Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Austan Goolsbee says he’s still hopeful that policymakers can resume interest-rate cuts by the end of the year. He spoke with Bloomberg's Michael McKee about February's jobs data.
--------
Watch Bloomberg Radio LIVE on YouTube
Weekdays 7am-6pm ET
WATCH HERE: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF
Follow us on X: / bloombergradio
Subscribe to our Podcasts:
Bloomberg Daybreak: http://bit.ly/3DWYoAN
Bloomberg Surveillance: http://bit.ly/3OPtReI
Bloomberg Intelligence: http://bit.ly/3YrBfOi
Balance of Power: http://bit.ly/3OO8eLC
B...
Questions asked in this interview
3
2:59Do you think you would have enough data by April to even make a decision one way or another?
3:54Are you still thinking of that PCE inflation as a residual tariff as opposed to an underlying fundamental problem with inflation?
5:44Are you concerned that this could tip us into the stagflation environment?
As you know, and I appreciate you asked it that way. I'm not allowed to speak for the committee or for anybody else, just myself. I've been saying for some months that we've had relative steadiness in the job market. In my view, the strongest thing in the economy is not a data center investment. It has been consumer spending being solid in a kind of a broad-based way in the economy. But the inflation hasn't been ideal. It's at least stalled out at kind of 3%. And some of the latest measures, the inflation disturbingly high in non-tariff categories like services. I think we're still basically in that same spot. I remain hopeful slash expecting that conditions will improve, that we'll start to see some progress on inflation, get us back to 2% and by the end of this year that we would be in a situation that we could commence our march back down to something like the settling point, which is below where we are today. But each time we add an uncertainty, I think the job market characterized by low hiring simultaneously with low layoffs is a weird combination. And when I talk to business people out in the Midwest, they characterize it as because of the uncertainty. So as we get more uncertainties, I kind of think the time at which it makes sense to act keeps getting pushed back. I always say the first rule of the data dogs is to recognize there's a time for sniffing and there's a time for walking. And when there's uncertainty and you're getting conflicting data points, that's the time for sniffing.
Well, I'm sure everyone out there is very glad to hear you bring back the data dogs. It's been a while since we've heard that. Speaking of data dogs, one dog that is barking very loudly right now is oil prices. But the Fed tends to look through that.
Yes. I mean, as with any supply-side shock, it can lead you into stagflation area direction, which is to say the inflation side of the mandate getting worse. At the same time, the employment side of the mandate is getting worse. And that's always the worst-case scenario for the central bank because there's not an obvious monetary policy answer to a stagflation or a shock. Oil prices going up. We need to think about is this a transitory thing that's going to be temporary? Is this going to be long-lived? How big will it be? How long will it last? And how is it affecting the supply chain before we can really say anything about it?
I would assume that you would assume that March is not going to see, March 18th, is not going to see any kind of rate move because there's still too much uncertainty. Do you think you would have enough data by April to even make a decision one way or another?
You know that I don't like... and you would assume that? I assume I don't know what would a data... Yeah. You know, I don't like tying our hands ahead of the meetings. I want to hear what my colleagues have to say. I want to get as much information as possible, especially at moments like this where we're getting conflicting pieces of information. But you've been there. It's the biggest table that I've ever seen in my life in that FOMC room. So there's plenty of room for everything to be on the table at every meeting. So I'm not going to rule anything out.
6 more exchanges in this transcript
Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.
Goolsbee, A. (2026, March 6). Fed’s Goolsbee Says He’s Hopeful Cuts Can Resume By End of 2026 [Interview transcript]. Bloomberg Podcasts. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/748076/
MLA
Austan Goolsbee. "Fed’s Goolsbee Says He’s Hopeful Cuts Can Resume By End of 2026." Bloomberg Podcasts, 6 Mar. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/748076/.
BibTeX
@misc{goolsbee2026_748076,
author = {Austan Goolsbee},
title = {Fed’s Goolsbee Says He’s Hopeful Cuts Can Resume By End of 2026},
howpublished = {Interview transcript, Bloomberg Podcasts. CEOInterviews.AI},
year = {2026},
month = {mar},
url = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/748076/},
note = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}