John Stankey36:08
Hi, Sean. Sure. Let me start by reiterating kind of what I just said and what our direction is. Our direction is to build the best converged network offering in the United States. And that means in order to do that, you have to have great foundational assets that you own and operate to do that. I just shared with you, for example, why is it important to have a core switching architecture, routing architecture that allows you to see every packet on a network? Because that's the way that you're able to manage service performance, security, offer the kinds of capabilities across heterogeneous access technologies like wireless, fixed fiber, Wi-Fi, other technologies that allow you to ensure the quality of service of delivering a packet over those heterogeneous architectures. And we start from a fantastic place with assets. We have great fiber. We've got a great wireless network. We have a great customer base that we know, that we know how to manage their accounts, we know how to manage their billing. We can build trust with them over time on the relationships that we have. And so, when you start to think about more access technologies becoming available such as direct to cell, which you know, we're going to see an opportunity to close out white spaces, I think we're naturally positioned to add those capabilities on to the great integration we've already done to be a converged access provider. And I don't mean to harp on fiber, but once you get that in place with a customer, it's a really good place not only because it's the lowest marginal cost to carry a bit of any technology that's available out there, but its performance is superior. And when you get top end performance, the best performance coupled with low marginal cost in the networking business, that's typically a really good combination for the long haul. So, we're going to continue to move to integrate partners. And I think when I think about LEO and satellites, you've heard me say it before, I think it's going to be great innovation for consumers. I think it's going to open up applications that none of us expected or knew about, and they're going to be new and different, and they're going to help grow the market in total.
I think that when you look at where we're at right now, what's really on the horizon that maybe a couple years ago we all would have said, you know, could this really happen? But 12 to maybe 18 to 24 months from now, we will have always-on connectivity in the United States. And that's going to be really, really important. And I think our customers are going to want that, and I think it's natural that we work with LEO providers that have the capabilities to solve that problem, to integrate those offerings into our services. We have a great position with those customers, and as you've heard me say my ideal outcome for the satellite space is that there's more than one satellite constellation up there. And I've offered that at some point I'd expect that there's probably at least three serving the United States with capable products and services. We're working with one closely right now to make sure that they get off the ground and they're viable. That's AST SpaceMobile. We've been putting most of our R&D and our work on bringing product out with what they will be matching to the market, but I fully expect that SpaceX will ultimately have a robust direct-to-device capability. I would expect that Amazon LEO will have a robust direct-to-device capability, and who knows, maybe even a fourth shows up. My goal would be that I have a good, strong wholesale relationship. And it may not just be with one of them, it may be with more than one of them. And that we architect this in a way that we can continue to manage the traffic on our network and control packets so that we are able to offer that end-to-end integrated service on a heterogeneous network. And that's the direction that we're taking.
Now, if you're thinking about the threat of a directed device approach, look, there's a lot to be done in getting LEO constellations up and working on directed device. I think it will happen, but I don't think it's going to be a straight line from here to there. There's all kinds of challenges to work through these things. One is getting satellites up in the air, two is getting them up and keeping them up. It's getting the right spectrum portfolio in place and working through all the issues of power levels and interference that are driven from it. It's getting the devices tuned so they work properly. Satellite works really good outdoors. It doesn't work very good indoors. You know, it's sometimes lost on people that we have spent literally decades investing in communications infrastructure in this country to raise service levels and performance for end-user customers that they've become accustomed to. And the landscape is littered with those that have come in and tried to kind of get into the business on the cheap or get into the business without understanding what the level of performance is necessary to have a minimally viable offering. Customers don't tolerate much interruption anymore. And there's decades of that infrastructure that's built. A lot of it is built in on the interior buildings. I know in our company we put about a billion and a half dollars a year into doing things to make sure hospitals and stadiums and hotels and universities all work really well, and you can't just flip a switch and get that done.
When I think about an MVNO construct, my approach in terms of how AT&T looks at it is we like to think about MVNOs in a way where it gets to a part of the market that we can't get to. It's an extension in a segment that maybe we're not doing a good job of penetrating and somebody can do it in a more creative way. And we also think about it in the context of we ensure that our network capabilities are used in a way that's consistent with our long-term goal to be the best converged operator in the US, which means that we don't just give traffic away without certain conditions and capabilities and requirements as to how they do business with us and how that capability is instantiated in the market. So this is not a wide-open here, you know, get connection to the network, do what you want with it. And within that context, do I think that I'm looking at satellite LEO right now and saying that that's a place that an MVNO relationship would open up access to customers I don't have today? No, I don't think that's the case. I think I've got a way to bring the right value to customers broadly in what I just articulated. And look, I don't know that I'm worried about taking on any comer in broadband right now when I've got fiber in a home. As I said, lowest marginal cost, best performance, that usually does pretty well in the market. And I like our investment strategy and where we're going to have 60 plus million fiber homes by the time we get to 2030 and living off that base and being very successful with it. Thanks for the question, John. Operator, we'll go to the next one, please.