Back
Richard Templeton
Executive Chairman, Texas Instruments

Texas Instruments Incorporated TXN CEO Rich Templeton on Q1 2020 Results

🎥 Apr 22, 2020 📺 Daily Earnings Calls ⏱ 66m 👁 32 views
Watch on YouTube

About Richard Templeton

Richard Templeton, executive chairman of Texas Instruments, has emphasized the company’s strategy of maintaining internal manufacturing as a competitive advantage, stating that during the COVID-19 pandemic, TI performed better than competitors that were highly outsourced. He noted that in the second quarter of 2020, TI planned to run its factories at levels similar to the first quarter, leading to an inventory increase to support customers with limited forecasting ability. Templeton also discussed capital allocation, advocating for disciplined stock buybacks and dividends, and said that research and development spending would remain unchanged due to its long-term, five-to-ten-year horizon. Templeton has spoken about the importance of U.S. semiconductor industry competitiveness, calling for long-term investment in research, access to skilled talent, and a competitive tax structure. He described the U.S. as needing to be an attractive destination for the world’s best minds and supported policies that encourage R&D and domestic manufacturing investment. On geopolitical tensions, he stated that TI would comply with all laws and rulings, and that companies that adapt best will cope with challenges accordingly. Templeton also reiterated his view that recessions present opportunities to extend competitive advantage through continued investment.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Richard Templeton's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (85 segments)
O
Operator0:01
Please standby for a day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Texas Instruments first quarter 2020 release conference call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to hand things over to Mr. Dave Paul. Please go ahead, sir.
D
Dave Paul0:25
Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our first quarter 2020 earnings conference call. For any of you who missed the release, you can find it on our website at ti.com/ir. This call is being broadcast live over the web and can be accessed through our website. A replay will be available through the web. This call will include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause TI's results to differ materially from management's current expectations. We encourage you to review the notice regarding forward-looking statements contained in the earnings release published today, as well as TI's most recent SEC filings for a more complete description. Given the likelihood of a significant economic recession due to COVID-19, we're changing the format for this quarter's earnings call. In addition to Rafael Lizardi, our CFO, we will be joined by Rich Templeton, our Chairman and CEO. Rich will be covering a broader frame of how we're approaching the current environment. I will then provide a summary of the first quarter, and Rafael will wrap up with the financial details of the first quarter and our outlook for the second quarter. Our prepared remarks will be longer than usual as we hope to cover a range of anticipated questions. Let me turn it over to Rich.
R
Richard Templeton1:51
Thanks, Dave. At the highest level, understand how we will approach the likely significant recession resulting from COVID-19. I remind you of the three ambitions that for decades have driven all decisions inside of TI. These ambitions are: first, we will act like owners who will own the company for decades; second, we will adapt and succeed in the world that is ever-changing; and third, we will be a company you are proud to be part of and would be proud to have as a neighbor. When we pursue these ambitions, our employees, customers, communities, and owners will all benefit. These guiding ambitions have served us well for decades, but they are enormously valuable in these times because they help simplify many decisions in an uncertain environment. Like many companies in the COVID-19 crisis, we have acted aggressively, keeping our people safe and able to support their families. We have kept our operations running to support our customers, with special emphasis on our medical customers. And in the communities where we operate around the world, we have provided direct financial support and medical supplies to provide some relief. The list of actions is lengthy. So, starting with the economic framework: no two economic recessions are identical, but the 2008 financial crisis provides us the most recent significant recession and therefore is the best example to study and inform decisions on operating plans, revenue forecasts, and investment and spending plans. As a reminder, if you look back to 2008, and specifically to September of 2008, our new orders turned off overnight. This led to a 26% sequential drop of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2008, an additional 16% sequential decline in the first quarter of 2009, and then a rapid snapback for the next six quarters. By the second quarter of 2010, or within two years of the start of the sharp decline, revenue moved back above the level of the third quarter of 2008. With the benefit of hindsight, our customers overcorrected to the downside, and we then spent a year and a half chasing backup to support demand. With this in mind, we are not trying to predict this economic recession and recovery, but instead we want to ensure that we have the highest degree of optionality so that we can deal successfully with any outcome. Therefore, regarding our operating plan, looking at the pattern from pre- and post-2008, in the second quarter of 2020, and quite likely the third quarter of 2020, we will be running our factories at about the level they ran in the first quarter of 2020. This will likely result in an increase in inventory during the second quarter. This will be important to support our customers during a time when they have limited ability to forecast. Our product portfolio, primarily long-lived products, makes it an easy decision and maximizes our optionality. Regarding second quarter revenue guidance, Rafael will elaborate in a minute, but with reduced visibility of customer demand, we have used the historical transitions that I mentioned from 2008 and adjusted for seasonality. We are not implying precision but explaining the assumptions we are using, an expanded range to account for the current uncertainty. Regarding spending and investments: first, research and development spending will be essentially unchanged as these are five- to ten-year time horizon decisions. We will continue to make ongoing portfolio adjustments, but these are unlikely to make meaningful changes to investment levels. On SG&A, we will maintain critical investments in new capabilities, such as strengthening ti.com, because these are important times to gain ground, but we can minimize expense, and we will certainly continue to do so. On capital spending, our plans are generally unchanged because the bulk of capital spending is driven by roadmap capacity needs in the 2022 to 2025 timeframe. We will continue with previously announced construction plans that are underway for the next-generation 300-millimeter analog fab in Richardson, Texas. Lastly, regarding how we are operating in the current environment, we were fortunately prepared for the unforeseen disruptions of COVID-19. As presented, we updated our customers in late March that our lead times remain short and unchanged and that we could respond to short-term demand. This is because we invested in inventory, a robust business continuity plan, and invested in a geographically diverse internal manufacturing footprint. Our manufacturing teams are operating throughout the world, including countries like Malaysia and the Philippines, where local restrictions have resulted in curtailed operations. We have adopted protocols quickly to keep our people safe and minimize any disruptions. Our team was prepared and is comfortable getting our work done remotely. We continue to actively work new design wins with customers via virtual selling processes that we instituted several years ago. On most days across TI, we are averaging a peak of 10,000 VPN connections and two million meeting minutes per day, about four times higher than normal. We all look forward to things getting back to normal, but in the meantime, we are focused on execution. Let me hand it back to Dave.
D
Dave Paul7:41
Thanks, Rich. I'll provide the standard comments on first quarter revenue by end market, and then I'll add some additional insight about the quarter in light of COVID-19. First, for highlights on first quarter revenue by end market versus a year ago: industrial increased mid-single digits from a year ago quarter and improved compared to the fourth quarter. Automotive declined mid-single digits and decelerated in the quarter as our customers' factory shutdowns impacted demand. Personal electronics declined mid-single digits, but by sector was a mixed bag: mobile phones declined low double digits, while by contrast, PCs increased low double digits. Communications equipment declined about 50%, as expected, due to a comparison against a very strong first quarter of 2019. Communications was up sequentially. And lastly, enterprise systems increased double digits on strong data center demand. For additional insight, the first quarter ran as expected into Chinese New Year but was slow coming out of the holiday as Chinese factories struggled to come back due to COVID-19. In early March, we saw a pickup in orders from most markets as supply chain disruptions led to increased customer concerns about being able to secure supply. This increase in demand that we experienced in March had continued into early April, with the exception of automotive, as manufacturers' plant closures reduced consumption. This increase in orders has steadily abated in April but returned to levels we saw in early March. The midpoint of our range assumes that this decline continues through the quarter as customers have reduced visibility to end demand. Rafael will now review profitability, capital management, and our outlook.
R
Rafael Lizardi9:48
Thanks, Dave, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue was $3.3 billion, down 7% from a year ago. Gross profit in the quarter was $2.1 billion, or 63% of revenue. From a year ago, gross profit decreased due to lower revenue. Gross profit margin decreased 200 basis points. Operating expenses in the quarter were $794 million, about even from a year ago and about as expected. On a trailing 12-month basis, operating expenses were 23% of revenue. Over the last 12 months, we have invested $1.5 billion in R&D. Operating profit was $1.2 billion, or 37% of revenue. Operating profit was down 10% from the year-ago quarter. Net income in the first quarter was $1.2 billion, or $1.24 per share, which included a $0.10 benefit for items that were not in our prior outlook. As we have discussed, I will now comment on our capital management results, starting with our cash generation. Cash flow from operations was $851 million in the quarter. As a reminder, first quarter is typically the seasonally low point for cash flow from operations due to payout of profit sharing and bonuses. Capital expenditures were $161 million in the quarter. Free cash flow on a net trailing 12-month basis was $5.6 billion. In the quarter, we paid $841 million in dividends and repurchased $1.6 billion of our stock, for a total return to owners of $2.5 billion. In total, we have returned $6.6 billion in the past 12 months, consistent with our strategy to return all free cash flow. Over the same period, our dividends represented 55% of free cash flow, underscoring their sustainability. Our balance sheet remains strong with $4.7 billion of cash and short-term investments at the end of the first quarter. In the quarter, we issued $750 million of debt with a coupon of 1.375% due in five years. This resulted in total debt of $6.6 billion with a weighted average coupon of 2.81%. Since then, we have repaid $500 million of debt during the second quarter, and we have no further debt due this year. We have $550 million of debt due in 2021. Regarding inventory, inventory dollars were flat to the fourth quarter, and days were 145. Distribution-owned inventory declined again in the first quarter by about $50 million, the sixth consecutive quarter of planned reductions as we continued the transition of our channels to have fewer distributors and bring more customers direct. We had about four weeks of distribution inventory, the lowest since the third quarter of 2017. Tactically and strategically, we're very pleased. We have steadily decreased total inventory dollars while increasing the percent of inventory concentrated inside TI and therefore in fewer places. This enables us to maintain short lead times and high availability, which is critically important in an environment where end demand visibility for our customers will be limited. With a recession likely upon us, as Rich mentioned earlier, we're using the 2008 financial crisis to inform our second quarter outlook. To reflect the increased uncertainty, we have also expanded the range for the second quarter. We expect revenue in the range of $2.61 to $3.19 billion and earnings per share to be in the range of $0.64 to $1.04. Regarding our operating plan for running our factories, we expect that customers in this recession, similar to past recessions, will overcorrect in the short term as their visibility of their end demand drops. We believe it will be an important advantage to maintain consistent lead times and to offer customers high levels of product availability. Our product portfolio of mostly long-lived parts affords us to have a steady hand. Therefore, we will be running our factories in the second quarter at approximately the same level we ran them in the first quarter of 2020. Inventory will likely grow during the second quarter, while distributor-owned inventory will likely drain. In closing, we continue to invest in our competitive advantages and make our business stronger. History has shown us that times like this are when we can make the most strategic progress. With that, let me turn it back to Dave.
D
Dave Paul14:44
Thanks, Rafael. Operator, you can now open the lines up for questions. In order to provide as many people as possible the opportunity to ask a question, please limit yourself to a single question, and after a response, we'll provide you an opportunity for a follow-up.
O
Operator14:57
Thank you, sir. And ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. Please make sure your mute button is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Everyone, that is star 1 if you have a question. We'll take our first question today from Vivek Arya of Bank of America.
V
Vivek Arya15:19
Thanks for taking my question. For my first one, I understand visibility is low and I understand the way you are predicting Q2, but just a few weeks into Q2, have your orders or bookings played out the same way as they did during the financial crisis? Does your confinement program now provide you better visibility than last time? I'm just curious what you have actually seen so far in the quarter so that we can get a better handle on the outlook that you're giving.
R
Richard Templeton15:52
Yeah, so let me, I'll start, and Dave, you want to chime in on that. But as we said in the prepared remarks, April has in fact behaved very differently than 2008 in the comparison. March was not only, April, March was strong coming out of the Chinese New Year. As presented in the prepared remarks, we came out a little slowly, but then things perked up. And into April, those things have abated in the second half of April. But we think that is due to the concern that many customers have on a supply disruption. So we arranged, particularly the midpoint of our range implies an expectation that demand will drop as customers internalize better their end demand. And frankly, they're going to have very low visibility. We expect them to have very low visibility of demand. That's why the important point here is that we're keeping high optionality throughout this process so that if things snap back, we can support that. We can support it on the other side of this. Dave, I think this was said, yes, follow on that.
V
Vivek Arya17:09
Yeah, thank you. You mentioned that you're continuing to run your factory loadings in Q2 at the same level as Q1. I'm curious if you can give us some color around what you're modeling days of inventory to be exiting Q2. Is it a certain maximum limit to the amount of inventory, or in terms of days or dollars, that you're willing to build before you have to start taking actions?
R
Richard Templeton17:34
Yeah, thanks for that question. So Vivek, just as you framed, I'm trying to frame it that way. It is a capital allocation decision. So we are allocating capital in the form of inventory. Capital is going to go into inventory instead of going to other places. And the inventory will increase, we expect very likely to increase into the second quarter. But that is what gives us the optionality that I mentioned, of having that inventory on hand. The key thing to remember, and you know very well, the vast majority of our products are long-lived. They're highly diverse, sold to many, many customers. They live a long time on the shelves and the customers' product life cycles are very long. So that inventory will not go bad. So it's an option we were fairly low cost upfront to have that option.
V
Vivek Arya18:32
That's great. Thank you very much.
D
Dave Paul18:36
We'll go to the next caller, please.
O
Operator18:38
Next up, we'll hear from Stacy Rasgon of Bernstein Research.
S
Stacy Rasgon18:44
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. For the first one, if I go back to 2008, the decline was a lot quicker. But if I look from Q3 '08 peak to Q1 '09, TI's revenues fell about 40%. This cycle has been longer, but if I take maybe that the peak was Q4 '18, your guide in Q2 '20 to be down about 30%, does that suggest that maybe there's still a little more to go for following the same kind of trajectory? And I guess also, if the decline from peak to trough is longer, does that suggest that you might be thinking about the increase off the trough as being longer? Like how do we compare the two situations?
R
Richard Templeton19:21
And Stacy, this is Rich. Given the recollection of 2008, I'd be careful of too much precision in where you're trying to draw that. I do think the valid comparison, and I think you know this very well from the history, is that 2008 was a reasonably, 2007 and the first half of 2008 were reasonably hot semiconductor markets, not overheated but pretty hot. And clearly, 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 were cooler compared to the heat of 2017 and '18. So when you try to get peak-to-trough, that's a little more complex. We just tried to basically look through what did we think demand was doing for a couple of years prior, and that was what helped inform and help set where we would put the operating plans.
S
Stacy Rasgon20:28
Got it. For my follow-up, I know you generally don't have tons of visibility into what true end demand is doing, but do you have any way to gauge, just given them, any way to gauge the amount of pull-forward that we might be seeing right now? Whether it's gauging the pace of rush orders or anything like that, or anything that you can give us to try to gauge how much of the strong near-term demand might be pull-forward versus anything else?
R
Richard Templeton20:56
Yeah, I think as you imagine, I don't think we have any precision on that. I think that, you know, as we saw after Chinese New Year, as we saw a spring, you know, we believe that that was due to the customer concerns. You know, it's hard to have any precision around what percentage of that was due to that concern with any degree of accuracy. But yeah, and Rafael, you want to add to that?
R
Rafael Lizardi21:29
Yeah, as I agree, the only thing I would add is that we know the channel is clean. Because as we said, we're at four weeks, we drained about $50 million on that channel, and we plan to continue draining for the next three quarters or so, about another $200 million or so of planned drain as we convert more and more customers to go direct. So the channel we know is clean and will continue to be clean. But as Rich alluded to, we really don't know the end customers, when they pull, how much of that is true end demand versus which is talk of potential.
R
Richard Templeton22:07
And Rafael, and I might add to that, you know, Stacy, 65-70% of our revenue is on confinement, so we're not flying blind. But we see plans that are in our customer factories, but as they have reduced visibility, all those plans are not updated. So they're being updated slowly as they're deciding what's building in those factories. So those updated plans are rolling through, and that's what's creating the uncertainty, as you'd imagine.
S
Stacy Rasgon22:39
Okay, thank you.
D
Dave Paul22:42
Thanks, Stacy. We'll go to the next caller, please.
O
Operator22:44
Next up from Morgan Stanley is Craig Hettenbach.
C
Craig Hettenbach22:51
Yes, thank you. Appreciate the color on the OpEx side of things. Any additional thoughts around just kind of variable compensation as revenue comes down? You know, some mitigation in terms of EPS impact the next couple of quarters?
R
Rafael Lizardi23:06
So, as we said in the prepared remarks, in general, OpEx will be relatively unchanged. So R&D, those are long-term investments. SG&A, we also have some investment areas there with ti.com and other places. We frankly run the company pretty tight to begin with, but whatever we can tighten up more, we do. On your specific question on variable compensation, that tends to be profit-sharing and bonus. Profit-sharing moves according to a formula, so it's very formulaic. So depending on what happens, that adjusts. And bonuses is determined by the board depending on relative performance on one to three years on several metrics.
C
Craig Hettenbach23:56
The follow-on, correct? I do. Thanks. And understand the different cadence by geography in terms of China was weak and came back, and Europe and North America may be weaker now. But just love to get your thoughts just for Q2, how you're expecting kind of things within your guidance from a geographic perspective?
R
Rafael Lizardi24:18
Yeah, you know, I always give caution on when asked about the geographical revenues. Sometimes we can see distinct patterns, but where we ship our product is very rarely where it's actually consumed. As you know, so we ship a phone, that product ends up in a phone built in China, it may end up in Europe. So if there was something distinct in our guidance that was impacted by a geography, we'd share that, and we don't have anything specific to share with that right now.
C
Craig Hettenbach24:56
But thank you.
D
Dave Paul24:58
Great. We'll go to the next caller, please.
O
Operator25:00
Our next question is from Ross Seymour of Deutsche Bank.
R
Ross Seymour25:06
Hi, guys. Thanks for all these additional details, especially with Rich on the line. Maybe one for Rich. In your comments earlier, you said you wanted to use 2008 as the template, and that's about as fair a template as I could imagine as well. You also laid out about how the pattern was a steep fall and a steep rise back. Given that you're behaving, your actions are very different this time where you're keeping the utilization flat, etc., is that because you view this cycle as being any different, too short duration matching the same one as a decade ago, or is it simply just the optionality side of the equation at the end of the day that you're trying to maintain?
R
Richard Templeton25:42
I mean, let me have Rafael. You know, Ross, just to help on that, I think Rafael covered this in some ways. If you think back to 2008, and a bunch of folks know, we were very much different. We had a large wireless business, we had portfolio reprofiling we had to do, we had a high percentage of our product that wasn't exactly custom but it behaved a lot like custom. So, you know, building inventory was a much, much more difficult game. And the beauty about where we are today is, as Rafael pointed out, is that high percentage of the portfolio is long-lived product. We've got our R&D and our resources well deployed in the areas that we want to be long-term, and that's what really puts us into a wonderful position where the cost to have maximum optionality is actually pretty low in our particular case in 2020 versus where it was back in October of 2008.
R
Ross Seymour26:55
Great, thank you for that. And I guess as my follow-up, just switching over to the cash return side of the equation, looks like you guys had pretty much the second-biggest buyback in a single quarter you've had in a decade. Can you just remind us on how you guys are thinking about the ability to return cash? I know your long-term policy of returning 100% of your free cash flow, and it's not just dictated by any single quarter, I appreciate that as well. But this was significantly above what you guys generated in a single quarter, and maybe even in a couple quarters of free cash flow. So just talk about how much leverage you're willing to put on the balance sheet to take advantage opportunistically of a pullback in your stock when it's below what I guess you view to be your intrinsic value there.
R
Rafael Lizardi27:37
So let me first, you alluded to it, but let me just remind everybody on the call that our objective when it comes to cash return is to return all free cash flow to the owners of the company. We do that through buybacks and dividends. So for example, on a trailing 12-month basis, we generated $5.6 billion of free cash flow, we'll return $6.6 billion. So obviously, all free cash flow is being returned. And then you mentioned that we have debt on the balance sheet, as we said on the call, $6.6 billion. We finished on a net basis at $1.8 billion because we have $4.7 billion of cash on the balance sheet. But we use that to increase the rate of return with some leverage when it makes sense. So that's how we view the returns on the debt. For many, many years, we have talked about it on capital management.
D
Dave Paul28:44
Okay. Thank you, Ross. And we'll go to the next caller, please.
O
Operator28:46
Next up is John Pitzer of Credit Suisse.
J
John Pitzer28:53
Hey, thanks for letting me ask a question. I just want to go back to your comments, Rich, in your prepared remarks about order slowing as we've been coming into April. Was there any end market distinction you can talk about? And I'm particularly interested in kind of understanding how industrial behavior at the beginning of this pandemic forced maybe things like PCs, data center, and phones.
R
Richard Templeton29:19
Yeah, John, you know, I'd say that when we looked at last quarter, it was very distinct. You know, we saw strength in PCs, we saw strength in data center, we saw distinct slowing in Auto, as we talked about. I'd say that the relative strength in orders that we saw in the quarter, that happened in March and continued into April, was broad-based generally and across the board, with the exception of auto. And then the slowing, I would say that it is also broad-based.
J
John Pitzer30:12
You have a follow-on?
D
Dave Paul30:15
Well, then just as my follow-on, returning to Ross's question about capital allocation and return, Rich, since you are on the call, you guys have always been good at sort of sagging what everybody else is thinking, and you've got a longer duration out there. I'm kind of curious about how you're viewing the current environment relative to M&A, and if that's something short of an arrow in your strategic quiver as we go through the next couple of quarters of much clearly going to be recession.
R
Richard Templeton30:42
Yeah, you know, John, if you think about it, and you can even, you've watched this for a long time, you can go back to 2008 and then look at what we did through 2009, '10, '11, and such. And clearly, if you...
Think about capital allocation. The things that I step through: keeping on the right R&D investments, keeping on the right capital expenditures, making the right capability investments on things like ti.com. You know, that's where you get just very excited about we will be getting stronger during this period and those strengths will help us. Even as the secular trends and more semiconductors in your life are growing, for the degree that we have an opportunity to buy used equipment or used factories or potentially M&A, as with anything on capital allocation, I think that one just goes down to the dependence type comment, meaning it would have to be probably a more prolonged downturn. If you think about what the mood was in 2010 and 11, well 2009, 10, 11, that mood had to be there for a while before opportunities became available. But we're certainly, we try to just be wise over the long term.
O
Operator32:07
Okay, thank you John. We'll go to the next caller please. Christiana Lee, Citigroup.
C
Christiana Lee32:17
Hey, thanks guys. And Rich, thanks for making the cameo. My first question, Rich, do you think or do you anticipate any longer-term structural changes in the business, either in terms of end markets or anything you're looking at as a result of this pandemic?
R
Richard Templeton32:39
You know, Chris, I think it's early. I think, you know, I know your world tries to get ahead on trying to guess what will happen. I in general think that the secular trends we've seen with semiconductors and more semiconductors coming into people's lives are going to continue. And I think somewhat as John alluded to in his question, it's obvious in the near term, server sales and PCs are going to do well as working from home continues. But I just think longer-term, you look at industrial products, industrial equipment, and even automotive, even though in the near term people will see our numbers come down, the secular trend on semiconductor growth inside of automotive is going to make it a great market to be in for the long term. So no, I don't think from that point there'll be a big structural change. I do think we've got a great advantage of having structural channel advantage. So the changes that we've been working towards for a number of years are building closer to real-time solutions with customers, things you now see playing out with a higher and higher percentage of inventory being in our hands to where we can be more efficient. That's going to be a fantastic trend. TI is well prepared to take advantage of that with our breadth of channel reach through the industry.
C
Christiana Lee34:13
Thanks. Can I follow up, Chris?
O
Operator34:16
Go for it.
C
Christiana Lee34:17
Great, thanks. And then Rich, to the extent you can, if you could give us any insight into what the customer conversations are like. What are they asking? What are their big concerns? And I guess at the root of it, you guys talked about it, I've thought about this, why aren't we seeing this sort of fall off in orders? Is everybody just kind of frozen in place out there? Why is that happening?
R
Richard Templeton34:43
You know, Chris, I think if you and Dave, I thought was very direct with what he described. We saw orders rise starting the first, second week of March. You saw them rise up, you've seen them start to trend down. They're still at that level we saw approximately ending February and in early March. I think that's starting to filter through for us especially, and they will have the number where we're 60, 70 percent consignment. It takes a while for those consignment feeds to really get updated because companies have got to start getting better numbers on that front. So I think customers are just still processing through what their customers are telling them, and we will see that play through. It's why we've made the assumptions that May would be down from April and June down versus April as well for the range.
O
Operator35:44
Okay, thank you Chris. We'll go to the next caller please. Next up is Tori Bertsche, Bernstein.
T
Tori Bertsche35:49
Yes, thank you. And I appreciate the wide range of the guidance in this environment, but could you maybe elaborate a little bit on what the assumptions are sort of at the low end and the high end of the range?
R
Rafael Lizardi36:05
Yeah, I'll give you my take. Frankly, there's no science on that. As we talked about earlier, we're using 2008 as the model for that. Again, it doesn't imply a recession, not even similarity, it's just the most recent exogenous event that we can use. So we're using that, and the midpoint is the closest thing to that, kind of adjusted for seasonality what you normally would see in a first, second quarter transition. Now you're seeing a negative 13% at that midpoint. But the entire range, then the other reason we widened the range is to reflect the great level of uncertainty that we have going on. Rich mentioned many customers right now, they're still processing what was happening, and we've actually heard some of them haven't been able to update their feeds to us. So they got to go through all that process, and so that's embedded in the wide range. The biggest point I want to make, and we made it a couple times already, is the optionality that we're going to get based on how we're running the factories. So this thing can go multiple ways for second quarter and third quarter and beyond, but we have just great optionality the way we're running the business, both strategically the type of parts we build and the end products and so forth, but tactically the way we're running the factories and the inventory story in second quarter.
T
Tori Bertsche37:44
You follow on, Tori?
O
Operator37:46
Yes, thank you Dave. The other question goes back to what you just mentioned there. So I'm sure your customers are probably thinking about this too, and maybe they are perhaps building some inventory to be able to respond to the eventual demand if that should be the case. How long would you be willing to have that optionality or perhaps run the inventories a little bit longer than normal?
R
Rafael Lizardi38:13
You know, it's going to depend on a number of factors that today we don't know. And I think we in the world and the industry will learn over the coming weeks and months, and then we'll adjust them as necessary. I think the advantage we have with the way we're set up strategically, with the type of parts we build and the type of customers we have and the type of end market, is that we can afford to have that optionality. These parts are not going to go bad. It was very different in a custom-centric, consumer electronics type of world. That's not the case with the way we've structured the company. So we have great opportunity to go through this beyond second quarter.
O
Operator39:03
Thank you Tori. We'll go to the next caller please. And next up is Umbr Shrivastava.
U
Umbr Shrivastava39:12
Thank you Rich, good to hear your voice. I'm sure nobody really wanted to hear you in a discounted forum. I had a question back on capital allocation and going back to the 2008-2009 template or playbook. You raised a dividend in the fourth quarter back then. It was a small portion, but it was pretty meaningful on a percentage basis. So as we compare where we're heading now versus, I'm sure nobody has any idea what next quarter is going to be, what's the right way to think about capital allocation based on the comments you and Dave and Rafael are making? Sounds like no change in the 100% free cash flow back, divvy plus buyback. No change? Just help us understand the thinking or scenarios that you're playing out that you're thinking through which might lead to a near-term modification in that.
R
Richard Templeton40:05
Rich and Rafael follow up. Yes, and let me set up and all that. Let Rafael cover it. The answer is no change in the first because we really have tried to have a very thoughtful long-term plan. But I think it's helpful for Rafael to summarize some of those points.
R
Rafael Lizardi40:22
Yeah, so just to come in, Umbr, as you said, and Rich just confirmed that, yeah, there's no change in the way we think about capital management, your long-term objectives. So as I said earlier, cash return, return all free cash flow on dividends. Specifically, as you alluded to, the objective is to provide a sustainable and growing dividend to appeal to a broader set of owners. And as a reminder, on a trailing 12-month basis, our dividend was 55% of our free cash flow. Now, of course, that's a backwards-looking metric, I understand, but it's a great place to start. Frankly, few companies are at that level in our industry and in the S&P 500. So it's a great place to start. But that objective of providing a sustainable and growing dividend has been and continues to be very important for us.
U
Umbr Shrivastava41:21
And brief, and this is more to do with that thing Chris asked, a good question on structural changes. Given that we are all working from home, at least those of us who can afford to work from home, how is it impacting the design activity that TI engages in in multiple geographies, multiple customers, so many end markets? What's the right way to think about the changes that you're seeing there? And does it bode poorly for when we ultimately get to a more quote-unquote normal world?
R
Richard Templeton41:56
You know, Umbr, it's why we included in my remarks comments about how we're operating. It's one of these deals, I produced an update for internal and basically I had a bunch of people telling me, gosh, we got lucky on some things. And I explained there's this great quote that luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. And we put in place this mass-market selling, really virtual selling technique starting three years ago. It's an instituted standard process. Our sales teams work it, applications people work it comfortably with customers. And so it's almost been like nothing has changed in terms of where we spend our time working between ourselves and the customers. They all want to do it on the phone anyhow. Our products group connecting in on that. So the readiness that we had to operate in this world is actually enormous. Having ti.com more capable to support customers' decisions to be able to support online commerce as we're bringing more customers direct, the comfort of our product groups, design engineers, and people to work collaboratively because we've always had to do that is really very, very unchanged. I do think people are working more hours just because the days and hours tend to blend into one another as I'm sure everybody on this call is experiencing. But it's very impressive to watch the team performing and watching what's getting done. We're at the point where all of a set of customer visits, even next week, those customer visits will be virtual as well. So we're just well into the way of operating this way.
R
Rafael Lizardi43:56
I just want to comment on a slightly different topic, but related in the spirit of preparation meeting opportunity. Just want to highlight, and we talked about it during the prepared remarks, but we were prepared for the unforeseen disruptions with a combination of our inventory strategy, our business continuity program, and our geographically diverse manufacturing footprint, which of course is part of our competitive advantages of manufacturing and technology. So we have, in all of those together, we were able and continue to be able to provide our customers with short lead times and inventory availability in this time where they need it most, not now, but in the coming quarters when their visibility will be impaired.
R
Richard Templeton44:41
Yeah, and I would say that we've had customers actually contact us and they're rather surprised that our lead times are stable and they can get the product that they need. So they're very, very happy with that.
O
Operator44:58
So thank you Umbr. We'll go to the next caller please. Next up is Harlan Sir, JPMorgan.
H
Harlan Sir45:04
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. And I appreciate the additional commentary on being on the call today. I know you guys don't like to talk about sort of specific geographies, but fact of the matter is China is coming out of this pandemic and starting to open up their economy and throwing quite a bit of stimulus at it. Are you seeing this being reflected in your order rates or consignment forecast for your domestic China customers? And roughly what percentage of your business today comes from domestic China consumption?
R
Richard Templeton45:35
Yeah, I'll start and please chime in Rafael. Again, I'll give the numbers of products of where we've actually shipped the product, but always offer the caution that it's where the box ships from. So we've got 50% of our product ships into China, but again, like solar phones as an example, may be built there, may be designed in California and end up in Europe as an example. So yeah, we are seeing those factories coming back online as we talked about in our prepared remarks. But I think the uncertainty is how much demand will actually be there as those factories come back online. And I think that's what's creating that uncertainty.
H
Harlan Sir46:42
So you have a follow-on?
O
Operator46:44
Yep, thank you for that. So IHS in its most recent forecast is calling for global light vehicle production to drop almost 20% this year. This is twice the year drop as experienced in the 2008-09 financial crisis. Outside maybe just a near-term inventory correction to kind of normalize to the lower production trends, how is the TI team thinking about your content growth in auto to potentially partially offset that significant decline in production this year?
R
Rafael Lizardi47:16
Yeah, you know, I think, Harlan, I'll make a couple of comments and Rich, if you want to jump in afterwards, feel free to. And I think that it's important for us as the longer-term opportunity in automotive remains unchanged. And we continue to invest in five different sectors inside of automotive. There will be more content per vehicle, as you know, Harlan, as you're pointing to. We will respond tactically to those changes in demand, and we know how to do that and take care of that operationally. That's not something that we'll be able to control, but we will keep our investments steady and be prepared to support that growing opportunity as it arrives. So Rich, you have anything to add to that?
R
Richard Templeton48:13
Yeah, I would just, you know, Harlan, amplify as I suggested earlier that the secular growth themes that are embedded in things like automotive, or embedded in industrial, are alive and well. They're going to be with us. They are not going to offset a 20% drop in any one year, and I think everybody does. But when it comes to making investments, as Dave said very well, you got to be looking five and six years out. And we think automotive will continue to be a great average upper of our long-term growth and our performance.
O
Operator48:53
Okay, thank you Harlan. We'll go to the next caller please. Next up is Tashia Hari, Goldman Sachs.
T
Tashia Hari48:59
Hi, good afternoon, and thanks very much for taking the question. I just had one probably for Rich. I was hoping you could talk a little bit about the competitive landscape that you're seeing today, both in embedded processing as well as analog. You guys have been a pretty consistent share gainer over the past five, ten, fifteen years. I wanted to get your thoughts on share growth potential going forward. Obviously, you guys are going through this recession, which although cyclical, I would think would be positive for industry leaders like yourself. You're also going through the go-to-market strategy change. You've also got the trade tensions between the US and China. So when you think about those three items, if you can talk to your confidence level around share growth over the next, call it, three or five years, that would be helpful. Thank you.
R
Richard Templeton49:55
Yeah, totally. I think you've almost answered the question. I think you described a couple of secular tailwinds if we do our job well, with a secular headwind depending on trade tensions. But even there, if we do our job well, I think we can mitigate some of that. I think you also, and I'm sure Dave is smiling, you got to the right context, which is you've got to look at this over two, three, and four years. I think he reminds everybody all the time. And so you look at the share we gained going into and then the position we were coming out of the 2008 downturn, and we gained momentum in that. And that's certainly what our plans are right now. And that's about both analog and embedded, and it's about the markets that we focus on, it's the customers, the products, the technology, the capability like ti.com where we put the place, and it's where all our energy is going on a weekly and daily basis is to get there.
O
Operator51:03
Okay, thank you Tashia. We'll go to the next caller please. Next up is Timothy Arcuri, UBS.
T
Timothy Arcuri51:07
Thanks a lot. I had, I guess the first one which is another half-think about how to think about the cycle. I understand people's... hello? I am Sam... yeah, we have trouble here. Could you start over please? Oh sure, okay. So the first question really is around how the cycle evolves and how to think about it. And I guess I understand that the magnitude, the peak-to-trough magnitude, it's hard to look back at a lot and to sort of look at that. But it seems like the near-term supply chain boost, or the concerns that customers have about that, that's boosting near-term demand. It seems like for you that effect is sort of beginning to wane maybe a little earlier than others because of your consignment model. So you're seeing it first. And I wonder if you'd agree with that, that it relates to the consignment model. And I guess the question is, does that argue that you would maybe see it out the other side first as well?
R
Rafael Lizardi52:22
Yeah, Tim, so I don't know. So first of all, we haven't seen what others have reported yet or what they've seen, so it's probably too early to do that. And we've had theories of us seeing it early and seeing it late. I'd just rather not weigh in on that debate and just report the facts that we have and let others debate it. We do believe that by pulling and controlling that inventory, we'll get much cleaner signals. But as you know, we've talked about before, our customers right now, they're not sure what their demand is going to look like. And so what they're telling us hasn't been updated yet. So even what they're telling us isn't completely clear. So it's going to take a little bit of time before all that stuff is updated.
T
Timothy Arcuri53:25
So you have a follow-on? I do, yes. For Rafael, so I guess on inventory, so if I assume that it's sort of flat up in dollar terms, obviously days are going to go way up in June, maybe they're 170, 180 days like that. And you know, possibly that out, but you know, can in September, I guess I was just wondering like can you give us some sense of what the pain point is where you might cut in utilization? Is it an inventory now seeing is the days thing, or is it a sort of just a duration of recovery thing?
R
Rafael Lizardi53:55
Yeah, no, good question. First, let me step back and remind you that for us, the objective of inventory is to maintain high levels of customer service, minimize obsolescence, while we improve our manufacturing utilization. The target of 115 to 145, frankly, is kind of incidental. It's just a calculation at the end of the day. This is a capital allocation decision. We're going to have $2.7 billion of inventory. That's real money that's on the balance sheet that if it wasn't there, the vacuum, the owners market. So we're very thoughtful in how we make those decisions to put potentially more inventory on that balance sheet. That's less cash that we have, but we just think it's going to give us great optionality throughout this thing. And like any decision when it comes to capital management, it's going to depend. So that's the decision we're making now. We have to see how things develop in the coming months, and based on that, we'll adjust. The important thing is the inventory lasts a long time. This inventory, the scrap levels on this inventory is very, very low. So while there's a working capital and an opportunity cost to it, what is very low given that it's highly unlikely that it's going to be scrapped, and it gives you just tremendous optionality on the other side.
R
Richard Templeton55:26
Okay, just to follow up, Rafael and Tim, Rafael said this before, so it's just me repeating his comment. The other thing to keep in mind, and he spelled this out, is while our inventory would be growing in second quarter, we will drain yet again distribution inventory. So we've just got to keep these multiple variables in mind, and it just keeps putting us in a better and better position when we're doing that. So if our balance sheet may show higher inventory, but we love the fact that that channel inventory will be getting leaner and leaner, and the inventory will be in one place where we can get the most effective use out of it.
R
Rafael Lizardi56:11
And I'll go ahead and add, when you and all the investors listen on the call, when you compare us to most or maybe all of our competitors, our balance sheet is very different in that regard because we have many consignment arrangements. Well, 65%, two-thirds of our revenue goes to consignment, whether it's the distribution or directly with the end customer. So that puts upwards pressure on that inventory level that we have. We also have our own manufacturing, including assembly test operation, where to a very high degree, about 80% of our output goes through our fabs and maybe six or seven through our assembly test operation. So that's also very different than our competitors. So that's why it's not apples to apples when you compare our inventory levels to those of our competitors. But let me make the point though that we think owning and controlling that inventory is a strategic asset. So we're very pleased with what we have in this consignment arrangement, clearly very pleased with owning our own manufacturing and what that has enabled us to do any time, but particularly in times of disruption like what we just experienced and continue to experience, that really puts us in a much better position to support customers.
O
Operator57:36
Okay, we have time for one last caller. And we will go to Mark Lipacis, Jefferies.
M
Mark Lipacis57:40
Great, thanks for taking my question. So I had one, our own field work in the supply chain downstream from you guys indicate that inventories are indeed like normal if not lean levels. And as the virus spreads around the world to places like Malaysia, Philippines, that the shortages of components, understanding that your inventories are higher than at the high end of the range and not hearing anything about TI shortages, but basically supply is being disruptive and there's a reticence to give up any excess inventories downstream. For you, I'm wondering if you could describe what you're seeing on your own supplier base. You want to run your factories at consistent levels here. Are you seeing any of these supply chain disruptions that your customers are seeing, that other components are you seeing that? And how are you managing that? And is there a risk that you're not going to be able to run your capacities consistently because of your own supply disruptions? That's all I had.
R
Rafael Lizardi58:52
Yeah, sure. Yeah, not a problem. The short answer to that is we're not seeing anything worth mentioning on this call. Little things here and there, but nothing that we cannot manage. Remember, I refer to our business continuity program, and we've been in this call, we've been talking mainly about inventory, finished goods inventory that we carry, but that also applies on multiple other angles. So for example, we also carry raw material inventory buffer. We have many dual and triple and quadruple sourcing of key raw materials. And we also have, as I talked about earlier, geographically diverse manufacturing footprint in Malaysia, in the Philippines, in Taiwan, in Mexico, in China. So that just really puts us in a very good position. Also gives us leverage to work with those suppliers, which by the way, we pay them in 30 days. We make the best part of our thinking to be fair to those suppliers, and we don't play games on that. So that's also from a long-term relationship standpoint, I think we are in very good shape with our suppliers.
R
Richard Templeton1:00:10
Yeah, so let me just wrap up by reiterating what we have said previously. History has shown us that it is times like this when we can make the most strategic progress. We will continue to invest in and strengthen our four competitive advantages, which are manufacturing technology, portfolio breadth, market reach, and diverse and long-lived products. We will also continue to pursue the three ambitions Rich mentioned. We will act like owners who will own the company for decades. We will adapt in a world that's ever-changing. And we will be a company that we're personally proud to be a part of and would be proud to have as a neighbor. When we're successful, our employees, customers, communities, and owners will all benefit. It is this ambition that will guide our decisions in the weeks and months ahead as we navigate these uncertain times. Our best to you and your families.
O
Operator1:01:09
And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today's conference. Thank you all for your participation.