Back
Stuart Miller
Co-CEO & Executive Chairman, Lennar Corp

Lennar Corporation LEN CEO Rick Beckwitt on Q4 2019 Results

🎥 Jan 15, 2020 📺 Daily Earnings Calls ⏱ 71m
Earnings Call for Lennar Corporation LEN CEO Rick Beckwitt on Q4 2019.
Watch on YouTube

About Stuart Miller

Stuart Miller, Co-CEO and Executive Chairman of Lennar, has described the current housing market as facing an affordability crisis that has left many families excluded from homeownership. He stated that the company is focused on managing inventory levels and reducing cycle times and costs per square foot to improve efficiency. Miller noted that after three years of increasing incentives, the company observed a potentially sustainable decline in incentive levels, which he described as a possible leading indicator of margin recovery, though he cautioned that the market remains choppy. Miller has commented on the broader economic and policy environment, stating that the inflation backdrop has likely taken the Federal Reserve off the table as a near-term source of relief. He expressed confidence that meaningful federal action on housing affordability is closer than the market believes, calling the level of government attention to the issue unprecedented in his experience. He also characterized certain policy initiatives as a concerning long-term development for housing, suggesting they could reduce production and supply. Miller has emphasized that Lennar is not waiting for rate cuts and is executing based on current market conditions, while maintaining that pent-up demand exists and that the company is working to rationalize its cost structure.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Stuart Miller's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (56 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
O
Operator0:00
Welcome to Lennar's fourth quarter earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. I will now turn the call over to Alexandra Lumpkin for the reading of the forward-looking statement.
A
Alexandra Lumpkin0:27
Thank you and good morning. Today's conference call may include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding Lennar's business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies and prospects. Forward-looking statements represent only Lennar's estimates on the date of this conference call and are not intended to give any assurance as to actual future results. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could affect future results and may cause Lennar's actual activities or results to differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those described in this warning release and our SEC filings, including those under the caption risk factors contained in Lennar's annual report on Form 10-K most recently filed with the SEC. Please note that Lennar assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. I would like to introduce your host, Mr. Stuart Miller, Executive Chairman. Sir, you may begin.
S
Stuart Miller1:28
Great, good morning everyone and thank you. This morning I'm here in Miami with Rick Beckwitt, our Chief Executive Officer; John Jaffe, our President; Diane Bessey, our Chief Financial Officer; and Dave Collins, our Controller. Of course you've just heard from Alex. I'm going to start, as I always do, with a brief overview. John and Rick are going to give some additional operational remarks and Diane will deliver further detail on our fourth quarter and year-end numbers as well as some guidance for our first quarter and full year 2020. As always, when we get to our Q&A, we'd like to ask that you limit your questions to just one question and one follow-up so that we can accommodate as many participants as possible. So let me go ahead and begin by saying that this is another excellent quarter and year-end for the company as we continue to focus on performance, cash flow and total shareholder returns. We're very pleased to report record quarterly performance together with a record strong finish to 2019 that started off paused and sluggish and ended the year with a rather robust housing market. Our results reflect both the continued strength in the housing market as well as our continued focus on leveraging size and scale to drive greater cash flow and higher returns on equity and on capital. On the macro front, the housing market continued to strengthen throughout the fourth quarter, confirming the continuing trend that we reported in our last two quarterly earnings calls. The market for new homes has continued a steady improvement from last year's pause as lower interest rates stimulated demand while the overall fundamentals of the economy have remained strong. We clearly saw traffic and sales continue to strengthen in the fourth quarter as a combination of lower interest rates and slower price appreciation have positively impacted affordability. Greater affordability, together with low unemployment, wage growth, consumer confidence and economic growth, drove home purchases, especially at the entry level, to return to a more affordable housing market. Even with the constant noise from the current election cycle and from the ebb and flow of global tensions which we're seeing play out in real time, the indicators that we see and hear from our customers gives us confidence in the stability of the economy and in the job market. As of now and through today, the housing market is strong. On the company front, Lennar achieved record results as we posted net earnings of over $674 million, or $2.13 per share for the quarter, and approximately $1.85 billion, or $5.74 per share for the year. These results derived primarily from solid operating results from both home building and financial services as our ancillary businesses have become less of a factor. In home building, improvement in new orders and deliveries produced a gross margin of 21.5% for the quarter, which was at the high end of our guidance last quarter, while deliveries jumped 16% over last year and new orders improved 23% over last year's rather tepid fourth quarter. Our size and scale in most of the best markets in the country enabled us to offset rising land costs with production cost savings, while overhead leverage has driven our SG&A to an all-time fourth quarter low of 7.6% and a full year low of 8.3%, which has enabled net margins of 13.9% and 12.3% respectively. We're confident that these trends are going to continue into 2020. Our financial services performance also continued to contribute to our earnings beat. I want to focus on this segment for a minute, as I did last quarter. Our financial services performance and improvement continues to be a proxy for many of the important initiatives driving our company into next year and beyond. Our financial services division earned $244 million versus $200 million last year, a 22% improvement. That performance improved through the year and in the current quarter, our financial services segment generated a record quarterly profit of $81.2 million compared to $57.6 million last year, for a 41% improvement. This record profit comes after selling substantially all of the company's retail operations in both mortgage and title in the first quarter earlier this year. These sales enabled our company to focus on the core home buying business and to implement technology initiatives that are streamlining the remaining business. This focus on the core business drove significant operational improvement in the second half of the year. First, we increased the company's combined mortgage capture rate from 74% to 78% by focusing on simplifying our customers' engagement and providing excellent customer service. Second, we reduced the cost to originate a loan by 11%, from $6,300 per loan last year to $6,000 per loan in the third quarter to $5,600 per loan this quarter. That's steady improvement and it's down by one third from $8,400 per loan in 2017. These cost reductions were driven by management's focus on technology initiatives, which include our Blend front-end technology for loan application, along with robotic processes that automate repetitive processes to reduce paper flow and streamline the closing process. These improvements all lead to not only lower cost to the company but to a friendlier and frictionless customer experience with the company. Finally, we have reduced total financial services headcount by about 50%. At the same time, technology together with management focus has enabled efficiency, a better customer experience, and a much better bottom line in our financial services division. Our management team and the entire group have made technology initiatives a core mission and are showing leadership for the entire company in that regard. Accordingly, we're gaining ever more confidence that we will continue to improve our entire end-to-end process to get to a one-tap closing, create a customer satisfaction process that is simple, frictionless and has never been seen before. As we're building these improvements, we're also seeing the fruits of our focus and investment at the bottom line. These improvements specifically and these types of improvements generally are sustainable and they will continue to drive bottom line improvement in our financial services segment and across our entire company in the future. Over the next two years, we expect to see some of the same technology-based improvements affecting our core home building operations, specifically in areas of customer acquisition costs and even flow production and inventory management. Stay tuned. Moving on, while our strong operating results drove the bottom line, we are simultaneously focused on any and all ways to improve total shareholder return by reducing our asset base. Our fourth quarter results reflect our overall focus on land spend and inventory control that has enhanced our strong and improving cash flow picture as well. We've maintained a relentless focus on our pivot to a land lighter strategy, from the timing of land purchases to the duration of each land asset that we buy to the percentage of option versus owned land. We are and will continue migrating towards a significantly smaller land owned inventory, driving our business and our cash flow forward while we're also driving our asset base lower by continuing to focus on monetizing non-core assets and business segments. Our most immediately impactful focus remains on our land spend and our inventory. With that said, strong operating results and our focus on asset base has increased cash flow for this year to $1.6 billion and projected annual cash flow expectations for 2020 are continuing to head towards the $2 billion mark. In the fourth quarter, we used excess cash to repay an additional $600 million of debt while we also repurchased another 1.7 million shares of stock at an average price of just under $59 per share. For the year, we retired $1.1 billion of senior debt while repurchasing almost 10 million shares of stock. We ended the year with $1.2 billion of cash and our revolver paid to zero. We improved our balance sheet with a debt to total cap ratio of approximately 33%, which is a 410 basis point improvement over last year. As we look to 2020, we expect to continue to generate strong cash flow and we'll use cash to pay down debt and to return capital to shareholders while improving our balance sheet as we continue to improve total shareholder returns. In conclusion, let me end where I began: we had another excellent quarter and year. Our management team is laser focused on deriving returns with excellent operational execution and careful land and inventory management. This focus is not just demonstrated by our words but also by last year's results. While 2019 is in the books, 2020 seems even brighter to us. We remain encouraged by both market conditions for the remainder of the year and Lennar's position in it. Our size and scale continues to facilitate the management of cost and production in a land and labor constrained market. In addition to carrying forward the successes of last year, we have the additional opportunities of our growing single family for rent initiative and our technology-based improvements to the way our customers purchase a home and the way our customers live in a home. These strategies, along with our "sustainable Lennar" sub-theme, will continue to drive operational innovation and excellence and enhanced total shareholder returns. With that, let me turn it over to the rest of the team.
R
Rick Beckwitt13:38
Right, thanks Stuart. We had a strong quarter in each of our business segments driven by solid execution of our operating strategies. Home building revenues for the fourth quarter totaled $6.5 billion, representing an 8% increase from 2018. This was driven by a 16% increase in deliveries to 16,420 homes, partially offset by a 7% decrease in average sales price. Deliveries for the quarter exceeded the high end of our guidance as we carefully matched available inventory with strong buyer demand. The decline in average sales price was driven by our continued strategic focus on the very robust entry level market as our percentage of first-time buyers increased year-over-year. Our gross margin for the quarter totaled 21.5%, which was the top side of our guidance and up 110 basis points sequentially from the third quarter. This sequential improvement benefited from the direct cost savings that John will discuss as well as a higher number of deliveries which allowed us to leverage our field expense. Our SG&A in the quarter was 7.6%. This marks an all-time fourth quarter low and highlights the power of our increased market scale and offering leverage. Home building operating earnings totaled $893 million, up 11% from the prior year. We're proud of the fact that our home building earnings are growing at a faster rate than revenues, once again demonstrating our operating leverage. Net earnings for the quarter totaled $674 million, up 11% from 2018, excluding the gain on the sale of Rialto and non-recurring expenses in the prior year. New orders for the quarter increased 23% to 13,089 homes, exceeding the high end of our guidance. From a dollar value perspective, new orders totaled $5.2 billion in the fourth quarter, which was a 23% increase from the prior year as well. New orders increased significantly in each of our operating home building segments, with extremely strong performance from our Texas region and our West region where new orders were up 48% and 34% respectively year-over-year. Our Texas segment is perfectly positioned and continues to benefit from our strategic focus on the strong entry level market. During the fourth quarter, we saw increased demand which benefited from favorable housing market fundamentals: low unemployment, higher wages, competitive mortgage rates, low inventory levels, and a much more confident homebuyer all contributed to a 26% increase in our sales pace per community year-over-year. We ended the fourth quarter with a sales backlog of 15,577 homes with a dollar value of $6.6 billion. This backlog combined with our current housing inventory puts us in a great position to close between 54,000 and 55,000 homes in fiscal 2020. As Stuart said, in fiscal 2019 we were laser focused on improving our returns on capital and generating increased cash flow. With this in mind, increasing our percentage of option home sites and reducing our years supply of owned home sites were top priorities. At the beginning of the year we set a two-year goal of having 40% of our home sites controlled via options and similar arrangements. We made great progress on this front throughout the year as we ended the first quarter with a 24% mix, end of the third quarter at 30%, and finished the year at 33%. Based on our progress, our new two-year goal is to have 50% of our land needs controlled versus owned by the end of fiscal 2021. During the fourth quarter we also made significant progress on reducing our years owned supply of home sites from 4.4 years at the end of the third quarter to 4.1 years at the end of the fourth quarter. Based on this progress, we believe we can reduce our years owned supply of home sites to three years by the end of fiscal 2021 as well. If we're successful, this would reduce our on balance sheet land position by approximately $3 billion. The combined impact of properly executing on our land lighter business and reaching our stated owned and controlled goals will drive meaningful higher cash flow, returns on capital, and total shareholder returns. Consistent with our land light strategy and focus on increasing returns, we're continuing to develop a program to address the single family rental market. There's no question that there's a shortage of affordable and workforce housing and new single-family rentals can solve this problem. Given the shortage, there's intense investor interest in professionally managed new single family rental communities where the owner can leverage the overhead cost of managing the rentals because they are in the same community with identical features from home to home. Last quarter we detailed our single family rental program where our home building operation will be building and selling homes in bulk in communities where the land is owned by third parties with no lease obligation. Since then we've expanded this program to include building and selling incremental single-family rentals in bulk in separate sections of some of our larger existing communities. While we're at the beginning stages of growing this business, we're excited about its growth prospects. Given the lead time in developing new communities and getting home production started, single family rentals will only represent about 1% of our closings in 2020; however, this program will have a much more meaningful impact in 2021 and we will provide an update accordingly. Single family rental is an expansion of our core business as it allows us to leverage our existing machine and overhead. Additionally, this program provides an interesting and unique edge to our for sale business. Before I turn it over to John, I would like to thank our associates and our trade partners for an excellent year. Through your hard work and collaboration we accomplished many great things in 2019 and more importantly we're excellently positioned to execute on our strategies in 2020. I'd like to turn it over to John now.
J
John Jaffe20:55
Thank you, Rick. As we look back on the quarter and our fiscal year, we can clearly see the benefits we are receiving from our significant size and scale across the platform. For both the fourth quarter and for the year, we delivered the most homes in Lennar's history. We continue to see the benefits in our direct construction cost dynamics and in our SG&A that are not only a result of this size and scale but also of our focus on process, particularly the simplification of processes to maximize efficiencies. Turning first to direct construction cost, I noted last quarter we had visibility that our direct costs are going down sequentially and will contribute positively to our gross margins going forward. In our fourth quarter, 70 basis points of our 110 basis points of sequential margin improvement came from our direct construction costs. In the fourth quarter, our direct cost as a percentage of our average sales price is 45.5%. Throughout 2019, this cost to price ratio has trended downward each quarter. We expect this trend to continue throughout 2020 even though we are projecting lower sales prices in 2020 due to a higher mix of entry level homes. Looking at cost per square foot, our overall direct costs were up less than 1% while average square footage was down by 4%. This is an improvement from the third quarter's 3% year-over-year increase and marks the lowest rate of year-over-year direct cost increase in 12 quarters. Going forward, as we deliver more entry-level homes, our average selling price and square footage will both continue to be lower. While this is occurring, the ability to both lower our direct construction cost as a percentage of average sales price and to keep our cost per square foot relatively flat demonstrates the value of the size, scale, and efficiency of our platform across the country. Our builder of choice focus allows Lennar to minimize the impacts of the labor shortage while maximizing supply chain efficiencies. Throughout 2019, we were disciplined with our even flow production model which, combined with our everything's included platform, gives predictability to our trade partners, suppliers, and manufacturers. Turning now to overhead, as noted our fourth quarter and full year SG&A of 7.6% and 8.3% respectively were both all-time company lows. Our focus on simplicity and technology combined with our size and scale continue to give us SG&A leverage. As we improve our systems and simplify our processes, our associates increasingly become more efficient. In the fourth quarter, our year-over-year personnel spend in home building SG&A was down 1% while our volume increased by 16%, giving significant G&A leverage. We achieve sales and marketing leverage through the use of technology to reduce our sales and marketing spend. As I mentioned last quarter, we are focused on higher quality internet leads to our internet sales team. In the fourth quarter, we had over 90,000 internet leads, meaning we have that many customers requesting specific information about a home or community. Our team of internet sales consultants can communicate with the customer online via text messaging or by phone call to learn more about the customer's needs and then match their specific needs with our homes and arrange a visit to one of our communities. The result is high quality, very well informed customers with scheduled times visiting our communities. In summary, we are executing our game plan with the following unified playbooks: one, simplification maximizing the efficiency of every process; two, asset light, selling land and buying land at shorter durations; three, even flow production operating our everything's included platform with a steady production start pace while matching sales to this pace using our dynamic pricing model for lower direct construction costs; four, developing strategic builder of choice partnerships throughout the supply chain along with value engineering workshops division by division; and five, technology providing better systems and information for happier, more productive associates, a better customer experience, and lower costs. Now I'll turn it over to Diane.
D
Diane Bessey24:57
Thank you, John. Good morning everyone. So please let me start with re-emphasizing a few points from our fourth quarter, starting with home building. So as we've mentioned, deliveries increased 16% from the prior year and exceeded the upper range of our guidance by 3% as we benefited from a strong housing market and a continued focus on returns. Our fourth quarter gross margin was 21.5%, which was at the higher end of our guidance, and the prior year's gross margin was 22.1% excluding CalAtlantic purchase accounting. Our fourth quarter SG&A was 7.6%, which is the lowest quarter SG&A percent we have ever achieved and was below our guidance. This compared to 7.9% in the prior year. New orders increased 23% from the prior year and exceeded the upper range of our guidance by 6%. Absorption for the fourth quarter was 3.4 versus 2.7 in the prior year as we benefited from increased demand and focused on accelerating the closeout of slower paced communities to enhance returns. Our ending community count was 1,283. And finally, for home building joint ventures, land sales, and other categories, we had a combined loss of $2 million compared to $4 million of earnings in the prior year. And then turning to financial services, segment operating earnings were $81 million compared to $58 million in the prior year. In the detail of the components, mortgage operating earnings increased to $57 million from $44 million in the prior year. Mortgage earnings improved due to an increase in captive volume as a result of higher home building deliveries and a higher capture rate, and reduction in loan origination costs primarily driven by technology initiatives which enabled us to reduce headcount, as Stuart mentioned. Title operating earnings were $22 million, excluding non-controlling interest, compared to $18 million in the prior year. The increase was due to an increase in captive volume and a focus on cost reductions to right-size the business. We also had mortgage finance operating earnings of $3 million compared to a loss of $1 million in the prior year. This was driven by an increase in securitization dollar volume partially offset by a decrease in securitization margin. And then turning to multifamily, our multifamily segment had operating earnings of $5 million, excluding non-controlling interest, compared to $33 million in the prior year. There were no building sales this quarter as compared to three transactions in the prior year. And finally, other — this is the category of the legacy Rialto assets outside of Rialto Mortgage Finance and our strategic technology investments — earnings were $11 million this quarter compared to a loss of $49 million in the prior year. This quarter's earnings were largely driven by earnings related to our Rialto fund investments, while prior year losses were primarily due to non-recurring expenses. And then turning to our balance sheet, we ended the year with an extremely well positioned balance sheet. In fiscal 2019, we generated approximately $1.6 billion of homebuilding cash flow and entered the year with $1.2 billion of cash on the balance sheet. We continue to make progress with our strategy to reduce years of land owned and increase our land control position. At the end of the year, our home sites owned and controlled totaled 313,000, of which 209,000 were owned and 104,000 were controlled. As Rick mentioned, our years of land supply owned decreased to 4.1 at the end of Q4 from 4.4 at the end of Q3. Our controlled home sites increased to 33% at the end of Q4 from 30% at the end of Q3. At the end of the year, we had no outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit facility, thereby providing $2.5 billion of available capacity. During the quarter, we retired $600 million of senior notes that were due in November, bringing senior note repayments to $1.1 billion for the year and $2.2 billion since the acquisition of CalAtlantic. During the quarter, we repurchased 1.7 million shares for a total of approximately $98 million. This brings our total for the year to 9.8 million shares totaling $493 million. At the end of the year, our debt to total capital was 32.8%, a 410 basis point improvement from the end of 2018. So now turning to guidance, I'd like to provide some high-level guidance for fiscal 2020 and then I will provide more detailed guidance for the first quarter. So for the full year of 2020, we expect to deliver between 54,000 and 55,000 homes with an average sales price for the year of approximately $385,000. This average sales price reflects our focus on a higher percentage of entry level product. Our fiscal 2020 gross margin is expected to remain consistent with fiscal 2019 and will be in the range of 20.5% to 21%. Although entry level margins tend to be slightly lower, we believe our margins for the year will benefit from our continued focus on reducing construction spend, leveraging field expenses over more deliveries, and reduced interest expense as we've continued to pay down our debt maturities. Our fiscal 2020 SG&A should be in the range of 8.2% to 8.3%. And as we continue to add higher volume, higher absorption entry level communities while also accelerating the closeout of slower paced communities to enhance returns, we expect our community count to grow one to two percent by the end of the year. Financial services earnings should be in the range of $250 to $255 million, and we expect our tax rate to be approximately 23.25%, primarily due to the recent extension by Congress of energy efficient home credits. Now let me give you more detailed guidance for Q1 only. Starting with home building, we expect Q1 new orders to be in the range of 11,300 to 11,500, and our Q1 deliveries to be in the range of 9,800 to 10,000 homes. Our Q1 average sales price should be between $390,000 and $395,000. We expect our Q1 gross margin to be in the range of 19.7% to 19.8%, noting that this will be our lowest margin quarter for the year, and margins will increase throughout the year to be in the range previously stated. We expect our Q1 SG&A to be in the range of 9.4% to 9.5%. And for the combined home building joint venture, land sale, and other categories, we expect a Q1 loss of approximately $10 million. We believe our financial services earnings for Q1 will be in the range of $25 to $27 million. Our multifamily operations will be at about breakeven. And for the other category related to the legacy Rialto assets and our strategic investments, we expect Q1 earnings of approximately $8 to $10 million. We expect our Q1 corporate G&A to be about 2% of total revenues. And as previously stated, we expect our tax rate to be approximately 23.25%. The weighted average share count for the quarter should be approximately 313 million shares. And so when you roll all this together, this guidance should produce an EPS range of $0.80 to $0.85 for the quarter. So in summary, we believe we are well-positioned to continue to have strong profitability and increase cash flow generation in 2020. And now let me turn it over to the operator for questions.
O
Operator33:34
Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1, unmute your phone, and record your name clearly. If you need to withdraw your question, press star 2. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question until everyone has had the opportunity to have their question answered. Our first question comes from Truman Patterson with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
T
Truman Patterson34:02
Hi, good morning everybody. Nice quarter. Thanks for taking my questions. First, just wanted to start off kind of a multi-part question on entry level. You know, multiple industry participants are moving to the entry level. Do you all see upcoming supply in balance or are you seeing robust enough demand that's really allowing the entry level communities to generate greater than historical absorption paces? And on the prior call you all suggested that you could get to 44% entry level in 2020. Do you think there's possibly upside to that level given the demand that you've been seeing? And finally, could you just give an update on the gross margin profile versus your other segments, you know, how much of a drag it might be on your margin profile?
S
Stuart Miller34:52
Truman, let me start at a macro level and say it's important for everyone to remember that the entry level part of the market has remained impaired for the longest period of time since the downturn and really had a very difficult time getting started. So that part of the market is probably the most supply constrained. You know that a number of participants are migrating towards that market. It has more recently become accessible. Demand is very strong in that part of the market and I think it's going to be some time before it gets saturated. Rick, John, maybe like to talk about margins?
R
Rick Beckwitt35:36
Yeah, so from an overall mix standpoint and our position, I think we really have benefited from the fact that this has been something that we strategically targeted for the last several years. We've been very methodical on lining up communities, repositioning product, working with our developer partners to really secure excellent positions that are sizable. When you're dealing with a single-family or entry-level product, you need some larger communities because your absorption pace in these communities is much faster. So we're really well positioned from a mix standpoint. Do we get up to 44%? I think it's too soon to tell. We're probably in the low 40% right now and we're just going to see how the year unfolds. From a margin standpoint, as Diane said, the margins tend to be slightly lower than our first-time move-up and move-up product, but they come with higher velocity and as a result, the IRRs associated with the build-out of those communities is much, much higher. And that's why we focused on that.
J
John Jaffe36:57
I think we covered it.
T
Truman Patterson37:02
Okay, thanks for that. Your rotation towards option lots, your traction has been a little bit faster than what we've expected the past couple quarters. Could you just discuss the health of the option land market, whether these lots are becoming more available across the industry or whether this is purely the result of your developer partners? And part two of that question: could you just give an update on the strategy to expand your developer partner relationships? I believe you were at three previously. What are you thinking throughout 2020?
R
Rick Beckwitt37:38
You know, I think what this really reflects is that as a management team, when Stuart, John and I sit down, we make a plan, we execute on the plan. And we really decided that we were going to convert and increase the amount of our option position. We worked with our regional trade partners and our regional developers and have significantly expanded that program. We haven't necessarily entered into new arrangements with different developers; rather, what we've done is expand the footprint of those relationships to other markets. And that's what you're seeing in the increase. In addition to that, our teams out there are really leveraging the relationships they have in all of their markets to increase that percentage.
T
Truman Patterson38:30
Okay, thanks guys.
O
Operator38:32
Thank you. Our next question comes from Alan Ratner with Zelman & Associates. Your line is open.
A
Alan Ratner38:39
Hey guys, good morning. Congrats on the very strong performance. So I was hoping to drill in a little bit just in terms of your thinking right now on capital allocation. You mentioned the focus on return several times and this year was a huge year for cash flow as you were expecting, so great to see that come to fruition. If I look at how you spent your cash this year, debt on the balance sheet came down by about $800 million, buybacks were about $500 million. I know a lot of builders say the primary use of cash is to grow the business, but it certainly seems like you're in a pretty enviable position where you can do that and you throw off a lot of cash flow. So should we think about the general use of cash this year towards debt reduction and buyback as kind of how you're thinking about prioritizing that, or has that shifted at all given the fact that your debt to cap is now down to that 30% type level?
S
Stuart Miller39:41
As we noted in our comments, we expect to continue to pay down debt certainly as it comes due. I think we noted that over the next year, over 2020, we have about $600 million of longer-term debt coming due. You can expect that we'll pay that down out of cash flow. But additionally, returns to shareholders, focus on returning capital to shareholders, is something that will be continued and properly balanced. As we've looked at our business and looked at our growth expectations, normal operations today are cash flow positive. As we noted last year we produced $1.6 billion and we expect to continue that trend and more. And that excess capital is going to be balanced exactly as noted. We're very focused on our balance sheet, very focused on total shareholder return.
A
Alan Ratner40:49
Thank you for that, Stuart. And second question, if I could, on the SFR expansion there. First off, just some housekeeping: were there any orders this quarter that flowed through the order line that were geared towards SFR? And more high-level, as you start to build these homes in existing communities, can you talk a little bit about the product that you're building for rental? Is it comparable to your for-sale product? And if so, is there any concern about cannibalizing that piece of the business, or is it being priced differently so that it should compete?
R
Rick Beckwitt41:27
Let me just start off by saying that right now this business is very small in the grand scheme of things, and what we've really done is focused on positioning to grow something for the future. So from an order perspective for the last quarter, the orders associated with this were de minimis. What we've really been focusing on is identifying markets where we can build a good business that is focused on providing product that the market needs within our existing communities. What we've done is looked at sectioning off different phases or sections of the community that will be priced completely differently than our for-sale product: smaller footprint, lower specification levels, not a lot of change from home to home, pretty identical features right down the street. But let me back up for a second and say this: SFR has been a part of the sales program for the past years in our company and in others, but it's basically been on a one-off basis, more mom-and-pop oriented. What we have been innovating over the past years, and we detailed this in our last call, is a continuation of that — a more structured program. We've been focusing on looking at single-family for rent communities, which is where we have innovated and our kind of branding going forward — a new way of thinking about single-family for rent. We are at the early stages of this. It has been an evolutionary track for the company. You're going to see others follow suit. Capital is starting to understand this business, and this will be an emergent part of the story as we go forward. But the single-family for rent that we're talking about is single-family communities for rent. There will be similarities with other single-family product, but it won't be directly competitive. Instead, this product is going to enable a consumer that wants single-family but might not quite be able to get into a for-sale program. We're very enthusiastic about this and it's a unique Lennar branded offering.
J
John Jaffe44:08
I just have two points. One is that we don't think it will cannibalize our existing product at all. It's the same product, it's really filling the need of a consumer that can't afford to buy, it doesn't make sense for them to buy. The other point is that a focus on this for us will further enhance our builder of choice position with the trades as we have more volume and this is even more consistent and higher volume. So we see that as being very complementary to our construction platform.
A
Alan Ratner44:38
Great, thanks a lot guys. Good luck.
S
Stuart Miller44:42
Thank you.
O
Operator44:44
Our next question comes from Michael Rehaut with JP Morgan. Your line is open.
M
Michael Rehaut44:48
Thanks. Good morning everyone and congrats on the results. My first question is focusing on some of your comments around inventory and driving returns and the resulting cash flow. I don't know if I heard, and maybe you typically don't give it, but I was trying to get a sense when you talked about reducing your balance of inventory by $3 billion over the next two years. I was wondering if you could give us what that number is at the end of this year, just to get a sense of where that number could go. And with that amount of inventory balance reduction, should we be expecting potentially an acceleration of share repurchase with the use of that cash as that cash frees up? I mean obviously you have $1.2 billion of debt due next year, but given your still declining debt to cap, I would assume you'd want some debt on the balance sheet and you can kind of push that maturity out. So just trying to get a sense of the finer numbers around that inventory reduction and how we should think about the use of that cash.
R
Rick Beckwitt46:14
Let me start off by just generally telling you how we look at the dollar value. We told you that we want to take our owned supply from 4.1 years to 3 years by 2021. If you step back and look at it, you can calculate that two different ways. It's about one year of land purchase, and we buy about $3 billion of land a year, so $3 billion sums up to that number. Looking at it in a different way, based on our guidance of 54 to 55 thousand homes for next year, if we don't have to buy the home sites associated with that, our average finished home site (or undeveloped in some cases) is about $54,000 to $55,000, which gets you to the same $3 billion number. So it's a pretty straight math calculation to look at the $3 billion number. Mike, you're correct in highlighting that this is additive to cash flow as we migrate in this direction. We do expect that cash flow will continue to benefit from our inventory and land strategy. And I think that your question is: does that mean that we accelerate things like debt paydown and return of capital to shareholders? And the answer to that is decidedly yes.
M
Michael Rehaut47:56
Great, thank you. I guess a second question, just a little bit finer granularity around order growth and how to think about that for the upcoming year. Obviously you gave first quarter guidance as well as community count growth expected to be one to two percent I believe for the year. I assume that's year-end over year-end. How should we think about the sales pace component of that, given that you've mentioned you continue to expect to shift a little bit more towards entry level which has higher sales pace versus other buyer segments, as well as the fact that you'd expect the broader market to continue to improve given where we are with rates and affordability? I think expectations perhaps are in a low to mid single-digit type of range for sales pace growth, but any thoughts around how you're thinking about that for the first quarter and the full year would be helpful.
J
John Jaffe49:08
First of all, that is correct: it's a year-end over year-end comparison. As we think about pace, it really goes back to my commentary about a very disciplined production approach and matching sales pace to that. So to the extent that the market is stronger or not, we'll adjust pricing accordingly. So we expect our pace to be a consistent one. If the market is stronger, we hope we'll see improvement in margins over what we're projecting. If the market were to soften, we expect the pace to be consistent and we would take some reflection of that in our margins.
S
Stuart Miller49:49
I'd say additionally that as part of our land and inventory management program looking internally, we have clearly focused on more of our higher paced communities and focusing on those communities with greater absorptions. And we've clearly been pruning some of the slower paced communities that might have come from a CalAtlantic legacy that are more of a drag on some of our returns. So this is all part of our inventory management program, and we've been looking community by community to enhance the absorption rate, thereby enhancing the trends.
M
Michael Rehaut50:36
Okay, so just to be clear then, given that shift that you're describing, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect an order growth rate for the year that would exceed the community count growth that you're looking for?
S
Stuart Miller50:51
Well, I think that's definitely the case. I mean if you just look at the guidance we gave with regard to deliveries, the delivery growth is higher than the increasing community count. So you'll get a natural increase in overall sales that is greater than the one to two percent growth in community count. And that's a more efficient, more effective business model.
R
Rick Beckwitt51:17
That's right. We've strategically focused on getting higher velocity out of each community as opposed to growing communities at a higher rate.
M
Michael Rehaut51:28
Right. Thank you.
O
Operator51:34
Thank you. Our next question comes from Carl Reichardt with BTIG. Your line is open.
C
Carl Reichardt51:38
Thanks. Happy New Year everybody. I wanted to ask a little bit about subcontractor trade cost. Obviously starts are flat this year. Builders are reporting some really significant order growth and move to the entry level, which increases number of units started for two reasons — the velocity and also just business is better. How are you thinking about the trades? It didn't seem like they had a lot of over capacity or not enough work last year. Are they going to look, even with your scale, at trying to get more aggressive on their pricing? How do you combat that — is it just scale, is it product simplicity and a focus on everything's included and even flow? I'm just curious what your perspective is, maybe not just this year but also for a year or two out.
J
John Jaffe52:31
Sure. There is a severe shortage of labor in the industry, particularly skilled labor. And we really don't see that improving because a lot of the labor out there is actually aging out of the workforce. So expect that pressure to continue. As we started several years ago, we really thought about the fact that as volume grows there will be more pressure on the system, and that's why we really reinvented ourselves with a focus on being the builder of choice. So it's much more than just volume and scale — that has a big part and strategically positions us to be the most desirable. But it has everything to do with this even flow production and the predictability that gives trades. Our everything's included platform is really critical because one of the big obstacles for trades is if they go out to a job site and it's not ready for them, that inefficient use of labor that's already in short supply backs up on itself and creates real issues. Because of that, the trades find us more favorable to work for. The jobs run smoother, they're more predictable, they don't have the starts and stops of options and upgrades. So we are continuing to focus on how do we get even better at that, how do we get even more disciplined about even flow so that as we move forward, the trades are actually able to make more money on our business because it's efficient, not because we're paying them more.
C
Carl Reichardt54:09
That makes sense. And then, Stuart or Rick, just on pricing again: mix to the entry level, more price sensitive customer. We've seen builders in the past use price to control pace so that production can actually catch up, but you're running even flow and your mix is changing. How do you look at your pricing power as you head into this year with such robust demand but likely a more price sensitive consumer? Obviously using dynamic pricing is helping manage pace, but is it different than what we've seen in the past where builders were shoving price to try to hold pace off?
R
Rick Beckwitt54:49
I don't think it's different. For us, we're going to be on a very consistent pace. If the market is stronger, as it currently is showing signs of now — Stuart said it's strong and we see that across our markets — we will have pricing power greater than we had in the last year or two. That will unfold as the months go by and we'll see exactly what the market is like. But if we look at it right now, it is strong and we would expect to be able to benefit from that.
S
Stuart Miller55:22
And I think the thing to focus on: we will solve for price, whether that's a higher price or lower price, but we're very focused on net operating margin for each community.
C
Carl Reichardt55:36
Thanks for that.
O
Operator55:40
Thank you. Our next question comes from Stephen Kim of Evercore ISI. Your line is open.
S
Stephen Kim55:46
Thanks very much, guys. Good quarter. Thanks for the information regarding your outlook for the year and the quarter. I had a little question about the interplay of the margins and the order cadence. You suggested in Q1 and in general that you expected the first quarter to be the low in the year, and you gave a pretty healthy guide for the full year. Can you give us a sense for when in the year you're expecting to see a meaningful step up in the margin? Is that going to be out of Q2 into Q3, Q4, or is that something that you're envisioning will happen later in the year? And if it is as soon as you know the second quarter, is that a reflection of the current environment allowing you to get better price?
J
John Jaffe56:50
Steve, as an overview, remember that our first quarter as always is our lowest from a volume perspective, and therefore our field overhead spread out has a bigger impact on the margins in the first quarter. You always see that trend with us. So what we will see is sequentially throughout the year margins will improve as we get greater field leverage just based on volume. The improvement is throughout the year, though. Based on what we expect to see with more efficient operating margins out of the efficiencies we're gaining in our systems and our costs and our SG&A, that should flow through all of our numbers. So it's really a combination of those two things progressing throughout the year.
D
Diane Bessey57:37
Yes, Stephen. The only thing I'd add is I think if you look at the gross margin trajectory in 2019, that would give you a really good proxy for what we're expecting in 2020, with the back half of the year having the highest increase in margins.
S
Stephen Kim57:57
Alright, that's helpful. Secondly, I was really intrigued by this comment Stuart you made about how you saw the improvement in the financial services business and specifically you cited the mortgage origination business and some of the tech initiatives you've got going on there as a, I believe you used the word "proxy" for what we might see from many of your other tech initiatives across the company. I was curious if you could give us a little bit of a preview as to what you meant by that. I think you had said home building customer acquisition costs and even flowing construction management. As I think about some of the initiatives you've got, obviously you have the investment in OpenDoor which could lead to customer acquisition cost improvement, but I'm particularly intrigued by the even flowing construction management. How in what way could the improvement we saw in your mortgage origination business be a proxy for that?
S
Stuart Miller59:10
Thank you for listening to the call carefully. Yes, that's exactly what I said. It starts with the fact that in our financial services group, which is where we really initiated many of our technology initiatives, we had a management team start to dip the toe, then a foot, then a leg into the technology stream. As they became more entrenched, there was kind of a feedback loop that began that said, 'Wow, this really does have impact.' The more we did, the more we explored, the more we found we could change the way that our business operates. If you think about the migration from $8,400 per loan in 2017 towards a $5,600 per loan cost of origination, that's a sizable step over a fairly short period of time. It comes from management focus and integration of new technologies, new ways of doing business that hadn't been done or tried before. The feedback from early successes leads to drilling deeper and trying more. We're starting to see many of those things happen in and around our dynamic pricing program. We've talked about it before. Early adoption starts to breed some early successes. It takes some time for those earlier successes to start to accelerate and translate into real cost reductions. But we're starting to see real efficiencies in the way that our inventory turns. If we look back from this year's year-end back to last year's year-end, the efficiency with which we're driving closings through the year is having real bottom line impact in the way that our business is configured. We think that that will accelerate. As it relates to customer acquisition, we've talked about a number of our initiatives. OpenDoor is one of them, but others are more internally focused about customer acquisition and lead scoring, developing a driven, focused internet sales consultant approach to the way that we handle our customers. We think that as it starts to drive adoption, it will drive costs down and efficiencies up. So there are a lot of initiatives going on behind the scenes. If you asked me this question at the beginning of the innovation cycle in financial services, it would have been hard to demonstrate the specific areas where costs would come from. But management focus, early successes, and adoption create a cycle that drives the cost structure down. I think the financial services group in that regard is a proxy for the way that we're seeing things starting to happen on the homebuilding side as well.
S
Stephen Kim1:02:37
Yeah, no, that's very interesting. I guess the one little clarification on my part would be the numbers you gave around the mortgage origination cost. I assume you're implying that the improvement you traced out for us has been better than what you believe the industry overall has been, so that's not just an industry issue, that's a Lennar issue. Similarly, you expect that in these other avenues as well. Is that correct?
S
Stuart Miller1:03:07
Listen, I can't really look at what the rest of the industry is doing at a micro level. But from what we understand at a macro level, the costs within the industry have been migrating higher, and we are an outlier in that regard.
S
Stephen Kim1:03:21
Great, thanks very much.
S
Stuart Miller1:03:24
You're welcome. How about one more question?
O
Operator1:03:27
Thank you. Our next question will come from Susan McQuarrie with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
C
Charles Brown1:03:33
Good morning, this is actually Charles Brown filling in for Susan. Thanks for taking my question and congratulations on the results. I was just wondering if you can provide an update on some of your key markets such as Florida and Texas and California, and also specifically for Texas if you think your success in this region is reflective of your recent initiative in this market.
R
Rick Beckwitt1:03:55
Let's start with Texas. We had strong performance in each one of our Texas markets: San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, and Houston, all up high double digits. The region was up 48% year-over-year in orders, and it really is driven by the fact that we completely repositioned to a much higher percentage of entry-level product. Right now we're about 50% of our sales in communities below $250,000 price point and have 70% of our communities below $300,000. So it's the strength of that reposition that's really fueling the market there. With regard to Florida, Florida was very strong particularly on the lower price points and that first-time move-up segment, and that really is across the board, north and east to west. John, you want to talk about California?
J
John Jaffe1:04:56
California has clearly seen a recovery. If you look at it from a year-over-year perspective, the prior year California really fought off the pause and the pause affected California perhaps more than any other part of the country. What we saw in the fourth quarter was a much healthier market, a clear recovery back to normal sales paces. Even in the Bay Area, which was perhaps the most impaired in the fourth quarter of 2018, we've seen that market come back to life. I wouldn't describe it as robust yet, but certainly a lot healthier.
C
Charles Brown1:05:34
Okay, thank you very much. That's all.
S
Stuart Miller1:05:38
Alright, very good. Well thank everybody for joining us on our call. We look forward to reporting in 2020. As you can hear, we're pretty enthusiastic about the year to come and look forward to keeping you apprised. Thank you all for joining.
O
Operator1:05:55
That concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may disconnect at this time.