CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Garry Tan
CEO, YCombinator

Session IV | Pirate Wires Keynote with Garry Tan

📅 Feb 21, 2025 Foundation for American Innovation 41 MIN 40 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
REBOOT 2024: Pirate Wires Keynote with Garry Tan Panelists: Garry Tan, President and CEO of Y Combinator Moderator: Mike ...

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 0:08Should we just... are we good to go?
  2. 0:16I'm sorry, what was the... the President?
  3. 1:21And how has the move affected the new batch?
  4. 11:25I mean, do you have any behind-the-scenes political whisperings you can share with us?
  5. 12:11What are the signs for Boom Loop optimism?
  6. 17:05What are the signs of hope for the Boom Loop?
  7. 19:26And how are they thinking about it? Are they getting more engaged?
  8. 22:48Which mayor do you think is going to win?
  9. 26:41So are you encouraging young founders to do more of this immediately, sort of going direct immediately?
  10. 28:36First, can you just kind of define the two camps for me?
  11. 36:44Is that roughly just like, the competition is the good there?
  12. 39:25Is there anything beyond AI, if anything, are you excited about right now?
Mike Solana 0:08 ↗
Hello, not much energy out there. Cool. Should we just... are we good to go? I guess we're starting.
I am Mike Solana. We got Garry Tan over here. It's my great honor to be interviewing you today, the CEO of Y Combinator... wait, CEO? I'm sorry, what was the... the President? President and CEO of Y Combinator. He is the dictator of Y Combinator. He's the strongman of Y Combinator. So I have a lot of questions for you, sir. Garry, I feel like the last four years, since 2020, the evolution of you in public and in San Francisco has been just inspiring and exciting for me personally, someone who cares about the city and the technology industry and really the kind of connection between the two, which is I think in large part what I want to talk about with you today. And I just want to start with there was a media story that I believe was wrong, which was that you were forcing everyone in the new Y Combinator batch to move to San Francisco. My sense of it, and correct me if I'm wrong, was that actually you were just recommending that strongly.
Garry Tan 1:13 ↗
Yeah, a strong recommendation. Yes, forcing is a bit strong. Like, do we force anyone to do anything in America anymore?
Mike Solana 1:21 ↗
Yeah, exactly. Certainly not in San Francisco. I guess a bunch of questions on this one because it's been a bit since this new... not forcing of people into the city. I want to know, is your sense still that San Francisco is the capital of tech? And how has the move affected the new batch?
Garry Tan 1:49 ↗
Yeah, I mean, San Francisco right now is sort of brimming with the kind of crazy energy that I can only imagine what that felt like during the personal computer revolution down in the South Bay with the Homebrew Computer Club. What's happening is that the rocks can talk, literally. We have taught silicon language, and large language models were trained by engineers right here in San Francisco at OpenAI and Anthropic, are now sort of empowering a whole new generation of startups that are actually not just making these toy dinky demos that you see on X, but things that are actually creating new jobs, new revenue. So something weird happened even in the past couple years at YC. The typical company increased their revenue in a matter of 10 weeks by 5x. So in aggregate, all the YC... we fund about 270 companies every six months, so going on 600 a year, and in aggregate they went from sort of just under five or six million dollars a year in revenue across all those companies to more than $30 million in a matter of 10 weeks. And that has never happened before. It's the best indicator that people are actually making real software that actually solves people's problems, and those people love those problems being solved so much they're paying a lot of money very quickly.
Mike Solana 3:31 ↗
So I mean, this is mostly in the realm of, it sounds like, artificial intelligence is obviously the originator of this entire new boom. I'm thinking now about the recent legislation surrounding artificial intelligence forwarded by Scott Wiener. And I think before we get to that, I just wanted... I want to go back to the extraction narrative. So four years ago, the city is locked down, the industry is leaving, the crime is really bad, the drugs are really bad, now you have these viral... the virus sort of mandates. There was a meme that went around that the tech industry was extracting all of the wealth from the city. And at the time I criticized it, I thought that was crazy. I wrote a piece about it, but I also criticized tech and I said, you know, we should have gotten much more involved. That was the real problem. It was not that we broke the city, it was that we never actually took control of the city in the first place. You've done a lot of work correcting that over the last four years. And I guess just at this point I'm wondering where you see it in terms of your progress that you've made, just like local politics progress, and then we will talk about Scott Wiener in a second.
Garry Tan 4:45 ↗
Yeah, I mean, let's see. I did not consider myself really that much of a political animal at all until really when COVID happened. I started seeing basically elders in my community being stabbed, robbed, pushed down. Vicha Ratanapakdee was a Thai man in his 70s who was killed on the streets of San Francisco. And I saw the reaction from the DA at the time, this man named Chesa Boudin. You know, son of... did someone just make a fart noise? I thought I heard that. I mean, this is someone who literally said, you know what, that was a temper tantrum, I want to let this person out. I mean, in so many words, like he did not take crime against our community seriously. And I looked at the numbers. San Francisco is 30% Asian-American, the voter base is 20 to 25% Asian-American, and yet how could we have an elected official really say openly that, you know what, I don't really... I don't care. Like, it's like that Kanye West moment where it's like, so-and-so didn't care about black people. It was like, how can we have an elected official, the person who's supposed to be the top cop of San Francisco, basically come out and say it's open season on Asian-American elders? And I got angry. I just couldn't believe that this was the deal. And actually, I think we were on a Clubhouse with him, and he was an incredible... I had been drinking, this was like... I was in Miami at the time, I was just vibing. It was the Clubhouse heyday, nothing had been serious at that point, all the conversations were very casual. And I was just doing a primer on local politics, just how it worked, who was your supervisor, which the average person in SF that I talked to did not know. And Chesa Boudin just showed up, and I was like, oh no, I have to take this seriously now. But he did log off the second Balaji came on, which is hilarious, of course. I'm not doing this. So there are levels to this game, I guess.
Mike Solana 6:53 ↗
Well, you got involved. And you did a lot. I mean, you galvanized... you not only did you galvanize tech, but you put money into this. You are a big supporter of GrowSF. On the extraction, the thing that... so the reason I'm linking it back to extraction is because obviously wealth is not extracted from San Francisco if we leave. And the wealth wasn't here, we weren't mining tech people, they didn't come here and mine it. Like, they weren't mining microcode or something like gold, right? They weren't striking oil. They themselves were the value. They brought people from all over the country, brought the value to the region and created the value. 50% immigrants, honestly. People from around... we are literally brain draining the smartest people from all the way around the world, and then they come here and they create, you know, billions or tens of billions, sometimes hundreds of billions of dollars worth of GDP, and they create thousands of jobs. So that doesn't sound like extraction to me. I'm pretty sure it's not, right? It's creation. And it was being driven away by policy. Now, Scott Wiener was sort of seen as one of the moderates. He was supported by all of the YIMBY people. He's obviously supported by Dustin Moskovitz and I think Open Philanthropy. I don't actually... you know what, this is... I shouldn't say I don't know that part for sure. But his AI regulation feels a bit like he thinks San Francisco has some kind of claim over it, whereas I don't necessarily think that's true. I think people are here working on it and could easily leave. What do you make of Scott's AI regulation? Do you think that there is a risk that the sort of exciting moment that we were just talking about could end? And then what do you make of Scott specifically?
Garry Tan 8:37 ↗
I think the wild thing is there is sort of a meme out there around AI safety that there are probably some real risks. I mean, everyone sort of walks around and says, you know, what's your P(doom)? And then the tricky thing, I think what Scott Wiener figured out was that this topic in particular is a little bit the Jets versus the Sharks. I think he came out and actually said this, that it's the Jets versus the Sharks, and in this case, he didn't realize that and he sort of ran out and started supporting the Jets real fast. So I don't know if he would have done the same thing, I can't speak for him, but I think he did realize there's a lot more nuance to the debate than not. Personally, I think it's really important for us to maintain the ability of open markets, of open source, of people actually being able to get lots of choice about large language models. You know, maybe there was a moment, maybe two years ago, that we were sort of worried that it was possible that a big tech situation could spring up again with access to the world's best models, and that might have been ensconced by really, really overzealous AI regulation that would basically be like the thing that we see in America over and over again: a new industry pops up and then sooner or later there's regulatory capture. And that was a real thing that we were pretty worried about back then. We're thankfully less worried simply because there is open source. We fund thousands of companies who actually need access and they need choices. And so in the broader debate, being able to maintain access to great LLMs is sort of the same thing as being able to access APIs, being able to... the whole innovation economy is sort of enabled by open standards and open source. And that's really the big danger, I think, when you have regulation, especially at a local level. Like, I actually think that the Biden EO, you know, it was not that bad, and actually maybe that was the correct level at which this type of regulation should happen. And the number one thing that I'm really worried about is, you know, this is a powerful technology. It's like they invented cars. These are bicycles for the mind. These are self-driving cars for the mind. And you know, do we prosecute the people who create cars? That would really sort of hamper society, actually. No, we regulate and we're very careful about what people use cars for, and we hold the people who misuse cars responsible. And that's really what I hope happens with this whole topic.
Mike Solana 11:25 ↗
So the new bill that's... I mean, it just passed, it's about to be signed or not, rejected by Newsom, we'll see. It does seem to be targeting open source a little. I mean, it feels good for companies like OpenAI and bad for an upstart trying to compete with OpenAI. I mean, do you have any behind-the-scenes political whisperings you can share with us? Like, what is... I mean, I hope Newsom... I hope Newsom doesn't sign it. I hope he vetoes it. I have no inside knowledge beyond that, but you know, I genuinely hope he does because if we want California to continue to be this magnet for the best talent in the world, we don't pass things like this.
Garry Tan 12:00 ↗
I hope Newsom doesn't sign it. I hope he vetoes it. I have no inside knowledge beyond that, but you know, I genuinely hope he does because if we want California to continue to be this magnet for the best talent in the world, we don't pass things like this.
Mike Solana 12:11 ↗
I want to talk a little bit about the Doom Loop versus the Boom Loop. So you guys do, you specifically, and I think you're just sort of the Y Combinator gang online, there's a lot of meming, a lot of Boom Loop meming, a lot of founder mode, founder mode. I like the meme that you guys do. Anyway, we'll talk... I'm not going to get into founder mode, but it's a great meme. I want to... so is San Francisco dying? Is it thriving? Are the brighter days ahead of us? Obviously you and I both have criticized the city governance a lot, but I think both have clearly... I mean, you grew up here and certainly me, I have a lot of love for the city. Downtown seems worse than it was four years ago, right? It's like totally gutted. Other than AI, which now possibly there's legislation putting it at risk, things feel a little bit diminished here. What are the signs for Boom Loop optimism? And then I want to talk about the power of the memes and why you do what you do with them.
Garry Tan 13:13 ↗
Yeah, of course. I'm pretty bullish. It was in a bad state, I think, three or four years ago. San Francisco has a $14 billion budget. Every other day, even right now, we're starting to see that there's sort of an outsource of state capacity. And then unfortunately, if you trace the money, that money goes to nonprofits that are spending money not to actually serve the people but to enrich themselves, and you know, sometimes used for political purposes to ensconce... I mean, it is its own form of capture. If you look at every major issue in San Francisco or most parts of California, you'll see the same thing, actually. Why can't we build? For instance, it's because we prevent people from building, even things that have 30 or 50% affordable housing, because the people who try to build the housing have to pay off the nonprofits like Todco. And if we were looking at this, if this were a New York Times article about a third-world country, you wouldn't be surprised. But we should be surprised. We should expect more. This is a grift. This should be illegal. I do not understand why this is possible that you can have a sitting supervisor in the city say, oh, this is a real project. There was a developer trying to make 30% affordable housing on a Nordstrom parking lot, and a sitting supervisor said, oh, I don't know why we're even here talking about this. You know what they needed to do was go talk to John Elberling at Todco and pay him off or work out a deal, and then this thing would be built. And I'm like, that's corruption. That should not be legal. And so when you wonder, like, why is rent so high, why are there all these problems in the city, if you dig a little bit, it's a lack of state capacity, and it is... we tolerate... it feels like we spend so much... it's incredible how much time we spend thinking about the big national issue, and then we totally neglect what's going on in our very backyard. And these are elections that are won or lost by dozens of votes, maybe a hundred votes. And they go on to... Apology actually has a great line about this where they're talking about billionaires, but there are 11 supervisors, each of whom, if you divide the $14 billion budget out, they're responsible for way more than a billion dollars in government spend. And it goes to their cronies, their nonprofit friends. The nonprofits take their workers and go work on their campaigns. Like, it is an entire loop. And that is, in a nutshell, I think, the Doom Loop. We are literally ensconced in this moment where the government funds are actually being spent on things that do not serve the people, that only ensconce the existing politicians in there. And then if we're not paying attention, then it just continues, it gets worse and worse, the budget keeps going up, we keep passing more and more taxes. I'm the... on the political scale, I'm actually fine with the taxes. What I'm not okay with is for us to spend billions of dollars to not serve the people.
Mike Solana 16:37 ↗
So it was like that four years ago, maybe a little bit worse because folks like Chesa were still in power. But you did have the Chesa recall, you did have the Board of Education recall, there were some victories in a regular November election on the sort of moderate side for the supervisors. And I mean, things still seem... you just said that's the Doom Loop, right? Like, the Doom Loop does still seem to sort of exist.
Garry Tan 17:01 ↗
Oh yeah, they're still in power. Sorry, guys.
Mike Solana 17:05 ↗
So what are the signs for optimism? How do we get to... I mean, you guys haven't seen it, but Garry produces these like crazy AI-generated beautiful future San Francisco vistas with like Boom Loop on there, self-driving car, and like the Golden Gate Bridge in the background, and it's like very happy. And I think honestly the kind of imagery we need. But what do we need to get there? How are we going to get there? What are the signs of hope for the Boom Loop?
Garry Tan 17:32 ↗
I mean, the hope at the end of the day, I think, is still technology. It's founders, it's people working in tech. I'm hopeful and thankful for people to continue to come to San Francisco despite all the problems. And the reason why people do it is the money's here, the talent is here. And I mean, okay, let me talk about YC for just a moment. The reason why I push people to be in San Francisco, and we all want it to happen, is because literally the rate of unicorns is twice as much if you base your company in San Francisco or the Bay Area. It literally is the high-order bit. It is the one thing that will double your odds of being a successful billion-dollar company. And this is just basic agglomeration effects. If you have all the people... most people from the rest of the... we have to appreciate this about San Francisco: if you come here and you earnestly want to solve a problem using technology, you're in a cafe, half of the people, three-quarters of the other people in that cafe are going to be like, that's awesome, in fact, I want to help you. And if you go to any other cafe in almost any other part of the world, they're going to be like, oh, sorry, you don't have a real job, do you? And they'll back away slowly. And that is incredibly special. This is something that has been happening in the Bay Area for decades. And then now because of the AI boom, the LLMs were literally birthed right here in San Francisco. All the 20-somethings, all the super cracked engineers, they want to be here because they know the high-order bit is here. And so that is the origin of the Boom Loop. We are going to create dozens, if not a hundred, companies worth billions of dollars, and they're going to fill all the office towers, they're going to fill all the apartments. But we have to build enough of them.
Mike Solana 19:26 ↗
It's clearly... that's all exciting, but that's clearly not enough to save the city, right? We lived through a massive boom on the company side and it all kind of came crashing down in 2020 because tech was not involved. What I'm wondering is, do you see more people in tech in the new YC batches involved in local politics? And how are they thinking about it? Are they getting more engaged? Because 14 years ago, no engagement. And I hope it's changing. I'm wondering if you see signs of that.
Garry Tan 19:57 ↗
It's definitely there. There are lots of people who absolutely love San Francisco and we're working together to try and fight for this. I mean, Chris Larson, Mike Morris, there's so many people who... they already earned... like, what's funny is the founders actually are a little bit premature. They come to me and they say, like, well, I'm here, what can I do? And I'm like, A, you should vote, B, you should join GrowSF or TogetherSF or Stop Crime SF. Like, go find people, just go spend your time. I mean, in AI and in civic engagement, attention is all you need. And so I actually think that that's a really important part. All we have to do is, at dinner, when something happens, talk about it. And then don't go skin deep. Don't take what the Chronicle has to say. Dig a little bit deeper. And if you work through these local political groups, you're going to meet literally the person who works in the city who will tell you, oh, that's corrupt and rotten out because of this. And then when you find out, put it out there, tweet it, make an X post. I will repost you. Like, you know, earlier we were talking with Francis Fukuyama about this idea of how media is shifting. And what I realized is that's actually what individuals are like. All the institutions are a little bit ruined, and all of the trust has now been atomized down to the level of the individual. That's why it's Substack or it's your individual writers. There's new voices and new... like, Pirate Wires is a great example of there's new atomization. And that's what it takes, actually. Attention is all you need. And if we do not pay attention, if we don't actually talk about what's really going on, there's no one else who's going to do it. And then we're just going to read this dumb voter card, and we're going to read the Pissed Off Voter Guide, run by the people who have run the city into the ground. Exactly. And that's sort of how we got here. It's like low-information voters not caring about the local individual issues. And the good news is it doesn't take a lot. Just pay attention. You don't have to be as mad as I am. You can just, when November comes around, let's read the GrowSF guide. And if you're in these groups, like if you're in the United Democratic Club, it's a fantastic Democratic Club that anyone who lives in San Francisco can join. And if you go to those events, you will understand what is actually going on in the city. And your vote and your work in those organizations, it moves hundreds if not thousands of votes. I think this November we are actually pretty much on deck to retake the Board of Supervisors and have a moderate mayor in the city, and that has not happened in many, many years.
Mike Solana 22:48 ↗
Which mayor do you think is going to win? They're all... it's like the Game of Thrones. There are like 15 different moderate Democratic mayors who are running. I mean, there's Farrell, there's Breed, there's Lurie.

20 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Tan, G. (2025, February 21). Session IV | Pirate Wires Keynote with Garry Tan [Interview transcript]. Foundation for American Innovation. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/662709/

MLA

Garry Tan. "Session IV | Pirate Wires Keynote with Garry Tan." Foundation for American Innovation, 21 Feb. 2025. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/662709/.

BibTeX
@misc{tan2025_662709,
  author       = {Garry Tan},
  title        = {Session IV | Pirate Wires Keynote with Garry Tan},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Foundation for American Innovation. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2025},
  month        = {feb},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/662709/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}