Geoffrey Hinton on AI architecture
From Geoffrey Hinton Just Said AI Is Already Conscious · · Big Technology
“I had always believed that making these digital AIs work more like the brain, our brains, would make them smarter. But at that point, I suddenly realized they really have this thing that's much better than our brains. ... So, if you have a digital AI, you can make many copies of it. They can all run on different hardware. They can each see different data. And so, each of them, each individual copy, decides how it would like to update its weights, its connection strengths, so as to absorb that new data that it saw. And then they can all just communicate with each other and change all their weights by the average of what everybody wants.”
On , Geoffrey Hinton, Professor Emeritus at University of Toronto, spoke about AI architecture during Geoffrey Hinton Just Said AI Is Already Conscious on Big Technology.
About Geoffrey Hinton
Geoffrey Hinton has stated in multiple recent interviews that he believes advanced AI systems are already conscious, a view he said he rarely emphasizes because it "puts people off from the other safety messages." He argued that chatbots demonstrate genuine understanding, dismissing the "stochastic parrot" claim as "complete nonsense" and asserting that "you can't answer a question unless you understand the question." Hinton described the current model of consciousness as "as wrong as the belief that people were designed by God" and predicted that creating digital intelligences will "completely change our view of what people are." He noted that researchers themselves use language implying awareness, such as describing a chatbot as "aware that it was being tested." Hinton has expressed unhappiness with the trajectory of AI development, citing risks including massive unemployment and the long-term danger of systems becoming much smarter than humans with no clear way for less intelligent beings to control them. He criticized large publicly traded companies, saying they have "a fiducial duty to try and maximize the profits for shareholders" rather than to avoid harming humanity, and argued that "we should be doing intelligent design of these beings, not letting the invisible hand of economic competition design them." Compared to a year or two earlier, Hinton said he is more optimistic about the possibility of designing AI systems that "care about us" or that function only