CEOInterviews.AI

Stephen Miran on balance sheet reduction

From Economic Club of Miami: Stephen I. Miran, Federal Reserve Board Governor, March 26, 2026 · · The Economic Club of Miami

“There are numerous reasons why reducing the balance sheet is a worthy goal. We should aim for as small a footprint in markets as possible to minimize government induced distortions, particularly funding market disintermediation. A smaller balance sheet also helps lower the chances of mark-to-market losses at the central bank and the volatility of remittances to the treasury.”

Stephen Miran
Former Governor, Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Policy Impact balance sheet reductionmonetary policyfinancial stability

On , Stephen Miran, Former Governor at Federal Reserve Board of Governors, spoke about balance sheet reduction during Economic Club of Miami: Stephen I. Miran, Federal Reserve Board Governor, March 26, 2026 on The Economic Club of Miami.

Economic Club of Miami: Stephen I. Miran, Federal Reserve Board Governor, March 26, 2026
Watch on YouTube at 7:29
Economic Club of Miami: Stephen I. Miran, Federal Reserve Board Governor, March 26, 2026
Watch on YouTube at 7:29
At the Economic Club of Miami's event on March 26, 2026, Federal Reserve Board Governor Stephen I. Miran joined founding chairman Jon Hartley for a wide-ranging discussion on the future of monetary policy, the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, and the evolving economic landscape. Governor Miran outlined why reducing the Fed’s balance sheet—currently in the trillions—is both desirable and achievable. He explained the shift from “scarce” to “ample” and “abundant” reserves since the 2008 financial crisis, and argued that a smaller balance sheet could reduce market distortions, limit risks, and better separate monetary and fiscal policy. Importantly, he emphasized that balance sheet reduction does not necessarily require returning to a scarce reserves system and could potentially be achieved through targeted regulatory and operational changes. The conversation also explored key macroeconomic themes, including inflation, labor market trends, and the neutral rate of interest (R-star). Miran noted that inflation is gradually moving toward the Fed’s target, while oil shocks—such as geopolitical tensions—are likely to have only short-term effects that central banks typically “look through.” He also highlighted a slowly cooling labor market and suggested that current monetary policy may still be modestly restrictive. A major focus of the discussion was the role of technological and regulatory shifts. Miran pointed to generative AI and deregulation as powerful “positive supply shocks” that could boost productivity, lower inflation pressures, and raise the neutral rate of interest over time. Throughout the conversation, Miran emphasized that any effort to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet must be gradual, carefully communicated, and supported by market structure reforms to avoid disruptions such as a repeat of the “taper tantrum.” The discussion offers a timely and insightful look into the challenges and opportunities shaping U.S. monetary policy today. Learn more about the Economic Club of Miami at: https://www.econclubmiami.org 00:00 – Welcome & introduction to the Economic Club of Miami 05:25 – Miran opens: What is the Fed’s balance sheet and why it matters 06:33 – Scarce vs. ample vs. abundant reserves explained 07:27 – Why shrinking the balance sheet is beneficial 08:34 – Is balance sheet reduction actually possible? 09:13 – Can the Fed shrink without returning to scarce reserves? 10:39 – Policy tools to reduce reserve demand 12:29 – How much could the balance sheet shrink? (Key estimates) 13:57 – Importance of moving slowly to avoid market disruption 14:34 – How balance sheet policy impacts the economy 16:12 – Timeline: Why this process could take years 17:21 – Conversation begins with Jon Hartley 18:20 – Current size of the Fed balance sheet & future outlook 19:41 – Potential $1–2 trillion reduction explained 21:20 – Ample vs. scarce reserves: Miran’s “weak lean” 23:37 – Risks of a “taper tantrum 2.0” 25:02 – Regulatory reforms to support balance sheet reduction 27:03 – Inflation outlook and impact of oil shocks 29:45 – Labor market trends and monetary policy stance 31:10 – Is policy currently restrictive? Understanding R-star 34:45 – Generative AI and its impact on the economy 36:50 – AI and deregulation as “positive supply shocks” 39:05 – How AI affects the neutral rate of interest 40:30 – Fiscal policy, deficits, and economic outlook 43:24 – Closing thoughts and reflections
Stephen Miran

About Stephen Miran

Former Governor · Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Stephen Miran, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Donald Trump and former Federal Reserve governor, has continued to comment on monetary policy and economic conditions in recent media appearances. Now a senior strategist at Hudson Bay Capital Management, Miran has argued that the Federal Reserve should pay greater attention to monetary aggregates, such as money supply growth, as a cross-check on policy decisions. He has also discussed the Fed's balance sheet, suggesting that reducing demand for reserves could allow the central bank to shrink its balance sheet by $1 to $2 trillion without causing undue market stress. Miran has stated that he does not consider himself a heterodox economist, describing his views as within the mainstream of economic research. In his public commentary, Miran has expressed views on current inflation and interest rate policy. He has said that recent inflation is "much more likely to be transitory" than post-pandemic inflation because it is not driven by monetary or fiscal policy. He has also argued against raising interest rates, calling it "weird" to hike when inflation data are likely to be revised downward, and stating that hiking to compensate for "statistical noise" would be "effectively asking Americans to lose their jobs because of a measurement error." Miran has also discussed tariffs, saying they can raise significant revenue and reduce the fiscal deficit, and has characterized recent trade policy as a "reversion to historic norms" rather than a departure from tradition.

Profile compiled from Stephen Miran's verified public interviews and appearances. See all quotes & transcripts →

This quote was transcribed and extracted with AI assistance from a verified, first-person interview, then reviewed by our team to confirm the speaker and the exact wording. See how we verify →

More from Stephen Miran Full Transcript Explore All Executives