About Sajjan Jindal
Sajjan Jindal, Chairman of JSW Group, was named Business Leader of the Year at The Economic Times Awards for Corporate Excellence in December 2025. In a conversation published in October 2025, Jindal stated that his ambition is to become the world’s number one steel producer. He said he does not plan to retire and told his son that he will continue running the business. Jindal also described Prime Minister Modi as a “big picture man” and said he chose to enter the automobile business because India should rely on its own energy sources rather than imported fuel.
In 2026, JSW Group held a groundbreaking ceremony for a 25 MTPA steel plant at its Vijayanagar Works, which Jindal described as the world’s largest steel plant at a single location. He said the target for completion is 24 months, referencing a Chinese record. In April 2026, JSW and JFE Steel inaugurated a 10 MTPA joint venture plant in Sambalpur, Odisha, which Jindal noted is JFE’s first integrated steel plant outside Japan. He said JSW is building four steel plants simultaneously in Odisha, which he called unprecedented globally. Jindal also commented on India’s energy policy, arguing the country should rely on solar, wind, coal, and nuclear power and criticized the difficulty of accessing government R&D funding.
Source: AI-verified profile updated from Sajjan Jindal's recent appearances.
Browse all interviews →
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
I
Interviewer0:02
Mr. Jindal, thank you very much for joining us here on the CNBC TV18 25th anniversary. It's great to have you. And what we are discussing tonight, ladies and gentlemen, is whether we are at a breakout moment as far as India's manufacturing sector is concerned. So straight up, Mr. Jindal, we had Uday Kotak here this morning saying that India needs to up its game as far as competition is concerned. We can no longer be protectionist on trade. We need to be far more liberal. How do you respond?
S
Sajjan Jindal0:31
So just coming before coming here, I heard this comment and I said Uday is not in manufacturing, so he can comment freely. If he was in manufacturing, then he would say this. So I was saying, you know, we are not yet the factory of the world. Let's first become the factory of the world and then we should open up our doors for competition. Let there be no... Nothing. I mean, the United States, even after let's say 100 years or 150 years of developed nation status, even today they have tariffs. Europe is putting tariffs, right? And we are saying we should open up? Then we will kill our manufacturing here. We are not a great manufacturing country in any case today. Our GDP manufacturing GDP is only 17% of our GDP, right? And we must get to 25-30%, what China is. But if you open up and we become liberal, then we will kill our industry.
I
Interviewer1:38
So you talked about tariffs. Donald Trump says tariff is the favorite word that he has in the dictionary, and he has promised that he is going to go full throttle as far as tariffs are concerned. What is that going to mean? We don't know the quantum. We don't know what finally will happen. But given the threat and what he's done in his previous term, what will it mean?
S
Sajjan Jindal1:57
What Donald Trump is, in my opinion, he is very clear. He is very clear-headed guy, whether right or wrong, but he has a clarity of thought. And he says that for me, America is first. I want to build America. I don't care about the world. For me, America is the world. And therefore, I want my industry to grow. I want America to grow, American industry to produce goods. It's not that Chinese should supply to me and then I will consume. I don't want to become only a consuming country. I want to produce and consume. So therefore, I want to put tariffs. Yes, tariffs do make you, let's say, a lethargic. Let's say it becomes, you become more uncompetitive to an extent. So therefore, you have to gradually bring down the tariff to become comparatively... start running the race.
I
Interviewer2:49
So let me throw that argument back to you. You said you have to allow the kid to grow up. So where are we? Haven't we adult yet as far as Indian manufacturing?
S
Sajjan Jindal2:58
Not at all. Not at all. It's a teenager? Pre-teen. Pre-teen. Yeah, we are just kind of four or five years old, really. Yeah, absolutely. In manufacturing, yeah. Because, because you see China, if you open up the records and see China in 1990, what kind of protectionist China was? In 2000, what were their protection levels? And what they are today? Today they are open up because they became the factory of the world. I wanted to export steel in 98-99 to China. Was not permitted to do that because China had tariffs. They removed the tariff. But now today, we have zero tariff on steel. Chinese steel, which is surplus, they are near 60% of their capacity surplus capacity. So it comes via Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Malaysia to India at 0% duty.
I
Interviewer3:49
So you are saying there is a case for higher tariffs to be imposed?
S
Sajjan Jindal3:52
I am not saying higher tariffs, but there has to be, the government must have a very clear view of what they want. The heavy industries to come up in this country. Because steel industry, for example, I am just taking steel as an example because I belong to steel industry. If you don't want the heavy industries to come in India, you want to rely on Chinese steel industry to build Indian ecosystem, Indian SMEs and MSMEs, I have no problem. I can go somewhere else and invest. I don't have to invest here. But I love this country. I would love to invest here. I have grown here. I have earned my bucks here, right? So I would love to invest here. But this thought that MSME and SME is more important than the heavy industry, if the heavy industry doesn't do, MSME, SME doesn't... So you have to...
I
Interviewer4:45
You're sounding pretty sanguine about growth as well as the future.
S
Sajjan Jindal4:47
Not really. I mean, yeah, but this fact is you have to, because steel industry needs huge investment, right? So for making huge investment, you have to make profits. If you can't make profit, then you can, my shareholders will not give me money to invest, right? So then I can't build more industry. Today, for example, India needs 20 million tons of steel every year. China needed, let's say, in year 2000. We need it today. So 20 million means 20 billion dollars of investment every year. I don't think if any other industry requires that kind of investment. We are willing to do that as an industry. But there are only, in every country, there are only four or five players which invest in any industry, right? So a 20 billion dollars among four or five players is a huge investment, yeah, which we are doing. But if we don't make money, we can't invest. Okay.
I
Interviewer5:48
So let's talk about you said that you know, if things, if the conditions are not right, you will go elsewhere and invest. I mean, in a matter of speaking, I'm not saying that you're going to do that, but I am talking about for instance, your own international plan, your own international expansion in markets like the US for instance. Are we going to see more of that being built out?
S
Sajjan Jindal6:08
Personally, no. As I said, I love India. I love to expand in this country. And this is my karma bhoomi. So I would do here. But I want the right policy. I want the country must really think about how to develop the heavy industry.
I
Interviewer6:30
So what you want? What is the number one to three thing you want from the government?
S
Sajjan Jindal6:34
For example, we cannot be a country that exports minerals and imports finished products. We cannot be there. So there has to be a complete... No, no. I have been advocating this policy for a long time, more than 20 years. Please don't export minerals. Please allow Indian industry to consume the minerals, add value, and export the products, right? But we are exporting minerals and importing finished products. This is a complete no-no. Number one. Okay. Number two, there has to be a level playing field, right? A country like China, which has huge surplus, near 500 million tons. We consume 150 million tons of steel. China exports near 150 million tons of steel. So therefore, there is no way that we can compete with China. I mean, it's not that we are not comparatively... In a normal year, then the Chinese steel companies do. But the Chinese are all state-owned companies, yeah. And for them, profit is not very important. It's more like a job creation, it's ego boosting thing that every province has a steel plant. That province has bigger capacity than the other, you know, that kind of thing. They have competition, healthy competition. But therefore, they don't care for the profits. But we don't make profits, then we don't have a state exchequer writing checks for us. Then you don't get money. Yeah.
I
Interviewer8:25
That is one of the aspects, Mr. Jindal. You know, it's almost a blow hot, blow cold relationship with China, isn't it? I mean, you just talk about all the reasons why we should not do business with China. And through the COVID period, you were very clear we should not do any business with China. But now you are doing business with China. You went into a joint venture for the electric mobility space with a Chinese company. So do you believe that there is a need to be pragmatic on how we engage with China?
S
Sajjan Jindal8:51
No, absolutely. With any country, in fact, even Pakistan, for that matter, we should be pragmatic. To deal with Pakistan, we should be pragmatic. Yeah, we should not say that no, no, no, no, nothing doing. So when I said we should not do business with China, when Galwan happened, because I was very clear that we cannot deal with an enemy state. Pakistan, for that matter, is an enemy state, yeah. But still, if we work properly, you know, over with a control mechanism, we should open up and do business. Because Pakistan, even with Pakistan, because a very poor neighbor will always hurt us. So therefore, we should think, we should have a long term. But this is not a foreign policy discussion we are having. But my point is that with China, we should, because China has already developed this technology on electric vehicles. Today, 60% of their new car sales are electric and new energy. India, we have 0%. And this is the way forward. We import all our fuel for the cars. All petroleum products are imported, 85-90% is imported. So it's in our interest that we transition ourselves to a technology which is domestic, which is local technology. So bring the technology in from China, but manufacture in India.
I
Interviewer10:20
Exactly. Absolutely.
S
Sajjan Jindal10:22
Because technology exists in China. We must develop it over time in India. But we must bring the technology and develop the products in India.
I
Interviewer10:31
I understand from you what is the aspiration now on the EV side. I mean, you've got this joint venture that you've inked with MG. Take me through what we should expect in the next five to ten years as far as JSW's EV ambition is concerned.
S
Sajjan Jindal10:45
So the idea is to give the consumers a very good product, very good quality at an affordable price in the EV spectrum. And I believe that JSW can do it extremely well. Okay. So that's... you're giving us, Mr. Jindal. But you know, on manufacturing, the big Make in India moment, you rightly pointed out, is still about 16% share of GDP. When do we get to that 25% which has been the target and the aspiration? How do we get from pre-teen to teen to adulthood?
I mean, it's a matter of time. We were discussing recently that India is not spending enough money on innovation, on R&D. Indian industry is not spending enough money. The government is trying to help and trying to nudge the industry to invest more in R&D. But we are not doing it. Because as they say, if you are hungry, first you would like to eat, and then you want to do puja, and then you want to worship, and then you want to do something. So right now, the industry, I think, is still growing, investing in the growth, and then it will go into the R&D. Because it's the most important thing. Somebody was asking me why we can't have an NVIDIA from India, why we can't have Microsoft from India. But the point is that because we are not spending enough in R&D, we don't have enough money. It's a capital problem. It's a capital problem. It's a mindset problem. Because you know, the mindset, once you are investing, you have a limited amount of cash available. Either you invest in expansion, which is needed for the nation, for the country's requirement, or you invest in your R&D and your growth and your technology. So you feel that expansion is giving you better ROI. And a straightforward answer in the boardrooms is let's go for expansion. Because if you invest in R&D, whether that would be successful or not, we don't know. And there are so many people investing in China, in the US. And so you prefer to buy the technology as opposed to investing in it yourself. As of now.
I
Interviewer13:34
So let me end by asking you, Mr. Jindal, you know, over the next few years, by 2030, you talked about how very few players are actually investing. This is a private capex challenge. How much is JSW across the group going to be investing in India? How much will you invest outside of India? In terms of numbers.
S
Sajjan Jindal13:55
Yes, it's not very easy. But demand... So we have made a very ballpark number that between now and 2030, 2031 fiscal, we would be investing close to 70 billion dollars in India and maybe 2 billion dollars outside India. 70 billion in India, 2 billion outside of India.
I
Interviewer14:20
Any more IPOs on the anvil?
S
Sajjan Jindal14:22
I'm not sure about it. Not for the moment. Not for the moment.
I
Interviewer14:26
Any new area of... any new businesses like electric mobility you decided to get into that? Anything else on the anvil?
S
Sajjan Jindal14:32
Not yet. No, no, nothing at the moment. The plate is full, more than full, more than full.
I
Interviewer14:38
Sajjan Jindal, many, many thanks for joining us. Ladies and gentlemen, a big round of applause for Sajjan Jindal here talking about India's manufacturing moment. Appreciate you joining us here this evening, sir. Thank you very, very much. Thank you.