Back
Tyler Winklevoss
CEO, Gemini

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss: Cryptocurrency and the Future of Money.mp4

🎥 Jul 01, 2019 📺 Winklevoss Brothers ⏱ 54m
bitcoinanalysis #bitcoinmining #bitcoinprice #bitcoincash #bitcoindaily #bitcoinatbppinastube #bitcoinrant #bitcoin2020 ...
Watch on YouTube

About Tyler Winklevoss

Tyler Winklevoss, CEO of the cryptocurrency exchange Gemini, has continued to promote Bitcoin as "gold 2.0" and has repeatedly stated his belief that the price of Bitcoin will reach $1 million per coin. He has argued that for Bitcoin to disrupt gold, it must capture its market cap, which he said would result in a price of $1 million per Bitcoin at a minimum)Skip. He has described the current stage of Bitcoin's adoption as being in the "bottom of the first inning" of a baseball game. Winklevoss has also expressed support for Zcash, describing it as "encrypted Bitcoin" and stating that the dawn of the age of AI has made privacy more important, creating an inflection point for the cryptocurrency. Winklevoss has commented on the regulatory environment in the United States, stating that the country is "not there right now" regarding clear crypto regulation and that the US is "ruled by octogenarians." He has described the US regulatory approach as "hostile" and has said that the country is losing crypto innovation to other jurisdictions. He has also discussed Gemini's expansion plans, including hiring in Singapore)Skip. In September 2025, Gemini went public on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "GMS," with Winklevoss stating that the company is "super excited for the next 10 years and beyond."

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Tyler Winklevoss's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (64 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
H
Host0:00
Alright, before we get started, I was gonna do this, and now I realize with the lights I'm not gonna be able to tell at all. But I want to take a quick survey. How many people own Bitcoin? I know I can see at least one. Yeah, you guys, if you don't know, there's gonna be a panic. People pick you liquidated, so you have to raise your hands. Hey, that's great. Thank you. How many people hold Bitcoin right now? Okay, pretty good crowd. How many people know what Bitcoin is? Hey, look, this is getting easier over the years. So just to define the terms quickly, either Cameron or Tyler, whichever, just tell us what Bitcoin is.
T
Tyler Winklevoss0:39
Sure. We think Bitcoin is digital gold, gold 2.0. But it's money, the first form of money that was ever built purposely for the internet. So it's sort of like what your email did to snail mail, cryptocurrency or Bitcoin does for money.
H
Host0:56
I agree. So look, I want to talk about a lot of things. I'm gonna try to structure this in a way I think makes sense, but if we go off topic, that's fine. You guys will rein us all in. Ben, I wanted to ask you first. Obviously, you wrote Accidental Billionaires, The Social Network. I mean, you covered Cameron and Tyler. But what led you from that to this book, to Bitcoin Billionaires? Like, what was the evolution of your interest in it and the point where you got where you decided there's another book here?
B
Ben Mezrich1:34
Yeah, so when I wrote Accidental Billionaires, this was like a decade ago. I had no idea that I would be revisiting any of the characters, and I probably could not have guessed that it would have been the Winklevoss twins. They were a very big source for me in that book. I had met them through Facebook, actually, right after Eduardo. Eduardo had come to me and I went from that and found these guys, and they were very helpful in writing it. But that movie didn't portray them necessarily in the best light, and I take responsibility for that to some extent. When I first met them in New York, they walked into the room, and let's be fair, they look like something out of mythology. I immediately remembered every 80s movie I'd ever seen, and they were the bad guys chasing the Karate Kid around the gym. So, unfairly, I think I wrote it to some extent, and Aaron Sorkin took it to a whole other level, as he does, and the movie was wonderful and Armie Hammer was incredible. But that was that. About a year and a half ago, I saw in the New York Times a headline that said they were the first Bitcoin billionaires. Over the years, people have been pitching me stories about Bitcoin, and I had no interest in it because the word 'blockchain' makes my eyes glaze over. It's the most horrible word in the world, and it just sounded like something that wasn't exciting. But that blew my mind, because people don't have second acts like that. You don't have characters who are part of one revolution, Facebook, and then suddenly part of another revolution. It's not... lightning doesn't strike like that, you know, by accident. So I came to New York, and they were gracious enough to talk to me after the movie, and this story just was unbelievably compelling to me. That made me want to revisit them and realize how much we got wrong about them.
H
Host3:21
How much did the Bitcoin aspect of it play into it? In other words, if Tyler and Cameron had decided after all that mishmash with Facebook, well, you know, we're gonna do a healthcare startup, right? No. Would you still have written the book? Of course no.
B
Ben Mezrich3:33
So when I sat down with them, I see that's the thing. I try and choose stories that are about the next big thing that's gonna affect all of our lives. Previous to meeting them, I did not know anything about Bitcoin. I thought it was a scam. I thought it was, you know, what some of you might still think that. But I thought this is not anything that important. Once I sat down and started hearing about what it really was and how it could change the world, I realized this really was the cusp of something enormous. So that's what drew me to it. Plus, there's exciting characters. The story takes place in the Wild West of Bitcoin. So, you know, it's this crazy battle between philosophies and all of this kind of stuff that really turned me on.
H
Host4:12
Yeah. I have to say honestly, my first reaction to being asked was, this is a scam, and I didn't want to write about it either. I was very much against it. So, in writing this book and spending however much time you spent with Cameron and Tyler, how did your impression of them evolve and change? And what led you to think that these guys are not the Karate Kid movie villains?
B
Ben Mezrich4:39
You know, honestly, I got to know them a lot more, and these are guys who speak multiple languages, who are Latin scholars. You know, we think they come from this privileged background, but the reality is they're from a line of coal miners, and their mother's father was a cop. They come from a very background of hard work. They were not the people that I thought they were. These are guys who can computer code. And bringing Mark Zuckerberg into their world was something they did because they trusted him. It wasn't because, you know, he was needed. It was because they trusted that he would do the job they wanted him to do. And then in the end, he screwed them. I think, getting to know them more, I realized that they had been painted, not just by me, but by the press afterwards. Because they were Olympic rowers, so every shot of them was in a boat, and every sort of article about them was somewhat jokey. But the reality was, these guys really were transforming the world. Not because they needed money. It wasn't about money. It was about they wanted to build something great. There's this whole... I see them as American icons of something. There's something 1950s about them, but there's something that's heroic. America needs mythology, and as much as I think Zuckerberg is now flipped and become something much darker, these guys represent something. His family isn't here, and I listen, very smart, very smart, successful guy. But I think that they represent something really important: entrepreneurialism. And you see this in this second act, and they've built a business.
H
Host6:17
Yeah. It feels weird for you and I to be asking these questions and talking about two guys right we're sitting right there. Okay, fellas. But I did want to ask you one more question. Do you feel like there is a kernel of what exists within these two gentlemen that was another aspect in convincing you to write this book?
B
Ben Mezrich6:38
Yeah, oh, I don't know what you're getting at specifically, but I would say one is about as open-ended a question. I would say what really intrigued me is Bitcoin came from a world of these crazy libertarian anarchists and drug dealers and criminals. It was this kind of thing that was used originally on something called Silk Road, which was a drug bazaar on the dark web. All of these things that would immediately make my dad want to turn off the computer, right? But I would say he's right here, so I can say that. But then the Winklevoss twins come in, and these guys are the men of Harvard, the guys in suits. What intrigued them about Bitcoin? That fascinated me, because they're trying to take Bitcoin out of this cowboy Wild West. There's a real division. There are people in Bitcoin who don't like the idea of regulation or the idea of it becoming a part of the financial system. They want to use it to take down the world. And the fact that they were interested in it really intrigued me, because you would think that guys like this would have shied away from it. But they saw something in it, and I think that was interesting.
H
Host7:42
Yeah. Cameron and Tyler, let's pretend Ben's not here now. Okay? How did you feel about your portrayal? I mean, rather than trying to be academic about it, I mean, what is it like to open up a book and read about yourself, to see someone describe you and talk about what you are like, and not just once but now twice? What is that? What does that feel like?
T
Tyler Winklevoss8:04
I mean, it's very surreal. But I don't see myself when I look at Cameron, even though we look identical. So when I read this book and it's about me, I don't... you know, at least the first... you know, I saw the movie. I really enjoyed the movie, but I wasn't like, 'Oh, that's me,' but its portrayal, so it wasn't that weird because people think I'm him too.
H
Host8:25
Nobody thinks their stories are that interesting. And then we were talking to Ben, and he started pulling it out of us, and we're like, there might be something here for a book. But we didn't think it was actually that interesting, because we kind of lived in it and swam in it for years, and it was just normal for us.
Did you... when and what was the whole process of you deciding to write the book? You telling them they're going to write a book? Did you want another book written about you? I mean, you can't stop him from writing another book, right? How did that whole dance take place?
T
Tyler Winklevoss8:57
You know, I think we didn't know there was necessarily a story. I think when you're living your life, it's like you're swimming; you can't see the color of the water, right? You're in crypto, and it's exciting, but you don't really see that larger perspective that someone else sees. But then Ben was like, 'Hey, I want to hear what you guys are up to about Bitcoin,' and we started talking. And then we're like, actually, that was really interesting and there's a story here. And it blended his genius ability to sort of draw that story arc and tell a story through Bitcoin, or tell the story of Bitcoin through us and some other characters, and sort of really humanized it and the tensions and the different philosophies that come to a head in the book. Should this thing be regulated? Should it not? Is it for anarchist libertarians, or is there something in the middle? So kind of through talking, he convinced us that it was a really interesting story. And of course, it is. But I think when it's your life, I don't think anyone wakes up and it's like, 'My life is like a movie or a book every day,' even though it might be.
H
Host10:06
Whoa. Someone said, was that Ben's father? How closely did you guys all collaborate?
B
Ben Mezrich10:12
Very interesting. Now that you said that, the Nathaniel Popper piece in The Times was the thing that kind of... popular... I think it was about December 2017, right towards the height of mania. So you wrote this pretty fast. I do write very quickly too.
H
Host10:22
Yeah. So how closely did you all collaborate?
B
Ben Mezrich10:28
The problem was, really, was once I met with them and I said I want to do this and they agreed to allow me to try and do it, I sat with them enough times to get them to tell me stories. I had them telling me story after story. Then I find the other characters in the story. So there's a guy named Charlie Shrem, who was kind of the first guy to go to jail for Bitcoin. You know, he was an 18-year-old kid in his mother's basement who created a company where you could buy and... well, with them, they funded it to buy and sell Bitcoin. Unfortunately, he allowed people to buy Bitcoin and then buy drugs with it. Didn't just allow it, but kind of was excited about it, which is a big no-no. So he went to jail, came out. So I spent time with him. Spent time with and speaking to the other character, Roger Ver, who's this crazy anarchist who gave up his citizenship after going to jail for a year for selling his clothes over the internet. You know, there's an interesting group of people in the story. So I talked to everybody and then I just wrote as quickly as I could. But they know this subject so much better than I do that I... they were gracious enough to go through and make sure I was doing it correctly. You know, I write very fast. I write a book in three months. So that's the process of making sure it's accurate. Longer than that.
H
Host11:48
That's super fast, by the way. That's extremely fast, right.
B
Ben Mezrich11:51
But I'm different than you or a lot of journalists. I won't go after a story if the main characters aren't willing to tell me the story. So I'm not one of those journalists who tries to get inside something where people don't want you. I want to be the fly on the wall that you don't squash.
H
Host12:12
Well, let's talk a little bit about the story now, I mean, we seem to be getting towards that anyhow. So Cameron and Tyler, do you want to just kind of tell us how you got introduced to Bitcoin?
T
Tyler Winklevoss12:24
So we were on an island in the middle of the Mediterranean, Ibiza. And... you're in your totally non-film cinematic story. No, very bad. On a beach, right. Not looking for the next big thing in the sky. A guy from Brooklyn recognizes us from The Social Network and said, 'Have you thought about Bitcoin or virtual currency?' I said no, and he started telling us about it. At first it sounded really weird, and then after some tequila it started to make a lot of sense.
H
Host12:55
See, if you had tequila the first time you heard about Bitcoin, it might have been different.
So you, it's interesting actually, because you guys pretty quickly, tequila aside, saw the potential of this and you wanted to get involved. And you started out by just buying some, and then you decided to become investors in Charlie's company, BitInstant. Let's talk a little bit, and this becomes a major point in the book. Ben obviously is talking about the tension between those two visions from the very start. You guys had a certain vision of how you thought this industry should grow, and there are others who had a different vision of how this industry should grow and what it should be and what this technology even represents. And that fact that that friction, that schism, is still there. But let's talk a little bit about what you wanted Bitcoin and cryptocurrency to be and that tension between your other partners.
T
Tyler Winklevoss13:52
Right, so we very much lived the Wild West days of Bitcoin. A lot of our early Bitcoin that we bought we had to buy on this exchange called Mt. Gox. And Mt. Gox is probably the best pivot in the world. It's actually an acronym for Magic: The Gathering Online eXchange. It was a magic card game exchange that went into crypto, and it was run by two Frenchmen who had cats in Tokyo. So we had to apostille documents to onboard to this exchange, wire our money overseas, it was completely unregulated. Go through, jump through hoops of fire to actually buy this stuff. The technology was really poor. And as we know, it was famously hacked, or they lost the private keys. It was either their incompetence or hackers, but they lost almost a billion dollars at the time, which by today's price is probably a lot more. So we love this technology, and when we first saw it, you think, 'Why is this different than PayPal? Why is this not a Ponzi scheme? Why is it not airline miles?' But it was really money that went over internet protocols, the same way voice now goes over the internet. So Skype, you can video chat someone for free anywhere. Before, there were long distance phone charges, and it was expensive to call someone from New York to California. Now no one even thinks about it. Millennials don't know about long distance phone charges. So this is what was happening with money with Bitcoin. So we saw the promise. And when you talk to a Bitcoin backer, Bitcoiners, what we call people in Bitcoin, the passion, these are people that are putting every penny of their lives into this thing, and you just look them in the eyes and they give great answers for every question. But it was such a Wild West. So we thought that for this to really grow, he would have to change. And investing in BitInstant and Charlie taught us exactly sort of what not to do if you're running a financial services company. And we ended up founding our own company called Gemini, that's regulated in the state of New York, to solve our own problems effectively.
H
Host16:03
How hard was it to get that regulation to go through? That whole process. Were there doors that got closed in your face? I mean, you walk in and say, 'Hey, we got a Bitcoin business, we want to join the world.' How hard was that to come at the legitimate world from the Wild West?
T
Tyler Winklevoss16:20
It took us a year and a half to get our trust company license in New York. So we were building the platform while we were getting that license. But we couldn't get a banking account. A bank account, a simple thing like that, to hold customer funds took about a year to get.
H
Host16:36
Because banks wanted nothing to do with it.
T
Tyler Winklevoss16:37
Yeah. Luckily, banks wanted nothing to do with it. They didn't touch the word Bitcoin. Like the cannabis industry, I think was really hard for any other startup. It's really easy to get a bank account for a crypto startup, even one with a New York trust company license. That's the same license that Bank of New York, State Street, the two oldest companies in the country started out with. Still wasn't enough. And even to this day, it's hard to get new relationships. We have State Street now that banks Gemini dollar or stablecoin, but that was actually the hardest part of it. It took a year to onboard with them. They come in, do diligence for six months. And that process should probably take like a week if you're a hedge fund and you need a cash Treasury account. So we don't deal with the fiat portion; we deal with everything else at Gemini. So we rely on bank partners to take wires and things like that into our omnibus account. So that's still challenging to this day. Even banks who want to get involved in crypto, like Goldman Sachs, hasn't gotten approval from the Fed to actually handle the Bitcoin. So they do synthetic products that give you a Bitcoin exposure. But even they have trouble. The regulatory... a lot of things have sorted out with the regulation. When we first got it, it was like, is this gonna be illegal kind of thing? That was like the question, right? So we're past that. But there are still... it's still sort of slow moving in certain areas, right?
H
Host18:05
I mean, there's still a tremendous amount of friction because you have some companies that are absolutely determined to operate outside of the regulatory lanes, and others that are trying to build within that. How does that affect you? How does that affect it as you're building the company? Because I mean, look, if you look at Bitcoin volume, most of it is coming from these unregulated exchanges domiciled wherever they can find them. So how do you deal with the fact that that is not going away necessarily and you're trying to build with the same technology but build a slightly different business. How do you deal with that friction, yeah?
T
Tyler Winklevoss18:43
We're playing the same game but very differently, and we're playing the long game. So we think in the future, customers like big macro hedge funds will want to work at places like Gemini that are regulated, that ask for permission not forgiveness. We think the offshore game is a limited time only. But there's a lot of people going after that and definitely making money in the meantime. Our mantra is we want to be the fastest tortoise in the race. But it's still been challenging because even if you scream from the rooftops, 'Hey, we want to do this the right way,' there's still not a fast path in the US at least right now at the SEC or CFTC. So that would be my criticism or my fear about the US: that even if you want to do things the right way, there isn't a clear path in certain areas. So I think it's a big disadvantage for us compared to the rest of the world, where people are just building and innovating at the speed of innovation, not at the speed of government. It's not a US-centric technology; it's a global asset. Anybody in this room, but anybody in the world with an internet connection, can buy Bitcoin. So they're not gonna wait around for the US to catch up or take its time and do the right thing. And this is the first time retail has actually driven that, led the charge. Usually, it's Sand Hill Road VCs, accredited investors, things go IPO, and it gets dumped on retail after it goes to public markets a decade after the company's founded. This is actually retail driven, and Wall Street is asleep at the wheel. And then when they woke up, they couldn't figure out how to get their compliance departments to sign off or the regulators to get comfortable with them as a regulated bank touching Bitcoin or custodying Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies. So it's the first time where the little guy actually is there and has an advantage structurally because they don't have the compliance legal departments holding them back.
H
Host20:38
Yeah, you know, it's interesting. So for you guys, that sort of friction between a regulated and unregulated world, that's just part of your real life. For you, that was an angle in the story.
B
Ben Mezrich20:52
And it's interesting too. It was interesting to me in reading the book is that yes, it's about Tyler and Cameron, but Charlie ends up becoming a major character in the book, almost as important as these guys are in terms of a story narratively. And you have him sitting between these two worlds, pulling at him.
H
Host21:13
He's definitely excited by the Roger Ver of the world, who are these anarchists who think Bitcoin should be no taxes, nobody knows who you are, you can buy drugs and no one will ever know, everything should be legal and free. And then these guys who say, 'You've got to be a good CEO. You have to be... your CEO and compliance officer. That's not a good thing, right? You got to figure yourselves out.' There's a great story where Charlie ended up moving out of his house and living above a club. They're trying to bring him to these important meetings with very important hedge funds and people, and Charlie shows up and looks like he's a disaster. I mean, he's a disaster. It was a disaster because he got rich quick. He's a young kid who lived... we can all live that life, right? But he got pulled in the wrong direction. And I have a lot of sympathy for Charlie. Charlie's a very light person. And I know you guys had a falling out. Sorry. He read the book and he called me up and he said it made him cry. I think that that... it was a terrifying thing. He was arrested at JFK. They dragged him into a cell, and they were facing 20 years in prison for selling Bitcoin. He ended up doing two years because he took an agreement. He's got his feet back under him at this point. But it's very compelling. So I am compelled by the drama of it, similar to The Social Network, Facebook. I don't care about Facebook; I care about this battle between people trying to create something that changes the world. And it's that internal drama of people that really gets the story going.
One thing I wanted to ask you about is, you do spend a lot of time talking about BitInstant and Charlie and those guys and that timeframe of 2013, 2014, which I thought was interesting because 2017 is when your main characters actually become the title of this story, 'Billionaires.' So was there a conscious decision to focus on those earlier days rather than... because 2017, I don't know how many of you guys were around for the 2017 run? That was just as crazy. Bitcoin ran to $20,000. So these guys, to put into perspective, in 2012 when they heard about Bitcoin, they bought into Bitcoin at $7 a coin. And the numbers that I believe are accurate is they bought one percent of all Bitcoin. So that ended up turning dollars into billions of dollars, which is incredible.
B
Ben Mezrich23:44
The origin story is what attracts me, similar to how The Social Network is about that first year of Facebook. Zero users to 500 million. Now Facebook is many billions of users and has become something totally different. This book is about zero to 10,000, because that was the moment that they became billionaires. But that tells you the origin of Bitcoin. And 20 years from now, if Bitcoin really is the thing that one thinks it might be, this will be the book hopefully people look at and say, 'That was the origins of it.' I think it's a... they are a great vehicle to tell the origins of this story because they were there from the early days, but they were also there from that transformation from the Wild West of Bitcoin to Bitcoin being something that might come out of ATM machines. And it does come out of ATM machines in some places.
H
Host24:33
Let's talk a little bit... I know someone's gonna get me some questions from the audience too, right? Someone's gonna hand me those cards. I'm not forgetting. But I want to talk to you guys about the state of crypto right now. If you would just spend a couple of minutes, just where do you think it is? What do you think it is doing well? What does it need to do? I have my own opinions about all that, but you guys have to say. Where do you think Bitcoin crypto is right now?
T
Tyler Winklevoss25:01
It's still very early. Institutions, everybody knows about it. Everyone's heard about it. And there's some very sophisticated people in even these banks who know about cryptocurrency, but they're still not really in the game yet. It's still very much a retail-driven market. Very much a lot of the action is out in Asia. So we still think it's at the bottom of the first inning. If you read this book, you understand how we got here and how far it's come, but it's also just sort of the beginning in a lot of ways. So I don't know. I mean, the price peaked about 18 months ago at about $20,000. It went down to about $3,000. It's recovered to about $12,000, but we're still far off that peak. But so much has happened. Gemini, we have about 230 employees today. Almost everybody's from financial services or Google, Airbnb, big name companies that you use that are a part of your everyday life. And these folks have all decided they need to be in crypto. They weren't in crypto two or three years ago. When we started, five years ago, Gemini was a core team of 10 people, and these were like really early people. But today, people are moving into this space at a rapid rate. So when I look around our office at the intellectual capital and these smart, brilliant people working in crypto...
H
Host26:29
I talked to somebody who's a senior at...
T
Tyler Winklevoss26:28
There's a young computer engineer from Dartmouth who is likely to enter crypto. Progress has been made but there's a long way to go. We're maybe post-2000 boom and bust, like 2001 when Facebook launched. The difference now is that everyone has a powerful computer in their pocket and fast internet. There's nothing stopping people from buying Bitcoin. In the late 90s, you had to be an angel investor in the Valley to get in early. Now Bitcoin is open to all. If Bitcoin is the software version of gold, the gold market is $7 trillion, Bitcoin is $250 billion, so there's potential 30x. The use case is still buy, sell, invest. The decentralized web 3.0 hasn't fully arrived yet. There will be crypto-native applications we can't imagine.
H
Host29:14
Speaking of Facebook, there's a character in that book named Mark Zuckerberg. As I was reading, I wondered if you guys ever thought he would become such a recurring part of your life. Facebook announced they are launching a cryptocurrency called Libra, after you launched Gemini. It's amazing how intertwined your lives are.
T
Tyler Winklevoss30:10
I don't wake up thinking about it, but I get the perception from popular culture. We grew up 20 miles apart in Connecticut. We've known each other since childhood. He was at Exeter, I think on the crew team.
B
Ben Mezrich31:01
I wrote this book a year before Zuckerberg launched Libra. The book ends with him launching a cryptocurrency. I framed it like The Count of Monte Cristo: you were wronged, went away, and reappeared as crypto billionaires. Now Zuckerberg has to face that and launches Libra. It might be a coincidence, but it's intriguing. I think it's all personal. You had a similar experience with Facebook. Now everybody is coming to crypto. In the next few years, all major tech companies will have their own digital coins. They're watching Libra closely. The roles have flipped: in The Social Network, Zuckerberg was the rebel and you were the establishment; now he represents the establishment and you're rebelling with new money.
H
Host33:33
What do you think of Libra?
T
Tyler Winklevoss33:41
It's a very interesting project. Gemini is a marketplace, we trade assets. Libra is a stablecoin tied to a basket, unlike Bitcoin which is volatile. We'll look at it. The fact that a company like Facebook is talking about crypto demystifies it and is good for the space.
H
Host35:01
If they weren't here would your answer have been the same?
T
Tyler Winklevoss35:01
I think so, yeah.
H
Host35:06
Okay, another question. Money is the ultimate social network. For Facebook to add payments is a logical progression. Whether this will work is another matter. Every major tech company has to be thinking about crypto. We are in the era of private money. It started that way 150 years ago and got regulated. Now companies are saying they can do it better. And engineers are launching decentralized currencies like Bitcoin. So we have a menu of options for people. It's a sea change.
But to use a little suspect, Gemini. I want to ask about the scene at Burning Man in the book. You were there, Zuckerberg was nearby. You almost met. Ben, as a writer, how much did you want them to actually meet? You ended up running into Dustin Moskovitz and had a moment. He invited you to where Zuckerberg was handing out grilled cheese sandwiches. You didn't go. If you had known, you would have showed up. But as a writer, did you want to fill in that blank? I had to stay true to the story.
So when you guys do run into Mark someday at a Bitcoin conference, what will you say to him?
T
Tyler Winklevoss38:19
Welcome to the party. What took you so long?
H
Host38:21
Let's do some questions. Would one of you run for president and have your brother as vice president? Who is at the top of the ticket?
C
Cameron Winklevoss39:14
Well, Tyler is the CEO and I'm the president of Gemini, so I work for him. The next time I'll flip it around. If we won for eight years and then flipped, it would be 16 years. I've never thought about that.
H
Host39:17
What crypto assets do you think will still be around in 15 years?
T
Tyler Winklevoss39:33
Bitcoin and Ethereum or something like it. Ethereum is creating a decentralized computer. There might be a few like operating systems. Zcash is interesting for privacy. Bitcoin has first-mover advantage and network effects. It's likely to survive. It's the digital gold.
H
Host41:14
I want to simplify for people who don't know Bitcoin. Gold is a store of value because it's perceived as valuable and rare. Bitcoin is similar but fixed supply and portable. It's like gold but better. The code is evolving.
How do you see Gemini and other exchanges solving the problem of the unbanked population in the US and overseas?
T
Tyler Winklevoss43:33
There are millions of unbanked in the US and over a billion worldwide. Crypto can help bank them. With a mobile app, you can store Bitcoin and that is your bank account. Micro payments are possible because Bitcoin is cheap and instant. The current banking system is broken. We had the aha moment when we realized money should work like email. For sanctions, Bitcoin can bypass control. No country wants to be North Korea. Bitcoin can get through the Great Firewall. It's a good thing overall. Exchanges need to offer a wide range of assets, including private securities on blockchain. The private market is bigger than the public market. One day you can trade anything on Gemini.
H
Host47:56
What is the biggest problem or problems facing crypto today?
T
Tyler Winklevoss48:27
Education. People think crypto is only for illicit activities. The US dollar has been used for crime too. Technology is agnostic. Also, Bitcoin is not truly anonymous; it's actually too open. Once people understand there are regulated exchanges like Gemini, they feel safe. There's an age gap: millennials live online and understand digital credits. Crypto enables microtransactions for the Internet of Things. It's not competing with the current system; it allows new things that couldn't exist before. Bitcoin is the first internet-native money.
H
Host51:29
Why do you think the criticisms of Bitcoin by economists such as Nouriel Roubini and Joseph Stiglitz are misguided?
T
Tyler Winklevoss51:50
Roubini is a no-coin-er; he missed out. The only people covering crypto early were crazy libertarians and drug dealers. Now these economists are late and call it a tulip bubble. They look worse every year. New technologies are held to an unfair standard. Bitcoin is only ten years old; it's still teething. Yes, there will be a Bitcoin Billionaires movie. It's the next step.
H
Host53:29
Well, on that note, since it's 8:30 and you have a book signing, gentlemen thank you very much. Everyone, thank you for coming.