CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Jb Straubel
Cofounder, Tesla

How Trump can improve Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: exclusive interview with JB Straubel

📅 Nov 27, 2024 Benchmark Mineral Intelligence 22 MIN 527 VIEWS 20 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
In this exclusive fireside chat at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence’s flagship Benchmark Week conference in Los Angeles, Tesla Co-Founder and Redwood Materials Founder, JB Straubel, discusses how Trump could improve Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act to attract more investment to the US. Straubel spoke to Benchmark's CEO Simon Moores, and COO Andrew Miller. Straubel received the Benchmark Lifetime Achievement Award 2024 at the conference. Benchmark Week returns to Los Angeles in 2025, bringing global industry leaders, financiers, and government officials together to chart a course for the tec...

Questions asked in this interview

10
  1. 0:04This is a special moment for you, right?
  2. 0:47Did you think my thoughts on the election were too optimistic?
  3. 1:59Can you just tell people through that story?
  4. 4:03Can I maybe pick up on that, JB?
  5. 7:08Is that a wider culture of not building stuff for so long, or is it something else?
  6. 8:36... the focus on doing stuff within our borders will mean that when we're not necessarily trying to take technology or partnerships with companies overseas to fill some of the IRA criteria, we can actually do it ourselves within our borders?
  7. 12:07I'm curious about whether you see that as the model, that it's really you plugging into automakers, or is there, where do you stop along that midstream?
  8. 14:41... the incentives are handed out, do you think these errors that you're talking about were on purpose, like politics, or was it just people just didn't know the industry when they were writing the thing and it was rushed out pretty quickly?
  9. 17:18Do you see that as something that is a net benefit or a hindrance to a company like yourselves who are trying to create this new ecosystem?
  10. 21:16It's kind of there for the taking, I guess, if the administration choose to go down that route. Is that fair?
Interviewer 0:04 ↗
JB, thank you for joining us. This is a special moment for you, right? Receiving this award, I would imagine it's up there. This is pretty cool.
JB Straubel 0:13 ↗
Thank you. I really appreciate the recognition. It's a great honor and, as you said, incredible company with some of your previous recipients here. I'm used to staying kind of a little bit behind the spotlight sometimes. I kind of prefer to be one step behind things and just getting stuff done and making it work. It's unbelievable to see how this industry has grown and the scale that we're at today and also where we're going. We're not done yet. So anyway, well, thank you so much. This is humbling and I really appreciate it.
Interviewer 0:47 ↗
More than welcome. Did you think my thoughts on the election were too optimistic? Were they too... we're trying to think this one over.
JB Straubel 0:54 ↗
I echo your optimism, actually. As we were kind of joking beforehand, I'm an optimist by heart as well. I think we kind of have to be, I'd say, in some of these markets where we're building, we're trying to create change and innovating. And I am cautiously optimistic about the future of this industry in the US in particular and what this administration can benefit from and do here. We obviously can't change the current reality of what we have in the country. And I think, as you've highlighted, the Republican states stand to gain a huge amount from this. And this is fundamentally an industrialization activity that we're in right now. We're scaling up, we're building, we're building mines, refineries, manufacturing sites. That's a little bit of a different shift than where we were even just four or five years ago when it was trying to figure out, okay, what's the incentive structure to kind of accelerate this and get it going. That's happened now. We just need to make sure it's going in the right direction and it's balanced.
Interviewer 1:59 ↗
But when you built the original Gigafactory in Nevada, you were saying actually most of that did happen under the Trump Republican administration. Can you just tell people through that story?
JB Straubel 2:09 ↗
Absolutely. I mean, Tesla, you know, prior to Redwood and even Redwood, we've gone through multiple cycles of Republican administrations, Democrat administrations. This is a bipartisan issue if there ever was one. It's energy security, it's jobs, it's environment as well. And in the beginning with the Gigafactory, that was really linked to a supply chain necessity for the EV, for the Model 3 at the time. And it was a pretty audacious, amazing thing that we had this concept to go and build several hundred thousand EVs, which was 10x more than anyone had ever done successfully or sold. So the first big question was, will anyone even buy that many EVs? But we also knew that if we actually wanted to succeed at that, we would have to have the battery supply, which didn't exist. So we had to preemptively start the Gigafactory project before even knowing if the customers would come or if the sales would come. That was a nail-biter. I mean, we literally had to bring the supply chain in, in our case Panasonic, there. And Panasonic was the first real battery maker to take that leap and commit to that factory and that supply chain before knowing really what the customers were going to do. I specifically remember the launch event for the Model 3. It's like distant memory in the EV industry now, but it was kind of a pivotal turning point where there were lines around the block for these. It was like an Apple iPhone launch kind of thing. And over the course of maybe three, four days, there were several hundred thousand reservations and it just blew all of the expectations away, even from inside of Tesla at the time. And I remember coming back to the office and being, 'Holy crap, we need to make this thing bigger.' We had kind of gone as far as we could fundamentally risk it with our planning, and we doubled it, really almost one week to the next.
Interviewer 4:03 ↗
Can I maybe pick up on that, JB? Because I'm really interested, I think a lot of people in the room will be interested. What you described you did at Tesla was really creating a whole ecosystem for the company. And I think we're starting to see some of that around your plans at Redwood. And I'm really eager to hear what you think the importance of creating that ecosystem is. We have a very fragmented, diverse supply chain, lots of people specializing in lots of different areas at the moment. But maybe there's an argument to push things forward at speed, which we need to do, that you do need to do just what you described. You need to create that ecosystem yourselves under one roof.
JB Straubel 4:40 ↗
Well, in the beginning of the journey at Tesla, some of that was by necessity because there was not a supply chain. We couldn't go out and buy a battery module or a motor or a charger from any other companies. There wasn't that supply chain. So we were kind of forced to say, well, we can't buy it, and I guess we better figure out how to design it and build it. And that actually led to a really inherent strength, I think, that endured and still endures for decades, which was tight integration, really excellent engineering optimization across all those. I'm talking more the physical components first. And that's benefited Tesla massively. It's a tightly integrated architecture across that whole vehicle and all the vehicles they make today. But that's now extending and needs to extend to not just the functional components but the batteries, the materials, the active materials, even the minerals. And I think as we get to these scales, that dependency and the risk of having a supply chain that's global and subject to crazy geopolitics and maybe tariffs, which could be highly volatile, I mean, all that really hit home through COVID. I mean, it was, you know, now again that seems kind of like ancient history, but it definitely highlighted that massive risk of the supply chain that was even outside of the kind of dysfunctional module ecosystem. So Tesla, I think, was one of the companies that took some of that to heart and has launched a lot of initiatives to begin to make a more tight ecosystem. But at Redwood, one of the opportunities I saw early on, back pre-2018, '19, was to help architect that for the whole industry. I think this is a fundamental opportunity across the whole electrification industry—cars, trucks, even stationary—is to architect that business ecosystem, figure out how to technically refine and reintroduce these materials. And I just saw this huge gap. I mean, there were no companies owning that. There was no incumbent technology or business architecture for it. But you could look at the physics and say, okay, in 20, 30, 50 years, this is going to be the majority of the material flow. Most of the nickel and lithium atoms in that ecosystem will be flowing in a loop. How would it work? No one could say.
Interviewer 7:08 ↗
But why do you think that was? That people just didn't connect the dots? Is that a wider culture of not building stuff for so long, or is it something else?
JB Straubel 7:15 ↗
I think it's twofold. I mean, one is it's far away and it seems infinitely far in the future. So when you start to think about something that's relevant as the whole EV market matures and starts to reach some kind of steady state and turnover, people just say, okay, that's like maybe that's 10 years away before this car comes back. It's too far to think about. Maybe that was one thing that put blinders on people. I think the other was just it's unintuitive that these materials can get reused with such high efficiency. We're so used to a petroleum and fossil fuel ecosystem where things kind of go from extraction to refining to consumption and that's the end. There isn't something after that. Then we worry about CO2. But this is fundamentally different and that is unintuitive. And I don't think most people have, even though it's obvious, it's actually quite simple, but it's unintuitive that these minerals can go into an application and then they just stay there. They don't get lost. They're 100% contained in the application, so they are all available to get remanufactured and reused. So that is a fundamental difference with the electric infrastructure and ecosystem that we're building so quickly now versus the especially petroleum ecosystem that kind of helped power that construction and is still helping today.

10 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Straubel, J. (2024, November 27). How Trump can improve Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: exclusive interview with JB Straubel [Interview transcript]. Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/885493/

MLA

Jb Straubel. "How Trump can improve Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: exclusive interview with JB Straubel." Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, 27 Nov. 2024. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/885493/.

BibTeX
@misc{straubel2024_885493,
  author       = {Jb Straubel},
  title        = {How Trump can improve Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: exclusive interview with JB Straubel},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2024},
  month        = {nov},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/885493/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}