over at CBS, 60 Minutes II. Thank you, thank you. Tell me about the 75th anniversary. What are you celebrating? How are you going to do it? And how do you cram 75 years of broadcast history into three hours?
L
Les Moonves0:57
Well, the amazing thing is the array of stars that are going to be there, because when you look back at the history of CBS going all the way back, it was the place of stars. So in that room on Sunday night are going to be the cast of M*A*S*H, the cast of Dallas, the cast of The Mary Tyler Moore Show, the cast of The Carol Burnett Show, the great figures in news too: Walter Cronkite, Mike Wallace, etc., etc., etc. So I think it's going to be a great celebration of so many great shows in such a great history. And under the direction and production of Gil Cates, who did so many Academy Awards, we have a spectacular special with live presentations plus a lot of great clips.
C
Charlie Rose1:35
All right. When you look back, take a look at this. This is the man who founded CBS, William Paley. Take a look at this clip about the guy who 75 years ago started, bought a series of radio stations and turned it into the Tiffany network.
N
Narrator1:57
In September of 1928, 26-year-old William Paley, the son of a successful cigar merchant, acquired a string of 16 radio stations to form the Columbia Broadcasting System. Through his singular drive and limitless imagination, he spent the next six decades creating the standard for which all broadcast entertainment soon followed. He brought stars like Lucille Ball, Jack Benny, Red Skelton, and Jackie Gleason to Hollywood and turned them into household names. The stunning success of those early shows paved the way for the instant classics CBS will forever be remembered by: Ed Sullivan, I Love Lucy, The Dick Van Dyke Show, Mary Tyler Moore, All in the Family. And of course, 'How you doing, Henry, man? You know, you're making selections that are going to have an influence on 20, 30, 40, 50 million people. Something very exciting about that. And when something works because you had a good idea.' Who is great, uncompromising in his vision. William Paley's dream of transforming CBS into the Tiffany network soon came true, and even in the twilight of his career, Paley's commitment to making good television never faltered. 'It's fun, it's challenging, and it's part of that spirit. You have a competitive spirit. I catch that. You get so much fun and satisfaction when you win, and it gives you such heartaches and such depressions when you lose. That's part of the fun of the business. You're always reaching for something new.'
C
Charlie Rose3:33
Think about this. Those are footsteps you're following.
L
Les Moonves3:35
You absolutely. And they are very big footsteps. Yeah, I mean, he was a genius, wise programming, totally, totally. He brought the stars over, he believed in stars, he believed in great programs. And you know, he believed in quality. And I think that was the mark of CBS then, and hopefully it's continued to now.
C
Charlie Rose3:53
You are a former actor, which we've talked about on this program. You are a guy who was successful at Lorimar, then at Warner Brothers as a television executive, providing programs. What was it that made you take an offer to go to CBS and run programming?
L
Les Moonves4:09
When I was at Warner Brothers, obviously we were a very successful company and we produced ER and Friends and a number of hit programs. I think when you're on the supply side, the production side, you always want that job. You always want to be the guy who's standing at the board saying, 'I'm putting that show Thursday at 8 o'clock or Friday at 9 o'clock.' And you want to compete, because I think it's the highest form of competition. And ultimately, you're the guy who makes that decision, you and your team. And there's nothing more exciting.
C
Charlie Rose4:45
Yeah. When you look at each year, take me through the process of shaping this season. Okay? How you decided on what you had and what were the risks you were taking this season.
L
Les Moonves4:58
We came off a very good season where we had a lot of strengths at various points in the week. Obviously, Everybody Loves Raymond was a big hit, CSI was a big hit on Thursday, Survivor, 60 Minutes and 60 Minutes II remain staples in our schedule. We go through an entire development season beginning in the summer that goes all the way through when we start. We pick that we develop about a hundred scripts and we shoot about 20 pilots. These pilots are shot January, February, March. And we look at the pilots and we do research on them. And at that point, the tough work begins. Then we start molding our schedule. We decide what we're keeping, and we already know of these 20 shows what's going to fit in and, more importantly, where. We knew where our holes were. We had to take a couple of gambles. We moved King of Queens, which was a stalwart on Monday, to Wednesday night, one of our weakest nights. And we took JAG, which had held up our Tuesday night, and moved that to Friday. The reason we did that, we felt like we had the strength to help Monday and Tuesday as well as move these existing hits to Wednesday and Friday.
C
Charlie Rose6:04
Well, most audiences follow their favorite program. Yet moving from Monday to Friday, they don't follow. If it has enough of a following and you let them know that it's going, in other words, you let them know where it is...
L
Les Moonves6:17
A very interesting statistic: people, their favorite shows, be it CSI, be it ER, be it Friends, the most faithful fan still only watches that show two out of four weeks. Right. The most faithful fan. So if you take, for example, M*A*S*H, which is one of the things we'll be honored here, right? Those fans would only watch it two out of four weeks. So it's important to move them into the right time periods and let people know that they're there. But they will follow them there. And it's very interesting, those viewing patterns.
C
Charlie Rose6:54
What's the... if you look at this season, CSI has had an offshoot, CSI: Miami, correct? Is that the most prominent trend of this primetime season?
L
Les Moonves7:08
There are a couple of things. I think clearly crime drama has been very successful, procedural crime drama, because we now have two CSIs, we have Without a Trace, also a second-year show, and to that we added a new show called Cold Case and a show called Navy NCIS, which is investigative on a military level.
C
Charlie Rose7:33
Whoever knew forensics could be so exciting? Yes, forensics would be the sexiest thing. By the way, an interesting trend now: forensics is taught at many colleges because of the TV shows.
L
Les Moonves7:40
You know, the other trend obviously is reality. I think the quality reality shows, and by that I mean the Survivors, the American Idols, have stayed and sort of become a staple in network schedules.
C
Charlie Rose7:53
Here's a fascinating story. Survivor, probably more than any other choice you made, has been the most important in your eight-year career. Would you say that or not?
L
Les Moonves8:04
Very possibly. Very possibly. It certainly had the most immediate impact. You know, there were a few shows which we call game changers. Millionaire was a few years ago where it suddenly took ABC from last to first, and then it collapsed again. American Idol certainly did that for Fox, who was having a tough year last year. American Idol came on, made that network successful. And the summer we put Survivor on, we were starting to move up, we were starting to build a schedule. But suddenly we had the hottest show on television. And when we put it on Thursday night, it suddenly changed the whole landscape of television. Plus, they had great demographics, which is something you were trying to build. I have three teenage children. It was the first show that my kids came home and said, 'Dad, they're talking about a CBS show.'
C
Charlie Rose8:56
Has that trend continued for you in terms of being able to make some inroads in this idea that CBS skewed older than everybody else?
L
Les Moonves9:02
Well, we still skew older than everybody else, but we've proven that with CSI, which skews much younger, with a show like Everybody Loves Raymond, then clearly with Survivor. And you know, shows like that, the reality shows, we're definitely getting a lot more of the younger people.
C
Charlie Rose9:20
You have made this point, and I believe this point, and I want to understand it: that you have a lot more buying power, you as an individual, than your 19-year-old son. Absolutely. Why? Why do we pay more attention to your 19-year-old son than your age group?
L
Les Moonves9:35
Madison Avenue is determined that 18 to 34 year olds or 18 to 49 year olds are a demographic that's very hard to reach, that it's the future demographic, that they are going to have more buying power. They assume that somebody over 50 is sort of set in their ways, they know what they're going to buy, they stick to the same old brand. And that if you've been using Crest toothpaste for 30 years, you're not going to change to Colgate because of some advertising spot. I don't quite buy into that, nor has the CBS philosophy been that. But what is your philosophy now? That you can have both. That's right. Once again, we sell 18 to 49 when it's advantageous. A show like 60 Minutes, no 18 to 25 year olds watch that show. Yet it has an older demographic, but a very affluent, well-educated demographic. So we're able to sell that to specific advertisers who want the older, more affluent, better educated demographic. So the idea is not just to be a slave to 18 to 49 year olds, but to sell whatever your strength is.
C
Charlie Rose10:44
You guys watch each other's performances. When you see the success of American Idol, you have to pay attention to it. You question and you have to say, can we create our own American Idol? Television is very imitative. Everybody, a big hit Survivor started a trend in reality shows. Same thing with The Millionaire. The only problem is most of the imitators are not nearly as good as the original. So at the end of the day, there were 20 shows similar to Survivor, but they weren't Survivor and they died. So we repeat that. We do copy each other and hope to hopefully tag on to that success. I'm fascinated by what people have, that gut. You know, is it gut? Bruckheimer does he have gut? This is a guy who brought you CSI. He's a guy who's had hit movies, Pirates of the Caribbean and something else I've forgotten what it was, for the television shows. How do you explain that? Is it because he is organized? Is it because he has brilliant insights?
L
Les Moonves11:39
There are a lot of factors. Number one, you mentioned gut. I think absolutely. I think Jerry Bruckheimer, he always says he doesn't care about the credits, right? He cares about the public. And the critics don't seem to care about him. That's right. And he can get all the bad reviews he wants. He's reading them all the way to the bank, right? His gut touches shows that people want to see. Once again, we have bought into that. We have four of his shows currently on our schedule, and they were all great shows. There are certain producers that just have that instinct and that ability to know what people want. Once again, he's also a great executive, so he brings the right people in to execute those things. And he surrounds himself with good people, which is also another secret.
C
Charlie Rose12:18
On my show, the reason was William Petersen, CSI star of CSI. But here was a guy that you have believed in for a while and looked for a vehicle for. Correct. You know, do you have a list of actors you've seen through the years and you say, 'I'll see the right property for this guy'? And there are a handful of those guys. How many? Is it a handful?
L
Les Moonves12:42
Petersen was certainly at the top. Having been an actor myself, and a mediocre one, I could see a guy like Billy Petersen and say, 'If I could act like that guy, I'd still be doing it.' You know, so he was somebody who literally for eight years in a row I had a meeting with once a year. 'Billy, what do you want to do?' And he'd say, 'I'm not interested in television. I'm not interested in television.' Until finally we got him to do a deal here at CBS. He helped develop CSI and he did it. It was a home run. Anthony LaPaglia, star of Without a Trace, he's another guy I worked with many years ago, brilliant actor, Australian actor. Once again, we found the property that he wanted to do. When I was at Warner Brothers, I had George Clooney through four or five failed pilots. He did little bits on different series until ER came along, and then it was a hit. So there are some guys you just believe in, and most of the time, hopefully, you're right.
C
Charlie Rose13:42
What's harder: knowing what actor to use and what part, or knowing what product, what story idea, what series idea will work?
L
Les Moonves13:49
You know, one doesn't work without the other. The most brilliant actor can't make a bad script work. He can't. And I've seen great scripts being trashed, tanked by bad acting. I think it really is, you'll often see a guy do 10, 12 pilots and it won't work, and then suddenly it's the marriage of the actor and the material that suddenly meshes. And you don't quite know why, and suddenly there it is, it's a hit.
C
Charlie Rose14:14
What failed for you this season?
L
Les Moonves14:18
There's only one show that failed for us: Brotherhood of Poland, New Hampshire. We launched six new shows and five of them have been renewed for the entire season. Brotherhood of Poland, New Hampshire was David E. Kelley's new show, right? And we knew going in it was a bit of a long shot. It was about three guys in their late 40s, all overweight, living in a small town in New Hampshire. A little bit quirky. It was David E. Kelley's normal brilliant writing, but it wasn't the most commercial show. It was up against Law & Order.
C
Charlie Rose14:51
Law & Order is the most valuable franchise in television. I might argue with that. CSI? No, you're right. Law & Order is amazingly successful for NBC. There are three of them. That's very important. Just like there are two CSIs. There's only one Friends. How do you explain it?
L
Les Moonves15:03
You know what? They are procedural dramas. They are great ensemble pieces. The writing is brilliant in both CSI and Law & Order. They're well cast, they're well produced, they're well shot. And the public just has a taste for that.
C
Charlie Rose15:23
Dick Wolf, from what I understand, is talking about Law & Order for years. And we're talking about a CSI maybe someplace else. But you said to me on this program on an earlier appearance that you might have made the same mistake by abusing the Millionaire franchise. That's exactly right. Clearly made a mistake. That's right. And you might have made the same mistake there.
L
Les Moonves15:44
With Millionaire, absolutely. It was, you know, I put it out there. I pushed it. The network wants to grab all the riches you can, and it proves to be a mistake. With the crime dramas, it's a little bit different because each one of them has a different character. CSI: Miami is a very, very different show than CSI. Law & Order: SVU is very different than Law & Order. The idea is to expand it and not overdo it, not kill the goose that laid the golden egg.
C
Charlie Rose16:15
When you look at Bruckheimer as a producer, and you look at Petersen as an actor, is it easier to sell television today to producers and performers?
L
Les Moonves16:23
No question about it. No question. There are certain people. Jerry Bruckheimer has opened the door because now every single feature film producer walks in our door and says, 'I want you to do with us what you did with Bruckheimer.' And I said, 'Well, that's not going to be easy.' Jerry brought a lot to the table. There are a number of them this year that are very successful feature film producers who want to get in.
C
Charlie Rose16:48
But is there anything about Bruckheimer that made him more likely to succeed in television than some other film producer who has an equally strong track record?
L
Les Moonves16:54
No question. Jerry is a populist, right? He really is. He's the people's guy. He also goes for the mass audience. He totally does. Plus, he has an extraordinary organization. He had a very good television department already set up. Plus, his operation brought a lot of the feature film. I mean, the people we had doing special effects on CSI are the same people doing special effects on Pearl Harbor. Yeah, it's you know, so he was able to bring that team to the table, which helped.
C
Charlie Rose17:27
The guy who created CSI was on this show. He said that was the most amazing thing. He said that Bruckheimer brought a quality and a look they might not have achieved otherwise.
L
Les Moonves17:34
That's exactly right. No question about it.
C
Charlie Rose17:42
What do you see down the road? You have a green light to stuff for next season? Not yet. Not yet. We're still in development. But we're in the process of developing the next hundred scripts which will turn into those next 20 pilots. And what does your gut tell you might be where we might be going? For example, are you surprised by the longevity of Survivor?
L
Les Moonves17:59
Yes, I am. We are about to begin Survivor 8. I know, as I told you before, I was surprised. Survivor number one, back when I walked into your office and pitched the idea, you said, 'I don't know. What are you telling me? This is a cable show.' That's a cable show. Exactly. But because it's so well done, the quality of it, that's why it's lasted. I think Survivor could go on for many, many more years. So you never really know what the trend will be. Right now, television is in a golden age of drama. I don't think dramatic series television has ever been stronger in terms of the quantity of great shows currently on the air: Law & Order, CSI, The Sopranos, The Practice is having a renaissance, NYPD Blue is still a very, very good show, ER is still a very good show. I think it's a phenomenal time for drama. And comedy is not quite the same. I think we need... not quite the same meaning in terms of the quality, in terms of popularity. We haven't had a breakout comedy hit in three or four years. So since Raymond, it probably was. Raymond was seven or eight years ago. Malcolm in the Middle is since then, which is certainly a very, very good show. And there have been certain singles and doubles, but no grand slam.
C
Charlie Rose19:18
That's because there's no talent that's come along?
L
Les Moonves19:20
No, the talent is there. I don't think people are thinking outside the box. I think in drama, it was easy to do things differently.
C
Charlie Rose19:24
Tell me where you think outside the box. What's his name? Barbara is thinking outside the box when we did Fail Safe with George Clooney, doing a live presentation which hadn't been done in 30 years. That was thinking outside the box. Something George wanted to do. Exactly. George came to us with this idea of doing a live drama like they did in the old Playhouse 90 nights. Didn't work? Throwback? Did it work? It worked brilliantly. It was good. It was good work. Well, in every dimension. It worked well in terms of audiences, very good. And the production was fabulous. And I have to tell you, as the head of the network, I was so excited that night. You know, you're there and the same guy on television forgets a line. You know, it's not like David Letterman or anything like that. This is the real deal. And it was so exciting when we pulled it off. It was great. It was great. So that was thinking outside the box. As I said, some of these reality shows are thinking outside the box. Survivor was a concept that was foreign to television. Even when you take a show like ER, when that first came out, that was thinking outside the box. It was a hospital show, but stylistically unbelievably different. CSI, believe me, different because of pacing, because of the shortness of scenes, because the number of stories going on simultaneously and the time frame they did it in. It wasn't your traditional standard hospital show. CSI used techniques never before used on network television: seeing a bullet going inside somebody's body with the detail that happens. It's truly phenomenal, very exciting.
Do you watch much television?
L
Les Moonves21:04
I watch as much as I can. You're a busy guy. I mean, you know, I like to watch a couple of episodes of every new show on television, especially the competition. I like to see as many of our new shows. Some of our existing shows, after they're in their third or fourth year, I rarely see them unless it's something very special. Most of the time when I go home at night to watch television, I usually turn on ESPN. You're a sports guy. I'm a sports guy, and it relaxes me.
C
Charlie Rose21:34
There are many people who will say that the people who are doing the most outside the box are the people like Chris Albrecht at HBO. Now they have more freedom. They do, because they don't have to reach as large an audience. Right. They're on a paid channel. Commercial considerations, but they can do more things. And it says something, and I'm not sure what it says, about giving creativity an opportunity to flourish.
L
Les Moonves21:57
Well, there are a couple of things. One, once again, we are dependent on sponsors. There is so much we can do in terms of language, in terms of violence, and in terms of sex. Certainly, Chris Albrecht at HBO, and he does a brilliant job, the wonderful executives with The Sopranos, he does things that we couldn't do on network television. In addition, he only does 12 episodes a year, and they cost twice as much as our average episodes. So what does that mean? They cost two million dollars an episode or more. Our average episodes cost two million dollars. And I said, he's up at four or five something like that for something like The Sopranos. And they take 14 days to shoot as opposed to CSI. But it's driven by salaries, in large part star salaries. Once again, the expense for HBO, their base is on subscribers. In other words, subscribers pay to get those shows done. We are paid by advertisers. Very different things. So they can afford to put the thing in as long as they're getting more and more subscribers.
C
Charlie Rose23:00
What about advertisers? Are they back? What I mean by that is advertising demand. In other words, there was a time that everybody in this television business was worried about a slackening of advertisers having the money to spend on this.
L
Les Moonves23:16
Everybody was there. Everybody was there, and everybody did extremely well. We had an extraordinary upfront that all the networks were up double digits. And it is a very heavy, healthy advertising climate. As we head into '04, '04, television, the prospects are extremely good. Number one, we have a presidential race, which for television is very exciting because there's more money spent in the marketplace.
C
Charlie Rose23:49
This may be obvious. What program on NBC would you like to steal? What program? Law & Order, more of course. Yes, because that's that franchise. Yes. Is that what? Their new season? Which one do you think you wish you had?
L
Les Moonves24:00
I probably wish I had... you know what, I'm pretty happy with the hand I have. But Las Vegas is a very good show. The one show they have at 9 o'clock on Monday night with James Caan, it's a decent show. And I wouldn't mind having that one.
C
Charlie Rose24:12
Were you offered it? Nope. Nope. Is the only thing changing about the means because you're number one? Right. You get offered the best generally? Or is that based on relationships and everything else?
L
Les Moonves24:26
No. CSI, you know, at that time, you know, Bruckheimer, you know, fortunately it came to us. It had been pitched to other places first, you know, so we were happy we were the ones that got it. What happened? Well, when I was here in '95, we weren't getting the first crack at things. Now we certainly are. There is rarely a pitch that we don't get first. Although now another factor comes in, and that's vertical integration. Right. For instance, there was a project this week that Universal was out pitching. Now we wanted it. Guess who got it? NBC. Good. So how much is that going to happen more and more?
C
Charlie Rose25:09
You have Paramount. We have part of exactly. Family. ABC has Disney as part of their family. Right. So to a certain extent, you know, you will always give your sister companies sort of a wink and a first look. But you're not going to put on a bunch of bad programs just because they're produced by you.
L
Les Moonves25:28
That's exactly right. Judging Amy is a show produced by Fox for us. Now that's not really a Fox show, right? It fits with CBS better, and they were smart enough to bring it here. And everybody's happy, everybody wins. There are certain shows that just don't fit.
C
Charlie Rose25:41
But does this mean it's much tougher for Warner Brothers today to get a buyer for its programs because each of you guys now have your own? Not everyone. First of all, they have the WB. And number two, in a way, it becomes more advantageous for them since there's all this vertical integration.
L
Les Moonves25:54
We buy from everybody. We buy from the best program suppliers. And that's the way you win. If you only buy from yourself or your sister companies, you're really limiting yourself.
C
Charlie Rose26:07
I'm going to get to a lot of things. Let me do what's happening in magazine programming. 60 Minutes, 60 Minutes II, Dateline, 20/20 are staples. That's correct. That's correct. They're staples. We're very happy we have them. Audiences are declining somewhat on them across the board. Across the board. Because there's unusually much, right? Well, there are less of them as well. Right. There are less. Dateline, I think, at one time, I think they were like four on the schedule. Yeah, there may have been one more. I still think they are extremely important. They have lost some of their audience. And part of that is because of cable. You know, you're getting news from CNN and Fox News, and there are magazines all over the place. Look, 60 Minutes and 60 Minutes II, we're happy they're still both doing extremely well. I'm sure NBC is very happy with Dateline, which still does solid, as is 20/20. Now they are staples. They're part of a network fabric.
Are we as CBS different in terms of... you see Katie Couric now doing a lot of primetime, an occasional amount of primetime specials. Right. So Meredith Vieira does something on ABC the other night. But it's all about the most sensational story. Correct. Correct. There are stories that Katie will go after, that Barbara will go after, that Diane will go after. That CBS doesn't have that kind of person, nor would it fit into 60 Minutes. Right. Would it fit into the form?
L
Les Moonves27:33
You know, I don't think 60 Minutes would have done... I know they wouldn't have done Jennifer and Ben. They wouldn't have done that interview that was a Dateline with Pat O'Brien. Right. They were cooking in the kitchen. Right. I couldn't see Mike Wallace cooking in the kitchen with Ben and J.Lo. Right. Right. So it's certainly different. There are a few gets per year that everybody runs out and hustles, and everybody gets it. For the most part, ratings winners. Some of them are, some of them are not. Some of them do better than others. Some of them are disappointing.
C
Charlie Rose28:09
Tell me what mistakes CBS made with the Jessica Lynch story when it had on the front page of the New York Times this memo. Right. Right.
L
Les Moonves28:21
The only mistake that was made is that the Lynch people, the attorneys and their representatives, were asking about all sorts of other things with a member of our news staff about movies of the week. And you know, they were promising everything including the kitchen sink, as you might say. They were saying, 'Look, we would like you to appear on a CBS news show. We have avenues into these other parts of our company which would be happy to make available to you.'
C
Charlie Rose28:45
When you saw it on the front page of the New York Times, was I embarrassed?
L
Les Moonves28:48
I wouldn't say embarrassed. I was distressed by it. I could see, you know, what it is. It's a fine line. The thing we have to deal with in network news, and I know all the morning news shows are called news shows, they're more entertainment than news. You know, after 8 o'clock, it's all entertainment. So the fine line to say, 'Gee, these are hard news shows, we should only do that.' I think the line has gotten finer and finer, and I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Once again, J.Lo had been with Pat O'Brien. It was called a Dateline. Dateline is produced by the news division. That wasn't a news story. It was access television, which is owned by NBC. And by the way, the intro is fine. I had no problem with the interview. But nobody should be criticized for stepping over the line. Yes, one of our network executives, our news executives, were a little aggressive. Right. But everybody's aggressive when it comes to them. You know, Jessica Lynch was promised a lot of things by other networks. So you know, the line is very blurry.
C
Charlie Rose29:56
Don Hewitt. Don Hewitt, a legend in our business. Totally. When you look at the pantheon of heroes in television, exactly. Don Hewitt has been a legendary producer. Absolutely. Don has agreed to do what? Don is executive producer of 60 Minutes. The season next season, the show will be produced by, executive produced by Jeff Fager. Don will still be involved with the show. How will he be involved?
L
Les Moonves30:23
He will be an executive producer emeritus. What does that mean? Executive producer emeritus. I could not do better for the news division. But you know, Don's hand will be there. He has a role in CBS News for the next nine years. After that, nine-year contract. I think it's a ten-year contract, which includes this year. He will be in that building. We expect him to be doing specials for us, still being very much an executive producer of 60 Minutes Sunday. Next year, he won't be. Well, he will be to a certain extent, but Jeff Fager will be the showrunner.
C
Charlie Rose30:56
This hard for Don to take. I'm sure it's hard.
L
Les Moonves30:58
Don is a genius. He is a legend. You said that. He's a legend. He created 60 Minutes. He devised the Nixon-Kennedy debates. You know, he truly is one of the geniuses of news programming. It's hard to give anything up. I'll tell you a story. Bill Paley had a mandatory 65-year-old retirement. Right. Bill Paley was supposed to hand over things to Frank Stanton when he was 65. The day he was supposed to do it, he went down to Frank's office and said, 'I can't do it.' It is very hard. It is very hard. He had created the company. So that's very different. But it's very hard to give it up. Absolutely. I mean, no matter how much you guys put everything on, I mean, you just sort of backed up the truck and said we wanted to show Don the respect and appreciation and not have him feel like we were pushing him out the door, which we're not.
C
Charlie Rose31:50
So where is this going to end? What do you mean? I mean, we expect Don will be happy that somehow we can work this out. I always want Don to be happy. Will he be happy? I don't know. It's going to be hard for him to give up being the guy who is running the show. And as of September of next season, it will be Jeff Fager. And by the way, Jeff is one of his disciples. Jeff Fager produced 60 Minutes II in the image of 60 Minutes. Totally. Totally. And Jeff Fager is not someone who is going to not show Don the appropriate respect. You know, he trained him. And you know, we all have a great deal of love and affection for Don. And you know, we want him around for a long, long time.
Things about human behavior. You say, 'I didn't mean to. I wish I'd stopped myself, but I did.' You know what makes him write those memos is what's made him a great producer. He's passionate and he loves it. And we respect that. As much as we would like him to go quietly at some point, you just can't worry about it anymore. That's exactly right. Exactly right. The morning television program, your morning show, is the fastest-growing morning program. Fastest-growing morning program. It is going up. It's up like 25% from a year ago. And it's doing extraordinarily well. We try to change up the form somewhat. We have four hosts, plus we have Dave Price. And it's doing great. It's lively. I think it's the best show we've put on the field in many, many years in the morning. And we're very pleased that we're becoming competitive in the morning. Why do you think that is? I mean, was it just what is it that made this, at long last, an effort that had a chance to succeed?
L
Les Moonves33:57
Well, we brought over Michael Bass, who was on The Today Show. Right. He was trained by Jeff Zucker, I guess. He was there for a while and took over when Jeff left the show. He really knows what he's doing in the morning. Plus, I think we have five extremely talented people. Is this like... does this somehow say something? Did you think of this idea because you were the guy who created ER and you knew that the whole sort of a lot of characters doing something was it that way because different people could identify with different? I thought that was part of it. But I think we created... look, there are two very good shows on the air with a man and a woman sitting at a desk. And if you try to be the third guy in as a man and a woman, you know, Andrew and I were... it was very funny when we were talking about it initially. We said, 'Look, we don't want the show to be Mad About You. We'd rather it be Cheers.' You know, there are different people. Mad About You was a romantic comedy with two people. Right. You know, which is The Today Show and GMA. We are Cheers. Well, we have a bunch of people, very entertaining, appealing to different demographic groups. And we think we're doing something very exciting.
C
Charlie Rose35:17
Letterman. Letterman seems to be very happy. He's going to be a father. Next, I'm not amazing. He's going to be a father fairly shortly. He seems to be very happy with it. I think his work is as good as it's ever been. He seems to be content. I think last time on the show, I had just gone through the... we talked about it. And he really appears to be very contented with the show. And you know, our relationship couldn't be better. When you think about... I mean, think more with me outside the box. I mean, that's... but you sit there. One thing we have here is consolidation. The best new evidence is NBC and Vivendi. Universal joins the family. That makes NBC more competitive. No, it makes it tougher. No question. In what way? Well, they now have a production company that is dedicated to supplying NBC first. They now have cable. They now have properties. Look, the Viacom cable operations have been unbelievably helpful for us. In what way? MTV would be one. It gives us so much promotional support. VH1. Nickelodeon supplies our Saturday morning programming for kids. We have BET. You know, it goes across. There's a lot of opportunities. You just signed a five-year contract with Viacom. Let's figure out what it would take for Les Moonves to leave CBS. What would be good enough to take you away from CBS?
L
Les Moonves36:33
It's a very good question. You know, I thought about it. Do you want to go to a studio, run a motion picture division? I got to tell you, I think running a network may be one of the most powerful things one can do today. But you mean powerful not because you can just sort of be powerful, but powerful because of what you can do. That's right. That's right. I get to put on programs. I get to order programs. I'm involved with news. I'm involved with sports. I'm involved with entertainment. I have the greatest job. I love what I do.
C
Charlie Rose37:12
I know we need to go through this. All right. So that's running a whole big flag. That's a good job. Yeah. Here's the deal. What would make you happy? This would... we could concoct this. Aren't you already listed in some of these surveys as the most powerful man in Hollywood? The entertainment... we can turn a wheel. The most powerful man in Hollywood. Yes. Would you want to run a movie studio? I don't know. I've been offered those things. I like what I do. I like what I do. I don't think that's particularly a better job. Do you want to be very, very, very rich? Do I want to be... by that, hundreds of millions? No. Surely not necessarily. You know, I'm very comfortable. I'm paid very well. Terry Semel, for example, is going to be even richer than he's ever been before. But Terry took a bold move to go to Yahoo. But you could have done that. You could have done what Terry Semel did. I could have. You know, maybe you had more guts than me. You know, I could have. Is there a new story here? Did it... he did it brilliantly. Now let's look at this. How are you not exercising your power in a way that could have an impact beyond just entertaining us? Are there things that you ought to be doing or could be doing that would make a difference?
L
Les Moonves38:24
With 9/11, you took the film made by those brilliant French filmmakers and put that on. Yes. And it was wonderful. Yes. It was. What else are you doing? If we're sitting here taking an account of your stewardship as a citizen, not just as a steward of Sumner's stock price. When Clinton was president, you know, I was active with his administration and worked on some of the things that he was doing. With what? Violence on television. Television. I became sort of a consultant for the Clinton administration on general matters of the media and television. And I became an advisor for them. And I felt that was important. At one point, I considered pursuing that as I went further into some sort of a political career and doing good work. One of the things you have to do as head of a network, and I take this very seriously, this job is really a public means of expressing opinions. And I think it's real important to have a fair and balanced outlook on life by presenting things that can do good, that can help the human condition. I think the best way to do that is by entertaining people, day in, day out, night after night. When you look at a show like All in the Family, that probably did more for race relations than any other show, any white paper that could have been on any other news program that went on. And I think right now, through some of the shows on television, the social can be accomplished. That's one of the things that will be part, I'm sure, of this 75th celebration.
C
Charlie Rose39:56
Carroll O'Connor has since passed away. Reiner is alive. Reiner will be there. Yeah. When CBS takes an account of the greatest shows it's had, the 75th anniversary, All in the Family, M*A*S*H, Mary Tyler Moore, great, Lucy. Think about this. This is The Honeymooners, this is The Waltons, Dukes of Hazzard. I mean, all kinds of different shows, all great, part of the culture. Part of the culture. Yeah. And when you look, there are many people who would say things like the good old days, the golden years of talent. Right. Are you prepared to argue that television today is as good or better than it was at any time in its history? Or have we, because of competition, moved towards the lowest common denominator?
L
Les Moonves41:00
You know what? When you look back at some of these great shows, and there were a number of them, you have to remember we're talking about decades and decades. You could pick out a handful of shows. And I would argue with you that if you look at the '90s and you look at the 2000s, you will find as many classic shows as you did back then. I think Everybody Loves Raymond will be a classic. I think 30 years from now, people will remember that show in the same way that Seinfeld is a classic. Yes. Seinfeld definitely was a classic. Friends is a classic. I think that will be remembered many years from now. There aren't many, but then again, looking back, there aren't that many. There are a handful. Yes. There were great shows. As I said to you before, I think in drama, there are more good shows on now than ever before.
C
Charlie Rose41:49
I'd be willing to argue the following: that what they best share is good writing. Correct. Yeah. Correct. Jerry Seinfeld, I think Jack Welch said this in his book. Jerry Seinfeld said this. And one of the... I think Jack said this on the show. They were willing to give Seinfeld, my facts may be off a little bit here, but I've got it about right, a hundred million dollars to take another year. Five million dollars an episode. Yeah. That's 100 million dollars. Jerry decoded that and he said no. And he said no because he said, 'I'm sitting here on Christmas Eve trying to write a script,' which he did. He was involved in everything. Right. Right. And he just said, 'The money doesn't make any difference anymore.' Right. Right. I am exhausted. I mean, and my point is, my point is that we forget how hard it is to be good, how hard it is to write great scripts. But there is a finite amount of... there's no question about it. You know, people have no idea, when you sit back at home, the amount of work that goes into doing a single episode of a single television show. We're forgetting The Andy Griffith Show. To my right, my brother from North Carolina. Exactly. Exactly. He's going to be there on Sunday night as well. You know, and as a matter of fact, the week after, we have an Andy Griffith Show special reunion. Will you bring them back? Where they are down there? They all got back together: Ron Howard and Don Knotts. And you know, these always do well. Don't think most of them... most of them don't know. Some don't. But most of them do. Absolutely. Absolutely. Which is nostalgia or what? Both. Both. A couple years ago, we did a Carol Burnett reunion. Right. The numbers were huge. But not only with people who were over 40 who knew the show. It was watched by 18 year olds. You know, so there was something about her and the fact that it's in syndication that brought people to television. Truly. True about Lucy. No question. No question. Seen somewhere on the face of the earth literally every moment during the day. There's no question about it. Speaking of that, American television overseas. Yes. Am I right in assuming American television overseas is not doing as well as it used to be? Or not?
L
Les Moonves43:56
It depends on the market. In certain markets, they have come up to the standards of American television, so they don't need us anymore. For instance, in France, there is now a quota on the amount of American television shows that can be on the air at any given time. That's new? That's... I would guess it's ten years old. You know, the quality of the work being done all over the world is now up to ours. You know, in Spain, in Italy, in Germany, in Australia, they have their own 60 Minutes. That's exactly right. You know, the influence in America, however, in the emerging nations in Eastern Europe and in the Far East, we're having more success now in selling our shows. So it's good. And that is because they haven't developed their own yet. Their industry is just beginning. It's really in very rudimentary stages. So they are buying more and more of our shows, because that's the best that they have and because they want to learn from it.
C
Charlie Rose44:57
The impact of cable. Yes. For years, people have said the networks are over. And every year, you guys at CBS, at NBC, and Fox, and Warner Brothers, just sort of say, 'Yeah, we're still the best game in town.' Yes. Still the only best place to get mass audiences. Where else can you get the number of people, 65 million people to watch the Super Bowl or the Academy Awards or the Survivor finale? The first year, watched by over 50 million people. Network television is still with us. More and more appointment television where everybody has their three or four favorites. You still do that appointment television. It happens a little bit. Absolutely. They're there. If you talk about Friends or Raymond or ER or CSI or The Practice, there are still people who set their clocks and say, 'I want to watch that show. I got to get home in time to watch that show.' What did you want to do in the last three or four years that you were too scared, too much at risk to pull the trigger?
L
Les Moonves46:08
I don't think anything. Otherwise, you said yes to Survivor even though it was a huge risk. You weren't convinced it would be good. But Burnett, or whatever his name is, Mark Burnett. Mark Burnett. Yeah. He's a hell of a salesman. Yes. Yes. You know, you did amazing. I can't think of any show that qualitatively I really wanted to do but for any reason that I was afraid of doing. There's really nothing I could think of.
C
Charlie Rose46:38
I would assume this is also true about you. You are more sure, even though you never can be sure, with experience and being there in the seat, you are more confident in your instincts.
L
Les Moonves46:44
No question about it. No question. The most important thing is, when you try things and they fail, you learn from it. You examine, because you have your heart and soul in every show, you examine why didn't that show work? Was it the wrong time period? Did I move it too much? Did I do the wrong kind of promotion? And you learn every week from that. And I think your batting average improves if you're smart as the years go on.
C
Charlie Rose47:10
Jack Welch has been here. I have mentioned him several times here on my show, and Jeff Immelt as well. They own NBC, and now they own Universal. And what used to be the USA Network. And they talked about the possibility, as has ABC, as has CBS, of buying CNN. Yes. Is that going to happen? You think CNN will ever be sold by Time Warner to one of the networks?
L
Les Moonves47:44
I think one day it very possibly could join with one of the existing networks. I don't think it'll be NBC, obviously, because they already have cable news. Fox. I mean, we explored it very carefully, as has ABC. Right. I know. Right now, logistically, it just didn't make sense. Why does it make sense? The valuation of CNN is a huge number for Time Warner. Right. The valuation of CBS News is very hard to get out of the hole because it's part of a bigger network structure. There was no way to make that deal work in terms of what they felt their CNN was worth in terms of combining it with us. And do you know what? I think a merger was not a great idea. I think one day they're going to agree to sell it to somebody. I think that's the only way it can be done.
C
Charlie Rose48:41
Beyond valuation, I mean, there was an issue also of how can you work this thing out in terms of personnel and all that?
L
Les Moonves48:49
No question about it. There's no question about that. That comes into play: which management is running it, where do promos come, how do you divide the money, how do you set up bureaus in different places, how do you combine it? There are a thousand logistical problems, which is why a merger of that kind is nearly impossible, and a purchase could work.
C
Charlie Rose49:11
It's amazing when you think about Bill Paley going into cable. He wanted to go into cable, and what it would have meant. His instinct was to go there. Absolutely. And then they lost it. It didn't work as well as it might have been, and they didn't have the staying power to do it. That's correct. CBS News, where I work proudly. Dan Rather. If you know and talk to Dan, he's going strong. He would be in Baghdad tonight if there was a piece. In California, as we speak, covering the fires. Right. There you go. Madison on this. On the other hand, CBS News Evening News has been third. Yes. Tom Brokaw is leaving the anchor desk. We think. We think it's a long way between now and stepping down. That's right. Right. And we know the dawn, he would central, don't we? It's a hard chair to give up. It is. No question. And especially if you love it as much as Dan does. And yet, give it up. Yes. You know, you guys are not leaning on him to give it up. Not at all. Not at all. Because he's good. Yes. And you believe what about the fact that CBS can be number one in entertainment? What is not well operated? Evening news. That's correct. Look, it's not the top-rated evening news show. We still think it's going strong. We still think evening news is a good place to be. We still think Dan is the best guy in the business. We think he's the best guy. We haven't changed. Unless you got some other person or reason to change. Well, why did the Brokaw announcement come? Because of Brian Williams. Right. You know, Brian wanted that job and certainly deserves that job and served well. Rather got his job by the way in the first place. Well, that's correct. You know, that's what happens when there is other opportunity for people out there. And it sort of forced NBC to make an announcement about Williams and Brokaw. Would you have gone after Williams? Williams is very qualified. You know, he's a very good guy. He's a very confident professional. Yeah. Oh, you went after him for the morning show, didn't you? We talked to everybody, Charlie. You wouldn't believe the people we've spoken to. You've got to have a lot of doors. Look at Katie Couric. We tried to get her for 60 Minutes. We talked. Tried to get her for 60 Minutes. We've driven the truck over there. And I'm happy that we did. Another truck over from General Electric. But Don was talking to her at length. You know, and it would have been great to have her over here. But it is important to develop people in the pipeline. No question about it. In 60 Minutes, yes. And in evening news, in 60 Minutes, there's no question. I think CBS has developed a great group of younger correspondents. A lot of them came out in the war. They did some excellent work. I think all the networks did. And out of that spring the next generation. I mean, that's where Dan Rather was. He was a reporter out in the field. And he got noted, made his mark during the assassinations, hurricanes. And there you go. There he was. News. Walter Cronkite could have something to do with his 75th. Absolutely. He's going to say what? You will see Walter there. You'll see a matter of presenter. You know, it's going to be great. They're going to be terrific. Yeah. I think I make this argument to friends all the time, and I really do believe it's not because I'm involved in the process of television and love it. And you know, why wouldn't you love it? You get up every morning and you think about what's going on in the world. And I create things that people will see. And I mean, what a great way. Unbelievably exciting. You know, you know, you whatever, what is entertainment or examine the documentaries or whatever. I also would argue, and I'm talking too much here, I would argue that there has never been such a wonderful range of options. You know, I mean, just think of all the great documentaries you can now see. Absolutely. You can see BBC America. You can see... you know, anybody that says because of vertical integration, that's been one of the criticisms here, you know, you're not getting enough creative choices out there, is nuts. Anybody that can't go home and find something in that 100 or 200 channel universe that they have, I think the range of choices is phenomenal. It's great. Congratulations. That's CBS on your own leadership there. And also on a great network celebrating 75 years of being part of the American culture.
L
Les Moonves53:41
Thank you, Charlie.
C
Charlie Rose53:47
Let's move this for the hour. Thank you for joining us. We'll see you next time.