Back
Donald Trump
45th and 47th U.S. President, US Executive Branch & The Trump Organization

LIVE: Trump holds press conference at G7 summit | NBC News

🎥 Jun 15, 2026 📺 NBC News ⏱ 171m 👁 15380 views
Watch live coverage as President Trump holds a press conference in France before departing from the Group of Seven summit. The president's remarks come as the U.S. says it has reached an agreement to end the war with Iran. For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day, click here: https://www.nbcnews.com » Subscribe to NBC News: http://nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC » Subscribe to Here's the Scoop podcast: https://www.nbcnews.com/heres-the-sco... » NBC News App: https://apps.nbcnews.com/mobile » Breaking News Alerts: https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre... » Visit N...
Watch on YouTube

About Donald Trump

President Trump attended the G7 summit in France in June 2026, where he held press conferences and bilateral meetings with world leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron and UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Trump stated that on June 14 the U.S. reached a memorandum of understanding with Iran that he said would end the current conflict, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. He described the agreement as a "wall against a nuclear weapon" and contrasted it with the previous JCPOA, which he called a "road to a nuclear weapon." Trump said the Strait of Hormuz was partially open and would be fully open by June 19, and he claimed oil prices were dropping and the stock market was rising as a result of the deal. He also said he had spoken with leaders of Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Turkey about the agreement. During the summit, Trump also addressed other topics. He said he had conversations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding the war in Ukraine, describing it as more difficult than expected. Trump discussed U.S. investment figures, stating that over $19 trillion was being invested in the United States. He commented on domestic issues including voter ID requirements, crime reduction in several U.S. cities, and the "Save America Act." Trump also referenced a UFC event held at the White House and joked with reporters about taking credit for the Iran deal or blaming Vice President JD Vance if it did not work out.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Donald Trump's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (95 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
U
Unknown0:02
President, fore, construction, mobilize, shadow fleet, collective resistance, President Foreign, multinational, and territorial, reconstruction, diversification, international gasolific, fore, nuclear ballistic, stability, international development, development, Africa forward, fund, system, international, Minister of Finance, the nutrition guarantee, Africa forward, capital fore, next, Egypt, Africa, forever, this is plus development, macroeconomic, domestic, conference, coordination, forever consolidation, the Canadian, I'm too fast, next, resistance, cooperative artificial intelligence discussion necessitated provision, Canada, Brazil, responsibility, platform, artificial intelligence, democracy, need responsibility, international, the regime's authority, democracy, Friskat, platform, international, France traffic, President, mercy, conversation, President Trump, President Trump, hello asset, Ukrainian President, Ukraine, for different, President, President foreign policy, for fore system defense, fore said discussion, stay positive Mr. President, President Trump, President situation for Canada, guaranteed security, it is needed, President, artificial intelligence, administration for technique, as a technology business fore, fore security, foreign, foreign, speech, President Foreign, fore situation, President Trump, bunch, no, responsibility humanitarian politic, for nuclear activity, GCP situation, guarantee America, Donald Trump, guarantee of President, surveillance, President Minister forgive mechanism, progressive responsibility, President Trump, President Trump, Donald Trump, forever President, President, mercy, force for sure, produce, President Trump, Ukraine, territory for minister, fore speech, okay, journalist, global, President Donald Trump, agonismatic, Brazilian, mercy, fore, social environmental, of foreign policy, accept, cancerary, international, positive text, I miss you, organization fore mercy.
D
Donald Trump1:24:30
Positive statement. The stock market has surged to record highs, picking up thousands of points over the last short period of time. Thousands of points. And oil is dropping like it has never dropped before at levels that went down by seven dollars, down eight dollars. They've never seen anything like that. But if we didn't do this deal, we could have dropped more bombs for another three weeks, two weeks, four weeks, two years. You would never have the Hormuz strait open. You would never have success. Your market would have, instead of going up at levels that nobody's ever seen before, would go down at levels that nobody ever saw before, maybe except for 1929 or whatever. And you know, all the tough guys don't realize that this wasn't a three-month deal. This was years in the making. You know why? Because I was the one that killed General Soleimani. And if I didn't kill General Soleimani, we probably wouldn't be talking right now about this deal because he was a mad genius. They never were able to replace him. But a lot of people forget that the tough guys, you know, the tough guys that would drive the country right down the tubes. The past two days have provided a chance to discuss the details of this historic agreement with many of our closest friends and allies including the G7 nations and many presidents and prime ministers. As you saw, Prime Minister Modi was here. We had a long talk. He's a great guy. They are thrilled that we made a deal. Every one of them. There's not one nation that came to us and said, please sir, keep dropping bombs on them. Please keep dropping bombs. Stupid people say that. But I'm thrilled to report. And by the way, those last two days were brutal. Two hundred million dollars worth of bombs. And you know, it is expensive too, by the way, aside from everything else. And they knew I was coming for a third night. We informed them we're coming for a third night. They didn't have their navy, it's sunk. They didn't have their air force, it's gone. Not one plane. They didn't have anti-aircraft equipment, so we got free reign. They didn't have their leaders, but they have a new group of leaders that I think, actually I think they're smarter. I think they're very smart. I think they're far less radicalized. I think they're really good. They love their country. You know, you talk about regime change, nobody will say that. But I guess that's, look, their one set of leaders is all gone. Their second set of leaders is all gone. Their third set of leaders, a little bit gone. But for the most part, and frankly, I think that's regime change. I think they're going to behave much differently. I think they see a different way of life that they were never exposed to. So the one thing I didn't want to see is I didn't want to see economic catastrophe. If you kept this going, that could have happened. But all I know is every time we talked about the possibility of peace, the stock market shot up like a rocket ship. It never went down. They didn't like it. The people, you know, the stock market is more brilliant than anybody there is, including the people on this stage, other than me, of course. Let's see. I don't know. What do you think, Scott? Is the stock market more brilliant than you?
S
Scott1:28:13
No, sir. Uh oh, that's a terrible statement.
D
Donald Trump1:28:17
All right. The stock market is quite brilliant. And every time we said something amazing, like we're going to settle, it would go up. And every time we said something negative, like guess what? We're not going to be able to settle. It would go down. Very big, Peter. Very, very big. Tells you something. And you know, I've studied presidents. Some good, some bad, some great. Not too many are great and some really bad. We had one just recently. And the one president I did not want to be was the late great Herbert Hoover. I didn't want that. And who knows what would have happened, but bad things happened. So the past few days have provided a chance to discuss the details of the deal with the closest friends and allies, heads of countries. They were all here, a lot of them, far more than the seven, as you know. And they put out a statement. I think President Macron, who did a great job, by the way, did a really fantastic job, him and Brigitte, they did a great job. But they all put out statements saying they love this deal because they want to see it over and they love the fact that the Hormuz, don't forget, if we were going to drop bombs, let's say we went another month, another two, three months, maybe weeks, could be another three months, could be whatever. What do you have left? That may be nothing. But the strait will never be open because people that own billion-dollar ships, these ships cost a billion dollars. They don't like sailing ships or having their ships participate. When you go up the coast and you go through the strait and there are rockets flying over your head, they want to protect their billion-dollar investment. You wouldn't have oil for maybe years. These are stupid people. But nobody was tougher than me. Nobody hit Soleimani. You know when I hit Soleimani, people thought that was the biggest thing to happen in the Middle East for 50 years. That was the biggest event. He was the boss of Iran and respected. But he was a mad genius. He was a genius. The father of the roadside bomb. When you see young men, and in some cases women, mostly men, walking around without legs, without arms, with a face that's been blown to smithereens. It's Soleimani, 95%, 96.2% they say or something. 95% that was Soleimani did it. Happened to come from Iran. And I blew him up. You remember that? I blew him up in the valley of death. He got off his plane and we followed him. And in all fairness, because they've been wonderful to me, Israel, but they didn't want to do that attack. They were all set. The night before the attack, they informed me they didn't want to do it. So I had to make a decision. I made the decision to do it. But it was a joint venture, as we say in the real estate business. That was a joint venture between Israel and us. We studied it for a month. We knew what plane he was going to be on almost a month before. He only traveled on commercial airliners, big ones with lots of people because he knew we wouldn't shoot him down. Very smart. But we knew he was going to be on that plane. Followed him, and then Israel informed me that they won't do it. And I had to make a decision. I had some very good generals, and not the ones you see on television. Very good. And I want to thank also Pete Hegseth and General Raisen, Kane who is phenomenal. Okay, these guys are phenomenal. They can't be better. But I had some good generals. And I said to him, well, if Israel's not going to do it, we're all prepared. Do we do it? Do you like doing it or not? He said, sure, if you want to do it, we can do it. How? Well, we'll do it just as well or better. We can do it ourselves. We don't need anybody. So we took out Soleimani, one of the biggest events to happen in the Middle East, maybe ever, but they say 50 years, they say 100 years. I was with the Prime Minister of Pakistan, and he said it's maybe the biggest event that has ever taken place, that nobody could believe it. So that's when it started. It didn't start like three or four or five weeks ago. And Obama wouldn't do it. What Obama did was he did the JCPOA. He loaded up a plane with $1.7 billion in green cash from banks all over Washington, Maryland, and Virginia. They were stripped of all their cash. They had no cash to do payrolls. It all went into a Boeing 757, a wonderful plane, and they flew it to Iran. And they gave it out to people. They bribed people. They thought they were going to get it done. Then they gave billions and billions of dollars after that. And they got a deal that was a road to a nuclear weapon. I get so angry. I guess I'm allowed to get angry when I watch the Democrats. They talk about it all the time. We had this deal done. You had a deal that was going to give them legally a nuclear weapon. And if that happened, Israel would have been blown away. And in all fairness to Bibi Netanyahu, who happens to be a good man, gets a little excited sometimes, but he happens to be a very good man, we've had an amazing partnership. He has been an amazing prime minister. We have a little dispute over Lebanon. And I say, you can do a little softer touch, Bibi. You don't have to knock down a building every time somebody walks into it that's from Hezbollah. But it's been an amazing partnership. But he will say we're the big partner and he's the very small partner. And that's true. So he came to the country and he begged Barack Hussein Obama, the president, not to do the JCPOA. He said it could be the end of Israel, and it would have been if I didn't come along. And Obama didn't listen to him. Bibi actually went to Congress and pleaded with them and he got nowhere. And they had this horrible deal that was horrible for Israel. And that's where it stood. And then I came along and I terminated that deal. It had very little time left. You know, it was a short-term deal. You know, with countries, you need hundreds of years. You don't need eight years or nine years. This isn't like you're signing a lease on a candy store on the corner. You need hundreds of years. This was a short-term lease. It expired long ago. Had I let it run, it expired. You wouldn't have been around. And a lot of people wouldn't have been around. But Israel would have been terminated. I think the whole Middle East would have been terminated. You saw that when everybody was shocked that all these missiles, they were aimed at these different places. Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE. Think of it. Bahrain, Kuwait, they got hit. Nobody thought that was going to happen. I didn't think it was going to happen. They didn't think it was going to happen. They were going to take out the entire Middle East, including Israel. And if they had a nuclear weapon, they would have used it within moments after getting it. So I made it very tough for them when I terminated the Barack Hussein Obama catastrophe. JCPOA, one of the worst deals. NAFTA might have been worse, but that was worse economically. This deal was really dangerous what he did. He gave them everything, including a lot of money, which we don't give them, by the way, just in case you have any question. We'll be giving this out so you can read it and you can see, and it's a memorandum of understanding. If it doesn't get done in 60 days, that's all right. We go back to bombing. You know, I don't want to do that because it's so good. But we might have to because we're never going to let them have a nuclear weapon, but they've agreed not to, and you'll see that very clearly in the agreement. But then the second phase of that was, they were building or they were enriching material, as they say, I call it nuclear dust. They were enriching material under granite mountains. Granite being, for those not in the construction business, granite being a very strong, the strongest stone. It's not as pretty as marble but it's much more, it's much stronger. It's a lot stronger. Like the new granite I put on the stairs of the White House going to the Oval Office, the black granite. It's rated one million years plus. No marble is rated that. Marble is rated a hundred years if it's outside. So these are granite mountains, and the B2s came along and they hit those air shafts in the dark at 1:00 in the morning with no moon. They had a beam going right up everywhere. Those guys did a job, and then they were criticized by certain members of the press, like CNN, for possibly not doing that much damage. And it turned out that the damage was far greater. Those mountains collapsed right on top of everything. Nobody's going to get that for a long time unless we want to get it. We'll get it. But we're the only ones that can. And they say China has the equipment to get it and we have the equipment to get it. And it's actually not valuable. Not a lot of value, but would like to get it psychologically, but nobody's touching it. We also have cameras. That's what Space Force is. We have the best, we have the greatest military in the world, by the way. But I'm proud of Space Force because I started it. We have Space Force cameras on every single door. Every, well, there are no doors. They've been pretty well shattered. But every area of that, if somebody walks in and he's got a badge with his name on it, like Muhammad something, which is about a 50/50 guess, Muhammad something, they can tell the name, they can give you a serial number. We can see things you wouldn't believe, the quality of the stuff that we have. It's why we've been so successful. That's why our blockade will go down in the annals of history as being unbelievable. Nobody's ever seen a blockade like that. It was just like a steel wall. So what happened is we then terminated that, and I call it the nuclear dust, and that was the end of that. But if we didn't hit that with the B2 bombers or if it wasn't successful, they would have had a nuclear weapon, a nuclear bomb at a very high level. Not the highest, but it would have been a very high level. We have much bigger, but we hope that we're never going to have to use it. We have the most. Russia has second. China is very far behind but going to catch up unfortunately. You know they're catching up, but we have the most. We have the most powerful, but we also have the most, but Russia's not far behind. And then you have China in third place, but they'll within five years they'll be probably even. And we ought to make a denuclearization deal. That would be so great. We don't need all of that. We don't need to be able to blow up the whole world 300 times over. It's terrible. It's really, if we could do a denuke deal, I'd love it. And one of those two is very willing to do it, I will tell you. But the other one is less willing to do it. And you need all of them. So the deal we reached with Iran on Sunday will be signed shortly, tomorrow, maybe the next day. I think you know, subject deals, my whole life is all about deals. That's all I ever did is make deals, and crazy things happen with deals. I've gone into deals where it's a guarantee, no way it cannot be signed, and it doesn't get signed. And I've gone into deals that you have no chance of making, and they go like nothing. So, but we're going to most likely sign a deal. They want to sign a deal, and they've been acting very appropriately. They took two big hits last week. Those were two very big hits. So importantly, Iran has agreed that they will neither produce nor procure a nuclear weapon. Neither produce, because originally they said they talk about that they will not develop a nuclear weapon. And some people found it okay. These guys didn't offer us, but some people, but I didn't like it, said it won't develop. I said what happens if they should buy? I don't know, it's pretty very dangerous for somebody to sell, because whoever sells them a nuclear weapon will get nuked themselves. If they sold a nuclear weapon, only a few that could do it, they would be nuked. They wouldn't have that country long. So it's a very dangerous thing for somebody to do. But I wanted it in there, so it's develop, procure, buy, anything. And you'll see that when you see the agreement, but it's appropriate that we release the agreement, and we did send a copy to Israel. By the way, they've been a good partner. Again, I think they could do better with respect to Hezbollah. I'm not saying they shouldn't protect themselves. I'm saying when two drones are shot into the desert and dropped harmlessly, you don't have to knock down buildings in Beirut. They could behave better, and frankly they could do a better job. I love them as a partner. They were terrific, but they could do a much better job with Hezbollah on that. I don't think they're doing well. And I feel very bad for Lebanon. Lebanon was a great culture. It was a great, they had the professors, the doctors, the lawyers. It was an incredible culture, maybe the highest in the Middle East for years and years, centuries. And for the last 50, 60 years, they have been just trashed. They have been living in hell. So they'll work closely with us to turn over the so-called enriched material that's very deep in the bowels of the earth. Very deep. Nobody can get it. So it's not important that we do it quickly, but we could do it fairly quickly. When we have a chance, we'll do it. But in the meantime, we have cameras on every inch of it. Nobody can do it. And if they do, we'll hit them with Patriots, that's all. And they'll be gone. And they know that technical discussions and the removal of all stockpiles of enriched materials will begin immediately. We're going to start that immediately. And unlike Barack Hussein Obama who sent Iran pallets of cash, any relief they receive under this deal, they'll have to get based on merit. And it won't be from us. We don't have to give them anything. But some people may want to invest. Like what are you going to do? Say you can never ever invest in a country? I mean, it's pretty tough. I don't mind being tough, but it's pretty crazy. You can invest in a country. You can invest in any country you want, but you can't invest there. Well, they need investment because we did a trillion and a half, maybe two trillion dollars worth of damage. So somebody's going to have to help them out. There's no guarantee about helping them out. Could be their neighbors will help them out a little bit. I don't know. But it's a lot of money. Almost nobody has that kind of money. That's the kind of damage that was done. But we're not investing any money. There was a fake story. There was a fake news story that got a man, a person, a good person. JD made a statement. It was a perfect statement and they reported it a very strange way, but that's because that's why it's fake news, I guess. So we don't give them money. We don't give them any of that. And what happens is with time, if they behave, if they be a citizen of the world, a reasonable citizen of the world, and I think this group, again, I think I didn't do this for regime change, but I think this group is regime change. I mean, hey, the first group is dead. One little morning having breakfast, the whole group. They thought they'd never be caught because we never bombed during breakfast, but we bombed and all 88 people, and I'm not proud of that at all. But the second group came in and they were very unreasonable too and they were all gone. They were all gone. And then the third group, we've been dealing with them. A couple left this planet, but we've been dealing with them, and again they've been fine. I mean, I've had a lot easier. I've had some easier ones. They're tough. They're smart. Maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has already increased very substantially, and the normal flow of energy will resume in the coming days, and trillions of dollars will be made by the world, and the stock market will, I believe, continue to rise. The only difference is that a player that's very volatile, very tough, very smart, frankly, you know, they have in one way a primitive culture, but it's also a genius primitive culture. They're very smart people, very good negotiators, but so are we. So rather than possibly going into a depression, rather than having your favorite president be Herbert Hoover, I was always the one I didn't want to be. I wouldn't have preferred Nixon. I wouldn't have preferred plenty I wouldn't prefer, but the one I always thought of, Herbert Hoover. And he caused it. He raised taxes too fast and he raised interest rates too fast all at the same time, and it caused the Great Depression. So I don't think I'll make mistakes like that. I lower taxes. I don't raise taxes. In fact, we just gave you the largest tax decrease, the largest tax cut in the history of our country. So we'll be working on a parallel effort with the Gulf nations to address non-nuclear issues such as the conventional ballistic missiles, which we'll be talking about, and support. I mean, they have to have some because other people have some. You've got to have some. Somebody said you shouldn't give them one. I mean, I have guys I like, some of these guys, but I don't think they're smart. Sir, you shouldn't let them have any missile. I said, well, what am I going to do? Am I going to let Saudi Arabia have missiles, but they can't have them? Yes, sir. Can't. Doesn't work that way. You know, it doesn't work that way. And missiles aren't the problem. Missiles hurt a little, but they don't blow up the planet. So the Gulf nations will address the non-nuclear issues. We'll be talking about the ballistic missiles, and we'll talk also about the terrorist proxies that they have that we don't want that to happen. But I want to thank our partners in both Pakistan and Qatar. These people work so hard, and they knew him a little bit, in the case of Pakistan quite well, in the case of Qatar they were sort of at odd ends. You know, Qatar was great because they had right next door. When I flew from there, from that location to Saudi Arabia, I'd fly for 40 minutes, and I'd fly to UAE for 40 minutes. Two great leaders there. By the way, in the case of Saudi Arabia, the father's still alive and he's fantastic, and the son is going to be great. Going to be great. The Crown Prince. And Mohammed at UAE is an incredible warrior. He was dropping bombs last week. I said, who the hell is dropping all those bombs? It was UAE. He's a good fighter, Mohammed. But every administration for decades has sought to get Iran to relinquish its nuclear ambitions. But the threat only got bigger. The words got bigger and bigger and stronger and bigger, and nothing ever happened. And Iran got stronger and tougher. If we didn't blow them up the first time and then blow out those weapons, they would have been unstoppable. This should have done what I'm doing, and what I did should have been done years ago. It would have been much easier, much less firepower, but it wasn't. And again, I want to thank all those countries, and I want to thank Israel and Bibi Netanyahu. So obviously, the breakthrough would not have been possible without the unprecedented pressure the United States put on the regime over the past year and a half. But again, it started a long time ago. It started with the death of Soleimani. That was a big deal. No president in history has ever been tougher on Iran than I have. And they know that. And by the way, if they don't honor the agreement or some things aren't even mentioned in the agreement, it's a memorandum of understanding. But we have an understanding of certain things without writing it. And if they don't honor that, we'll probably go back to bombing them until they honor it. You know, it's amazing what bombs can do. So I say it, the Obama deal was a road to a nuclear weapon, and let's call it the Trump deal was a wall for a nuclear weapon that the nuclear weapon could not get through. Nobody's going to get through it. We built a wall. They weren't going to have it. And that's what we have right now. And it says very clearly, the most important clause to me, too. Number one, the strait opens, but that's much less important than the other clause. Clause number whatever, five, eight, is a very strong statement that they will never have a nuclear weapon. And it doesn't say they'll have one in five years or ten years or twenty years. With Obama, they were able to enrich very quickly. This agreement now provides Iran with a historic opportunity. If they follow the path of cooperation that will have open for them, their country will have a chance to survive. Now think of it, you know, they have 91 million people. People want me to bomb the bridges. Why don't I bomb? I already did because, you know, they went back on one of their promises and I bombed their biggest bridge, the equivalent of the George Washington Bridge of Iran. But we bombed that bridge. You saw that one quick strike by an F-22, the most beautiful fighter jet ever made, by the way. In fact, we're ordering some more of them. We're bringing it out because it's so effective. It's incredible. Look, we have the greatest military in the world. Those B2 bombers are unbelievable. Who would have thought they could handle, each had two because the flight was so long, but they handle three of the biggest, heaviest bombs, hundreds of thousands of pounds, and they handle them like they're nothing. It's amazing. And also, they're undetectable. They flew into Iran. Totally, think of it, totally undetected. Now, Iran is waiting for them. They're waiting for them. And they never saw them. One in the morning, they never saw them. They're stealth. And we just ordered 22 more. The newer upgraded version, which I guess is better. I don't know how the hell you get better. But as I expressed to the world leaders here this week, it's my hope that the peace agreement will be the beginning of a much larger deal all across the Middle East. We're very close. Look at the job we've done on Gaza. Look at Hamas. Hamas has been very silent. You haven't read anything about Hamas. And we're trying to get them unarmed. You know, they grew up with a machine gun in their hand. I think they actually when they were born, they came out with a machine gun in their hand. So it's not the easiest thing, but they've actually, you know, behaved pretty well considering this was not the lifestyle that they were taught to have, but including an end to all Iranian aggression, and they're not going to be Iranian aggression, and an end to war and terror in Lebanon. So the Lebanon piece is something we'll have to work on a little bit. It's a very small piece of the puzzle actually, but it still makes a lot of noise. The big deal is the Iran deal. That's where the money is, where the power was, but they have Hezbollah and we've got to get that done one way or the other. We'll do it. I think Israel can do a much better job on it. Syria would love to do it. The gentleman in Syria that's now the president of Syria, he's done a tremendous job. He's put that country together in a year and a half. Sort of like our country, a year and a half, similar size. They said, please don't put him there, he's a very violent man, al-Qaeda. They said, well, I know one thing, a Boy Scout's not going to work. And he's actually done a very good job. He'd love to go in and, you know, Hezbollah is an enemy of his, and he'd go in, but he wouldn't knock down buildings every time he hears there's somebody. He'd just go and get them with precision. But I don't know that people want that. Maybe they don't. Maybe Lebanon doesn't. We have to be guided a little bit by Lebanon. And by the way, the president is going to be coming. Prime Minister, president going to be coming over to see us very shortly over the next week or two. Good man. He is living what a tough life he's got because he's got tough groups of people. And it's amazing there is a Lebanon with all they've been through. They have been treated worse than just about anybody, disrespected incredibly. So the expansion of the Abraham Accords is the other thing that we hope we're going to get. And I think Saudi Arabia, if they lead the way, they'd be doing themselves a big favor because everybody that's in it, UAE went in right from the beginning. Again, he's a warrior. And they never got out. Nobody ever got out. You think maybe during the war they were all afraid of, everybody was afraid of Iran. And that's why we ended up with the original members. But then when the election was rigged, that's right. And I wasn't here at all. Nobody cared about anything. And the country went to hell in every way. That was the least of it. Middle East was the least of it. The country went to hell, allowing 25 million people into the country unchecked and unvetted. Many of them criminals. Many of them murderers. 11,888 murderers allowed into our country. So this was the least of it. But the past two days have also provided an opportunity to discuss a number of other key issues with members of the G7 and our partners. Yesterday morning we had a productive conversation on the war in Ukraine. I spoke with President Putin. I spoke with President Zelenskyy. He was there, and President Putin I spoke over the phone with. And something's going to happen. They're losing a lot of people. A lot of soldiers are losing soldiers. Both are losing a lot. Russia's losing more because they're the offensive ones. And when you're offensive in war, you lose more. Pretty simple. But I provided an update on my call Sunday with President Putin and expressed my continued hope. We had a very good conversation with President Putin and a very, very good conversation with President Zelenskyy. I think they both want to do something. They just don't know how to do it. They want to do it. They just don't know how. In our session yesterday afternoon on international partnerships, I offered an update on how the United States is leading the world in responding to the Ebola outbreak in Africa, sending $375 million in aid so far to help stop and contain the crisis at its source. And we've done great. I was with the president of a couple of presidents came over, by the way, from African nations, and they were so happy with what we did. But where it's unfair is we gave $375 million. The rest of the world gave essentially nothing. Maybe a couple of bucks, but nothing. And they were all saying thank you so much. And I think they've done a good job. It's a terrible thing. Ebola is a terrible thing. That's an unbelievable one. Fortunately, it's not like COVID where it's that easy to spread around, but it's rough. And we've done a good job. We've moved people to certain quarantine, certain locations. But today we also had excellent meetings on the economy and artificial intelligence, which is amazing what's going on with that. It's going to be the biggest thing ever. We have to be very careful with it. It's both great and could be bad. We have to be careful with it. But we're leading China. We're leading the world on that. We're allowing them to do their own electric plants because they need, as an example, those buildings are so big and they're not taking the communities' electricity. I gave them the right. It's my idea. I gave them the right to build electric plants like Con Edison in New York. And they've come up with plants that nobody's ever seen anything like them. Those are by very high IQ people. So they're actually building electric plants. So because otherwise they could never build a building because the grid is old and tired and broken and a mess. So they're building, and they're going to sell their additional, their extra electricity into the grid. So we take care of a lot of things like California, which doesn't have nearly enough electricity. They don't know what they're doing there. And instead of having blackouts and brownouts, they'll be able not to. We found a great deal of unity here at the G7. And we signed a declaration on illegal immigration, the first time ever for a G7 statement. They did a beautiful statement. We signed other agreements to step up and to really coordinate and spend a lot of time coordinating drug trafficking and stopping drug trafficking, which is crazy. It comes through Mexico, comes through the southern border. The little that comes through, they find a way. They put it, their genius, if they would use that genius for good, they'd be very rich people. They have it in engines. They have it in hubcaps. They have it in areas you wouldn't even believe. They have it in the structures of cars. Most incredible thing. But we've done a great job on it. We have drugs coming through the border down 61%. Drugs coming through water, the sea, ocean, gulf, down 97.2%. That's the ones that get hit. Just like we hit the Iranian mine sweepers and mine droppers, they call them. They dropped. Who would have 28 mine droppers? Who has 28 mine droppers? They actually had them, but they don't have them anymore. We hit them just like we hit the drug dealers. But drugs are down by water 97% and over 60% they're down, and now we're going to go and focus on the land. They come through Mexico. Mexico has lost control of their country. The cartels run Mexico, and it's sad. And the president is a very good woman, but she's a very scared woman. The drug cartels are totally running Mexico. It's not even close. We agreed to accelerate our efforts to secure our critical minerals and rare earth supply chains, where we have great companies really going to town. We're going to give everybody a big run because we do it better, and we had to get motivated. The G7 also agreed that the United States's new approach to international development based on the private sector investment is working at levels that they never thought possible. It's really working. I held a number of very positive bilateral meetings including with the president of France. It was a very good meeting actually. The Amir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim, was, I tell you, I wish they could really know the guy. You know, some people say, well, he lived in that neighborhood. He can't, you can't be saying things that you'd like to have him say. He was fantastic on this, and he's been a fantastic guy in terms of energy and getting energy out there. President of the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Zayed, who's an amazing warrior. President El-Sisi of Egypt. Prime Minister Modi of India. We spent a long time together today. I spoke to Mohammed. I spoke to the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia a number of times. They're all so happy that they're still, you have to have them happy too. You know, we're using their airports. Not that they could stop us if we didn't want them to, but it'd be nice that I got that little sucker. But I hate missing. But we spoke to all of them and many countries all over the world. So every country, I think Israel too. Think of what Israel is getting. They're not going to be nuked. It's very simple. I told Bibi, your biggest risk was that they drop a nuclear weapon into the middle of Israel. They'd only need one and there would be no more Israel. Think of it, baby. The most important thing that you were asking for is that. So I think they're happy. Some people are going to be not, but there are some people, some writers some that I thought were friends of mine, but I don't want them as friends anymore because they're either stupid or they're bad people. But we stopped nuclear holocaust, and it stopped. I mean there's not going to be any of that. So from the beginning to the end, it was clear that this week, America's back. It's bigger and better and stronger. We're more respected as a country right now, I think, than we ever have been. And we were a laughingstock two years ago. They would laugh at us. We had a man that should have never been there. You know that. A man that would walk up to a podium once every year. And they'd ask him, what flavor ice cream do you like? I like vanilla. Then he'd try and find the stairs, which he couldn't find most of the time, and he'd leave. This is very unfair reporting. And then you said you didn't know about that. You didn't know there was something wrong. We can never let that happen to our country again. To me, the worst. We had the worst inflation ever. We had the worst in prices and the costs. It's all coming down now because the oil is bringing it down. You're going to see numbers that are going to be amazing. But this evening, I look forward to a very special dinner with President Macron and his fabulous wife at the Palace of Versailles. I sort of like that palace. It has a lot of gold. I want to check it out. It's a beautiful palace. Maybe the most beautiful of all. I hope you're going to get to see it. The ones that are traveling with me, I hope you're going to get to see it because it's amazing. But they asked me if I'd stay a little bit longer and go to Paris. So I'll get home a little bit later, but it'll be a nice dinner. But I'm interested to see it. I mean that's the ultimate. I guess it's the ultimate of its type. Louis the 14th celebrating the 250th anniversary of America's founding and America's oldest alliance. And we're celebrating that a little bit tonight. They'll have the biggest people in Europe at the dinner. And those people love our country. And hopefully Europe is going to find its way. Europe is having a lot of hard times. They are doing some things very badly on energy and on immigration. They're doing things very badly, and we'll be talking about that tonight. So with that all said, if you want to ask us any questions, feel free to ask the people behind me, huh?
R
Reporter2:04:58
Bonjour. You've been clear, President Trump, the United States is not going to directly pay Iran. But the US is going to let the Iranians start making billions of dollars, selling oil, accessing this reconstruction fund.
D
Donald Trump2:05:16
Only if they're doing things right. Only if, Peter. Only if we're not doing anything. We're not putting up money. Only if they're doing things right. If they're doing things right, if people want to invest, they can invest. But they had this $300 billion fund. It's only if they're doing things right. Remember this also when you talk about billions of dollars. They've had much more than a trillion dollars worth of damage done. They've got a long way. There'll be 15 to 20 years to rebuild what they have right now. So they have to behave themselves. If they're not behaving, they get hit again. You know, they'll be hit again because we can do it very easily. It's going to take a long way for them to build back their anti-aircraft stuff. And you know the other thing I want to thank China, President Xi. I was with him, and he stayed neutral, totally neutral, and I appreciate it. And I would want to thank Vladimir Putin. He was very neutral. They could have made it much more difficult for us. And I want to say it, you know, somebody would say, oh, that's terrible. He's thanking President Xi of China. Well.
Let me tell you, I had a long talk with him. You know, they have shoulder weapons to knock down airplanes. It's not like the real deal, but they're accurate. They're fairly accurate. I said, "I would really appreciate you're not giving or selling any of that stuff to Iran." And you know what? For the most part, he didn't. So I just want to thank them because they made it a lot better. You explain though what the difference is between giving Iran US dollars and unfreezing US dollars for them.
Well, the unfreezing that's an easy one to answer. We have taken a lot of their money and we have their money. We have taken their money. It's not our money. It's their money and we froze it at a certain point in time. I guess we're going to have to give it back. You know, if we didn't give it back, nobody would ever invest in the dollar again. If you took their money, 'cause I thought about it, you know, I'm not the most perfect person. I said to Scott, Scott, why don't we keep their money? What the hell are we giving it back to them? But, you know, people from lots of nations, some nations we don't agree with. They have their money. The dollars become very strong under me and they don't want to have a little conflict with somebody and end up having the United States just take their money. So if you do that, you really don't have a system.
R
Reporter2:07:56
And I did just want to ask you about this. A wise man once said in January of 2020, Iran never won a war but never lost a negotiation.
D
Donald Trump2:08:09
That wise man.
R
Reporter2:08:10
Who said that?
D
Donald Trump2:08:11
Donald Trump. Oh, that's what I thought you were going to say.
R
Reporter2:08:13
So, how do you go back to the United States and convince a skeptical American public that this deal is a win?
D
Donald Trump2:08:21
Here they lost militarily. Okay. It's very tough because I know that no matter what, if I would go, by the way, if I'd go another three or four weeks, those same people that are critical would say he went too long, he should have done, you know, no matter what. If they raised the white flag of surrender and if they said, "Praise be to Allah. Donald Trump is the greatest president ever. We totally concede. We totally give up. This war is over. We have failed." The New York Times and CNN and a couple of others are not all that dishonest. They say Iran had a great victory. Okay? And they practically do that. You know, it's amazing. When we knocked out their last ship, they had 159 ships. When we knocked out the last ship, The Times refused to do a story on it. They said, "Why wouldn't you? They don't have a navy and you don't want to do a story on it." They don't have an air force. You don't want to do a story. We need a fair press. And that's why they're all doing so badly because they lost credibility. When I went in a landslide and I had 93% bad press, they take good stories about me and make them bad. But the only reason that happened is because they have so little. The media has so little credibility that the people voted for me. 93% of the stories on network ABC is horrible. I think ABC is the worst. NBC is terrible. And CBS is terrible. CNN obviously. And I never get good no matter what I do. I could do the greatest thing. I won't get good stories on this. I'll get it from fair media. I'll get it from all over the world. They're running good. But no matter what I do, I'm going to get bad press. I know that. Now, if I did the opposite, if I went out and continued to bomb them for another four, just bomb the hell out of them, I get bad press on that. No, there's nothing I can do. But what this does is it allows the ships to go. If we keep bombing, those ships won't be going. And you're talking about 500, 600, 700 million dollars a day. It's a lot of money. A lot of money. That's why the world is okay. Hey, it's liquid. It's fine. Also, we run out of reserves in about four weeks. You know, there are reserves all over the world and we would really run out and there'll be a time when you wouldn't be able to get it. And you want to see bedlam. So, for all those so-called geniuses that want to show me how smart they are, ask them why didn't they blow up General Soleimani? Ask that of the general and couple of other people that I like very much, but boy are they wrong. Go ahead, Mr.
R
Reporter2:10:58
How about you? Thank you, Peter. I give you more Peter but people say I like you too much.
D
Donald Trump2:11:02
Thank you Mr. President.
R
Reporter2:11:04
You know he told me that first day in office he asked me like seven questions. I answered all of them. Is this true? He said he just answered more questions in one meeting than Joe Biden did in four years. Okay. You know I'm not going to get you in trouble but that's what you said. Go ahead.
Mr. President, in the Art of the Deal you write about the importance of leverage. Obviously, you have a lot of leverage when it comes to Iran, whether it's militarily or through economic sanctions. What leverage, sir, do you have when it comes to Israel and Hezbollah to ensure that they abide by the ceasefire?
D
Donald Trump2:11:38
Well, I think we have leverage just by the fact that we really have Iran now has to be good. They have to behave. And we might help. That's a much smaller conflict. It's a conflict that should be able to be over with. I'm surprised it's taken so long. And it's a much smaller, but we have a lot of leverage. We have, look, we have the greatest military anywhere in the world. We have the strongest, most powerful. Look at the blockade. By the way, the blockade was more impactful than all of the bombing raids where we dropped a billion dollars worth of bombs on Iran. The blockade was so incredible. The naval blockade, the admiral, the whole thing, not one ship got through. That meant no money got through. They were dying. They had no money. They have inflation that's 250 or 300%. They have no money. We have tremendous leverage. We have the leverage of the economy as an example. We'll get that done. That's a small one. And we'll work with Israel and get it done. But I'd like to do it. I mean, you have people living there. Buildings are being dropped on top of them or right alongside of them. How would you like to live there? It's so unfair. Especially Beirut. You know, you go into Beirut and I looked at the scene two days ago yesterday where they hit that was a big hit. That was unnecessary in my book. Yeah. Please.
R
Reporter2:13:09
Two questions. If you could clarify something you said just a few minutes ago. One of the goals of Epic Fury going into it, you said was...
D
Donald Trump2:13:15
Say it again. Speak up.
R
Reporter2:13:17
One of the goals of Epic Fury, you said going into it was to destroy Iran's ballistic missiles and its capabilities to build more. Yeah.
Why is it acceptable to you now that they keep some of that capability? And Iran is Iran.
D
Donald Trump2:13:29
What are they keeping? What are they keeping? They have less than other nations now. We knocked out probably 84, 85% of their missiles. The rest of them are underground. They can't even get them out. You know, the other night's raid, I think it was on the first night, we knocked out hundreds of their missiles actually by mistake. We were hitting an area and it, you know, you can sort of see when the bombs are going off and then you see one that looks like, wow, what happened? A lot of missiles knocked down. No, but what are you going to do? Let's spend another two weeks and give them none. They don't want to be firing missiles right now. They're going to have a hard time rebuilding. They're going to have a hard time rebuilding. And if people from the Middle East, you know, if people want to invest, and again, they don't have to invest at all, but if they do want to invest, it does have oil. It does have probably a future, but it's going to take a long time. But are you going to let the 91 million people starve to death? I mean, one of the things I was very intent on, they have water desalinization plants, very good ones. I could have knocked them out in five minutes. Just like I knocked out Car Island, I knocked out everything but the oil. I said 25. It was so complete. The only thing there is the pipes coming with the oil because I didn't want to ruin the world market because they do a lot of money. But I didn't want to do that. No, it would have been so easy. It would have been easier and I would have satisfied a group of 10% of the people. But it would have been the wrong thing to do.
R
Reporter2:14:58
And it could have caused an international depression. Iran's position maybe not. Iran's position has always been that their nuclear program was for civilian purposes. If they come back after the signing of this and say they want to continue to have a civilian nuclear program. Is that acceptable to you?
D
Donald Trump2:15:14
Well, I've said to them always, I say, "Look, you have probably the third largest oil reserves in the world. What the hell do you need nuclear for? You need nuclear for some electricity." So, I've always felt that way. So, we've been pretty tough in that. You know, it's also it is a little hard though when you say that somebody wants it, other people have it, other adjoining states have it, and you're not letting them have it for purposes of electricity and things like that. It's always a little tough. You have to use a little common sense. Please.
R
Reporter2:15:44
New York Times, please.
Thank you, Mr. President, for the question. Now that you're approaching a new phase in this conflict with Iran, can you now say whether you will hold anyone in your administration accountable for the strike on a school that killed more than 100 children on the first day of the war?
D
Donald Trump2:16:02
No. If it was a fault and as you know that's under investigation. It's such a strange question to be asked at this state because you're talking about a long time ago. But nobody did that on purpose. I guess you'd have to say about them. What about the thousands of soldiers that they blew up when they opened their car door? What about the thousands of people that were killed by Iran? No, mistakes are made. The war is nasty, but I know it's under investigation and I could have a report for you tomorrow or they I'd ask I would ask Pete I would ask Pete Hegseth that question because they have it under investigation. Please.
R
Reporter2:16:43
Mr. President, you've been saying all week that this deal permanently prevents Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, but the drafts of the deal that have been floating around barely mention Iran's nuclear program. So, can you explain how exactly the deal achieves that goal?
D
Donald Trump2:17:00
So, when I say permanently, it should be permanently, but if it's not permanently, we will bomb them. They will be bombed just like I bombed them on Wednesday night and Tuesday night and was going to bomb them on Thursday night at a level that was three times greater and they knew that. I will bomb them. Now that's with me as president. If you have a weak pathetic president maybe that doesn't happen but I can only do the job that I have to do. I have a long time to go. I have almost three years close to three years. Time is going fast, but our country's become the we're the most respected country in the world. Those leaders today, they say, "We used to laugh at you. Two years ago, they'd same guys, they'd laugh at the country." And now they say, "You're the most respected country anywhere in the world." Militarily, even military, take a look at what happened in so many different locations. Afghanistan, that horrible retreat that these people made, leaving equipment behind. They weren't under any pressure. You take your time. You can get out. I was going to get out. We're going to get out with dignity and pride. Take 100% of the equipment. I was even taking the tents down. But then they got in and they just left. They left all the equipment. I may get all that equipment back. Now, here's the thing. More symbolic because it's a little old now, but we may get it all back.
So, Afghanistan is kissing our ass. You know that.
R
Reporter2:18:28
So you're threatening to bomb Iran if they don't comply. But there's nothing enforceable in the deal itself. Is that correct?
D
Donald Trump2:18:34
Doesn't have to be. I let him know. I said, "Look, if you don't adhere to the agreement, I don't want to do that. But we're going to bomb the hell out of you." And I don't think that they're going to veer from the agreement. What else am I going to do? Am I going to say, "I'm going to take you to court. Let me take you to court. Let me sue you." No. We're going to bomb the hell out of them if they violate the agreement. I don't want them to. I want them to honor the agreement. Again, the straits close up. Bad things can happen. You know, in war, terrible things happen. Like you mentioned the question before about a school gets hit. Other things get hit. Bad things happen in war. War is a nasty place. I see it. I see it better than maybe anybody has ever seen it.
R
Reporter2:19:21
Go ahead, please. Thank you, President Trump. Oil prices are now plummeting. How do you see this agreement further affecting energy prices in the US and the US economy in the long term? And secondly, Mr. President, how do you think Vice President JD Vance did on The View yesterday?
D
Donald Trump2:19:38
Well, first of all, thank you for the word plummeting because that's what's happening. Oil prices are plummeting and that means oil prices are going to come down. You know, if you make donuts, you have a heating, you have a stove, and you have to buy the heat, you need the gas or the electricity or whatever you're using. And when oil prices come down, oil is the biggest thing. Oil is you get oil prices coming down. And they're going to come down. And we're hitting in the threes now for gasoline. And that'll come down a lot lower. So, I was in Iowa just before this started. And I was saying to myself, I can't believe we're doing so well, but I have to go and we have to put out this fire in Iran because I don't want them using a nuclear weapon. They would have used a nuclear weapon. 100% they would have used it. The only question is, was it going to be that day or that week? They would have used a nuclear weapon. They were on the way. And I said, "We're going to have to put out the fire." And I said, you know, oil prices, so gasoline. We passed two gas stations in Iowa. Made a speech up there. The people are great. I want it by so much. And I love the people, farmers. And we passed two gas stations. One was $1.85, one was $1.91. Now, that's Iowa, but it was I mean, California has all those crazy taxes that they put on, you know, California taxes. But, the oil was down to $2 to I'd say between two and 250. And it was heading down further. And we were going to have a great run. We took a little journey down to a place called the Islamic Republic of Iran and we bombed the hell out of them and now they can never have a nuclear. Now, we had a disturbance, but I must say it was much less than anybody thought. The oil never went to $350 a barrel. It went to 115, 120. The oil never went anywhere near that. And the other thing, I thought the stock market would go down 25 or 30%. The stock market a week ago before we started this was higher than it was when we started, which tells you that we have a very resilient economy. We have the strongest economy we've ever had. Now, the word affordability, it's a fake word made up by the Democrats. Here's where it's fake. Because they made it up because I inherited these prices. And when I had my first news conference, first day, they started screaming affordability. The Democrats, affordability, affordability, they're screaming. I say, "What's that all about?" They gave it to me. They gave it to me. It's affordability. And they use that word to a fairly well. Well, they were the ones that created the affordability crisis. I'm the one that got it down. Remember, highest insurance rates in history. Highest rates for everything. Eggs. Remember eggs? They were four times more expensive than they were in my administration. And I got it down, Peter, very quickly. Our secretary did a good job of agriculture. Brooke, she did a great job with eggs and everything else. And now that the oil is coming down, you're going to see everything follow. Everything follows the cost of energy. And we're going to end up having the lowest energy anywhere in the world. Please.
R
Reporter2:22:56
Yeah.
D
Donald Trump2:22:58
No, please. Thank you.
You're from ABC. You're fake news. Go ahead.
R
Reporter2:23:03
To follow up on oil, can you confirm will Iran be able to immediately sell their oil to market? And will US sanctions snap back immediately if there is a delay or collapse in the talks? And then relatedly, is there any safeguard in this deal to prevent Iran from charging what they say could be fees after the 60-day extension?
D
Donald Trump2:23:26
The thing that's going to stop them from doing that because you can't cover everything in a document is common sense. They don't want to get bombed. They don't want to get hit. As far as sanctions are concerned, at some point, you know, we have sanctions which will never let them rebuild. They would have no money. They would be in poverty. The 91 million people would starve. So, something will happen as soon as they behave. When they behave, we're going to let that go. We're going to have to I'd put sanctions on a lot of people and then let them go. A lot of countries. Yeah. Please.
R
Reporter2:23:56
Thank you, Mr. President. My name is Shinja. I'm a Japanese newspaper company from the Washington correspondent. My question is about the spirit of homes. Did you ask other G7 nations to send military force and what specifically are you asking of Japan or...
D
Donald Trump2:24:15
Where are you from?
R
Reporter2:24:16
I'm from Japan.
D
Donald Trump2:24:17
From where?
R
Reporter2:24:18
Japan. And is...
D
Donald Trump2:24:21
I just left your prime minister. Japan's doing very well. She's my biggest fan. I have to tell you. She thinks I did a great job. You have to call her and ask her.
She's doing a very good job, by the way. Go ahead.
R
Reporter2:24:34
And military support is no longer necessary.
D
Donald Trump2:24:37
What do you want to know?
Go ahead. Just tell me what do you want to know?
R
Reporter2:24:40
Okay. My question is, did you ask other G7 nations to send military force? And what specifically are you asking of Japan? To send the air force for what?
D
Donald Trump2:24:53
Who asked any country to send military?
R
Reporter2:24:57
Oh, other countries, not just Japan.
D
Donald Trump2:25:00
No, no, I don't need. We don't need it. Oh, by the way, they all want to do it. They all want to do it. Every single one of them. They want to go be a part of it now. Not while the war was going on. I was really disappointed. The UK, I said, "It would be nice if you..." I didn't put a hard sell on, but I said, "It'd be nice if you send some ships." And the prime minister said, "They'll be there, sir, as soon as the war is over." I said, "Did he just say that?" I couldn't believe it, actually. Japan has offered to get involved. But I mean, I'll be honest, Japan was not willing to get involved during the war. I asked her, I said, "You want to get involved a little bit?" I didn't put the heavy sell on, but they said, "No, we don't want to get involved." Nobody did. We did it ourselves with Israel and with the Arab states that got hit. Surprisingly hit. Yeah.
R
Reporter2:25:55
Mr.
D
Donald Trump2:25:58
Yes, please go ahead.
R
Reporter2:26:01
Thanks a lot, Mr. President. Question on Brazil. I would like to know how was your interaction here in Avian during the G7 with the Brazilian president Lula. Did you talk about the new US tariffs on Brazil? Did you talk about the US designation of criminal gangs as terrorist? How was it?
D
Donald Trump2:26:24
I spent a lot of time with him actually and it's become a little rough country, right? Politically, it's been a little dangerous politically. You're talking about Brazil? Yeah. It's been nasty. I hear they arrested somebody that's running for office today. I found that out after we left. I just said goodbye to him and I heard that they arrested the Bolsonaro Jr. He was doing well in the polls and they arrested him because he made a statement in Texas. They arrested him or they want to arrest him. They have something out for his arrest. Right. They play pretty tough, but nobody plays tougher than the United States. Look, our elections are totally rigged. We have rigged elections.
R
Reporter2:27:12
Please in the back. Yes, sir. Go ahead.
Thank you so much, President.
D
Donald Trump2:27:18
Thank you.
R
Reporter2:27:19
Sakamoto as for G7, the concept of the rule of law has long been considered the core principle. During this summit, any of the leaders expressed any concerns on the possible violation of international law on the attack on Iran?
D
Donald Trump2:27:42
No. No. Actually the opposite. They felt they were very dangerous. They were very relieved because they could get hit too. They were very relieved. No, we never discussed that. No, it would be the opposite. They broke the law. They killed thousands of people. They killed thousands of our soldiers and hundreds of thousands of people. Yeah, please go ahead.
R
Reporter2:28:03
Go ahead.
Okay.
Mr. President.
D
Donald Trump2:28:13
Yes.
R
Reporter2:28:13
Yesterday the Pakistan for the Chinese government to help make a peace talk between Iran and the United States. So what do you think about China's work to get the United States and Iran sitting down to talk and make the deal? And the second question is...
D
Donald Trump2:28:30
Okay. Okay. Let me answer the question.
R
Reporter2:28:32
Okay.
D
Donald Trump2:28:32
So I think China's been terrific. I told you that before. They could have been bad. They could have sent in to try and block or break the blockade. They could have sent in an oil ship with six destroyers alongside of it on each side. They didn't do that. President Xi helped me. He tried to help and I think he probably helped get it solved. You know, they get 50% of their oil from that location. So, that wasn't that easy. President Xi was fantastic. He tried to help me solve it. And he didn't give any big weaponry. I guess something we'll find something somewhere along line, but he didn't give any big weaponry. I can tell you that. No, I think China was I couldn't ask for much more. Again they were impacted because they get more than 50% of their oil from the Hormuz Strait and no I thought they were fantastic. Okay.
How about one more question right here? Go ahead, please.
R
Reporter2:29:30
The latest YouGov Economist poll shows that Democrats have lost a five-point edge on the generic congressional ballot. They just have now just a two-point lead since February. Do you think that they're losing momentum?
D
Donald Trump2:29:42
Well, I see the Republicans in generics. You know, generics are very important. I don't know how accurate because I see a lot of bad polls. Polls are very dishonest, just like a lot of reporters like these people over here are very dishonest. CNN, ABC, it's a whole group of them over there. They're really dishonest people. But, you know, and really networks are very dishonest and they have to straighten themselves out or they're not going to be very successful because people don't believe them anymore. But no, the generics are very interesting because the Republicans are coming up strong even before this. You know why they're seeing all these lunatics like the guy in Maine with the swastika sticker. You know, for 10 years they've been calling me a Nazi and now they have a Nazi running. He's got a tattoo on him. I've been denying it for 10 years. They know it's not so. But they've been calling I don't think they could call it to me anymore. You know, one more. One more. Go ahead, Peter. Let me finish with Peter because he's been better to me than he's been to Biden.
R
Reporter2:30:45
Thank you, President Trump. I have a question about this weekend. Why not stick around for the signing ceremony with this Iran peace deal?
D
Donald Trump2:30:54
I might.
R
Reporter2:30:55
You might.
D
Donald Trump2:30:55
Yeah, I might. But I'd rather. This is a memorandum of understanding. It's very important, but it might not be the kind of a document that I should be signing. There's some element to this where you send the vice president. If it works out, great. You look like a genius for sending him. And if it doesn't work out, it's the vice president's...
R
Reporter2:31:19
I like that idea. Sure. What? This way. If it works out, I'm going to take the credit. If it doesn't work out, I'm blaming JD. You better be careful, JD. He's going to turn his plane around and get the hell out of here. Yeah. I like that idea. I think it's a good idea. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
U
Unknown2:31:38
All right, we have been listening to President Trump's news conference on the final day of the G7 summit in France. The president spoke for over an hour claiming that the Iran agreement will be signed shortly, potentially tomorrow or Friday. He said that he has sent a copy to Israel. The president also saying that maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz has increased substantially but warning that if a deal isn't done in 60 days the US will, in his words, go back to bombing. The president though not providing all that much substance in the details of this agreement between the United States and Iran. He also said that he does not think at this point that it's necessary for him to sign this document, although he did leave open the possibility that that may occur. Let's bring in NBC News senior White House correspondent Gabe Gutierrez. He is in Geneva right now traveling with the president. So Gabe, at the same time that this was happening, we also had some other news happening as senior White House officials outlined the details of this agreement between Iran and the United States. You were on that call. It was embargoed. We were not allowed to report it until the president was done speaking. Talk to us a little bit about what you learned in that call because this is the most substance that we've gotten yet in terms of this deal.
Ryan, it truly was remarkable to hear senior US officials speaking about the details of this memorandum of understanding simultaneously when the president was holding his news conference. But you're right, a senior US official actually read the text of this memorandum of understanding aloud on this call and I'm going through it now. What I can tell you is that the main point that the administration wants to emphasize is that Iran as part of this MOU has agreed not to produce nor procure a nuclear weapon. Of course, that was something that Iran had previously agreed to under previous agreements under the one signed under the Obama administration that it would only have its nuclear program for civilian purposes. But along with what we've been hearing with the administration when it comes to reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending the US naval blockade, some of the most controversial points here will be 10. By the way, this memorandum of understanding, senior US officials confirmed, does have 14 points. 10 it says the United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil petroleum products and derivatives. So basically the thing that will kick in immediately once this is formally signed is sanctions relief for Iran. That has drawn widespread skepticism from even some of the president's allies, some Republicans who are concerned that you're essentially rewarding Iran upfront. A senior US official on this call defended the sanctions relief by saying that essentially they'll be able to keep better track of any oil that Iran is selling to other countries, that'll have more visibility for it. And that's the defense that the administration gave. 1 the US also undertakes to make more fully available the use of frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Now such funds whether retained to the original counter transferred should be made shall be made fully usable for payment to any beneficiary designed by the central bank of Iran. So basically, Ryan, the administration is laying out for the first time, reading this 14-point plan, this memorandum of understanding that it claims that some of its points will only be given to Iran and act as rewards if they fully uphold their commitments as part of this memorandum of understanding. But Ryan, this might be seen by people who are hardliners here that the US is giving up too much to Iran upfront. The administration is arguing no, that is not the case. That this is only setting up this 60-day window to talk about specifics of the nuclear program. But again, we are learning for the first time the specifics of this 14-point plan that senior US officials read on this call just as the president was speaking.
Yeah. And Gabe, let's drill down on that because when you talk about the potential of criticism that could come particularly from Iran hawks, these are supporters of the president, supporters of his plan to invade Iran. One of the huge criticisms of the JCPOA, which was the original agreement that the Obama administration had hatched, was a similar provision, the unfreezing of existing Iranian assets. It wasn't necessarily direct payments from the United States government to Iran. That was heavily criticized by Donald Trump at the time. It's been heavily criticized by the administration even before this conflict began. But it does seem as though that's exactly what they are planning to do this time around in terms of bringing this deal. It's not about the United States handing over US dollars, but it's about unfreezing assets that already belong to Iran.
Right. And look, that is a criticism that we do expect to hear in the coming days as this memorandum of understanding is dissected. But what the administration is trying to argue is that it's only if Iran meets certain benchmarks although it hasn't specified what those benchmarks are. The president today in his news conference that he just had and also previous events throughout the day at the G7, he tried to argue that he is very willing to resume bombing Iran if it doesn't uphold its commitments if he's not happy with how this is implemented. Ryan.
Okay, Gabe Gutierrez, thank you for your reporting and thanks for being on that call. Let's go now to our chief White House correspondent, Garrett Hake. He is traveling with the president. He was in the room. And Garrett, let's talk about the question that you asked President Trump, which I think is a significant part of this. He has been insistent that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. But one of the key sticking points here was would he allow a nuclear program of any kind to allow them to generate power or use it for their own domestic needs. You pressed him on that and I think his answer was pretty revealing. Give us your take.
Yeah, I think so too, Ryan. And he didn't say no. I mean look overall I found the president to be incredibly conciliatory toward Iran both in tone and in specific content. It sounded at times like he was making a pitch for investment in Iran more than describing a document which ends a war that he believes the US was victorious in. On nuclear enrichment or on the idea of having a nuclear program, he did not say that they couldn't do it. He suggested that he doesn't think it's necessary but he didn't say no. He basically said it would come down to common sense. Likewise, before that, I asked him about Iran's ballistic missile program. Remember, one of the four goals of Operation Epic Fury, which we heard from White House officials and the president dozens and dozens of times, was to destroy Iran's ballistic missiles and their capabilities to make more. Now, the president says not only is that off the table. He thinks Iran should be able to keep ballistic missiles because their neighbors have them. He told me that they won't perhaps have as many as some of their neighbors, but he's not going to go about destroying them or even arguing that they should be decommissioned or removed. That's probably not going to sit particularly well with Gulf Arab allies in this conflict or with Israel, which I think is another subplot from this whole press conference here that the president who at the beginning described Israel as a joint partner continued for the second day in a row now to really strongly criticize Israel and the manner in which they've conducted their own war against Hezbollah in Lebanon. And so I think really for people who were if you sort of jumped from February till now, this could be considered head spinning the degree in which the president was now sounding conciliatory about Iran and their future and condemning the tactics of Israel who started this conflict as our day one joint venture partner as the president described it.
Yeah. And I wonder too, Garrett, just your overall impression about the way the president has described this agreement, this kind of path forward. A couple of days ago, the White House was basically declaring that this was the end of the war. Now, it seems as it's edited, it's kind of entering into a new maybe more solid ceasefire. It doesn't seem to nearly have the same sort of concrete declaration of the end of the war that maybe it had a few days ago.
Yeah, not at all. Ryan, I found the president had sort of a lack of emotional connection to this ceasefire. I mean, he said really two things out loud that, you know, conspiracy theorists or skeptics have kind of mumbled about or talked about online. First, that, you know, part of the reason he responds the way he does to some of these things is for the markets that the stock market always reacts favorably when he talks about a peace deal as opposed to threatens more bombing. He said he's well aware of that fact and it clearly influenced some of the way that he's talked about this deal. Second, right there at the end, he said, you know, what a lot of people have sort of been whispering about this idea that if things go well, he'll take the credit. If it goes poorly, he'll blame JD Vance and resume the bombing. There was not a question asked, and I think it's one of the outstanding ones that we still have, is, you know, when do the American military forces that are arrayed around Iran get to come home? Are they going to be sitting there for months and months and months on end to ensure compliance here? Because the compliance structure, as the president described it, is basically more bombing at a time and place of his choosing. That doesn't say to me the war is over. That says to me the ceasefire is extended. The president wants to keep the talks and the stock market rally alive.
All right, Garrett Hake, terrific work inside the room. And that leads us to that topic about military intervention and how long the military could be in the region. Let's bring in our senior Pentagon correspondent, Courtney Kube. So as Garrett said, Courtney, we heard the president say that the US could still bomb Iran if it doesn't adhere to the agreement. What does that say about the military posture and what could it look like moving forward? I would imagine it doesn't mean that these ships are coming home anytime soon.
Yeah, it doesn't seem like anything is going to happen while the US and Iran continue this, I guess, next phase of negotiations for some sort of a final agreement, but there is tucked inside of this what the senior administration officials released that Gabe was referencing. Tucked in there is a reference to the fact that the US military will draw back its presence from the region. That is a very vague statement, Ryan. It's not really clear if that means you can see, look on set on screen right there. You see this map here, the USS George HW Bush carrier strike group in the Abraham Lincoln, they're down at sort of the base of the Gulf of Oman there. They've been reinforcing the naval blockade that will immediately be lifted once this final agreement is signed on Friday, according to what we now have learned from senior administration officials. It's not clear though, will they just pull back a little bit during the course of these final negotiations, or are we talking about decreasing the overall US military presence in the region? I bring that up because this has been something that Iran has wanted for decades. One of the arguments that they have had for getting involved in wars like the war in Iraq and providing funding and training and money to these proxy groups is with an ultimate goal of pushing the US out of the region. If in fact they have attained that from this agreement, that would be a huge strategic win for Iran overall. Couple other things. Gabe spoke about the sanctions relief that would immediately kick in. Again the naval blockade that's been in effect now for weeks that according to this latest memorandum of understanding will also immediately lift that naval blockade. Just for perspective here, the US has turned around more than 140 ships during the course of that blockade and they have disabled at least nine meaning they have taken strikes, shot Hellfires and other munitions into the engine room of a number of these ships to disable them when they appear to be in violation of the blockade. There was one case recently where the US fired on a ship that had a crew of Indian civilians on an Indian mariners and at least three were killed. We heard from President Trump met with Indian Prime Minister Modi this morning. There was no mention of that but that has become a diplomatic issue between the two countries. Another thing that deals with the US military as part of this agreement is the US and Iran will ensure that maritime traffic will be back at pre-war levels within about 30 days and then it mentions that there is the possibility that Iran could have placed mines in the Strait of Hormuz that could impact that timeline. Well, we know according to officials we've been speaking with on a near daily basis just trying to keep sense of whether Iran has placed mines that the US hasn't been finding them. They've not been pulling them out of the water. But there are still traffic lanes, maritime lanes throughout that Strait of Hormuz that the US has not been able to clear. So that still could be an issue going forward. Notably in the language, it talks about the possibility of Iran demining some of those traffic lanes. The US destroyed all of Iran's mining vessels. So, I'm not really sure how Iran could accomplish that or they would look to the US and potentially other partners as President Trump talked about other nations being willing to be involved in the Strait of Hormuz going forward. Finally, the other thing that I was really struck by in this Ryan is President Trump talking about missiles. Garrett touched on that. It was based off of his question. I was really struck by the fact that the president said missiles aren't the problem here. You'll recall that early on, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, he gave this explanation for why the US was engaged in this war, arguing that the Iranian conventional shield, including missiles and drones, provided an opportunity for Iran to potentially pursue a nuclear weapon. So basically, Iran could build a nuclear weapon and use their conventional shield of ballistic missiles and drones and other capabilities to defend against any kind of threat to that nuclear program going forward. One of the main reasons that they went in allegedly was to destroy that missile program, to destroy the drone program. It is very very notable to hear President Trump go back on that point. Now, that was one of the most coherent arguments that we got early on from the Trump administration about why the US or how they believed that they could really disrupt any kind of a nuclear program was by going after Iran's conventional capabilities. It now appears that they have backed off of that as one of their strategic goals here, Ryan.
Okay, terrific context from everything. Courtney, thank you for all of that. Let's go to the region now and get a sense of what the response is there. We'll bring in NBC News foreign correspondent Matt Bradley. He's in Tel Aviv. So Matt, the one thing that we haven't talked about in the context of this after hearing from the president and getting the details of this memorandum of understanding is how Israel plays into this. We only know that Israel was now has access to this document, which they didn't initially. And we still know that this conflict that they are engaged in with Lebanon continues to be a lingering issue. How could that impact the way things are where you're standing now? And should we expect that this means the conflict with Lebanon and Israel will also come to an end soon?
Yeah. Yeah, I mean it's one of the gaping flaws to everything that has led up to this announcement, these negotiations, and now this memorandum of understanding is that Israel, which had participated and some would say had led the effort to start this fight against Iran back in late February, that they were nowhere to be seen during the negotiations. There were several days until apparently just tonight that the Israelis were actually given a copy of this memorandum of understanding. It doesn't sound like they're going to be participating in the signing ceremonies tomorrow or Friday. I've reached out to the prime minister's office right after we heard President Trump say that he had given over a copy of that MOU to the Israelis. They said that there's been no real change in that situation. So, it sounds as though they haven't heard that the Israeli side has been given a copy of the MOU. What we've heard from the president tonight is enough to really rankle a lot of Israelis who had been investing a lot in this war. We heard from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who has been facing terrible criticism over the past several weeks about what looks like the fate of a joint American and Israeli effort that now looks like Israel has been the big loser. The real flaw here is that while Prime Minister Netanyahu had very little involvement in any of these negotiations, he is in the best position out of anybody to completely undermine and destroy this ceasefire even before it emerges across the region. It's because of the fighting in Lebanon that this ceasefire has been stillborn on several occasions over the past couple months and weeks. We heard President Trump taking Prime Minister Netanyahu to task, calling him on some occasions expletives and just today basically very gently, more so than he had over in the past couple of days, chiding the prime minister for the way that the Lebanese military has been fighting in Lebanon against Hezbollah and once again ruminating that the leader of Syria might be able to do a better job. But it's those questions of ballistic missiles that we heard from Garrett that really is going to vex so many Israelis who faced all of that retribution from Iran in the form of those ballistic missiles over the past year.
Okay, Matt Bradley in Tel Aviv. Thank you for that. Let's quickly go back to senior White House correspondent Gabe Gutierrez in Geneva. And to Matt's point, Gabe, based on what you heard as the administration outlined the details in this memorandum of understanding, how could it impact Israel?
Well, certainly Ryan, look, I asked the senior US official on this call specifically about Israel and this idea that Prime Minister Netanyahu had not been given the text of this memorandum of understanding. This senior official said that Netanyahu had not asked for it, but that the Israelis had been briefed on all of this throughout the process. So, it may be a technicality. Maybe they didn't send the exact text of the agreement, but according to this US official, Israel was briefed. Now, Matt was right that President Trump has been increasingly frustrated with Prime Minister Netanyahu and has taken him to task for his handling of the Lebanon situation, but this US official said that the Israelis were somewhat on board and while they were skeptical, they were looking forward to what the US was able to accomplish here.
Okay, Gabe Gutierrez in Geneva, thank you so much for that and thank you so much for joining us for this live coverage of President Trump's press conference at the end of the G7 summit. You get more coverage ahead on NBC News Now. I'm...