Back
Robert Scaringe
Founder, CEO & Chairman of the Board, Rivian Automotive

Rivian Automotive Inc ($RIVN) Q3 2025 Earnings Call

🎥 Nov 06, 2025 📺 Castify Earnings Call ⏱ 60m 👁 2 views
Watch on YouTube

About Robert Scaringe

Rivian founder and CEO RJ Scaringe has been focused on the launch of the company's R2 vehicle, which began production in Normal, Illinois in April 2026. Scaringe stated that the R2 is crucial for the company's path to profitability, noting that its bill of materials is expected to be approximately half that of the R1 platform. He described the R2 as a "high volume mass market vehicle" with a starting price of $45,000, targeting the mid-size SUV segment. Scaringe also discussed the company's autonomy platform, stating that Rivian is developing a "large driving model" or foundation model for driving, and that the company plans to introduce point-to-point capabilities later in 2026. He said he believes advanced autonomy will become a key differentiator for customers by the second half of the decade. Scaringe has also addressed the company's financial performance and broader strategy. He stated that Rivian delivered a second consecutive quarter of positive gross profit in Q1 2026, with a gross profit of $26 million. He noted that the policy environment, including changes to EV tax credits and tariffs, continues to be complex and rapidly evolving. Scaringe discussed Rivian's $5.8 billion software licensing deal with Volkswagen Group, which he described as allowing the deployment of Rivian's compute stack and software platform across Volkswagen's electric vehicle portfolio. He also mentioned the company's decision to increase the production capacity of its planned Georgia plant by 50% to 300,000 units annually, supported by a Department of Energy loan of up to $4.5 billion.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Robert Scaringe's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (78 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
O
Operator0:00
Good afternoon and thank you for joining us for Rivian's third quarter 2025 earnings call. Today I'm joined by RJ Scaringe, our CEO and founder, Claire McDonough, our Chief Financial Officer, and Javier Varela, our Chief Operations Officer. Before we begin, matters discussed on this call, including comments and responses to questions, reflect management's views as of today. We will also be making statements related to our business, operations, and financial performance that may be considered forward-looking statements under federal securities law. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties are described in our SEC filings and the shareholder letter we have filed with the SEC. During this call, we will discuss both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of historical non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures is provided in our shareholder letter. Just before the earnings call, we published and filed our shareholder letter, which includes an overview of our progress over the recent months. I encourage you to read it for additional details around some of the items we will cover on today's call. Following our prepared remarks, we will be taking questions from sell-side analysts. In the interest of keeping the call to 1 hour, we would ask these analysts to limit any follow-on questions to one. With that, I'll turn the call over to RJ.
R
Robert Scaringe1:30
Thanks, Chip. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us for today's call. We continue to make progress against our key strategic priorities, including preparation for the launch of R2 and development of our technology roadmap, including autonomy and our vertically integrated hardware and software. As we have stated before, over the long term, we expect the industry to be fully electric, autonomous, and software-defined. I've never been more confident in the opportunity ahead for Rivian than I am today. I firmly believe Rivian's technology, along with our direct-to-consumer ownership experience, position our company to build a category-defining brand with a strong product portfolio for the US and European markets. One of the key drivers for attracting customers to electric vehicles, and to Rivian's products more specifically, is consumer choice and price point. The average new vehicle purchase price in the United States is now just over $50,000, and the most popular configuration is a five-seat SUV or crossover. Given the attractiveness of this crossover market, I believe R2 is addressing the largest market opportunity with the right product. We leveraged the performance, utility, and personality of R1 and refactored it into a smaller SUV at a lower cost. From an R&D perspective, our teams are executing well to ensure the development of R2 remains on track with our plans. We continue to increase the quality and maturity of our design validation builds, positioning us to begin manufacturing validation builds at year-end following the full commissioning of production equipment. We recently completed the construction of our 1.1 million square foot R2 body shop and general assembly building, and our 1.2 million square foot supplier park and logistics center. All shops have started equipment bring-up, and we're in the process of commissioning the robots in the R2 body shop. In addition, we have completed updates to our paint shop that will allow us to increase our total annual plant capacity to 215,000 units. I've been driving an R2 for a while now, and it is incredible. From a performance perspective, it delivers on the adventurous spirit customers expect from Rivian, while also being a great daily driver that will fit so many different use cases for our customers. Looking longer term, we expect to add an additional 400,000 annual units of capacity for R2, R3, and associated variants with our next US manufacturing facility in Georgia. In September, we were honored to be joined by state and local officials for a groundbreaking ceremony. Our significant investment in the state of Georgia is expected to create 7,500 jobs, as well as billions of dollars of economic benefits to the local community as we expand our US manufacturing and technology footprint. In parallel to the progress we've made in developing R2, we've also continued to invest in our technology, including our hardware, our software, and our autonomy platform. I'm excited to share the progress we're making at our upcoming autonomy and AI day on December 11th. Over the longer term, we believe what will differentiate Rivian's autonomous capabilities will be our end-to-end AI-centric approach. With the launch of R2, our growing fleet of customer vehicles will collect real-world driving data, which will complement the data already collected by our second-generation R1 vehicles. That data can be used to train our large driving model, which we believe will allow a rapid rollout of updating driving inference models with growing capabilities. In closing, as we look towards 2026, I'm excited about the opportunity ahead for Rivian. I believe our technology and our products will position Rivian as a market share leader over the long term. I want to thank our employees, customers, partners, suppliers, communities, and shareholders for their continued support. With that, I'll pass the call over to Claire.
C
Claire McDonough4:59
Thanks, RJ, and good afternoon, everyone. As RJ mentioned, we continue to make progress on our priorities, and I want to thank our team for their continued focus as we drive execution throughout the business. While we face near-term uncertainty from trade, tariff, and regulatory policy, we remain focused on long-term growth and value creation. It's great to see the continued progress in R2 validation and testing. We're also excited to share more about our hardware and software roadmap and vision in December at our autonomy and AI day. Turning to the results for the third quarter, our consolidated revenues were approximately $1.6 billion, and consolidated gross profit was $24 million. Gross profit included $125 million of depreciation and $24 million of stock-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA losses for the third quarter were $602 million. As expected, we saw a quarter-over-quarter step-up in overall operating expenses. This was driven by elevated R&D investments related to prototyping as we prepare for the launch of R2 and training costs for our autonomy platform. SG&A stepped up primarily related to the growth of our sales and service infrastructure and team, as well as operating expenses we don't anticipate will be part of our ongoing cost structure. Now, looking at our automotive segment, during the third quarter, we produced 10,720 vehicles and delivered 13,201 vehicles from our manufacturing facility. As we've said previously, we expect Q3 will be our highest delivery quarter for the year, which was the primary driver of the $1.1 billion of automotive revenue. Automotive gross profit in the third quarter was negative $130 million and was negatively impacted by low fixed cost absorption associated with a planned shutdown to prepare the Normal plant for R2. Despite this headwind, we saw strong progress in our unit economics with one of the best quarters ever in automotive cost of goods sold per unit delivered, driven by improved material costs. Our software and services segment reported another strong quarter with $416 million of revenue and $154 million of gross profit. About half of the revenue within software and services was a result of the software and electrical hardware joint venture we created with Volkswagen Group. We also experienced strong growth in gross profit contribution from remarketing and vehicle repair and maintenance. Looking at our balance sheet, we ended the quarter with approximately $7.1 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. We continue to see improvements in our working capital, primarily driven by our focus on reducing our raw material, work in progress, and finished goods inventory levels. We continue to expect to receive additional capital of up to $2.5 billion associated with our Volkswagen Group joint venture transaction, $2 billion of which we expect to receive in 2026. Additionally, we continue to partner with the Department of Energy for an up to $6.6 billion loan at a favorable cost of capital. We will update the market as we progress on this important project for the company. Finally, for our guidance, we are reaffirming our 2025 delivery guidance range of 41,500 to 43,500 units. We are reaffirming our 2025 adjusted EBITDA loss guidance range of $2 billion to $2.25 billion, and 2025 capital expenditures guidance of $1.8 billion to $1.9 billion. We continue to expect our gross profit for the full year of 2025 to be roughly break even. Thank you again to the team for delivering a great quarter. As we near the end of the year, we look forward to 2026 and remain steadfast in our belief that R2 and our technology roadmap will be truly transformative for our growth and profitability. I'd like to turn the call back over to the operator to open the line for Q&A.
O
Operator9:25
For the Q&A section of today's session, we will be utilizing the raise hand feature. If you would like to ask a question, click on the raise hand button at the bottom of the screen. Once prompted, please unmute yourself and begin with your question. As a reminder, we ask that you stick to one question and one follow-up. We will now pause a moment to assemble the queue. Thank you. Our first question comes from Emmanuel Rosner, Wolfe Research. Emmanuel, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute yourself and ask your question.
E
Emmanuel Rosner10:00
Oh, great. Thanks so much for taking the question. My first one is, I'm curious if you could characterize the demand environment in the US that you're experiencing on the back of the removal of the consumer tax credits. Obviously, a big portion of industry reports monthly sales and did so yesterday, and for those that are involved in the EV business, there was quite a bit of a drop September into October. So just curious what you've seen and the level of comfort around the demand levels on a go-forward basis.
R
Robert Scaringe10:39
Thanks, Emmanuel, for the question. We certainly expected to see a pull forward of demand from October into September with the end of the IRA program, and we saw that in September. That pull forward, of course, results in somewhat of a softer demand environment as we look at October, and I think that's true just across the full space, across the industry, across multiple different manufacturers. I think it's important that we look out from a longer-term horizon point of view and recognize that ultimately the customer is going to be making decisions around what's the best product for them. We spend a lot of time, I think, often overly focused on electric vehicle sales relative to others. The way we think about this, and in particular with regards to R2, is we need to build the best vehicles and give customers great choices. In the case of R1, we have the best-selling premium SUV sold in the United States. That's for EVs, premium SUVs, and we have the best-selling SUV, electric or non-electric, in the state of California. With R2, we're really hoping to capture the magic of what is in R1 in terms of performance, features, and capabilities in a much more cost-effective or affordable package that allows us to have this vehicle be cross-shopped with so many different types of vehicles. It's hitting the most popular segment with a mid-size SUV, five-passenger SUV, with a price point that starts at 45. The average price of a new vehicle sold in the United States is around 50. So we're really bullish, really confident on R2 and what that represents for us as a business.
E
Emmanuel Rosner12:29
Okay, great. And then as a quick follow-up, what are you expecting in terms of demand for regulatory credits? I don't believe you're assuming any additional sales this year, but any directional view into 2026?
C
Claire McDonough12:45
Thanks, Emmanuel. We don't expect to have meaningful revenues from the sale of regulatory credits, and we've taken those out of our forecast just given some of the uncertainty on potential policy changes. We wanted to make sure that our forecast was conservative on this front.
E
Emmanuel Rosner13:04
Great, thank you.
O
Operator13:06
Thank you. Our next question comes from Mark Delaney with Goldman Sachs. Mark, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
M
Mark Delaney13:16
Yes, good afternoon. Thank you very much for taking the question. For cost per vehicle, I think it came down about $96,000 per vehicle even with the downtime the company took to get the Normal site ready for R2. I think you already mentioned material cost as one of the key drivers of that, but I was hoping you could speak a bit more on what you're seeing in terms of cost per vehicle. I guess ultimately any change in where you think cost can get you, especially as you look out to R2.
C
Claire McDonough13:45
Thanks for the question, Mark. As you noted, we had about $96,300 of cost of goods sold per unit delivered in Q3. And that was despite the fact that we had several weeks of downtime, so there was an impact from fixed cost absorption included within these results. As we look forward, the big driver of performance improvement in terms of our cost of goods sold in 2026 will be the volumes that we receive from R2's ramp and scaling efforts. So we'll see benefit not just with R2's path to positive gross profit and positive unit economics, which we expect to achieve by the end of 2026, but also the volume impacts that will benefit both R1 as well as our commercial vans as volume scales throughout the Normal facility as a whole.
M
Mark Delaney14:39
Thanks for that. My other question was on Main Robotics. You mentioned doing work with Main Robotics, but I'm also forgetting an external financing. So maybe you could talk a bit more about what Main Robotics does and what kind of opportunity you see for the entity going forward. Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe14:58
Yeah, Mark, this is an area we've spent a lot of time on as a company, thinking around what our manufacturing infrastructure and manufacturing platforms look like long term. As we thought through that, it led us to the view that we need to develop products and robotics solutions that can allow us to run our manufacturing plants more efficiently. The design of these robotic solutions captures the data that we have within our existing facilities to train the robotic platforms on manufacturing and to train on some of these high dexterity operations. We've ultimately raised $110 million in a seed round to launch this as an effort outside of Rivian, but obviously with Rivian still as a close partner and as a shareholder in this entity. The applications will include Rivian applications, but also much wider ranging, thinking about a wide spectrum of industrial applications where we see the benefit of AI-enabled robotics.
O
Operator16:14
Thank you. Our next question comes from George Gianarikas with Baird. George, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
G
George Gianarikas16:26
Hi everyone. Thank you so much for taking my questions. If maybe you could just update us a little bit on the Volkswagen relationship just because there are lots of headlines as to what's going on there eternally. Any update there would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe16:44
Yeah, the Volkswagen relationship coincidentally is coming up on its 1-year anniversary for the joint venture. A lot has happened in the last year. We continue to make great progress. We have an incredibly productive and strong relationship with Volkswagen Group. I was just in Munich a few months ago for a number of different product reveals, one of which was the Volkswagen ID.1, which is a roughly $22,000 EV that's being developed by Volkswagen. Of course, leveraging our technology platform, and it's just an awesome vehicle. I'm really excited for that to be one of the launch vehicles that comes out of our collaboration and joint venture with Volkswagen. It's the first of what will be many programs that come out of this joint effort. The relationship remains very strong, very positive, and there are lots of things to come in front of us in terms of products and other ways we can work together.
G
George Gianarikas17:47
Thank you. And maybe as a follow-up, I don't mean to front-run the autonomy day in December, but what role do you see Rivian playing in the robo-taxi market? There are some of your peers also developing electric vehicles that have teamed up with some of the ride-share companies. Any sort of anything you could share on that front? Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe18:09
A lot of emphasis has gone on the robo-taxi side. I think independent of whether the application is in a personally owned vehicle or in a robo-taxi, what's really important is recognition that the technology is going to become a key part of our automotive ecosystem. In our view, as we look towards the end of this decade, it will start to become a really important driver for consumer purchase decisions around whether or not a vehicle's capable of driving itself with both hands off the wheel and eyes off the road. Importantly, doing that across a very wide spectrum of roads. Essentially, any drivable road should be something that can be driven by a vehicle without a lot of involvement from the driver. As it stands today, more than 95% of the miles driven in the United States are in personally owned vehicles, the remainder being a mix between taxi, ride-share, and rental. We think that's likely to stay mostly the same. Maybe ride share grows by some percent, but in terms of large-scale adoption of autonomy, solving this for personally owned vehicles is going to drive the biggest step change for us. That said, the opportunity for us to participate in robo-taxis is of course there. If we chose to partner with some of the big ride share operators, there are lots of market opportunities there. But our focus today is really on the technology. That's what we'll spend our autonomy and AI day talking about: the technology roadmap, how we've developed it, both the hardware, the software, and our data flywheel. We'll demonstrate what all those different elements come together to enable in terms of what the vehicle can do. Through that event, you'll see there are lots of different ways this can be applied in terms of go-to-market, whether that's personally owned or through robo-taxi partnerships as you stated.
O
Operator20:15
Thank you. Our next question comes from Joseph Spak with UBS. Joseph, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
J
Joseph Spak20:27
Thanks. Good afternoon. RJ, the CEO of Scout Motors was recently reportedly said that 80% of their pre-orders are for their E-REV variant. And you know, BYD has both a BEV portfolio and E-REV portfolio. Even if you look at China overall in recent years, E-REVs have been growing arguably faster. So there's clearly demand for that type of product. I think there's probably some benefits to that type of powertrain for the vehicles you want to sell, meaning trucks. So I may disagree, but I'd be curious to hear that. I know you talk about this all-electric future you envision, but the question is, would you actually consider offering an E-REV for the US market or globally, and if so, how easy is it to adjust the platform?
R
Robert Scaringe21:19
Thanks, Joe. We're not planning to offer an E-REV or, effectively, a series hybrid which would involve putting an engine into the vehicle. That's not in our product roadmap or something that we're at all contemplating. But I do think it's important to note that part of the journey of electrification is providing customers with choice. Different manufacturers are going to make different decisions on this. Some will decide to take more of a hybrid approach or an E-REV approach. Others are going to take a pure EV approach. In the end, as asymptotically, this is all going to be driving towards, in our view as I said in my opening remarks, everything will be electric, everything will be software defined, and everything will have very high levels of autonomous capabilities. We're very focused on continuing to lead with electrification. We think particularly for the mid-size segment SUV, which is going to make up the vast majority of our volume with the launch of R2 and its follow-on product with R3, that that segment really works beautifully with an electric car, a fully electric architecture where we're able to deliver great performance, outstanding range, and at a price point that's very comparable to ICE or hybrid alternatives.
J
Joseph Spak22:40
Okay, thank you. And as a second question, I know you spoke briefly on Mind. I guess I just want to one, there's no spend or has there been spend already going on for that? Two, how should we think about that spend going forward, or is it all ring-fenced in this sort of external company of which you are just an owner? Maybe just if you could clarify that for us, that would be helpful. Thanks.
R
Robert Scaringe23:10
Yes, Minder Robotics is a separate company from Rivian. Rivian is a shareholder in this. The $110 million that I referenced before is the seed financing as capital from outside of Rivian. We're incredibly excited about it. As much as we've seen AI shift how we operate and run our businesses through the wide-ranging applications for LLMs, the potential for AI to really shift how we think about operating in the physical world is in some ways unimaginably large. That influences how we think about designing logistics inside of a plant, how we think about designing even plant layouts. The creation of this company ultimately came from us coming to the view that we wanted to have direct control and direct influence over the design and development of advanced AI robotics that would be very focused on industrial applications. These are robotic solutions we will be creating through this entity, through Minder Robotics, that are designed and optimized around manufacturing and industrial environments.
O
Operator24:29
Thank you. Our next question comes from Dan Levy with Barclays. Dan, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
D
Dan Levy24:39
Hi, good evening. Thank you for taking the questions. I wanted to ask if you could possibly give us the latest update on tariffs within the results. I know you had stockpiled batteries, so I don't know if there's any impact there, but we have seen some changes in tariff policy. And then maybe just broadly on tariffs, given IRA is no longer really a consideration, how does that change the battery sourcing strategy for R2? Can you rely perhaps on some of the cheaper LFP batteries from overseas?
C
Claire McDonough25:21
Thanks for the question, Dan. As you mentioned, the administration announced the lengthening of the 3.75% MSRP offset for section 232 automotive tariffs to 2030 last week. It also included the ability to designate parts in the 232 automotive classification that expands the pool of eligible parts, which is particularly important for a company like Rivian, which is heavily vertically integrated. Today we source a lot of raw material inputs that we're building sub-assemblies of internally that weren't necessarily designated under a section 232 classification. We're really appreciative of the administration for these new changes that were announced most recently. As you think about the impacts on the quarter itself based off of the product that we sold, we were just under a couple thousand dollars per vehicle of impact in Q3. On a go-forward basis, we expect the impact to be a few hundred dollars per unit for new builds once these policies are fully in place. We'll see a trend down in terms of the tariff exposure in Q4 since we'll certainly be selling some vehicles that have higher levels of inventory or parts that we're building towards in inventory today. That's the general glide path and trajectory there. Then, I'll pass the second part of your question on the R2 battery cell sourcing back over to RJ.
R
Robert Scaringe27:12
Yeah, the R2 program, we've talked about this in the past, is launching with the 4695 cylindrical cell. That cell, starting in the late 2026 time frame, will be produced in the United States in Arizona. We sourced that quite some time ago and have been developing in close partnership with the supplier of that cell, which is LG, for some time. As you point out, there are opportunities to look at other sources of battery cells both in terms of chemistry and in terms of supplier. But as it relates to the production coming out of our Normal facility, that's planned to be the LG cell produced in Arizona.
D
Dan Levy28:01
Okay, great. Thank you. Second question is somewhat related. I know that the regulatory picture still has to sort of emerge a bit more, but it is a bit more clear now. Can you tell us to what extent, now that you have maybe a better sense on tariffs and a better sense on red credits, those have moved against maybe some of the initial assumptions you had when you were planning the R2 BOM? Knowing that the BOM is sticky, what mitigants do you have to ensure that you're going to get the appropriate unit economics? I know you've talked about plans to get the BOM cut in half versus R1 and exiting '26 with a positive gross margin, but how do you mitigate against some of these given the BOM is sticky?
R
Robert Scaringe28:53
There's a lot in that question, but let's unpack it. First and foremost, the bill of materials is contractual. As we negotiated the bill of materials and made decisions strategically as to where the content that ultimately makes up the bill of materials in the vehicle is coming from, we made decisions around prioritizing domestic or USMCA-compliant BOM sourcing. We had parts coming out of USMCA-compliant locations because those decisions were made where we already had line of sight to the likely shift in some of the policies that we've seen recently. Importantly, those contractual agreements that we have on the BOM itself help give us confidence in achieving the BOM and getting to the exit rate of positive unit economics on R2 at the exit of 2026. Another element that's changing is the expansion of the 232 framework and the allowance for the 3.75% to carry out longer, which is very helpful for us. We previously guided to say the effective tariffs have been a couple of thousand dollars, and what we would now guide to say is that it's a few hundred dollars of tariff cost per vehicle. So it's a pretty significant shift for us. Above and beyond that, in terms of the overall COGS framework, Javier and the team have been very focused on making sure we're ready at the plant. Your team is responsible for the bill of materials and supplier sourcing, so just comment on the confidence we have in our cost structure.
J
Javier Varela30:44
Yeah, when it comes to the bottom as you have explained it, I want to insist that we have sourced on a landed basis. By contract, we have 100% of the cost sourced. We understand what the cost we are incurring is, and the tariff situation is that much more favorable as Claire explained. For the rest of the content of the cost, we are working obviously on the conversion cost, logistics, and all the transformation cost in the plant. We are doing already in Normal a huge lean transformation, improving our performance in our daily operations, and all these learnings we will translate to the R2 operations. The design of our process is more compact in R2, lesser space, less cost in terms of maintenance and overhead consumption. We are really confident, and we can see and confirm with our internal numbers that we are sticking to our target of reducing by half the cost.
D
Dan Levy31:58
Great, thank you.
O
Operator32:01
Thank you. Our next question comes from Edison Yu with Deutsche Bank. Edison, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
W
Winnie Young32:10
Hi, this is Winnie Young for Edison. I wanted to ask about the OpEx trajectory on a going forward basis. You mentioned in the shareholder letter guide there is some inclusion of that for autonomy training. So on a going forward basis, how should we think about that OpEx line for the permanent training for autonomy?
C
Claire McDonough32:34
Sure. Our philosophy and approach has always been to drive efficiencies into the business to help self-fund strategic areas of differentiation such as our autonomous driving training. As we look at our future roadmap of investment, that remains intact from a philosophy and approach. We're always looking for and committed to finding efficiencies and opportunities to reduce spend within the organization so that we can also scale the business for the increased volume that we expect to come with the introduction of our new vehicles as well. As you think about the R&D spend, we'll see elevated levels of R&D spend in the lead-up to the launch of R2, primarily driven by a lot of the work that we do to build development prototypes. Today, design validation builds, we talked a little bit in our prepared remarks about starting to have manufacturing builds in our Normal plant at the end of this year. Then you'll see some of that external spend drop down when we launch the R2 product. So you'll see over the course of '26 more normalizing levels, despite the fact that we're going to be continuing to ramp up our autonomous training over the longer term as well.
W
Winnie Young34:00
Got it. That's very helpful. My second question is on the R2 launch for next year. Was wondering if you can comment maybe on the production cadence as you see order flow coming through. How should we anticipate that to sort of look like, first half versus second half etc. for next year? Thank you.
C
Claire McDonough34:21
Sure. For R2, as we mentioned, we plan to start saleable builds and deliveries in the first half of '26. But we would steer folks to there being limited volumes in the first half of the year. Then the second half of the year, we will build up our ramp and see increasing production volumes throughout the second half of the year and then into 2027, where we'll first be in a position to have fully optimized the 215,000 sort of run rate units of capacity that we have established within the Normal facility.
W
Winnie Young35:04
Very helpful. Thank you.
O
Operator35:06
Thank you. Our next question comes from Federico Merendi from Bank of America. Federico, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
F
Federico Merendi35:17
Hi, good evening everybody. I wanted to touch upon the capacity that you're building up. In Normal facility you're going to have 215,000 units of production available. In Georgia, from what I understand, 400,000 additional. But given what Emmanuel said about the underlying demand and that you're not going to integrate your production with hybrid vehicles or range extended vehicles, how should we think about the saturation of those two plants that you are building up?
R
Robert Scaringe36:03
The Normal facility, as you said, will have 215,000 units of capacity, and that'll be split between R1, our commercial van, and R2. R2 of that will have 155,000 units of capacity. The Georgia facility, built across two phases, will ultimately have 400,000 units of capacity, and that'll support R2, R3, and variants of each of those products. I said this before, but I think it's a very important point to make: understanding the demand profile from customers for electric vehicles requires us to look deeper than just EV sales in aggregate, but rather to look at the strength of a vehicle offering relative to what else is on offer. Ultimately, the way customers are going to be making decisions is based on the price of the vehicle and the value it provides, which includes performance, capability, and features. We're very, very bullish on what we're building with R2. The way we think about it as a team is we're building the best car you can buy in this category and at this price point. We want that to be abundantly clear and something that is so self-evident when you use the vehicle. We were just talking about how exciting it'll be for people to compare the vehicle to other things in this price category. We've also seen that the rate of adoption of EVs really does tie heavily to the number of highly compelling offerings. To date, at this mass market price point, call it in the $45,000 range, there's really been a single dominant brand with really two products. That's, of course, Tesla with the Model 3 and Model Y. With them taking up roughly half the market, 50% market share, it's not a reflection of a healthy market; it's a reflection of a very underserved market in terms of choice and options. What we're building with R2 is very different than a Model Y. It's similar size, similar price, but very, very different in terms of the way it's executed. It's going to attract, we think, a very wide range of customers, including people that may be considering EV, but also importantly, folks that are not necessarily considering EV but just looking for a great vehicle for $45,000 to $50,000. With all that said, what we've shown to date in terms of product sets or product portfolios is the R2, the R3, and the R3X. Importantly, there are other variants which we haven't shown yet that will be built off the R2 and R3 platforms that will support the overall volume in Georgia as well.
F
Federico Merendi38:57
Thank you. I would assume that to basically ramp all that volume, you will export vehicles to other regions or countries. When should we assume that you will enter into other markets?
R
Robert Scaringe39:17
The R2 and R3 vehicles are absolutely architected from the very beginning and designed with Europe in mind and planning for Europe. We think they both fit the European market extremely well. We haven't announced European timing yet, but it is really a core part of the program. It was also a key element of the decision we made to set up the plant in Georgia, given its ease of export for vehicles going to Europe.
O
Operator39:52
Thank you. Our next question comes from James Picariello from BNP Paribas. James, your line is open. Please unmute and ask your question.
J
James Picariello40:06
Hi. Can you hear me?
O
Operator40:09
Yes, we can hear you.
J
James Picariello40:12
Great. So, yeah, just on free cash flow, how are you thinking about working capital in the fourth quarter relative to the strong source of cash contributions in the second and third quarters? And I know it was previously indicated that we should expect CapEx to run higher next year. Is there any dimensioning you can share regarding that increase? Thanks.
C
Claire McDonough40:35
Sure. As we look at the fourth quarter, as implied by our guidance, we do expect to see a step up in our capital expenditures in Q4. As you rightly called out, we've seen strong favorability in working capital trends throughout the first three quarters of this year. I will see that reverse a little bit in the fourth quarter, where we expect working capital to consume cash in the fourth quarter. As we look at the working capital outlook for 2026, as we build up inventory for R2, we expect working capital overall for 2026 to be a use of cash. We'll see that normalize as we ramp and get to our run rate levels overall. As Javier mentioned, we are very focused on making sure that we have very lean operations in Normal as we look at the broad-based imagery outlook for the business. In the longer term, we'll provide more details on the 2026 CapEx outlook on our Q4 earnings call. We'll circle back with more details there. As RJ mentioned, that would be additional capital to start vertical construction for the Georgia facility that would be reflected in our 2026 CapEx spend.
J
James Picariello42:02
Understood. That makes sense. So, my follow-up with respect to the next tranche of VW investment, the billion dollars in equity, this is tied to two scopes of successful winter testing, I believe. Do you expect the testing to take place this winter or late next year? Just curious on the timing there. Thank you.
C
Claire McDonough42:23
We don't plan to comment on exact timing, but as you heard me talk about in my prepared remarks, we were confident in our ability to achieve the billion dollars of equity investment from Volkswagen Group in 2026.
O
Operator42:41
Thank you. Our next question comes from Ben Kallo with Baird. Ben, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
B
Ben Kallo42:52
Hey, good evening. Thanks for taking my question. So, maybe two parts with the R2 coming. I know RJ you've talked about $45,000. Can you just talk about your philosophy around pricing? Model Y and other Tesla models, they would release the highest trim if we want to call it that first and then kind of scale down from there as the market expands. But can you talk to us about pricing and how you set that versus cutting it in the future, considering that for now at least at Normal, supply could be limited, and then how that ties into the Georgia plant and R2 because it seems like you have a lot going on and pricing kind of differentiating the two in a short amount of time. Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe43:43
In the early part of next year, we're going to have an R2 event where we'll go through the full portfolio of R2 products, which would include the different pricing levels across trim and powertrain configuration. As you called out, when we're starting a production line of a new vehicle, we're going to limit the number of variants that we're building. We have a launch edition for the R2. This is a classic challenge because, of the thousands and thousands of people that are excited for R2, some will want the most base version, the lowest price version, others are going to want the highest end version, some will want something in the middle. We spent a lot of time thinking about what's the right version to launch with. I'm not going to provide the pricing for that here. I'll say that it's a dual motor variant and that's well appointed, but it's not intended to be our most expensive version. It is intended to be a very nicely set up vehicle which we think will make the most people the most happy, which is really the goal we had in selecting our launch configuration. As implied, following the initial ramp up with that launch configuration, we'll then add in the other trims and other configurations. At that event I referenced earlier, we'll go through that in the early part of 2026 and talk about when those different trims are going to be available.
B
Ben Kallo45:14
Thank you. My follow is along the same lines. Just on terms of marketing versus advertising versus cutting price to figure out the market size, how do you guys think about where advertising fits in? A lot of the questions have focused on other OEMs retrenching and not going down the path of EVs or doing hybrid electrics. So is there something that you guys can do through advertising or marketing to distinguish that not all EVs are built alike? Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe45:48
It's an awesome question. Ultimately, the question is getting at this idea of awareness. Awareness of what R2 is and awareness of Rivian as a brand. Some of that will naturally come just from the presence of R2 on the roads and having more people have access to it, the brand becoming much more accessible because of a much lower price point, and some of the same word of mouth that's benefited the brand to date with R1. Beyond just the existence of the product, the presence of it on the roads, and the positive dynamics associated with word of mouth, we are putting a lot of thought into exactly how we'll launch different campaigns for the vehicle. That's putting it in unique places, making sure that it's whether those are physical activations that are temporary in nature, physical activations through partnerships with other entities, whether it's going to show up at a ski resort or a restaurant, these types of decisions, to the more digitally focused marketing spend that allows people to see and experience the vehicle. We've historically not really relied heavily on paid marketing. That's certainly been a decision, but I think there's an opportunity there for us to be thoughtful and highly measured, but thoughtful in how we deploy dollars into driving awareness so folks know about this really incredible product that we've developed.
O
Operator47:22
Thank you. Our next question comes from Felipe Ushua with Jefferies. Felipe, your line is open. Please feel free to unmute and ask your question.
F
Felipe Ushua47:35
Right. Thank you very much, and good afternoon.
O
Operator47:49
Felipe, are you still there?
F
Felipe Ushua47:52
Can you hear me again?
O
Operator47:54
Now we can hear you.
R
Robert Scaringe47:55
We didn't hear any of the question, though.
F
Felipe Ushua47:57
Right. Okay, sorry about that. My question was on tariffs. So it's clear now on tariff and thanks for the clarification that it's a negative still but less negative than it would have been six months ago. What has become a net positive though compared to the past is that import duties into Europe are going to go from 10 to 0. I'm just wondering to what extent it has kind of shifted your thinking on Europe. I know you talked about Europe and R2 R3 are well suited for the market. I would agree. Does it make sense to think about a faster rollout into Europe and potentially also a bigger scale? And if you think about the potential of the market, is it still appropriate to try to do a direct selling from the US exports, or does it make sense to use local distribution and dealers in Europe as a separate business model? Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe48:53
The impact of a 0% export tariff is certainly something we've been quite enthusiastic about, and we're pleased to see it. It hasn't had as much attention as we think it deserves. While as I said before, we haven't announced the timing for when we're going to be exporting to Europe, it's certainly part of our own calculus on deciding when we add that layer of complexity to the business, recognizing that we have a lot of demand here in the United States and we want to make sure we achieve critical mass for the large pool of demand that we have here in the US. But at the same time, without a tariff to now bring our vehicles from the United States to Europe, there's a real opportunity to get into Europe sooner. These are the types of things we're thinking about, but we haven't yet said exactly when we'll be in Europe.
F
Felipe Ushua49:50
Right. And if I can do a follow-up, I think you've been quite efficient in delivering the R1 development on time, and congratulations for that. Can you remind us what time lag we might expect between R2 hitting the road and then R3? Is it 12, 18 months, 24 months? What's your timeframe there?
R
Robert Scaringe50:12
We haven't announced R3 yet in terms of timing. But what we have said is that R3 will be produced only in our Georgia facility. We're not planning to produce that in our Normal facility. And the Georgia facility, we have said, is launching in late 2028. So it would be no sooner than the launch of that facility in Georgia.
O
Operator50:37
Thank you. Our next question comes from Andres Shepherd with Cantor Fitzgerald. Andres, please go ahead and ask your question.
A
Andres Shepherd50:49
Wonderful. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you so much for taking my question and everyone's questions. Really do appreciate it and congrats on all the progress. RJ, I think most of my questions have been asked. I do want to maybe go back to a subject which I believe you're quite passionate about, which is autonomy. I guess with the rapid acceleration and deployment of self-driving vehicles both in passenger vehicles and commercial vehicles, I'm curious if maybe you can give us a little bit more into your vision for Rivian's approach. I realize we probably get a lot of these answers in the AI day coming up, but curious if you see a scenario where Rivian might pursue perhaps a robo-taxi partnership with a vendor or perhaps pursue autonomy in commercial vehicles, maybe even with the EDVs. Any thoughts there? Thank you.
R
Robert Scaringe51:44
First, thanks for the plug for autonomy day on December 11th. We're incredibly excited about that. We're going to be going into a lot of detail there and talking about a number of things we've not yet talked about publicly, unveiling a lot of the technology behind what we're building and what we've been focused on the last several years to enable this. At the highest level, this is an area of the business and a technology drive within our business that we think is going to be among the most important for transportation. It represents one of the largest investment areas for us as a company, one of the most focused R&D efforts for us as a company, and it captures a tremendous amount of excitement from us as a business and certainly for me. In terms of the applications for autonomy, it is very wide-ranging. We think it's going to become a very powerful driver of sales. When you think about the products we're launching, particularly with R2 and R3, the form factor of those vehicles is so universally useful. It's universally useful for a personally owned vehicle, for a vehicle that might participate in any form of ride-sharing services, and it's universally applicable in the United States and in Europe. Layering on top of that already very interesting vehicle in terms of form factor, package, pricing, very high levels of autonomy, where we start to look well beyond hands-off wheel, eyes on road, but into hands-off wheel, eyes off road, point-to-point navigation, so address to address, we look at that as a really significant driver of demand. It will unlock a lot of folks that may not have even been considering Rivian or an EV but to say, 'Wow, I really like this car, but I also really like the fact that it can give me my time back. I can have it drive places with me sitting in the car on my phone, getting my time back.' That is our North Star. It's not that we will be able to start immediately there, but what we'll talk about on December 11th will be what that roadmap looks like: first, expansion of the number of roads that we have hands-free on, then overlaying that with point-to-point, address-to-address navigation, then following that, adding in for select specific environments hands-off and eyes-off, which is an important one, and then over time growing the number of locations and broadening the operational design domain for where the vehicle can operate with eyes off. That is the core focus for us as a business. Doing that well will unlock, as you already alluded to, many different types of businesses that'll support what we already build in our commercial business, which we're quite excited about. It opens up opportunities for robo-taxi, but importantly, by far and away the largest revenue opportunity is consumer-owned vehicles or vehicles owned by a household, which represents well in excess of 95% of miles driven in the United States and largely true for Europe as well. That's our core focus to start, but to be very clear, the technology can be applied in many, many different places.
A
Andres Shepherd55:21
Wonderful. That's super helpful. Really appreciate all that color. Maybe just as a quick follow-up one for Claire. I don't believe this has been asked about yet, but just on the DOE loan, can you maybe just remind us or refresh us on your expectations for disbursements for next year or beyond? Thanks.
C
Claire McDonough55:42
Sure. The DOE loan, if you recall, is a project-based finance loan, which means that we would need to be underway with vertical construction of our site in Georgia and have also met at that point in time for a first advance a number of different conditions precedents ahead of initial draw. As RJ alluded to, we plan to begin vertical construction in 2026 and see the first vehicles coming off of the line by the end of 2028.
O
Operator56:14
Wonderful. Thank you. Our final question for today will come from Colin Langdon with Wells Fargo. Colin, your line is open. Please feel free to ask your question.
C
Colin Langdon56:25
Oh, great. Thank you. My question is, if I look at the midpoint of guidance, it implies adjusted EBITDA is actually improving moving into Q4. But the midpoint of the lower guidance would be down. So what would drive better Q4 EBITDA or lower volumes?
C
Claire McDonough56:48
Sure, Colin. As you think about the trajectory for the fourth quarter overall, we anticipate seeing a consistent level of EDV volume as a whole as you look to Q4 results. The EDV has historically had a lower cost basis associated with it as well. So that's one factor. The other factor is, as we look ahead to the future, we'll continue to earn increasing levels of background revenue associated with our background IP for the Volkswagen Group joint venture as we continue to show progress against key milestones in the JV. That's similar to what you've seen throughout the course of Q3 relative to Q2. There could be incremental improvement in terms of the gross profit benefit from software and services as well. In my prepared remarks, I mentioned on the SG&A side, we do expect to see a slight reduction in SG&A spend in the fourth quarter.
C
Colin Langdon58:04
Got it. And you talked about regulatory credits. You don't expect any for the rest of the year. Are there any as you think about 2025, is there any coming out in sometimes the contract for a multi-year, or should we kind of assume 2025 also doesn't have any regulatory credit help?
C
Claire McDonough58:21
As I mentioned before, we've taken regulatory credits out of our forecast just given some of the uncertainty in the broader policy environment.
O
Operator58:33
All right. This concludes the Q&A section of the call. I would now like to turn the call back to RJ for closing remarks.
R
Robert Scaringe58:44
Thanks everyone for joining today's call. Hopefully you can hear in our voices just the level of excitement that we have for R2 and importantly the technology platforms that we're building. Certainly our autonomy platform being chief among them. We've got a lot of work to do in front of us as we get ready for the launch of R2, but as I said, I've been spending a lot of time in our vehicles and they are just absolutely incredible. Both the vehicle, the technology, and the autonomous capabilities of the vehicles. We're incredibly excited to spend more time on December 11th talking about our autonomy technology and overall AI within the business and within the vehicles. Then certainly in the early part of next year, starting to get folks in our R2 products. That is what we're heads down on and focused on. We spend a lot of time talking about the vehicle itself, but the rest of the business is also being prepared: all of our go-to-market functions, our service functions, and as you heard from Javier, getting our plant and our operations teams ready. We are focused on that and feeling very excited for the launch of the vehicle and for the launch of all this technology that we've talked about today. Thank you all very much for joining today's call.
O
Operator1:00:04
This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect.