Back
Ben Thompson
Founder, Stratechery

What All Musk Businesses Share | Sharp Tech with Ben Thompson

🎥 Jun 14, 2025 📺 Sharp Tech Podcast ⏱ 4m
Link to Episode: ...
Watch on YouTube

About Ben Thompson

Ben Thompson, founder of Stratechery, has published a series of articles and podcast episodes in the last 60 days analyzing major technology companies and the AI industry. In "The iPhone’s Last Stand," Thompson argued that Microsoft's Project Solera positions it as an enterprise play, and that consumers "don't want to work and don't really care about being productive." He described Apple's Siri as the only service that can pull off personal context across apps, "as long as it's not vaporware." In "The Google Capital Company," Thompson characterized Google's business model as one where "supply is free" and "consumers willfully compete against each other to raise your prices," and discussed the company's use of equity to fund AI capital expenditures. On his Sharp Tech podcast, Thompson discussed the possibility of an AI bubble, stating that "it's going to be a lot of existing companies realizing the AI spends not worth it" and that such companies "are just going to slowly die as new companies come along that actually do use AI." Thompson also wrote about SpaceX's IPO and the concept of data centers in space, expressing concern about "our ability to muster enough compute to fully realize the gains from AI" and describing Musk's proposal as "an alternative path to unlimited compute." He noted that "Musk is the master of memes" and that his companies offer "a dream" to investors. In "Amazon's Durability," Thompson argued that Amazon's focus on long-term investments in the physical world makes it "as sturdy as ever" in the AI landscape. He also covered Anthropic's Mythos model, describing it as a "major security threat" and discussing the company's "opportunity cost problem" regarding compute allocation. In "Tim Cook’s Impeccable Timing," Thompson reviewed Cook's tenure as Apple CEO, noting that revenue increased 303% and profits 354% during his leadership, while also suggesting that Cook may have "created the conditions for a crash out" by forgetting "what makes Apple Apple."

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Ben Thompson's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (2 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
B
Ben Thompson0:01
Related to cost structure, he says, 'Hey guys, I appreciate the recent discussions about WEO versus Tesla business models in autonomous driving. What is missing seems to be the elephant in the room for all AI companies: compute cost. Sure, Tesla's Robo taxi maybe $330,000, but Tesla is spending billions of dollars on Nvidia GPUs and Dojo, whatever that is, in order to make the $30,000 Robo taxi possible. $330,000 then is only the marginal cost. Tesla's capex over the last 12 months was $9.8 billion. For context, during the Model 3 ramp in 2017, Tesla's capex was $4.1 billion. Tesla probably spent about $5 billion building full self-driving data centers over the past year, and that will go up.' Any thoughts on that?
Yeah, that's so implicit in this argument about scale and cheapness. When I say cheapness, I mean marginal cost cheap. Like, what's the cost of one additional unit? And the whole bit about compute is one additional unit is free, barring power and all that sort of thing. And so, the Starship is a great example. They've spent billions and billions of dollars developing that. They have a long way to go to make their money back as far as that goes, but the marginal cost of a kilogram going into space is going to be drastically lower. What Elon does is he takes this fundamental financial equation of tech. This starts the reason why the whole Silicon Valley ecosystem exists. It literally started with silicon, that's why it's called Silicon Valley. And the fundamental nature of chips is they cost a ton of money to develop, but once you're making them, every additional chip is basically free. It's just sand, that's your input. Now it's overstating it a bit, you have to actually process it and get silicon and all these sorts of things, but TSMC, they're spending $30 billion or whatever it might be, or $20 billion on a fab. That's an unbelievable amount of money. TSMC is spending so much money, and then the chips come out, and basically from TSMC's perspective, a wafer that goes in is a few hundred dollars, and from that wafer they get 100 chips. So their costs per chip are tiny. All their costs are depreciation of those fixed costs. And so that is how tech works: massive, massive, massive upfront costs and then basically zero marginal cost at the back end. This model is how venture capital came about, because you need to get started, you need astronomical amounts of money, but your payoff is infinite because you can just make an infinite number of things. So Silicon Valley starts, venture capital is a part of the Silicon story. Then software comes along. Software is the exact same model but even more extreme, because now it actually literally is zero marginal cost, it's just copying the whole thing. But again, huge amounts of investment upfront to make it work. And so software becomes huge, and then you have venture capital becomes this massive industry. What Elon is doing is he's taking that and applying it to the physical world. What does it mean to take a silicon mindset, to take a software mindset, and apply it to cars? What does it mean to take it and apply it to space? And it's not a perfect analogy. Apple is a useful example here, because the brilliance of Apple is they make these incredibly expensive objects, but they do it at scale. It's the scalability that's amazing. And again, it's not a perfect example. iPhones have actual costs, Teslas have actual costs, rockets have actual costs. But it is taking to the absolute extreme. To what extent? People talk about Teslas being computers on wheels, and that is correct. To the extent they're eliminating all the controls and trying to put everything, and even once they're self-driving, it's really the case. But it's taking a computer mindset and applying it to physical goods. That's the consistency in Musk's businesses, and that is Apple as well. And so to Travis's point, yes, absolutely they are spending a lot and they're going to spend even more. And that's why you need big dreams, because the risks are astronomical. If you build and spend all this money and it doesn't work, you are out of business. And that's why regular businesses don't do it. The risks are too great.