Back
Nick Fox
SVP of Knowledge and Information, Alphabet

Why Google Is Making Its Biggest Change to Search

🎥 Jun 14, 2026 📺 Bloomberg Television ⏱ 11m 👁 7762 views
Google is making the biggest change to its search business in more than two decades, integrating AI-generated answers, conversational search, and reasoning tools directly into the heart of its search product, which has shaped the course of content and the internet.. Nick Fox, Google’s Senior Vice President of Knowledge and Information, argues that AI allows users to ask more complex questions and get faster, more useful answers while still connecting people to content across the web. But, for creators and publishers, fewer keystrokes could make a difference. -------- More on Bloomberg Televi...
Watch on YouTube

About Nick Fox

Nick Fox, Google's SVP of Knowledge and Information, appeared at Google Marketing Live on May 20, 2026, where he discussed the integration of AI into Google's search products. Fox stated that the company "confidently leaned into" the AI shift, describing it as "the fuel of future growth" and "obviously beneficial" for search. He outlined Google's approach of blending AI responses into the existing search experience rather than making AI mode the default, explaining that "if an AI response is helpful, we'll show an AI overview" and users can then expand into a conversational AI mode. Fox emphasized that trust is "the foundation of everything we do" and that Google is applying its existing principles for ads—such as clear labeling, separation from organic results, and relevance—to AI mode. Fox also addressed the evolution of search queries, stating that the vision is for users to "ask anything" with longer, more detailed queries rather than short keywords. He discussed the impact of AI on jobs, saying that while roles will change, "the jobs will continue," and that marketers will be "turbocharged with tools" that make them "more effective, more efficient, more productive." Fox noted that Google is bringing Gemini to its ad stack to help marketers target the "breadth and specificity" of user queries.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Nick Fox's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (28 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
N
Narrator0:00
This is a story about anticipating your every want. Last week we told you how AI is cutting into traffic for internet publishers. And what that could mean for their business. But Google isn't standing still for all the challenges from chatbots. Last month it announced the biggest changes to its search approach in over 20 years. Nick Fox is Google's senior vice president for knowledge and information and the man responsible for the changes.
I
Interviewer0:27
With your experience, rank order, which is probably unfair, this change with the AI compared to other innovations you've done.
N
Nick Fox0:34
Oh, I think number one for sure.
N
Narrator0:36
For Google, that transformation includes AI generated answers, conversational search and new tools that can reason through complex questions, monitor information across the web and even complete tasks on a user's behalf. How would you describe the change?
N
Nick Fox0:52
You know, just to take a step back, AI is the best thing that's ever happened to search. And a lot of people are questioning that. A lot of people are saying, "Hey, what does AI mean for search?" And what we see, the vision of search is you should be able to ask whatever question is on your mind. And the way I think about that is we have probably thousands of questions that go through our head any given day. We ask maybe a few of them. Maybe we ask five of them. Maybe we ask 10 of them. Why do we not ask them all? Well, we don't know if there'll be a helpful response to it. Might be hard to ask that question. So our big idea is you should be able to ask anything and AI really supercharges that. AI enables people to ask whatever question is on their mind and get a helpful response. And so that's what we're pushing on.
N
Narrator1:29
The quality of the user experience is a priority for Google even as it's changed its search engine to put AI at its core. And Rand Fishkin, who's specialized in the business of online search, says that improved experience is very much central to Google's business.
R
Rand Fishkin1:45
Instead, they push those down and they put the instant answer from AI right up at the top. They call them AI overviews. In the long run it's better for their user experience and it creates an addiction to search and quick answers. If they can get people searching more and instantly answering their queries, they would come back more often. They would trust Google more, and they would click on more ads in the future. So, Google is hurting themselves a little tiny bit right now, costing themselves maybe a dollar that they could charge, so that in the future they make 5, 10, 50, $500 from you.
N
Narrator2:21
Fox does not deny the advantages to Google if its new approach to AI-driven search gives users more reason to use its product, but sees that as a feature rather than a bug.
N
Nick Fox2:32
What we're seeing with users is they're asking far more questions than they've ever asked before. They're getting the approach that we've taken. The approach that really defines what Google in search is doing with AI is that we're able to bring the best of the web together with the best of AI, where we're able to bring frontier AI capabilities built on our Gemini technology in close collaboration with DeepMind, and then we're able to bring that together with the web. So people can get links, they can discover content across the web, but they can also get helpful responses that contextualize the web and also give contextual responses that answer their question.
N
Narrator3:06
But Fox insists that time spent on a search is not the right metric for success. He'd rather people spend less time on a particular question or search and be able to press further to get their answers, including from the web.
N
Nick Fox3:20
For us, it doesn't have to be about time. And to some extent attention, but we don't measure search by how many minutes are people spending on search. We measure search by how many queries are people doing, how many tasks are people doing. If it takes two queries to do a task instead of five queries to do a task, we would prefer that. We actually don't want people to do more queries in a way where they're thrashing and not getting a good experience, or spending more time because they're thrashing and not getting a good experience. That's not what we optimize for. We actually try to get people off Google as quickly as we can. That is one of the things that I think has been a hallmark of Google. We do want people to be doing more things with Google. If we can help people with twice as many of their questions as we could before, that's great. But they're doing more with Google because they're getting more done, rather than they're spending more time to get the same set of things done.
N
Narrator4:12
As AI takes on a greater role in helping us gain access to content on the web, there are those concerned about its use discouraging the creators of the content. Caitlyn Petrie is author of the book All the News That's Fit to Click.
C
Caitlyn Petrie4:26
I think that it's really important to think about what's happening with people who make content and AI as this kind of longer story of a tussle or a conflict between tech companies and people who create media and information. And then the question becomes if the business model for making original content, and particularly I'm concerned with journalism and art, but if the business model for making original stuff kind of goes away or becomes even more challenging and even more punishing than it already is, what do we do about that?
N
Narrator5:02
Fox says he has similar concerns that whatever Google does with AI in search not take away from the value of the content on the web for the sake of all involved.
I
Interviewer5:16
What does this mean beyond the users? For the rest of the web, the rest of content generators. I mean because Google was originally a way to organize the web, right? And a lot of content generators got linked back to their material. What does this new approach mean for them?
N
Nick Fox5:33
So we remain committed to Google organizing the web. That's a core part of what we do. And I would say relative to really any other company and really any other organization out there, we care about the web incredibly deeply. We're a company that started in the web. We're a company that still is deeply in the web. And so that is a bedrock commitment for us. And that leads to how we actually build our products as well. So for example, in search, it's not just AI, it's AI with links within the AI as well. We don't think users need to make a choice between AI or the web. But rather, we can bring both of those together in a really effective way. So we have lots of links within the AI responses. It's not just because of a commitment to the web. We also think it's really useful for users. Right? If you're interested in a topic, you want to go deep on a topic, you might get an AI summary, you might get an AI sort of overview to give you the context. But then, you want to read it more deeply. You want to see original reporting on the topic. You might want to see first-hand perspective. You might want to hear from someone who was actually there. You want to get that. You don't just want to hear from the AI. And so we're cognizant of that and we design around that. People are searching more than ever. People are searching for topics they were never searching for before. That all creates opportunities for websites to get discovered that never would have before. Right? If a user was never asking the question, the website never would have gotten traffic, never would have gotten a click. This is an expansionary moment, not just for search, but for the web overall.
N
Narrator7:03
Accuracy and trust have long been the foundation of Google Search. But in an era of AI-generated answers, where users may never click through to that underlying source, ensuring the quality of that information has become more important than ever.
I
Interviewer7:17
Accuracy and trust are important when you're searching. How do you monitor that? Because there are a lot of people out there who actually have almost a goal of putting out information that's not reliable, that's not accurate. How do you monitor how you're doing?
N
Nick Fox7:32
I mean, this is what Google has been doing for years and years. It's what we've been doing for decades. We understand the web. We understand the web very well. We understand, you know, the very early days of PageRank was that you could use the citations across the web to understand what's more valuable than others. We've obviously built on that tremendously over time, but we understand the web well. We understand what's accurate on the web. We understand what's reliable. We understand what's trusted across the web. We're also able to understand when we get it right when we don't get it right because we're able to understand sort of metrics across our user populations. So for example, when we roll out a new AI experience within search, we know based on experiments, we run tests, and we can analyze those to see has this improved the experience or not. We only release changes that actually do improve the experience.
I
Interviewer8:24
Are there some categories of information that you have to be particularly careful about? I'm mindful of the fact we're going to have elections in the United States coming up in November, and you can have a lot of people trying to use AI and the web to misinform either political rivals or foreign governments. What do you do to protect against that?
N
Nick Fox8:41
We are particularly careful on those types of questions. So if an election type of question, we're particularly careful, a finance type of question, a health kind of question. The way we approach that is in a few ways. Number one, if we don't think that the accuracy of the information is high enough, we won't show an AI response in that kind of a case. So that's the first level of it. The second is we invest incredibly heavily here. We focus particularly heavily in categories where the stakes are particularly high. And then the third piece is we're clear with users about what is AI generated, and we indicate, you know, AI can make mistakes so that users can be cognizant of that as well.
N
Narrator9:21
As AI reshapes how people find information online, it is also reshaping the competitive landscape. And while Google may dominate search today, the rise of AI has opened the door to a new wave of competitors.
I
Interviewer9:35
You come from a very strong position in search. I mean, you've become a verb in addition to a noun around the world. Do you have a comparative advantage against other AI companies in that you have search coming to AI rather than starting in AI?
N
Nick Fox9:52
I think our advantage comes from deep expertise and a deep focus on innovation and continual reinvention. I think one of the maybe understated advantages that Google has is we've been through many disruptions before. We went through a mobile disruption. We arose in the web disruption. There was Ajax technologies. There was voice. There's been sort of time after time disruptions. Each time it would be, "Is this the Google killer?" And we have worked through those and we have really a playbook of how to work through those, which is lean into the innovation, innovate through the disruption with an excitement about what the technology can enable and a promise to build a better product for users through it. And I think that's a core advantage through any of these transformations, is to rely on that playbook.
I
Interviewer10:46
You raise a really interesting point. I mean, was there any hesitation anywhere at Google to say, "We're doing pretty well on search. Why do we need to disrupt ourselves on this?" It's a form of innovator's dilemma. Was there any sense of, "You know what, we're doing pretty well. Why rock the boat?"
N
Nick Fox11:02
Never. Because we've seen it before and we understand that if you stand still, if you don't innovate for users, you'll become irrelevant. And that's so clear. We know that time and time again. And so we see a new technology come along, we jump on it. We invent the new technologies in most cases. But we see it, we jump on it, and we know that if we innovate for users it will be expansionary. We know that our business will thrive through it.
N
Narrator11:32
For Google, the choice was between disrupting its strong business in search or having someone else disrupt it. As AI yet again reshapes how information is discovered and consumed, the question will be, as it always is, whether this new innovation gives people what they want and need.
N
Nick Fox11:52
We're seeing that users are loving it. And the best sign that we see is that queries are growing.