CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Srikanth Velamakanni
Cofounder, Fractal

A Strong Q4 For Fractal Analytics | FY27 Revenue Will Be Better Than FY26, Says Company | CNBC TV18

📅 May 11, 2026 CNBC-TV18 10 MIN 322 VIEWS 27 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
#4QWithCNBCTV18 | Fractal Analytics Reports A Strong Q4FY26 Executive VC, Srikanth Velamakanni to CNBC-TV18 Expect R&D to go up to 10% of revenue while improving the gross margin OpenAI’s recent move an enormous validation for our products #fractalanalytics #2026results #2026earnings #earningsgrowth #revenuegrowth #margingrowth #profitgrowth #ebitdamargingrowth #2026growth #cnbctv18 #cnbctv18market #businessnews #businessnewstoday #businessnewsinenglish #sharemarkettoday 🔴CNBC TV18 LIVE TV: https://youtube.com/live/P857H4ej-MQ SUBSCRIBE to our Channel: https://bit.ly/3nvEcxf --------------...

What Srikanth Velamakanni said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Srikanth Velamakanni, co-founder and executive vice chairman of Fractal Analytics, discussed the company's Q4 FY26 results and outlook. He reported 19% revenue growth for the year, with significant gross margin expansion and profitability. Growth was impacted by two TMT client-specific issues, one involving a joint venture and another a reorganization, but excluding TMT, growth was 27%. These issues have washed through the P&L, and Velamakanni expects FY27 revenue growth to be better than FY26. He outlined plans to increase R&D spending from 6.5% to 10% of revenue, focusing on building foundation models and the Cogentic multi-agentic platform. He attributed margin expansion to a shift from input-based to output-based models, which carry 5-7 points higher margins, and noted that 60% of revenue is currently input-based, with a three-year horizon to reduce that to 40% or below. He also commented on OpenAI and Anthropic's AI services moves as validation of Fractal's work.

Key takeaways

  1. FY27 revenue growth will be better than FY26's 19%.
  2. R&D spending will increase from 6.5% to 10% of revenue.
  3. 60% of revenue is input-based; target is 40% or below within three years.
  4. Output-based models carry 5-7 points higher margins than input-based.
  5. TMT client issues have washed through the P&L.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
19% FY26 revenue growth metric 0:53
27% FY26 revenue growth excluding TMT metric 0:53
6.5% Current R&D spend as percentage of revenue metric 2:35
10% Target R&D spend as percentage of revenue guidance 3:02
5-7 points Higher margin for output-based models vs input-based metric 7:02
25-30 points Higher margin for license revenues metric 7:02
60% Current revenue from input-based models metric 7:50
40% Target revenue from input-based models guidance 7:50
2-3 points Overall gross margin improvement from shift guidance 8:50
5% Current revenue per billable FTE growth metric 9:09

Chapters

  1. 0:00Q4 and FY26 results
  2. 2:02TMT client issues and FY27 outlook
  3. 2:35R&D investment plans
  4. 5:20OpenAI and Anthropic AI services
  5. 6:31Gross margin drivers
  6. 7:41Shift to output-based models
  7. 9:09Revenue per employee growth

Questions asked in this interview

7
  1. 0:10Is that the only reason, had growth been higher, and what can you guide on that particular TMT client or clients?
  2. 2:02And those two TMT clients for which you're facing particular issues which you highlighted, does that persist in FY27 and will there be a quantifiable revenue loss on account of that?
  3. 2:35And when we say R&D in the context of a company like yours, I mean where exactly is this going?
  4. 6:31Can you tell us how much of it came on account of pricing push towards outcome-based?
  5. 7:41So if I look at your current revenue base, what percentage of it would be input-based?
  6. 8:08And by when do you think?
  7. 8:29And pricing in the process of this shift, how will that change?
Reema 0:10 ↗
Welcome back. Let's talk about Fractal Analytics. Reported a good set of Q4 numbers. The profits have gone up 14% quarter-on-quarter. They've doubled on a year-on-year basis and margins have expanded for the company. Srikanth Velamakanni, co-founder, executive vice chairman of Fractal Analytics is now joining in on the show. Srikanth, morning, Reema here. So it's been a good quarter. It's been a good year. For the full year, you've ended with 19% topline growth, slightly lower than the 20% plus run rate that you were enjoying. Now you flagged off that there was pressure in the TMT clients, and that led to a 19% drop in revenues for that particular vertical. Is that the only reason, had growth been higher, and what can you guide on that particular TMT client or clients?
Srikanth Velamakanni 0:53 ↗
Thank you, Reema. We reported pretty good numbers overall, 19% growth for the year and significant expansion in gross margins and overall profitability as well, which is one of the things that I think you asked much of times before we went public or during the time we were going public as to how in a stable way can we make money all the time. And I think we have demonstrated that we can be extremely profitable for a long period of time. Now coming to growth, in TMT we had a couple of client-specific issues because of which there was a decline in TMT. If we exclude TMT, our overall growth would be 27% for the year, so pretty good numbers overall. Within TMT, we had two client-specific issues. One of the clients did a joint venture because of which they stopped working with us or reduced the size dramatically, and the other one was a client that went through some reorganization and restructuring. So if you exclude those, overall growth numbers have been pretty good. Even including them, growth numbers are pretty good at about 19%. So that's what we think is pretty good for where Fractal is going from here.
Reema 2:02 ↗
And those two TMT clients for which you're facing particular issues which you highlighted, does that persist in FY27 and will there be a quantifiable revenue loss on account of that?
Srikanth Velamakanni 2:13 ↗
Those have now washed through the P&L. We don't see any more issues from those. So everything else comes back to normal. So we expect that that will have a good impact on the overall growth numbers for this fiscal.
Reema 2:26 ↗
So FY27 revenue growth should be better than FY26.
Srikanth Velamakanni 2:31 ↗
Better than FY26.
Reema 2:35 ↗
Okay. You're not putting a number to it. Srikanth, morning. Just a quick word on, so two things. One, you were investing about 6.5% of revenues on R&D. That's 100 basis points more than what you did a year before. Where will this number settle at? And when we say R&D in the context of a company like yours, I mean where exactly is this going?
Srikanth Velamakanni 3:02 ↗
Yes, let me explain that. Number one is that we expect to continue investing in R&D and increase the overall investments in R&D beyond where we are investing right now. That is the expectation. We want to take it up to 10% of revenue as R&D investments, which will be roughly between, let's say, companies that are services versus product companies which are at 14% of revenue spent on R&D. So we expect that number to go up. We want to do that while expanding gross margins. So as we expand gross margins, some of the gross margins we want to spend on increasing R&D spends. So the overall profitability continues to expand as we go forward. And in terms of where we are spending this money on R&D, we're building foundation models, agentic models. We're building this platform called Cogentic which is underneath every transformation solution that we're taking to. This is a multi-agentic platform where agents can work with each other, collaborate to solve a complex business problem. In doing so, they can access tools like machine learning algorithms and so on. And these algorithms in turn work with enterprise data. So this layer of agenticity on top of data platforms is critical to driving AI transformation inside companies. So we're building that platform. Secondly, we're building foundation models like our Vaidya medical foundation model which is doing really well on the HealthBench hard metric as well as the Asper platform which drives revenue growth for CPG companies. These are places where our R&D money is getting spent.
Reema 4:39 ↗
Right, got that. And I'm assuming this is mostly, this 6.5% to 10%, right, you take the R&D expenses to, this is mostly on personnel, I'm assuming a large portion of it.
Srikanth Velamakanni 4:55 ↗
Part of this is people and part of this is compute spends. So compute spends and including some spends on data acquisition and data labeling and things like that which are also spends. So overall it is about data acquisition, data labeling. It's a platform build which includes people as well as compute. And then certainly there is an R&D team that is also part of the expense overall.
Reema 5:20 ↗
We are talking to you on a day, Srikanth, when this OpenAI deployment company is causing a bit of a flutter and IT services talks. You know, I was saying earlier maybe this was in response to Anthropic's lead on the enterprise side, maybe they want to show that they're doing enough as well, but of course it's having an impact here. Just your thoughts on this.
Srikanth Velamakanni 5:42 ↗
This is, I think, the day Anthropic announced, OpenAI also announced the deployment company almost at the same time. So this has been a week in the making. It's a very good proof point that enterprises need a lot of work in order to drive value from AI. So what OpenAI and Anthropic both are saying is that our models alone are not enough. We need an AI services arm that can build this out for big enterprises and therefore they're investing in it because they don't see enough supply out there. So it's an enormous validation of the work that Fractal is doing, which means that this is a space that will take off quite well and with that Fractal as well. It almost feels like the model wars between Anthropic and OpenAI are behind us and now it's going to move on to implementation wars.
Reema 6:31 ↗
But Srikanth, just getting back to the numbers then, if you want to increase your R&D spend to 10%, you will have to push your gross margins higher because that's where the money for investment into R&D will come. What will gross margins need to look like to make that 10% R&D spend? And secondly, even in this quarter we've seen an expansion in gross margins. Can you tell us how much of it came on account of pricing push towards outcome-based? And third lever is on internal productivity improvements.

14 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Velamakanni, S. (2026, May 11). A Strong Q4 For Fractal Analytics | FY27 Revenue Will Be Better Than FY26, Says Company | CNBC TV18 [Interview transcript]. CNBC-TV18. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/901426/

MLA

Srikanth Velamakanni. "A Strong Q4 For Fractal Analytics | FY27 Revenue Will Be Better Than FY26, Says Company | CNBC TV18." CNBC-TV18, 11 May. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/901426/.

BibTeX
@misc{velamakanni2026_901426,
  author       = {Srikanth Velamakanni},
  title        = {A Strong Q4 For Fractal Analytics | FY27 Revenue Will Be Better Than FY26, Says Company | CNBC TV18},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, CNBC-TV18. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {may},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/901426/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}