Chris Hughes, Economic Security Project co-chair, Facebook co-founder and ‘Marketcrafters’ author, joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the fallout from President Trump's attempted firing of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, the dangers of the Trump administration's attacks on the Fed, who's responsible for AI content, and more.
Questions asked in this interview
3
2:01If in fact Lisa Cook did something that was illegal or even immoral, does she have an obligation to step down on her own?
3:41And if she does, do you think this will go away or not?
4:52Are the owners of that machine responsible for the content?
Our next guest sounding the alarm. This is now months ago on the dangers of the Trump administration attacks on the Fed. Joining us right now is Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes. He is co-chair of the Economic Security Project and author of the book Market Crafters. It was published in April, which covers how the Fed has shaped markets over the last century. His April New York Times op-ed warned that the president's attack on the central bank undermined Fed independence. And we want to get into all of it. Crystal, I want to start with this. You know, I think when I last saw you and I read the book and was reading these op-eds, there was a feeling that if the independence of the Fed was genuinely challenged that the markets would react, that the bond market would react, perhaps the equity market would react, that that would be the governor to some extent on any challenge to the Fed's independence. And yet, for whatever reason, and this is I'm curious what you think the reason is, we have not seen that.
That was the hope. But I think it's true that the markets reflect the conventional wisdom. And right now, I think the conventional wisdom is that Trump's team is a lot of talk and not a lot of substance first off. And then secondly, it seems pretty clear that this firing is illegal. And I think markets expect that there'll be a preliminary injunction at the district court level and that the Supreme Court will hold it up. And perhaps there's even one more reason for market optimism which I don't necessarily share, but that's that the idea that the administration is recognizing that they can only fire a governor for cause. I mean, back in April, we were all worried that they could just fire governors just like they'd done at the FTC and elsewhere. Now, I think that the reality is that this is the most aggressive assault on Fed independence that we have ever seen. I'm a historian of the institution and there's been all kinds of jawboning, all kinds of threats, even leaks from the president to smear the chair. This is in a totally different league and I think that we should all be significantly more concerned than the market seemed to be.
Chris, here's the question though. If in fact Lisa Cook did something that was illegal or even immoral, does she have an obligation to step down on her own? Putting aside whatever you think the president is doing, couldn't we hold both ideas in our head, which is to say, you could argue that this is a weaponization and a challenge against the independence of the Fed in terms of how this is being orchestrated. At the same time, there have been members of the Fed board that have stepped down for doing things that may not have even been illegal, but raised questions and eyebrows. And for the credibility of the Fed, there was an argument to be made that they needed to step away.
Not for a paperwork error that was made 5 years ago that has nothing to do with how she's executed her time on the job. Listen, we know exactly what happened here. The president made threats for the chair. They didn't really work. So then he asked folks in his administration to go find some dirt on governors. They found a paperwork error which seems important and something that needs to be rectified. However, it does not go in any way to Lisa Cook's ability to be a governor of the Federal Reserve and to execute her responsibilities effectively. You got to tell me that people like Scott Besson, Howard Lutnik, these are very wealthy folks who have reams of complicated tax returns and mortgages, these guys have never made any error in any of that paperwork ever. This is an attempt to find some dirt and then to aggressively prosecute a case. And Lisa Cook should say, 'No, this is not for cause and I won't step down.'
A paperwork error, if that's what it is, is different from intentionally misleading something, though. I mean, I guess if that is indeed what happened, do you think she'll come out and publicly clarify that before too long? And if she does, do you think this will go away or not?
She should. I mean, for this to actually be mortgage fraud which is the term that the administration is using, you have to have the intent to defraud and I suppose it's theoretically possible that that's true but it seems very unlikely. I've talked to a lot of folks in Democratic and some Republican administrations who have made similar errors. You know, even marking a residence as a principal residence, moving to DC to work, renting it out, and not changing the designation on the form. So, the idea that she was trying to falsify documentation seems to me to be fabricated, and it's part of this pattern of finding these errors in order to prosecute a case that is really quite thin. And I think the courts will see that.
Hughes, C. (2025, August 28). This is the most aggressive assault on Fed independence that we've ever seen, says Chris Hughes [Interview transcript]. CNBC Television. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/626632/
MLA
Chris Hughes. "This is the most aggressive assault on Fed independence that we've ever seen, says Chris Hughes." CNBC Television, 28 Aug. 2025. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/626632/.
BibTeX
@misc{hughes2025_626632,
author = {Chris Hughes},
title = {This is the most aggressive assault on Fed independence that we've ever seen, says Chris Hughes},
howpublished = {Interview transcript, CNBC Television. CEOInterviews.AI},
year = {2025},
month = {aug},
url = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/626632/},
note = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}
