Back
Olivier Pomel
Co-Founder, CEO & Director, Datadog

$DDOG Datadog Q3 2024 Earnings Conference Call

🎥 Nov 07, 2024 📺 EARNMOAR ⏱ 61m 👁 140 views
11/07/2024 Q&A: 23:38 Datadog, Inc. operates an observability and security platform for cloud applications in North America and internationally. The company's products comprise infrastructure and application performance monitoring, log management, digital experience monitoring, continuous profiler, database monitoring, data streams and universal service monitoring, network monitoring, incident management, workflow automation, observability pipelines, cloud cost and cloud security management, application security management, cloud SIEM, sensitive data scanner, and CI visibility. Datadog, Inc. w...
Watch on YouTube

About Olivier Pomel

Olivier Pomel, co-founder and CEO of Datadog, discussed the company’s performance and strategy during earnings calls from Q2 2025 through Q1 2026. He said the company views AI as an additional secular growth driver, with AI-native customers representing about 80% of annual recurring revenue even though they account for only 20% of total customers. Pomel noted that training workloads, which he previously described as “not a market for us yet,” have become a growing opportunity, and the company has landed deals with two of the world’s largest AI research teams to monitor and optimize training workflows. He also stated that data residency and “bring your own cloud” offerings represent a potential growth lever, as the company sees increasing demand for deployments in customer environments. Pomel addressed the impact of AI agents on the platform, saying Datadog’s usage-based pricing model is well-suited regardless of whether usage comes from humans or agents. He reported that the company’s security product suite surpassed $100 million in annual recurring revenue, growing in the mid-40% range year-over-year, and that Datadog signed a seven-figure annualized expansion with a $60 million three-year contract with a large bank. Pomel also said the company has not yet observed any effect from tariffs on consumer or e-commerce businesses, and that it continues to invest in geographic expansion and certifications for the public sector.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Olivier Pomel's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (56 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
O
Operator0:00
Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q3 2024 Datadog earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Yuka Broderick, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Y
Yuka Broderick0:44
Thank you, Liz. Good morning and thank you for joining us to review Datadog's third quarter 2024 financial results, which we announced in our press release issued this morning. Joining me on the call today are Olivier Pomel, Datadog's co-founder and CEO, and David O., Datadog CFO. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements, including statements related to our future financial performance, our outlook for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2024 and related notes, our gross margins and operating margins, our product capabilities, and our ability to capitalize on market opportunities. The words anticipate, believe, continue, estimate, expect, intend, will, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or similar indications of future expectations. These statements reflect our views only as of today and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For a discussion of the material risks and other important factors that could affect our actual results, please refer to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. Additional information will be made available in our upcoming Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2024 and other filings with the SEC. This information is also available on the investor relations section of our website, along with the replay of this call. We will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in the tables in our earnings release, which is available at investors.datadoghq.com. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Olivier.
O
Olivier Pomel2:10
Thanks, Yuka, and thank you all for joining us this morning. We are pleased to report a strong Q3 as we continue to execute against our goals to help our customers grow faster, safer, and more efficient as they modernize their applications. We kept broadening our platform in observability and beyond, including in AI, where interest continues to rise, and we added new customers while expanding with existing ones as they grow into the cloud. Let me start with a review of our Q3 financial performance. Revenue was $690 million, an increase of 26% year-over-year and above the high end of our guidance range. We ended the quarter with about 29,200 customers, up from about 26,800 a year ago. We had about 3,490 customers with ARR of $100,000 or more, up from about 3,130 a year ago, and these customers generated about 88% of our ARR. We generated free cash flow of $24 million, with a free cash flow margin of 30%. Turning to platform adoption, our platform strategy continues to resonate in the market. As of the end of Q3, 83% of customers were using two or more products, up from 82% a year ago. 49% of customers were using four or more products, up from 46% a year ago. 26% of our customers were using six or more products, up from 21% a year ago. And 12% of our customers were using eight or more products, up from 8% a year ago. We continue to execute on growth across the three pillars of observability, and we are pleased to report that infrastructure monitoring, APM suite, and log management together represent more than $2.5 billion in ARR. As a reminder, within the APM suite we include core APM, synthetics, real user monitoring, and continuous profiler. We also want to call out our newer products, which are increasingly contributing to our business. Of our 23 products, 15 now exceed $10 million in ARR. These include our cloud security product, as well as CI visibility and cloud cost management. So we have many products beginning to contribute to our revenue growth, and we're continuing to build greater capabilities within those products for our customers. Now let's discuss this quarter's business drivers. Overall, the business environment for Datadog has remained stable and similar to what we have seen throughout 2024. Our customers overall are growing their cloud usage, while some are continuing to be cost conscious. In Q3, we continue to see existing customer usage growth broadly in line with our expectations. Our usage growth with existing customers continued to be higher than in the year-ago quarter, and we saw healthy growth across our product lines, with newer products growing faster and more mature products off a smaller base. Finally, churn continues to be low, and gross revenue retention was stable in the mid-90s, highlighting the mission-critical nature of our platform for our customers. Moving on to R&D, in the AI space, customers continue to experiment with new AI technologies, and as they do, they want to get visibility into their AI use. At the end of Q3, about 3,000 customers used one or more Datadog AI integrations to send us data about their AI, machine learning, and LLM usage. As some of these experiments start turning into production AI applications, we are seeing initial signs of traction for our LLM observability product. Today, hundreds of customers are using LLM observability, with more exploring it every day, and some of our first paying customers have told us that they have cut the time spent investigating LLM latency, errors, and quality from days or hours to just minutes. Our customers don't only want to understand the performance and cost of their LLM applications; they also want to understand the LLM model performance within the context of their entire application, so they are using APM alongside LLM observability to get fully integrated end-to-end visibility across all their applications and tech stacks. Meanwhile, we continue to work to make the Datadog platform the best place for customers to monitor, secure, and take action on their systems, no matter where they deploy. In September, we launched Datadog monitoring for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure for general availability. With this launch, our customers can get visibility into their OCI stack and manage in real time the performance of OCI cloud services, servers, VMs, databases, containers, and apps in Datadog, and customers can now unify their monitoring across OCI, other clouds, and on-prem environments. We also continue to extend our platform in new ways to bring value to our customers. At our Dash conference this summer, we announced Datadog On-Call, our newest product in the cloud service management space. As you know, our customers use Datadog extensively during their workdays for alerting and troubleshooting, whether that's for observability or security use cases. Now with Datadog On-Call, we are bringing a modern paging experience directly into our unified platform, and we now offer a completely integrated solution that covers incidents from end to end, from detection, alerting, and paging to incident management, troubleshooting, and resolution. Even though On-Call is still in limited availability, we are already seeing very strong reception for the product, and we are beginning to see customers request On-Call as part of their deals. In particular, new customers are interested in including paging as part of their land with Datadog. So we're working hard to deepen and broaden our platform, and our innovations are rightfully being recognized by independent research firms. We're pleased to see that for the fourth year in a row, Datadog has been named a Leader in the 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Observability Platforms. We believe that this validates our approach to deliver a unified platform which breaks down silos across teams. And Datadog has also been named a Leader in Gartner's very first Magic Quadrant for Digital Experience Monitoring, which includes Datadog products across synthetic testing, real user monitoring, product analytics, session replay, and error tracking. Now let's move on to sales and marketing. Our sales team continued to execute this quarter, and we added some exciting new customers while expanding with many more. So let's go through a few examples. First, we landed a seven-figure annualized deal with a leading e-commerce company in India. With its previous observability vendor, the customer saw quickly increasing costs while lacking the enterprise-grade observability they needed. By switching to Datadog, they expect to support their scaling goals and will rely on our tracing, granular profiling, and cloud integration support. I will note that we're pleased to have landed a large new logo customer in India, and we are continuing to invest to grow our presence and our opportunities there. Next, we signed a six-figure annualized land with a major US federal agency. This agency is beginning to move some of its workloads to the cloud and is expanding the services it offers to every single US citizen through cloud applications. They have chosen Datadog to observe and secure their cloud environment and deliver a faster, better experience to their users. This deal includes eight products on the Datadog cloud, including Cloud SIEM and Cloud Security Management. Next, we landed a seven-figure annualized deal with a large American financial services company. This customer has a very seasonal business and experiences dozens of major incidents during the annual peak season, with an average downtime per incident of about five hours, and they estimate millions of dollars of lost revenue for each hour of downtime. By replacing its clock providers' monitoring tools with Datadog, and in particular using our real user monitoring product, this customer targets substantial reductions in downtime. They are starting with five Datadog products and now trialing network monitoring, database monitoring, cloud security, and cloud cost management products as they look to consolidate dozens of homegrown and commercial tools. Next, we signed a seven-figure annualized expansion with a major airline in Europe. This customer has adopted Datadog for its customer-facing website. They are now moving hundreds of applications from on-prem to AWS, and they want to derisk their cloud migration. They estimate that each incident can cost tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue and customer impact. By using Datadog across five products, this customer expects to significantly improve mean time to resolution, and they have already seen progress in that respect during their evaluation period with Datadog. Next, we signed a seven-figure annualized expansion with a division of a hyperscaler delivering next-gen AI models. This customer is very technically capable and already has a homegrown observability solution which requires time-consuming customization and manual configuration. They will be launching new features for their large language model soon and need a platform that can scale flexibly while supporting proactive incident detection. By expanding their use of Datadog, they expect to efficiently onboard new teams and environments and support the rapidly increasing adoption of their LLMs. Next and last, we signed a seven-figure annualized expansion with a leading online food delivery company in Latin America. Before Datadog, this customer suffered from excessive alerting noise, siloed teams, and lack of visibility, with each minute of downtime resulting in thousands of lost orders. By using Datadog, this customer has experienced meaningful reductions in mean time to resolution and false alerts, while saving on hard costs in their cloud environment. This customer is expanding to 10 products in the Datadog platform. And that is it for another productive quarter for our go-to-market. Now let me say a few words on a longer-term outlook. Overall, we continue to see no change to the multi-year trends towards digital transformation and cloud migration, which we continue to believe are still in early days. We are seeing continued experimentation with new advances such as AI, and we believe this is one of the many factors that will drive greater use of the cloud and other modern technologies. So we are helping our customers every day to observe, secure, and act on their business-critical applications and workloads. With that, I will turn it over to our CFO, David.
D
David O.13:27
Thanks, Olivier, and good morning. Q3 revenue was $690 million, up 26% year-over-year and up 7% quarter-over-quarter. To dive into some of the drivers of our Q3 revenue growth, overall we saw trends for usage growth from existing customers that were consistent with our expectations. We've seen conditions remain roughly stable throughout 2024, with continued movement to cloud and modern DevOps technologies, and with customers remaining cost conscious and seeking efficiency and value from their spend. In Q3, we saw usage growth from existing customers that was higher than usage growth in the year-ago quarter, as well as higher than usage growth in the prior quarter. Now, some of our growth is coming from AI-native customers, who this quarter represented more than 6% of our Q3 ARR, up from more than 4% in Q2 and about 2.5% of our ARR in the year-ago quarter. AI-native customers contributed about 4 percentage points of year-over-year growth in Q3, versus about 2 percentage points in the year-ago quarter. While we believe that adoption of AI will continue to benefit Datadog in the long term, we are mindful that some of the large customers in this cohort have ramped extremely rapidly, and that these customers may optimize cloud and observability usage and increase their commitments to us over time with better terms. This may create volatility in our revenue growth in future quarters on the backdrop of long-term volume growth. Now, regarding usage growth by customer size in Q3, similar to last quarter, we saw the strongest performance among our largest customers who spend multiple millions of dollars with us annually. And as we look at usage growth by segment, similar to recent quarters, we are seeing the strongest growth from our enterprise customers, where year-over-year growth in usage has accelerated over the past several quarters. Meanwhile, our SMB customers remain solid, with year-over-year growth similar to the past several quarters. As a reminder, we define enterprise customers as our clients with 5,000 employees or more, mid-market customers with 1,000 to 5,000 employees, and SMB customers as those companies with less than 1,000 employees. Regarding our retention metrics, our net revenue retention percentage was in the mid-110s in Q3, with continued improvement from last quarter. This is a trailing 12-month measure. Meanwhile, we've continued to see an increase in recent quarters as we look at the NRR quarterly trend. Finally, our trailing 12-month gross revenue retention percentage remains stable in the mid to high 90s. Now moving on to our financial results. First, billings were $689 million, up 14% year-over-year. Billings duration decreased slightly year-over-year. Pro forma for changes in billing timing and the slight change in duration, billings growth would have been in the mid-20s percent range. Our billings and billings growth can be volatile on a quarterly basis depending on the timing of our deals. Our 12-month trailing billings growth is similar to our trailing 12-month revenue growth, with both in the mid-20s percent. Remaining performance obligations, or RPO, was $1.82 billion, up 26% year-over-year, and current RPO growth was in the high 20% year-over-year. RPO duration was down slightly year-over-year. Normalizing for duration, RPO growth would have been in the high 30% year-over-year. We continue to believe that revenue is a better indicator of our business trends than billings and RPO, as those fluctuate on a quarterly basis relative to revenue based on the timing of invoicing and the duration of customer contracts. Now let's review some key income statement results. Unless otherwise noted, all metrics are non-GAAP. We have provided a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financials in our earnings release. First, gross profit in the quarter was $560 million, representing a gross margin of 81.1%. This compares to a gross margin of 82.1% last quarter and 82.3% in the year-ago quarter. Our Q3 OpEx grew 21% year-over-year, the same growth as last quarter, which would have represented an acceleration from last quarter excluding the impact of our Dash user conference in Q2. As we said before, we are investing in headcount in 2024, and the acceleration in OpEx reflects our execution on our hiring in sales and marketing and R&D so far this year. Q3 operating income was $173 million, or a 25% margin, compared to 24% last quarter and 24% in the year-ago quarter. Turning to the balance sheet and cash flow statements, we ended the quarter with $3.2 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. Cash flow from operations was $229 million in the quarter, and after taking into consideration capital expenditures and capitalized software, free cash flow was $24 million, for a free cash flow margin of 30%. Now for our outlook for the fourth quarter and for fiscal 2024. First, our guidance philosophy remains unchanged. As a reminder, we base our guidance on trends observed in recent quarters and apply conservatism on these growth trends. For the fourth quarter, we expect revenue to be in the range of $709 to $713 million, which represents a 20 to 21% year-over-year growth rate. Non-GAAP operating income is expected to be in the range of $163 to $167 million, which implies an operating margin of 23%. And non-GAAP net income per share is expected to be 42 to 44 cents per share, based on approximately 361 million weighted average diluted shares outstanding. And for the full fiscal year 2024, we expect revenue to be in the range of $2.656 to $2.66 billion, which represents 25% year-over-year growth. Non-GAAP operating income is expected to be in the range of $658 to $662 million, which implies an operating margin of 25%. And non-GAAP net income per share is expected to be in the range of $1.75 to $1.77 per share, based on approximately 359 million weighted average diluted shares outstanding. Now, some additional notes on guidance. We expect net interest and other income for the fiscal year 2024 to be approximately $140 million. Next, we expect cash taxes in 2024 to be in the $20 to $25 million range, and we continue to apply a 21% non-GAAP tax rate for 2024 and going forward. Finally, we expect capital expenditures and capitalized software together to be in the 3 to 4% of revenue range for fiscal 2024. Now to conclude, we are continuing to execute on our strategy, investing in our innovation and expanding our platform to deliver more value to our customers. And lastly, I want to thank all Datadog employees worldwide for their efforts as we close out 2024. And with that, we'll open the call for questions. Operator, let's begin the Q&A.
O
Operator23:11
Thank you, David. At this time, we will conduct the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.
M
Mark Murphy23:38
Thank you very much and congrats on another very healthy performance. Olivier, we noticed your AI contributions surged to about 6% this quarter. We're watching all the advances in the foundation models, including the OpenAI Strawberry version, the multi-step reasoning, how they're becoming multimodal, the longer duration inference, the video models. Does it seem reasonable to you that we are on the cusp of a pretty interesting period the next couple years for the inferencing loads, and that that might drive some incremental fraction for Datadog that is tied to AI? And then I have a quick follow-up for David.
O
Olivier Pomel24:34
I mean, this is definitely a very interesting period, to say the least. We see tons of innovation across the customer base, still largely more around experimenting and testing new applications. Though as we reported, we are seeing some customers move into production, and we are seeing our production-minded LLM product, for example, being used by real paying customers with real volumes and real applications in real production workloads. So that's exciting and healthy. I think it's a great trend for the future. In general, in terms of the workflows, you're right that we're starting to see more inference workloads, but they still tend to be more concentrated across a number of API-driven providers, so there are a few others both on AWS and other kinds of models. So this is where I think most of the usage in production at least is today. We expect that to diversify more over time as companies get further into production with their applications and they start customizing more on their own models.
M
Mark Murphy25:47
Okay, understood. And then David, to the extent that you've always said that revenue is a better indicator than billings and RPO, but to the extent that billings growth was affected by timing as you mentioned, we've seen that before, we know it can bounce around. But did you have some invoices that would have gone out in September and instead they were issued in October? In other words, would we see some recapture of the timing element in Q4 or perhaps in early next year, or is it some other dynamic there?
D
David O.26:22
Yeah, it's really some other dynamic. It's that the timing of billing for last year was slightly different than for this year, and so it was more a factor of timing for billing last year that didn't repeat this year. So we think that the weighted average, what we talked about the average over the 12 months, is a better indicator of the relationship between billings and revenues, and when you look at that, they're much more closely aligned.
M
Mark Murphy26:58
Excellent. Thank you again.
O
Operator27:02
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Sanj Singh with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.
S
Sanj Singh27:11
Yeah, thank you for taking the questions. Olivier, in the framework that you have laid out for the business — observe, secure, and act — I wanted to focus on the last two pillars: secure and act. When we think about how the security, cloud security sales motion has been going this quarter versus prior quarters, any trend lines there? And any early indications on the uptake of some of the service management products and more of the automation features within the Datadog platform?
O
Olivier Pomel27:45
Yeah, so on the security side, I think there's quite a bit of focus right now on Cloud SIEM, as we see a number of very exciting opportunities there. I think when you look at the landscape competitively, what other companies are using, because most companies have a SIEM already at least for some part of their business, I think there's a very interesting opportunity for us there. The product is mature enough to win in best-of-breed situations across the existing product. So we are making quite a bit of a push, and we're still investing quite a bit in the rest of the platform to bring all the products together to be a unified platform for security. But I would say the tip of the spear for this quarter is Cloud SIEM. I think there's a very specific opportunity there. On the service management side, we actually see very exciting trends from customers. We mentioned on the call our On-Call product, which puts us directly into the paging loop and the start of many incidents. The product is getting stronger reception than we initially thought, to the point where customers are basically claiming to buy even though it's still in preview. So we feel good about handling the full loop for them, starting with when we detect something in observability all the way to full incident resolution and automation of a big part of it. So we think On-Call can be a bit of a watershed for us to do quite a bit more on that. So we're also excited and we're doing what we can to accelerate the roadmap there because we think there's a very good opportunity. We have a few other building blocks on the service management side that we released over the past year, and they're all growing quite nicely from small bases today. But we're very excited in the way they all come together to form an integrated platform where we can fully automate resolution for our customers. So that's again something we're building largely from those building blocks, but something that we think is going to be very exciting in the quarters and years to come.
S
Sanj Singh30:26
That's great to hear. And one follow-up: going to the spending intentions from your customers, it feels like most of the past 12 to 18 months, the sales playbook particularly in the enterprise has been around consolidation. Is that still the theme in terms of driving new bookings and new expansion deals, or are you starting to see customers focus more on innovation and bringing their innovation budgets to invest in AI and cloud, and bringing Datadog along for the ride?
O
Olivier Pomel31:02
There's always been innovation and new things. You're right that at least for the deals we talk about in the earnings, there tends to be more consolidation, but that's the nature of it. Innovation typically happens gradually as opposed to being a big bang, like a customer switching $5 billion from five vendors into another vendor. So we talk about these less on calls, but that's been happening throughout. We definitely see room for a lot more consolidation moving forward, both in terms of existing customers and new logos. And at the same time, we are excited to see what's happening with AI innovation as it gets further down the pipeline, away from testing and experimenting and more into production applications. We have some signs that it's starting to happen. We see that with our LLM observability product, we see that also with some of the workloads we monitor from our customers on the infrastructure side. But I would say it's still very early days in terms of customers being in production with their AI applications.
S
Sanj Singh32:09
Great. Thank you for the thoughts.
O
Operator32:16
Thank you. Our next question comes from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Your line is now open.
R
Raimo Lenschow32:24
Hey, thank you. Congrats from me as well. Can I stay on that subject a little bit longer? Olivier, if you think about the one big driver for you guys in the past was workload growth, and that's something that we're all watching out for the hyperscalers as well. But it looks like there are stable trends at the hyperscalers and for you as well. If you think about the puts and takes there, how much of that is just plain vanilla macro, and how much of that is taking project resources — not so much money but also time — for AI? And obviously it's early in this lifecycle. How do you see that playing out? Because that's the one thing we're all watching out for. Thank you.
O
Olivier Pomel33:11
Yeah, I mean, the key thing to remind everyone of is we think this general move of workload growth in the cloud or cloud-like environments — might be public cloud-based, but they might also be private clouds — this growth and move to the cloud is going to last for a very long time and it's going to be at a fairly high level for a very long time. So you're right that when we look at the numbers from the hyperscalers and when we try to factor out what GPU-driven growth is, it looks stable-ish. We think that growth is still high and is going to last for a very long time, and that's one of the big underpinning trends that we're going to ride for the years to come. Now on the edge of that, you're right that the workloads could have grown maybe instead of growing 20%, they could grow 25%. Maybe some of that 5% instead is being invested both in terms of infrastructure budget or innovation time and innovation budget, all that is going into AI, and that's largely right now in experimentation and model training and that sort of thing. That's probably right. But we see that also as a precursor to further workload growth in the future, like more traditional production application workload growth. So for us, it doesn't change the equation. It does create a bit of a decorrelation between our numbers and the numbers you might see reported from the hyperscalers, where a lot of their short-term growth rides more on the capacity of GPUs they bring online for those experimentation and training workloads.
R
Raimo Lenschow34:54
Okay, perfect. Thank you. And one follow-up for David. If you think about capacity, where are you in terms of sales capacity in case things are changing? How do you think about increasing or maintaining capacity as we think about the new year? Thank you.
D
David O.35:11
Yeah, we think long term our sales capacity is highly correlated with our top-line growth. And as we said, we've been attempting to increase our sales capacity similar to top-line growth rates. That has to do, as we've mentioned, with bottoms-up planning, putting sales capacity in areas where we see either under-coverage or a lot of white space, and then ramping and training our salespeople. So our philosophy is to scale our sales capacity roughly in line with the top line. We see plenty of opportunity for growth, and the plan is to keep growing the capacity. There are many markets, many geographies where we are under-penetrated. We mentioned India on the call; it's one of them where there's tremendous opportunity and we have very little presence at this point. And in general, there's a question of what we're doing strategically, where we're going, and how much we want to invest. And then tactically, the question of how we execute against that plan is a lot harder, because it's easy to say we're going to grow the sales team by 20-30%, but it's much harder to then have these people show up in the right region at the right time and be trained and everything else. I would say we're doing fairly well there. We're probably doing better at the end of the year than we did at the beginning of the year in terms of bringing all of our growing sales capacity for tactical reasons. But overall, we're executing towards our plan.
R
Raimo Lenschow36:51
Thank you.
O
Operator36:58
Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from Kash Rangan with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
K
Kash Rangan37:07
Thank you very much. Appreciate it. I'm curious to get your thoughts on two things. I'll keep this brief. In the subsequent few weeks after the quarter closed, I'm curious especially with rate cuts, how you feel the customer feedback has been coming along, particularly on the SMB side, since the rate of change has not been discernible at least as at the end of the quarter. And one for you, Olivier: as you look at GPU workloads, what about the company's existing portfolio geared to CPU applies in a GPU world, and how do you monetize an instance of GPU versus a CPU, if that makes sense? Thank you so much.
O
Olivier Pomel37:46
I can go GPU. So look, there are two parts of it. There is what can you do for GPU that's different from a CPU. I think in general, there are quite a few things that are the same, in terms of understanding how that machine sits with the rest of the application, or code system performance, that sort of stuff. And there's quite a bit that's new and differentiated around profiling in general and understanding how you maximize the usage of the GPU bandwidth, which is usually what it's about. I would say right now we're working with a number of customers that have real-world large inference workloads on how we can help on the GPU profiling side for inference. We're doing less on the training side, mostly because the training jobs tend to be more bespoke and temporary, and there's less of an application that's attached to those. These are just very large clusters of GPUs, so it's closer to HPC in a way than it is to traditional applications. Though we are also experimenting with what we can do there. There is a world where maybe in a durable fashion, 60% of workloads are inference and 40% are training. If that's the case, there's going to be a lot of value to be had by having repeatable training and repeatable tuning for that. So we are also looking into that. Today, as of today, we really don't monetize GPU instances all that well compared to CPU instances. A GPU instance is many times the cost of a CPU instance, and we charge the same amount for it. That doesn't have to be the case in the future if we do things that are particularly interesting, if we can have a real impact and deliver value to help customers make the best of their GPUs and in the end save money. But today, that's the current situation. And to your other question, in the period since the closing of Q3, we've seen very similar trends to the year-to-date in Q3, in terms of customer growth, strength in enterprise, stability in SMB, and we have a strong pipeline for Q4 that we're working hard on harvesting as we get towards year-end.
O
Operator40:33
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. Our next question comes from Brent Phil with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
B
Brent Phil40:47
Good morning. David, on RPO, it has been decelerating. It's in focus with investors. I know you've said focus on revenue, but I think many are kind of concerned about the trajectory. I know you've said the backlog is wrong and you're adding sales capacity and all the things that make sense, that your backlog is maybe bigger than the numbers are reporting. But what can you add any more context to what the pipeline is, how you feel about the pipeline, what you think is going on with the metric in terms of the deceleration? It was a pretty big step down.
D
David O.41:27
Yeah, I think as we started talking about duration, we had a surge in the period last year of longer-term contracts. That was really customer-led. We may well have that in the future, but in just comparing the timing of that, it doesn't affect revenues. We had that kind of compare. I would say when you look at adjusting for duration and looking at over a long term, we do find that all of these metrics are circling around revenue, you know, in the mid-20s. So I think there's a lot of noise in those, and it has a lot to do with the timing and particularly in RPO of multi-year deals. We'll report at the end of Q4 how that progresses. We have a lot of business to do in Q4, particularly in the larger customer and enterprise side, and we'll see where that lands. But I think it's again best to go back towards revenues as the North Star, and those really don't relate all that much to the sales pipelines because a lot of those — I'm putting my CFO hat right now, so bear with me — sometimes everything has to do with when customers recommit and extend their commits and for how long they extend this commit, and there's a high degree of variability there. They might go from one year to three years. Those three years might actually run out, or they might recommit after one and a half years or two and a half years or three years, or maybe three years and two months if it takes longer to figure out what level they want to be at next. So it adds a ton of variability to the billings numbers in general, and that's why we don't look at them at all for managing the business. We look at usage and we look at the sales pipelines in terms of what new business units, what new workloads, what new revenue and usage are we getting from customers. I think what Olivier is saying is it's an output of the natural flow of business, which has more volatility than revenues do.
B
Brent Phil43:48
Great. Thanks.
O
Operator43:51
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Carl Kirstead with UBS. Your line is now open.
C
Carl Kirstead44:04
Okay, great. I've got a couple of questions about the comment, David, around some of your larger AI-native customers maybe revenues from them going being a little bit more volatile going forward. I guess first question is, why do you think that is? Is this just a natural phenomenon of a few of those AI-native customers now becoming quite large, and so it's normal that they try to look for better unit pricing and optimization, or is there something else going on? And then maybe secondly, when you set your Q4 guide, did you embed the assumption of some of these AI startup pricing and observability trends that you called out, or are you just trying to be prudent and that might be a little bit more of a 2025 phenomenon? Thanks so much.
D
David O.44:52
Yeah, I can take that. I think the look, what we see there is we have that group of AI-native companies — a relatively small number of AI companies or AI-native companies, many of them are model providers or infrastructure providers for AI that serve the rest of the industry and are really a proxy for the future growth of the rest of the industry in AI. That group has been growing very fast. We mentioned it's 6% of our ARR, it was about 4% of year-over-year growth in Q3 versus 2% one year ago, so it's been growing very fast. There is some revenue concentration within that group, so customers there are few or low in terms of revenue like the rest of the customer base pretty much. And seeing this very fast growth, what we do expect — we've seen that before — is we expect optimization at some point and better terms at recommit from those customers, because they're all way over their last commit with us, many of them. Which again goes back to the other comment on bookings: their growth doesn't show up at all in the RPOs and the booking numbers because they're well over their commit. The analogy I would give there is what we've seen with cloud natives in the late 2010s and early 2020s, where we had these numbers of cloud-native consumer companies that were growing very fast, with two differences. The first one is that the AI cohort is growing faster and there are larger individual ACVs for these customers. And the second difference is that it's a much smaller fraction of our total ARR. At the time, we had a very large amount of revenue that was cloud companies and consumer companies in the late 2010s and early 2020s. Today, we just have 6% of our ARR in that bucket. So we made that comment because we don't have anything to say in terms of where it goes. There's nothing we see in October that tells us there are big changes, but we do think there can be volatility there, especially this can move the numbers in the short term, while the mid to long-term dominant motion we'll see is growth with that customer base. So that's why we made that comment.
O
Olivier Pomel47:22
And as to the fourth quarter, I echo the comments we make overall, which is we take conservative assumptions relative to usage growth that are lower than we've seen in providing our guidance. Of course, where we are in the year, the effect on Q4 is more limited than it would be on next year. And as we report Q4 and give guidance, we will update everybody on any trends that we do see in this cohort at that time. We didn't change guiding principles for this. We made an extra comment on it because we want to be transparent. We've seen that, and we see some customers are well over their commits, but we didn't bake anything specific in the guidance.
C
Carl Kirstead48:15
Okay, that's all very helpful. Thank you.
O
Operator48:17
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. Our next question comes from Kirk Matney with Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.
K
Kirk Matney48:29
Yeah, thanks very much. Olivier, you mentioned the one federal customer this quarter, the larger federal customer. Can you just talk on broader trends for you all within the federal government and the opportunity there and what you're seeing? And I guess if it had any positive impact — obviously it's their fiscal year end in September — so just any comments more generally on fed would be great. Thanks.
O
Olivier Pomel48:53
Look, it's a huge opportunity for us, and we are quite early with some interesting successes. We have some exciting logos there, like this one we mentioned this quarter, which is an agency we all interact with and which has tremendous opportunity for growth and upsell with us. There's another agency that already has a very large multi-million dollar ACV footprint with Datadog that we didn't talk about this quarter, but that's been a long-term customer. So there's plenty of opportunity. We're still very early in terms of capacity building, channel building, and go-to-market in general in government. So I would say still a small part of overall business, but we see that there's tons of upside in it, and we're working hard on the product side so that we can capture that fully. Over the past years, we worked on FedRAMP compliance, and we are working further on getting into more regulated, even tougher to get into workloads with FedRAMP and IL5 and other certifications like that. So we have a long roadmap there and big plans, and a lot of upside.
K
Kirk Matney50:24
Thank you.
O
Operator50:27
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Mike Seos with Needham. Mike, your line is now open.
M
Mike Seos50:40
Hey, thanks for getting me on the call here, guys. I just had two quick questions for you. The first on gross margin: just wanted to get a better understanding, is there anything you can speak to as it relates to those AI-native customers, the intensity of those workloads, and how your products feed into it, or maybe even the broader portfolio and the product expansion you've seen? I'm just wondering if those newer products maybe are detracting from gross margin nearer term here versus some expansion that we can expect as these products scale. That's the first question. Second question was just great to hear that the usage growth continues to trend higher, especially for those existing customers. Does it feel where we sit today in this new environment like this is par for the course kind of growth when thinking about the usage coming from those existing customers, or is there reason to believe that this can actually accelerate? If things can move higher one way or another, what would drive that?
O
Olivier Pomel51:46
Yeah, so on gross margins, in general we're happy with where they are, and there are some small moves in it. I wouldn't read too much into the moves. There are a number of things that underpin that. We keep releasing new functionality at the same time we keep optimizing our code and our usage. We actually use our products to optimize that quite a bit, and then we also keep getting better and better agreements with our cloud providers as we scale. So the combination of all that is what you see in the gross margin number. In general, we have to make a call always on whether we direct more effort at building new functionality or optimizing. The way we manage that is when gross margins get a little bit low, we put more effort on optimizing, and when we are in a happy zone, we redirect more effort on new products and new functionality. There's not a lot of change from product mix; it doesn't really matter all that much from a gross margin perspective. So there's no particular worry there. We think long term there are plenty of opportunities to improve margins, but right now the focus is on really shipping enough products to enough customers, making sure those products provide them with as much value as possible while staying in a certain happy zone on the gross margin. In terms of the growth of workloads, look, we see growth across the customer base pretty much with the growth of classical workloads in the cloud. We see large growth on the AI side. We think that the one big catalyst for future acceleration will be those AI-native applications, or those AI applications going into production for non-native companies, for a much broader set of customers than the customers that are deploying this kind of application in production. And as they do, they will also look less like just large clusters of GPUs and more like traditional applications, because the GPU needs a database, it needs an application in front of it, it needs layers to secure it, authorize it, and all the other things. So it's going to look a lot more like a normal application with some additional more concentrated computing on GPUs.
M
Mike Seos54:29
Thank you very much.
O
Operator54:33
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from the line of Gray Powell at BTIG. Your line is now open.
G
Gray Powell54:44
All right, great. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe just to follow up on Datadog On-Call, it's good to hear the commentary on that earlier in the call, and it has come up more in our fieldwork. So I'm just curious, how should we think about the opportunity there? Is that something that could completely displace a product like PagerDuty, or is it more of an add-on feature, since my understanding is it mainly works with the Datadog ecosystem versus other tools? Thanks.
O
Olivier Pomel55:18
Look, we'll take it where the demand takes us. We initially built it as a way for customers within our ecosystem to have a fully integrated experience, and really as a stepping stone towards full automation of incident resolution, full ownership from end to end. The part that strategically is the most interesting to us is the automation of the resolution, not physically paging customers. That being said, the response from customers has been so strong that there is very high demand for integrating with many different other sources and plugging ourselves into incident resolution loops that we might not have been a part of before. So that's definitely something that we're going to build for customers, and we're just very happy to see the demand there.
G
Gray Powell56:17
Understood. All right, thank you very much.
O
Operator56:19
Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Itai Kidron with Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.
I
Itai Kidron56:32
Thanks, and nice numbers, guys. Olivier, a question for you. I think you mentioned in prepared remarks that 15 of your 23 products are now running over $10 million. Maybe if you look at the ones that are still under $100 million or under $50 million, where do you see the most excitement? Which ones do you think have the highest odds of crossing the $100 million mark?
O
Olivier Pomel57:00
Well, I again don't want to single out any product for which we didn't disclose metrics in particular. But look, we mentioned in previous calls there are products that are growing very fast that we think will reach scale. We talked about database monitoring, for example, as a product that has been growing very fast, very clear value. And we actually forgot which number we disclosed last time, but we did disclose a number for it. So this one is clearly headed for north of $50 million. There are a number of other products across security, user experience, that are definitely going to get there very soon. So we feel good about all that. Basically, pretty much every single one of those products should be about $50 million. Some of them are going to get there faster than others. Some of them will cross $100 million, some of them will cross a billion maybe. So I think we feel good about the product set.
I
Itai Kidron58:21
That's great. Maybe a follow-up for both of you. You didn't provide 2025 guidance, of course, but are there any thoughts you want to leave us with as we think about 2025? Perhaps given where we are in the year, all your initial conversations with customers and how they think about next year, anything to point out with respect to their behavior or investment areas of focus which perhaps are different than what they've been in 2024?
O
Olivier Pomel58:57
Look, I think the only thing I would say is I won't get into second-guessing or guidance or things like that. In general, it's also very hard to guess usage ahead of time, because that's actually very different or can be very different from the intents that are being manifested by customers or their understanding of what the next year is going to look like. But the one thing I will say is we're investing. We're building sales capacity, we're definitely investing heavily in engineering. I think it's a great investment in the industry. Unlike many others, we don't expect at this point to have outsized investments in compute. We're not building large GPU clusters, but we are building engineering capacity and we are building sales capacity. So we should expect that in the numbers we will give for next year.
D
David O.59:57
I think we've said that at this point we've noted that there's been stability to an upward trend in usage, that many of our clients particularly in enterprise are getting back to the work of launching digital applications, and that's creating the pipeline and the results for us. And although we still are in an environment that's careful and wants return on their investments, we'll update everybody as to whether that's what we see. But generally, we're giving comments based on what we see in this environment, which has been good and stable.
I
Itai Kidron1:00:47
Thank you. Appreciate it.
O
Operator1:00:50
Thank you. This concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to turn it back over to CEO Olivier Pomel for closing remarks.
O
Olivier Pomel1:00:58
Well, thank you all for joining the call. I want to give a few shout-outs. First, to the product and engineering team for building great products this quarter. To the customers that actually spent all this time with us on getting those products to work right, especially for the new products — I'm talking about LLM observability, for example, or On-Call — I know we spend a lot of time with customers to get those right. And I also want to give a special shout-out to the go-to-market team. We have a very, very loaded fourth quarter, a very full slate for everyone in the next month and a half, and I know everybody is super hard at work. So thank you everyone. And on this, I think we'll wrap the call. Thank you for your participation.
O
Operator1:01:43
This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.