Interviewer5:45
Well, I think there's two things I would say with respect to that. I think ePO was a little bit different. ePO was very self-serving to McAfee at the time, but it was also very value-add to our customers and it was actually value to the ecosystem. ePO actually made a lot of those connected frameworks and that connected ecosystem of tools better as a result of being better managed, better orchestrated, better automated, and all that kind of stuff. I don't see anything inside the center of other people's platforms making anybody else better. There's way too self-serving. That's an interesting point, because there were 12 companies in the SIA, right? This Security Innovation Alliance we called it. Probably 30 or 40 of them were truly well integrated. And to your point, they had their own management tools, but they just perhaps weren't that good, or they didn't have the deployment or the scale. And what ePO gave them was actually a good thing to go and make themselves be more valuable for their prospects. That's right. And what it gave McAfee was a hot bed of companies to acquire, because they already did the work to integrate with ePO. It was a farm league for technology. Yeah, it's fantastic. And the customers that were using those disparate tools got value out of the integration. It made that disparate tool better, it made that disparate tool connected, it allowed data sharing, console integration, data integration, all those different things that they seek and desire. It was a great framework, and it's stood a bit of the test of time. What's a bigger waste of money: the Cyber truck or a booth at Black Hat?