CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Jorge Lemann
Brazilian investment banker and businessman, 3G Capital

Jorge Paulo Lemann and Brad Jacobs at Harvard

📅 Jun 01, 2026 Luiz Martins 43 MIN 30 VIEWS 81 SEGMENTS · 3 SPEAKERS
Brad Jacobs, the serial entrepreneur who has founded multiple multibillion-dollar companies across oil brokerage, waste management, heavy equipment rental, freight logistics, and warehouse automation, sits down with legendary Brazilian investor Jorge Paulo Lemann, co-founder of 3G Capital and the force behind AB InBev, Burger King, and Kraft Heinz. Over the course of his career, Brad Jacobs has completed approximately 500 M&A transactions, raised over $50 billion in debt and equity capital, and created tens of billions of dollars in shareholder value. Today he is fully focused on his latest...

What Jorge Lemann said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Jorge Lemann interviewed Brad Jacobs at Harvard, discussing Jacobs's youth, business principles, and success. Jacobs said his edge was intensity of focus and working seven days a week, and that his biggest mistakes were in people choices, hiring executives who focused too much on cost cutting or growth without balance. He described his hiring process as eight or nine interviews and a 45-question questionnaire, and said he studies deception detection from former CIA polygraph expert Dick Houston. Jacobs advocated overpaying top talent with long-vested equity, but not using equity for lower-level workers. He said his best deal was investing $60 million in 1989 for about 20% of a small brewery, now AB InBev, worth $120 billion, with no dilution. He said he has no personal life, takes intelligent risks with high upside and acceptable downside, and advised students to figure out what they really want, noting billionaire status is overrated and requires total dedication. He discussed US volatility under Trump, seeing opportunity in mispriced assets, and said he learns businesses by being an outsider, not knowing the industry, and focusing on the business of business.

Key takeaways

  1. Jacobs's best deal was investing $60 million in 1989 for about 20% of a small brewery, now AB InBev, worth $120 billion, with no dilution.
  2. Jacobs advocates overpaying top talent with long-vested equity, but not using equity for lower-level workers, preferring bonuses tied to their job.
  3. Jacobs said his biggest mistakes were hiring executives who focused too much on cost cutting or growth without balance, hurting revenue or margins.
  4. Jacobs said he takes intelligent risks where the odds are rigged in his advantage, the upside is far higher than the downside, and he can live with the downside.
  5. Jacobs said he never learns the industries he enters, seeing his outsider status as an advantage, and focuses on learning the business of business.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
$60 million Investment in 1989 for about 20% of a small brewery, now AB InBev commitment 17:05
20% Stake in AB InBev, still held without dilution metric 17:22
$120 billion Current value of AB InBev metric 17:52
22% Current share of AB InBev held metric 17:41
8 or 9 Number of interviews for senior hires metric 17:05
45 Number of questions in hiring questionnaire metric 9:14
10 years Time it takes to learn a business, and Jacobs's cycle for changing industries timeline 41:00
$100,000 Jacobs's childhood dream amount to retire on other 3:59
18% Interest rate on Bank of America CD in his youth other 3:59

Chapters

  1. 0:00Youth and early dreams
  2. 4:58Edge and success factors
  3. 7:37Mistakes and people choices
  4. 9:14Hiring process and deception detection
  5. 11:21Motivation and company building
  6. 13:03Compensation philosophy
  7. 16:58Best deal: AB InBev
  8. 19:37Personal life and work-life balance
  9. 21:48Risk taking and problem solving
  10. 25:27Advice to students and philanthropy

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 4:58I think that was my edge. What was your edge?
  2. 7:37The right question would be what mistakes did I not make?
  3. 9:14Is this somebody who I can provide what they're looking for?
  4. 11:21What are we trying to achieve in order to make a lot of money?
  5. 20:43Hey, what happened to our margins here?
  6. 21:57I think, do you agree with that?
  7. 25:27What's your best advice for these folks? What's your best advice?
  8. 28:39So do you think of yourself much more as a manager than an artist or are you an artist also?
  9. 29:57Like this is so fun, this is so mesmerizing, like wow, why would I waste time doing something else?
  10. 34:32Then I'll make it up since nobody knows what philanthropy means. No, what philanthropy means?
  11. 36:26Thank you for your question. What do you think?
  12. 40:18And the audience whispered at me to ask you if they want to work for you or with you, what should they do?
Jorge Lemann 0:00 ↗
And Jorge Paulo Lemann.
Unknown 0:09 ↗
Please welcome to the stage Brad Jacobs.
Brad Jacobs 0:23 ↗
Feel the pressure. I feel the pressure.
Jorge Lemann 0:35 ↗
For Brad, I'm only going to speak in Portuguese and the rest will be in English now. And I'm a great fan of Brad. I really admire what he has put together, the way he has worked. He has built some very big companies and he's done it in a way which I like. He's very involved in the management of these companies. He invests a lot of his own money in the projects he's built up and he has developed a system of doing it over and over again and repeating his success. So, as a businessman and somebody who's interested in building companies, I have a lot to learn from Brad. I'm a little bit worried here because I'm supposed to interview him, but he has said that he's going to be asking me questions also. So, we're ready. But before we get going, how many of you want to be philanthropists in the future and would like to help others and create big projects? Okay. How many of you want to be a billionaire? Okay. So, I recommend very much that you read his book, How to Make a Few Billion Dollars. It's a good book to tell you how to become a billionaire. But Brad, tell us a little bit about your youth and how that affected what you became later and how it affected your business principles and like that.
Brad Jacobs 2:30 ↗
Well, first of all, thank you for inviting me here. I appreciate it and thank you all for taking time to listen to us. My youth, I still think I'm in my youth. I still feel very young. I don't feel mature at all. I don't feel like an adult. I feel like an adolescent. And I feel I have the same mental energy and to some extent the same physical energy and even more of the spiritual energy of someone young. So, I don't know if I buy into this concept of you're young and then you're old. I think you kind of what you want to be. I was kind of older in some ways when I was younger.
Jorge Lemann 3:06 ↗
What did you want to be when you were very young?
Brad Jacobs 3:11 ↗
Different times I wanted to be different things. My mother wanted me to be president of the United States. I wasn't so interested. At some point I wanted to be a rabbi but I lost interest in that. At one point I wanted to be a musician. I wanted to be a musician very strongly and I still identify as a musician even though I don't play music and practice music like I should but I identify as a musician and I think of all the different things I did earlier in my life the music is what influenced my business career the most because it was involved in improvisation and teamwork and harmony.
Jorge Lemann 3:48 ↗
Good. So what was your big dream then and what is your big dream now?
Brad Jacobs 3:59 ↗
My big dream when I was a kid is I wanted to make $100,000 because we had stagflation with Jimmy Carter and interest rates were in the high teens. So you could take $100,000 and put it in a Bank of America certificate of deposit and you'd make 18% on that. So, you'd make 1,500 bucks a month. And I figured I could retire after I made the $100,000 and I'd make 1,500 bucks a month and I could meditate and I could do my music and I could just really have a deep life. But I started a company and we started making $100,000 a week, $100,000 a day. It just kind of kept going. And then I just always intended to stop at some point, but I just never stopped. I just kept going.
Jorge Lemann 4:48 ↗
And what do you think is your edge? What is your edge? Why have you done better than most? And why have you been so successful?
Brad Jacobs 4:58 ↗
Well, I think without trying to be falsely modest, I do think luck matters. I think where you're born helps or hurts. What education you get helps or hurts. What social environment you grow up in helps or hurts. So I lucked out on some of those things. But I think once I was the beneficiary of that, I think it was drive. I think it was motivation. I think it was determination. My edge was intensity of focus, concentration at the obliteration of everything else. Just concentrate on one specific thing at a time and go really deep into that and be passionate about it and work seven days a week from when you wake up to when you go to sleep and just don't do anything else. I think that was my edge. What was your edge? Because you've done much better than I have. I should be interviewing you. This is reversal here.
Jorge Lemann 5:57 ↗
Oh, my edge, I think, is I work very hard. I chase things very hard. I'm focused. I don't try to do too many things at the same time. And I like everything I do a lot. So if you do things that you like and if you work very hard and focus, you get there. And that got you where you are now. And the second question you had, the following was, 'And what's your dream now?'
Brad Jacobs 6:25 ↗
Oh, the dream now is to make the companies I'm involved with continue to be very successful. Some of them are doing okay, some could do better. I'm trying to improve how they do and my dream is that my family continues watching over some of these companies and continuing the philanthropic work I do. I mean I do a lot of stuff in education and training people and giving especially Brazilians a better chance in life. And I hope and the idea is that the companies I'm involved with will fund the foundation that helps these philanthropic projects.
Jorge Lemann 7:13 ↗
I'm curious in this room here, how many people either indirectly or directly have benefited in some way from Jorge Paulo Lemann and his wife's philanthropy. Wow. Okay. So, you've touched a lot of lives as well. Good. Good for you.
Brad Jacobs 7:37 ↗
Well, Brad, what mistakes did you make? The right question would be what mistakes did I not make? Because I really have made every mistake you can possibly think of. The biggest category of mistakes is the same as what's made me one successful, which is people choices. If you pick wonderful people, and wonderful needs to be defined, but if you pick very wonderful people, you will succeed. The chances of your success go way, way up. If you pick the wrong people, dishonest people or incompetent people or people don't work together in the team well, or people just aren't as great as you thought they were, it can really slow you down quite a bit. I would say the biggest mistakes I've made have been once in a while I've made a whopper of a decision on a person and had big consequences. But I'm okay with that because mistakes are something I've learned to not just accept but to actually enjoy and to realize that that's part of the game. And I'm making mistakes now. I expect myself to make mistakes. I expect myself to make a lot of mistakes because I'm making a lot of decisions. So like you, you know, when you're running big business, you're making decisions all day long and sometimes you don't have time to really think them through really long and carefully and thoughtfully. You have to make a snap decision because they're waiting for you to decide. You hear a little bit, you hear a little bit, you make a decision and fortunately most of them are right. Once in a while someone's going to be wrong. That's just the way it's going to be.
Jorge Lemann 9:10 ↗
How do you find and pick the people that work with you?
Brad Jacobs 9:14 ↗
How I pick the people is very, very carefully. So for someone to work at one of my companies on a senior level, you get about eight or nine interviews each of about an hour to an hour and a half. You get a questionnaire which is in the back of my book. It's 45 questions of unusual questions for an interview. HR people actually don't like asking some of those questions, but I need to ask those questions because I need to know who the person is. I need to know what motivates the person. I need to know what are they really all about? What defines them? What's their goal? What are they trying to achieve and can I do a deal? Is this somebody who I can provide what they're looking for? Most of the time the majority of that is money but it's not the only thing. People want development. They want leadership. They want to really make a difference. They want to apply things they've learned. So they really need to understand their mind where they are. So the process of hiring someone is a long one. I try to do most things fast but that I do pretty slowly.
Jorge Lemann 10:14 ↗
If you're using the same questionnaire, don't they know what you're going to ask and they all learn how to answer it? And how do you get away from that self-serving bias?
Brad Jacobs 10:26 ↗
There is some of that. For the last 15 years I've been a student of a guy called Dick Houston who's written a couple books since he used to be the head of polygraphy at the CIA and then he developed a model of detecting deception. He's the world's expert in detecting deception, knowing when you're lying. And so I've studied that. So even if a person is not telling the truth according to the model of detecting deception, you can detect that pretty easily. It's very objective. That tells you something, too. So the fact that they're insincere is valuable information to know. So yeah, there's some pollution in the data because they know the questions ahead of time, but on balance, we still get to where we need to go.
Jorge Lemann 11:13 ↗
So after being so successful, what keeps you going?
Brad Jacobs 11:21 ↗
I haven't gone to therapy in about 15 years, so I don't know the answer to that. So I knew what motivated me when I did two years of therapy, but it's been so long. I don't know. I don't know that you really know what motivates you. Everyone thinks they know. People think they know what motivates them, but maybe it's something else that's motivating. But for me, I just love what I'm doing. I'm having fun. I like starting businesses. That's the funnest part. I usually go in 10 year cycles and then I get bored and sell a company or start a new company, whatever. But the first few years for me are the most enjoyable ones because it's pure art. It's pure creativity. You're starting off with a completely blank slate and you can paint whatever you want. There's no, you have complete freedom and you get to select the people you're going to spend all this time with, which is a wonderful thing to have the freedom and luxury to spend time with people you love and respect and admire. That's probably one of the top five things I value in life. So you get to pick the people. You get to design the organization from start. What's decentralized? What's centralized? What's shared? You got to figure out all the delegations of authority. You understand how do you get a comp, what are the main things we're doing? What are we trying to achieve in order to make a lot of money? What are the top 10 or so things that we got to do and then who's going to be in charge of that and how do you compensate people so that if they succeed at that they make a lot of money. So that part when you're initially setting up the culture of the organization for me is the funnest part. So the next two three years should be fun. It should go downhill after that.
Jorge Lemann 13:01 ↗
But what have you found out about remunerating people?
Brad Jacobs 13:03 ↗
Pay them more than you should. I'm a big advocate of overpaying. I think overpaying is underpaying because if you want to succeed in a big way, you need good people. You just can't do it yourself. There's just too much to do. You know that. And if you want really good people, they have choices. There's a lot of competition for great talent. So, one of the things you have to provide is money. They have to have a real opportunity to make a lot of money. Now, I like to structure the deal so they don't make that much money if we just do okay or even if we do better than okay, but they can make a ton of money if we do fabulously successful. So I like to structure compensation packages that are long-ended so they have a lot of equity that vests at the end so no one thinks about going anywhere and ones that are heavily equitized for the top people. So everyone's thinking about how do we get share price to go up long term? How do we create share price long? Everyone's in that mindset all day long. Below the top part of the organization I don't like using equity at all. I find it hasn't worked when I've done it because it doesn't correlate. If you're a truck driver, you're a warehouse worker, you're not really following stock so much, but you are following a bonus. So there I like to compensate people on what they're in charge of, what their job is.
Jorge Lemann 14:31 ↗
Do you find our philosophies of compensation or when you're similar or different?
Brad Jacobs 14:37 ↗
Yeah, we've always overpaid and tried to incentivize people maybe excessively like that. So we haven't really figured out what is ideal but make sure we try to make sure that the compensation of the people that work, our executives, since we're in public companies, are equivalent to what the public investors are making like that. That's right. Try to link it so that you don't have the executive making a lot of money and the investors not making any money like that. So that's our basic orientation.
Jorge Lemann 15:24 ↗
But you've made people who have been associated with you have become billionaires and multi-billionaires.
Brad Jacobs 15:30 ↗
I've made investors billionaires. I've never made an employee or partner of mine a billionaire. I've given people the opportunity to make themselves hundreds of millions of dollars, tens of millions of dollars, many, many people millions of dollars, but I haven't caught up to you yet on the billionaire stuff. I have to learn that. I haven't figured that one out.
Jorge Lemann 15:51 ↗
Well, we figured we want to attract the best possible people and we started off as brokers and stock brokers and things like that in Brazil. And then the way we didn't have money, we didn't have a name. So the way we could attract the best possible people was by giving them partnership and that worked quite well and we did well. So we always remained with our model of attracting very, very good people and top people and making them partners in our business and yeah, and so they did very well and sometimes did better even than the public investors as you say but it's been our way. But all those companies, you've been in many different industries like I have. Which one made the most amount of money for shareholders? All your different ventures.
Brad Jacobs 16:58 ↗
Oh, our best deal of all was obviously the brewery.
Jorge Lemann 17:05 ↗
Yeah.
Brad Jacobs 17:05 ↗
Where we bought a very small, small by world standards brewery and we invested $60 million in 1989.
Jorge Lemann 17:20 ↗
60 million.
Brad Jacobs 17:22 ↗
60 million and well that's the 60 million we invested was about 20% of the company we bought which is what we still have of the company that it is now.
Jorge Lemann 17:38 ↗
And you haven't diluted.
Brad Jacobs 17:41 ↗
No, amazing. I mean we haven't been diluted. We still have the same number of shares which is 22% or something like that.
Jorge Lemann 17:52 ↗
And the company's now worth 120 billion. So 20% is nice work out nice.
Brad Jacobs 18:03 ↗
I'll drink to that. And yeah, this AB InBev.
Jorge Lemann 18:09 ↗
Yeah, this AB InBev. Are you worried about marijuana taking market share?
Brad Jacobs 18:15 ↗
Our first 30 years were better than our last seven years. So even though it was very, very successful, it slowed down. This is life.

40 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Lemann, J. (2026, June 1). Jorge Paulo Lemann and Brad Jacobs at Harvard [Interview transcript]. Luiz Martins. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/955401/

MLA

Jorge Lemann. "Jorge Paulo Lemann and Brad Jacobs at Harvard." Luiz Martins, 1 Jun. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/955401/.

BibTeX
@misc{lemann2026_955401,
  author       = {Jorge Lemann},
  title        = {Jorge Paulo Lemann and Brad Jacobs at Harvard},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Luiz Martins. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jun},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/955401/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}