Back
Clement Delangue
Cofounder and CEO, Huggingface

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue on what Nvidia's open-source power grab really means — 3/19/26

🎥 Mar 19, 2026 📺 CNBC Television ⏱ 29m 👁 2906 views
Jensen Huang just used GTC to reposition Nvidia from a chip company to an open-source AI platform. NemoClaw, open frontier models, Nemotron —he's doing more for open-source AI than any CEO in America. It sounds generous, but it's strategic. Nvidia gives away the software and monetizes what it runs on. Zuckerberg spent years and billions trying to escape his dependence on Apple and Google's platforms. Huang is making sure Nvidia never ends up in that position. Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue joins live. Hugging Face hosts over 3 million models and is the platform where most of the open-sourc...
Watch on YouTube

About Clement Delangue

Clement Delangue, cofounder and CEO of Hugging Face, made a series of media appearances in mid-2026 discussing open-source AI, regulation, and robotics. On the Equity Podcast, Delangue said he has repeatedly observed companies starting with proprietary frontier APIs and later switching to open-source models for cost reasons. He described the potential risk of a few companies controlling AI, stating that keeping models behind closed doors creates an "asymmetry of power" and argued that the world can be made safer by "leveling up the playing field" through open-source competition. Commenting on government scrutiny of Anthropic's Mythos model, Delangue said that being labeled "too dangerous" can serve as effective marketing for frontier AI firms and noted that it is "fair for the US government to at least try to get more transparency." He cautioned against spreading regulatory constraints to smaller entities such as startups and academia, which lack the resources of large AI companies. Delangue also promoted open-source approaches in robotics, citing Hugging Face's release of a small robot called "Rich Cimini" and stating that transparency and control over robots that interact with people require open-source development.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Clement Delangue's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (41 segments)
D
Deirdre Bosa1:39
Hey everyone, it's Thursday, March 19th. Welcome to another CNBC live stream. I'm Deirdre Bosa. Well, GTC just wrapped and everyone is talking about new chips, Vera Rubin, the Grok integration, usual GPU horsepower. But I think the most important thing Jensen Huang did this week actually had nothing to do with silicon. He launched Nemotron Claw, jumping on that open claw frenzy bandwagon. It's a free open source platform for AI agents. That tells you where Jensen Huang is looking next. Now that well-used Gretzky saying applies here. Skate to where the puck is going, not where it's been. So while every other CEO in semis is focused on building a better chip, Jensen Huang, he's also looking to the next layer. Of course, he's building the next great chip as well. He's looking to an operating system for agents. Let me explain. Nvidia dominated the training era of AI through lock-in. Its software ecosystem made it nearly impossible to switch to a competitor. That's CUDA. But the industry, it's now moving from training models to running them. And when you're running models, that lock-in, it doesn't hold the same way. Google is building its own chips. Amazon building its own chips. Broadcom is designing custom silicon for the hyperscalers. So that moat that made Nvidia the most valuable company in the world, that is getting thinner. So what does Jensen Huang do? Well, he builds a new moat at the platform level. Nemotron Claw, it's free and it runs on competitors' chips too. That sounds like a crazy reversal for a company that became dominant thanks to that lock-in until you think about past technology shifts. Google, right? It gave away Android because the product wasn't actually the operating system. It was search. Same idea here. Jensen's product isn't Nemotron Claw, the compute and GPUs underneath it. Now, there's another layer to this. If Nemotron Claw becomes how companies actually deploy their AI agents, it commoditizes everyone above it. So, makes it harder for OpenAI or Anthropic to get big enough to squeeze Nvidia on pricing or build their own chips. Now, Jensen isn't just building a platform here. He's making sure that no single customer ever gets powerful enough to walk away or even just get the upper hand. So, that's what we're going to dig into today. I have the perfect guest for this conversation, Clement Delangue, CEO of Hugging Face, which is essentially the home of open source, where developers go to find, download, share AI models. Clem, welcome. It's great to be chatting with you again today. And congratulations. You're coming off paternity leave with not one but two babies. You had baby girls, twins.
C
Clement Delangue4:03
Oh, thank you. That's so nice. I mean, my wife has to be congratulated. She did all the work. I was just here to support. But yeah, as you said, super exciting week, super exciting announcements at GTC. As you said, I think Nvidia recognized that they need everyone to be able to build AI, not just a few players. And so that's why they're supporting open source AI so much. That's why they became, in my opinion, the American king of open source AI. And that makes it super exciting to see what they're going to do next.
D
Deirdre Bosa4:41
I really love that framing. I know you tweeted that, too, and I retweeted you. You're officially calling it. Nvidia is the new American king of open source. Who's he dethroning? Would that be Mark Zuckerberg, Meta?
C
Clement Delangue4:56
Well, I mean, they're dethroning, and they're competing first with Chinese players, right? Because the reality is that so far the ones dominating open source AI are Chinese companies. We released a few days ago a state of open source AI that shows that for the first time in 2025 the volume of downloads of open source models from Chinese providers was higher than from American providers. Right? Even in the US now the majority of open source model downloads in the US are from Chinese providers. And so I think what Nvidia is doing, which is really great, is kind of like creating an American competitor to that and providing American models to Americans but also to the world.
D
Deirdre Bosa5:54
So back up a second. Why do we need an American champion? I've been looking at the same data with you and you know, as you have, and you know, DeepSeek, a lot of folks in America want to say that was sort of like a moment, a glitch, and it's been reversed. But the data doesn't show that, right? The adoption of open source models is only growing. So explain to the people who are watching why we need someone in America to be looking at this.
C
Clement Delangue6:21
Open source and open source models are really kind of like the foundation to build all technology, right? Everything is built, like the chatbot that you're using every day is built on these open source foundations, right? And so I think what we need is every single country in the world to be able to build their own models so that everyone else can build on their values, right? For example, in the US it's democratic values, it's entrepreneurship values. And so that everyone has their own control, right? That they can decide their fate, decide what to do, not to do with the technology. Versus if you have only one country, for example, only China that is dominating all open source, then it creates a bunch of risks, right? It creates a bunch of biases, meaning that some of the biases that you can see in Chinese models could be replicated in the applications that you're using every day. And so that's not something that I think is positive for the world. You want basically every single country in the world to be able to train their own foundation models. We've seen that also recently with the announcement of Nvidia again, Jensen playing like in all the different fields with South Korea announcing really big initiatives for sovereign AI and for creating their own open source foundations for the ecosystem to thrive on local foundation models.
D
Deirdre Bosa7:53
Right. But for the last few years, it's felt like American companies and especially a lot of the CEOs that I speak to, especially public companies, say that they want to buy a closed model from OpenAI or Anthropic or Google. Does inference and this next sort of phase of AI where you're actually running it, does that change? And do you think that appetite is growing now among corporate America for these open source models?
C
Clement Delangue8:21
I think so. In the study we released we saw that almost 30% of the Fortune 500 now is using Hugging Face and using open models sometimes in addition to closed models, right? They're going to use like a big API for their more generic use case and then they're going to use open source for smaller use cases when they need things to be cheaper, faster, more secure. So that's what we're seeing, a world where companies use a mix of proprietary APIs and models that they train themselves based on open source. You're seeing that with Cursor today, right? Which for a long time has been kind of like the poster child of using APIs, right? Famously built on top of Anthropic API at the beginning. Today they released their new models that they built themselves, of course, based on open source.
D
Deirdre Bosa9:19
Which company? I missed it. Which company did you... Cursor?
C
Clement Delangue9:22
Cursor, yeah. The code editing. They announced it, I think today, their own models. So the future is really companies both using APIs and building, owning, fine-tuning their own models based on open source. And we're seeing more and more companies doing that.
D
Deirdre Bosa9:40
Cursor is a good example, right? Because its costs are high when you're using an Anthropic model. So part of the point is to bring it in and be able to control, get leaner, get more efficient. And that's really like what Open Claw is about too, right? This phenomenon that has basically seen compute go through the roof because these agents just require so much more of it. It started on Anthropic and then I know you know Kimi in China was big for Open Claw. So let's get to like the Nvidia of all of this. So yes, it's been releasing open source models, but what it did with Nemotron Claw during GTC this week is launching free software. So Clem, I wonder if this feels like a gift to the open source community or do you read it more as a land grab?
C
Clement Delangue10:24
It's alignment between their incentives and I think what's good for the field. You know, as I said, I think Nvidia needs as many people as possible to be able to train AI themselves, to build AI themselves, right? They don't want to end up in the world where only OpenAI and Anthropic are training and building models themselves, and everyone else is just using the APIs, right? That's really not a world that is beneficial to them. It's also a scary world for me. So that's why also Hugging Face is trying to fight that. But at the same time it's really great for the field and what we're seeing on Hugging Face is that people are really, and AI builders are really thankful to the contributions of Nvidia. They're now kind of like the biggest organization on Hugging Face in terms of numbers of followers for a big technology company. They release on Hugging Face more than one new model or data set every day for the past year. So the volume of their contribution to the field and to open source is really unprecedented. And people love that. You see how popular Jensen got at GTC, really giving his keynote in a stadium like a rock star. And I think part of this popularity comes from the contributions to community.
D
Deirdre Bosa11:56
Right. He filled the whole hockey stadium. I know, it's amazing how much it's grown. It's like the Super Bowl here. Clem, you talk about this sort of community, right? And that's what sort of past open source technologies have really been built on, right? Like Linux as well was more community, but this is a company with incentives. You called them aligned incentives, but can we be certain that they're always going to be aligned? Because on one hand, developers, they get a free tool that works on any hardware, but on the other hand, if everyone is standardizing on Nvidia's platform, Nvidia, Jensen Huang, they end up controlling how AI agents get built and deployed. So, do you worry about those incentives always staying aligned?
C
Clement Delangue12:41
I think it's a matter of kind of like looking what's better than other things. There are no pure kind of like, you know, openness, no control, and there's no kind of like full control, no openness. It's more a gradient. And the more it goes towards open source, the better for the world. The beauty of open source is that the control of something like Nemotron Claw is not as strong as it would be, for example, if it was an API, because people can fork it, they can contribute to it, they can modify it, they can own it themselves, right? So if at some point they're not happy about the work that Nvidia is doing, well, they can build their own, right? And for the field in general, the beauty of open source AI is that it's distributed and many, many players are playing a role, right? We talked about Chinese open source, but for example, in the US, Google is doing an amazing work on open source. They're releasing tons of models that are really, really used by the community. OpenAI released a model last summer. You have Allen AI that is contributing many models, data sets.
D
Deirdre Bosa13:55
Let me push back a little bit on that front. Yes, OpenAI and Google are releasing open source models but it's not their best models the way that China is. I've been asking folks too about the OpenAI open source model and I get kind of like lukewarm responses. It was supposed to be Meta, right? Have they just completely fallen off this open source race? And I mean, are there any significant competitors especially versus what China is putting out there other than right now Jensen?
C
Clement Delangue14:24
Well, I mean, building frontier open source models is hard, right? And I think even a big technology company like Meta sometimes can do very, very well, sometimes can struggle a little bit. I think I'm really thankful for the contributions that they've done to the field, you know, but others can continue and can keep pushing kind of like the frontier in open source. It doesn't need to be exactly the same frontier as closed source, right? Because open source has some unique advantage that makes it kind of like different than closed source. For example, you can run a closed source model on your hardware which makes it actually free. So even if open source is a little bit not as good as closed source, it's tremendously useful for the community and for a lot of use cases. In terms of players, I'm really excited about, you know, new American startups. Obviously, entrepreneurship is the main strength of the US. And I think if we can see more startups starting to contribute to open source, maybe you've seen Reflection AI that raised big rounds in the US and doing sovereign AI with South Korea. If we can see more and more American startups contributing to open source, we can definitely catch up to Chinese open source and have a big impact in the world.
D
Deirdre Bosa15:53
Yeah, Reflection is certainly one we have our eye on. Hoping to talk to them soon. Good question from one of our viewers right now that asks if you can comment on AMD's open source platform compared to Nvidia's.
C
Clement Delangue16:05
They're getting better. Their software is so much better than it was maybe two, three years ago. And you know, they really emerge as kind of like a good alternative for a lot of these workflows. And I think they're just getting started really. And we expect them to make a lot more progress in the next few months.
D
Deirdre Bosa16:36
Okay. I know you dodged it a little bit earlier so I'm gonna ask it again. I think like we talked a while ago and we talked about sort of Zuckerberg building the ecosystem for open source models and I wonder, you know, and tell me if I'm thinking about this in the wrong way, right? Like Mark Zuckerberg has always sort of lamented the idea that Apple and Google created the operating system for smartphones and he had to build on top of that and you have like disputes even today that Apple, you know, taxes developers on top of its platform through the App Store. Could that scenario happen for open source AI? Could Jensen, you know, build the ecosystem and then find ways of charging people? And would you rather Jensen Huang be doing that than Mark Zuckerberg?
C
Clement Delangue17:22
I think it's much, much harder to do that on open source than in any other things because again open source, it's super easy to fork. It's super easy to modify yourself. It's super easy to host it yourself. And so in a way you don't really build a moat, you don't really kind of like lock the community or lock the users with open source. Or it has to be, you know, thousand times bigger and better than everything else but I don't really see that happening. So in my opinion the risk is much less of concentration of power for open source, it is more for APIs and for agent APIs. Right now we're seeing a lot of concentration happening on code for example and overall Caplacropic solutions, but in open source it's almost impossible to do just by the nature of the technology that everything is available and so everyone can fork it, modify and switch very easily if they want to.
D
Deirdre Bosa18:33
So harder to control and anyone can fork it at any time. Why do you think that Nvidia and Jensen Huang are going down this path? I mean, its lock-in for decades has been its CUDA software that keeps people in the ecosystem. This is essentially opening it up, right? Saying you can take any model built on any GPU, any chips to this platform. What is Jensen's motivation?
C
Clement Delangue18:57
Well, they win if as many people as possible are using AI factories, right? Like token factories that they're basically building, right? The best... that's data center, that's like servers, that's basically their infrastructure offering, right? Nvidia is the infrastructure AI company and for this to continue to grow they need to provide the tools for everyone to actually do AI themselves rather than use APIs. So that's why they're doing that. They can give the software for free, make it as open as possible. Jensen is talking about being horizontally open but then they win on the vertical side by owning the infrastructure for AI and being kind of like the vertical infrastructure.
D
Deirdre Bosa19:55
Right. That was Jasmine in my read as well. We're going to be having a column coming out on that shortly. But basically it's kind of what Google did with Android as I mentioned at the top. Microsoft with Internet Explorer was really to sell more Windows licenses. And then someone in the comments as well says it's the Jobs Apple model when you own and build the hardware software too. This is good actually. You can offer the best of breed. That's an interesting comment. So thank you to data center dude. Clem, what is the biggest barrier right now for a company that wants to use open source but hasn't made that jump?
C
Clement Delangue20:30
I mean, for a long time what's interesting is that the bigger barrier was skills, right? Just not having machine learning engineers, AI engineers, AI scientists in your team. This barrier is completely disappearing with agents, right? It's incredible now a software engineer or even a non-software engineer can use an agent to fine-tune models themselves. It's incredible. On Hugging Face, we were originally historically the platform for AI builders, right? We have 15 million AI builders using the platform. Now, increasingly, we're seeing agents used by software engineers or non-software engineers using the platform. I think by the end of the year, we're going to have more agent users on Hugging Face than human users on Hugging Face. And it is because everyone can use agents now to fine-tune and train models. So it's removing this big barrier. It's amazing to see.
D
Deirdre Bosa21:35
Actually, I think Jasmine, my producer, called it software as a service for agents. Jensen Huang had his own version, but what you're saying is what we've heard from others like Aaron Levie of Box. He says that, you know, he's creating products for agents now, right? And that is a whole another market or TAM that's just getting started. So very in line with what you're saying.
C
Clement Delangue21:57
Yeah, the agents are becoming the users and the customers for most of the tech platforms today.
D
Deirdre Bosa22:06
Which is just a wild shift. There was this Wall Street Journal article this week. It reported that as AI shifts to inference, companies want these smaller, cheaper, more commoditized models. I think that's what you're saying. The agents don't really care what model it is. But that is where open source wins. So is the inference era in particular, is that basically the open source era? Are we going to see a lot more of this?
C
Clement Delangue22:28
I think so. So I mean, the same way if you look at software, right, the majority of the technology is built on open source, right? It hasn't been the case for AI yet for different reasons but I feel like in the agent world it could become more of the case where maybe 10% of the AI workflows are driven by proprietary APIs and 90% are driven by in-house AI building based on open source. It might take some time to happen but that's definitely a direction that we're seeing. And the second big trend is obviously as I mentioned which is that you don't need to be a machine learning engineer. You don't need to be an AI scientist anymore to actually build AI yourself, right? To really fine-tune, train models yourself, optimize models yourself, run models yourselves thanks to agents. So in a few years we'll see tens of millions, hundreds of millions of AI builders, of people being able to build AI themselves. Not just use AI in their workflows, but really build AI themselves.
D
Deirdre Bosa23:38
And already this year has just been such a big year for that. I mean, I think that a lot of people still think about coding as something that software engineers do or they get help with from AI, but the reality is that anyone, including me, can build things now. You just have to be able to prompt. What does this mean though for the biggest AI labs that keep their models closed? Like we talked about OpenAI and Google, but you know, OpenAI's last open source model was last year. How can they keep charging when it's agents that are deciding and they want something that's good enough, but they want it to be cheaper and more efficient? How do they keep charging?
C
Clement Delangue24:17
Yeah, I mean I think they're going to keep charging for the frontier, meaning that, you know, for like the 5% of tasks that need to be at the frontier, you know, I'd be happy to keep paying for APIs and keep paying for proprietary APIs that are maybe a little bit more expensive than other models. And that's already kind of like in my opinion a massive market, right? They can already be trillion dollar companies just doing that. So yeah, but in a different era too much about them.
D
Deirdre Bosa24:54
Okay but in a different era, right, when you have these huge leaps but the gap of getting ahead is shrinking and the Chinese open source models are close, they're catching up faster than ever. So how can they stay far enough ahead to keep justifying the billions of dollars they're raising and the money they're charging especially enterprise. I mean, we know kind of now there's been this huge enterprise push. OpenAI is focusing on that. I mean, I don't think enterprises, do they care that much about frontier? Will they continue to, especially if Nvidia is putting out an open source frontier model?
C
Clement Delangue25:30
It's more a question for them than for me. But I think there's still going to be kind of like a significant portion of the workflows that are good for them to solve. So I'm not too worried about them.
D
Deirdre Bosa25:44
Okay. Yeah. I mean, there's lots and lots of money at stake. Clement, last one for you. I feel like we've been anticipating this DeepSeek model for some time. The next one, have you heard anything? Are we going to get it? What do you know what the delay is? Not going to hold you to it, but are you hearing anything?
C
Clement Delangue26:02
Yeah. No, I'm excited like everyone else. One thing though in open source is that the almost kind of like the frequency of release right now really beats kind of like big releases. That's what we've been saying for example with Qwen or also Nvidia. They're getting super successful because they don't just release one model every few months. They release really new things every day. So that's what AI builders have been expecting right now. So yeah, more following kind of like the day-to-day things and than some of the big releases that sometimes are more kind of like the tree hiding the forest.
D
Deirdre Bosa26:43
Last question for you. Earlier, you said that I think it was 30% of Fortune 500 companies, they're using open source models. What do you think that number is a year from now?
C
Clement Delangue26:55
I think the majority of them because from what we're seeing from the adoption, you know, I was talking recently to the CEO of Pinterest, Bill, who's been talking publicly about using more and more open source. I think Brian Chesky from Airbnb has been talking about how they're using open source models. Notion released an open source model integration in Notion AI a few days ago. So I think the startups are really starting to, and the big startups are really starting to adopt open source AI and the big companies also.
D
Deirdre Bosa27:40
So yes, startups and certainly Pinterest and Airbnb, they're companies that were founded here in the Bay Area. What about outside of tech? Do you see manufacturing, retail, healthcare, etc. starting to use open source models?
C
Clement Delangue27:55
Yeah. Yeah. We especially thanks to agents, right? Because even if they don't have a lot of AI scientists, now their software engineers can adopt open source AI thanks to agents. So yeah, by the end of the year hopefully the majority of Fortune 500 will use open source which doesn't mean that they'll use only open source, right? But they'll use open source plus proprietary APIs depending on their task, depending on what problems they're trying to solve.
D
Deirdre Bosa28:29
Well, Clem, it is always so great to talk to you and get your insight. We will certainly be checking in with you in the months ahead and see how that adoption is going and see, you know, if Nvidia continues to stay the American open source king. That's a great phrase. Thank you so much for being with us.
C
Clement Delangue28:45
Thanks for having me. Thanks for having me.
D
Deirdre Bosa28:47
Thanks everyone on the back end as well. Sammy in the control room, Jasmine as always. And Robert and Evan who are just over here manning the cameras. Thanks everyone for tuning in. See you next time.