Whitney Tilson25:32
Right. Well, look, let me start. It's a super complex question, and I'm not known for concise answers, but I'm going to try. Let's start with the fact that New York City is unbelievably wealthy. We have 2.5% of the US population, and we're 4.6% of US GDP. Stop and think about that. New York City, not the tri-state area, not New York State, New York City alone is almost 5% of US GDP. And we have the highest marginal tax rate of any major city, which means there's a huge city budget. So I do not have experience managing a $112 billion entity with 306,000 employees, but I know a lot of people who do. And the mayor, like I said, it's a strong mayor system. The mayor appoints 155 people basically unilaterally, doesn't require city council confirmation or whatever. Okay. One of the things I'd like to think I bring to the table is, I'd like to think I'm honest and smart or whatever, but I also have some humility. Like I know what I'm good at, I know what I'm not good at. I could never run a system that big, but I don't think I'm the smartest guy in the room. My goal is to hire 155 people, every single one of whom is smarter than I am in fighting crime, building affordable housing, filling potholes, operating parks, operating our subway system, etc., etc. Right? And my job, my message to them is twofold, and this gets to your question about the budget and taxes and all, which is: message number one is, only 24% of New Yorkers think the city government is providing good or excellent services, and they're right, it's not. Despite much higher spending, our municipal spending per capita is by far higher than any other major city in the country. We're the second-highest spending city after Chicago. We spend 36% more than Chicago. We're at $13,400 per citizen. Chicago's like under $10,000, right? And every other city is half or one-third our spending, right? So the problem isn't that we don't have the money. A super-rich city with a super-high tax rate, so we got loads of money. It's just not being spent very efficiently. So number one, my message to all those people I hire is twofold. Number one, do a better job, provide better services, cut crime, make our parks cleaner, fill more potholes, etc., etc. Right? Number two, find me all the fraud and waste and inefficiency. We can't raise taxes, but we need more money for the mentally ill and drug-addicted homeless people that we see out there on the streets every day, right? The solution is not to lock them up at Rikers. It is not a crime to be homeless. Some of them are out there committing mayhem and crimes, and yeah, absolutely there should not be a revolving door that's endangering all of us, right? But the vast majority of them are suffering. They are mentally ill, they suffer from addictions. It costs a lot of money to help people like that. Well, where are we going to get that money? I can look at the top-level numbers, how much we're spending, and I can talk to everybody in the system bottom-up, and I can tell you there's lots of fat in there. But I'm not coming in with some DOGE from people outside the system. My second message to the people inside the system is, go in there and find the fat and cut that fat and give me money back that we can reallocate for things we need. But don't cut the bone and the muscle. That's why it has to be done by experts inside each agency. You can't just parachute in from outside and claim that we're going to save $2 trillion when you don't know jack about the actual system. I actually believe in good government, but good, efficient government. So once they find me, I mean, in a $112 billion budget, when we're spending this much more than anybody else, I cannot believe that you can't get me 10% savings across the system, right? That's $10 billion that maybe we can selectively lower some excessive taxes that are driving businesses to close, etc. I think what Portugal did recently, where they cut the tax rate for people under age 30, again selectively, up to 30,000 euros a year of income, young people in Portugal are paying less. I want to make New York, young people in this country are doing worse than any other group of young people in history. They're not doing as well as their parents. They're suffering from off-the-charts rates of anxiety, depression, not holding jobs. They're still living at home. They're not getting married or having kids. You know, so I'd like to do something there, right? I'd like to channel more money into the highest-crime pockets of the city, to flood those areas with more drug and alcohol counseling, fix the street lights, etc., because not just police, because you got to comprehensively address these problems. So that's, I'm not out there promising huge tax cuts across the board. New York, I don't think that's very likely. But I think we can find a lot of savings, and we can make New York a heck of a lot more livable than it is right now. And by the way, the single biggest issue on affordability is housing. And if you'll give me 30 seconds to digress on that, we've lost 77,000 people in New York in the last four years, and the vacancy rate in New York right now is 1.4%. Now, I'm probably the only candidate in the race who understands basic supply and demand. We need people coming back to New York. What happens when more people come? There's no place to live. That's just going to jam prices higher. We need to build a lot more housing in this city. And we've had zoning rules dating back to the 1960s that make it virtually impossible to build new housing in this city. So it's not surprising housing costs are skyrocketing every year. So the city council just passed a watered-down bill, the far-lefties, you know, the NIMBY types, that's going to be 80,000 new units of housing in 15 years, and that is less than 10% of what we need. I want to be the person that lifts all these horrible zoning laws, regulations, restrictions. Ask anyone who tries to build and operate housing in New York versus any other city in the country, and they just start laughing. They hold their head in their hands. They're like, a two-week environmental review in Nashville is a two-year environmental review in New York. I mean, we're just punching ourselves in the face.