Back
Matthias Zieschang
Chief Financial Officer, Fraport AG

CFO Zieschang: „Fraport wird eine Free-Cashflow-Maschine werden“

🎥 Nov 12, 2023 📺 FINANCE Magazin ⏱ 11m
Der Flughafenbetreiber schiebt aktuell Brutto-Finanzschulden von 11 Milliarden Euro und einen Leverage von fast 7x Ebitda vor ...
Watch on YouTube
Transcript (19 segments)
H
Host0:00
Paul T and the entire team of FPS finance people solutions, your partner for filling CFO and management positions in the finance department, present finance TV.
Welcome, dear viewers, to a new edition of finance TV. There are many companies that will be affected by the turnaround, and one of the most affected is here with us today, represented by the CFO. We are talking about the airport operator Fraport, and our guest is an old acquaintance of ours: Dr. Matthias Zieschang, CFO of the Year 2020, and has been on finance TV several times. Hello, Mr. Zieschang, thank you for being here.
Today we will go through the entire balance sheet, a lot of numbers. First question: how relaxed can you live with a net debt of almost 8 billion euros and a leverage of 6.8 times EBITDA? Deeply relaxed? Deeply relaxed?
M
Matthias Zieschang1:11
Yes, because we simply managed it well. The banks' leverage is textbook too high, but that's due to Corona and expansion. We communicated that accordingly, and the market accepts it. So refinancing in terms of volume and price is not an issue at all. That's why I live deeply relaxed. Corona is more or less over, earnings are almost back to where they were before, investments are still running for a few more years, and the end is in sight. One thing that is central is the expansion of Terminal 3 in Frankfurt. You recently said that you will have a cash outflow of just over 2 billion euros until the project is completed.
H
Host2:00
Then you also have a major expansion program in Lima. How much cash outflow is still planned for the other expansion programs besides T3 in the coming years?
M
Matthias Zieschang3:28
No, not in the existing portfolio. Everything is long-term and financed. The upfront payments were already made in the past. We have to reduce debt absolutely and relatively, which we are doing as planned. Regarding M&A, our appetite is currently modest, but prospectively we will generate large free cash flows. Then we will see if there is something on the international market. You occasionally give sneak peeks of what free cash flow could look like without these expansion programs. You recently said that in 2022, without these expansion programs, you would have achieved free cash flow of half a billion euros. That gives an impression of the debt reduction capacity for the period after the expansion program.
H
Host3:28
Is there still upside potential for the free cash flow from that half a billion euros?
M
Matthias Zieschang4:19
Yes, definitely. Clear guidance, we repeat like a mantra: in 2025 we will reach break-even on free cash flow. Then we will have an EBITDA of about 1.5 billion, and investments will still be around 1 billion because T3 is still being built. Then we have about 300 million in interest, which roughly balances out. But then prospectively from 2026 onwards, the capex level will drop to the mentioned 400 million. EBITDA will march towards 2 billion by the end of the decade, and we will pay about 400 million in interest. The difference is about 1 billion, which is the perspective for free cash flow generation. After the expansion, Fraport will be a free cash flow generating machine.
H
Host5:11
Let's put that in the context of the debt figures. You currently have gross debt of over 11 billion euros, net debt of 8 billion because you have over 3 billion in cash. You say you will soon become free cash flow positive. Do you need all that liquidity, the over 3 billion, for the remaining capex, or could you already say, with an eye on the interest rate level, that certain maturing financings we will not refinance but pay back from cash and reduce?
M
Matthias Zieschang5:38
First of all, we feel very comfortable with the high liquidity because it carried us through the pandemic. Without these high balances, we would not have survived independently. So it's our life insurance. But as you said, we have the option to reduce these extremely high liquidity balances at any time instead of new financing. That's our option, depending on further interest rate developments. But at the moment, with about 3.7 billion in liquidity, we feel very comfortable. However, we will certainly reduce the high liquidity when the free cash flow turns positive.
H
Host6:15
Let's talk about interest costs. In 2022, you had net interest expenses of 260 million euros, which was about a quarter of your EBITDA. But from next year to 2030, maturities of between 1 and 1.5 billion euros are due each year, and you certainly won't be able to maintain your current average interest rate of 2.6%. As the CFO looking ahead, what increase in interest costs do you expect in the medium term due to the refinancings?
M
Matthias Zieschang6:44
You named the figure. Currently we pay an average of 2.6% on the 11 billion gross debt. But if we go to the market today, our credit rating hasn't changed. We have a BBB+ rating from the Bundesbank, solid investment grade, so 180 basis points spread for 7-10 years, so all-in around 5%. That means we are currently rolling over 1 billion per year. We go from 2.6% (in Frankfurt even slightly lower) to 5%, so a delta of 3% on 1 billion costs us an additional 30 million per year. The interesting question is how long the high interest rate level will last. We internally expect that in about 3 years, interest rate relief will come again. We are on the conservative side. So we will have a few years of 30 million higher costs. But we don't have to because we have the option to let liquidity melt away. But that's not the plan. So we have a temporary increase in interest costs, but it doesn't hurt us because we also have 3.7 billion in investments, which are much shorter-term, and the yield curve is inverted. So we have a positive cost of carry. Interest expense goes up, but interest income also goes up, so there is a compensating effect that helps us temporarily. That's why I am deeply relaxed.
H
Host8:16
That question I saved for the end, but I'll bring it forward. As you already indicated, the 2.6% interest costs you can beat in your asset management, meaning you're currently making money on the 3.8 billion? Yes, exactly. If you take the outlook, when I add it up, we are probably at 400-500 million in interest costs, 400 million capex, and you mentioned EBITDA of 1.5 to 2 billion medium-term. That's basically the picture for investors regarding Fraport's debt reduction capacity.
M
Matthias Zieschang8:16
Yes, exactly. If you take the outlook, when I add it up, we are probably at 400-500 million in interest costs, 400 million capex, and you mentioned EBITDA of 1.5 to 2 billion medium-term. That's basically the picture for investors regarding Fraport's debt reduction capacity.
H
Host8:47
Exactly. The business model is always primitive: three levers: EBITDA on one side, capex and interest on the other. The difference is the mentioned 1 billion that we will see at the end of the decade. The shareholders should be happy. But some analysts are skeptical about Fraport. The stock hasn't developed so well. What are the points that investors are currently criticizing or that prevent them from investing in this deleveraging case?
M
Matthias Zieschang9:15
Simply the fact that currently the company is characterized by negative free cash flow. On the other hand, we have the statements of our change. We have a very good track record when it comes to our guidance; we have never deviated. Nevertheless, the situation is what it is. And we are naturally in the same boat as the airlines. They are currently earning very well, but they also have the exposure to ticket prices. We have recession, geopolitical risks. The big question is whether this very comfortable high ticket price level can be sustained going forward. I don't think so. There will be at least a freeze or a partial decline. That would hit the airlines' earnings heavily. The analyst's view is always on the entire industry, with the sawtooth profile of airlines, and airports suffer along with that, even though they have a completely different volatility.
H
Host10:18
Thank you for the context. Finally, I have three questions from finance TV for you, with a request for a very short answer. You know the game. For the first two, I'd like a number. First question: in which year will you start repaying net debt? Second question: at what leverage net debt to EBITDA would you feel completely safe? Third question: which financing channel do you currently find most attractive: bank loans, promissory notes, or bonds?
M
Matthias Zieschang10:18
2026, 4x, promissory notes.
H
Host10:48
Then we won't hear much about how you finance and how much you repay, but you report every quarter. Thank you for taking us through your numbers. It was very number-heavy, but that's what CFO interviews are for. Your message came across clearly. Thank you for your visit, Matthias Zieschang. That's it for finance TV today. Next week we have an exciting show for you. We'll look at a smaller company, MCF Corporate Finance, which has been restructured and bought a debt rise. We'll look behind the scenes of this restructuring. Fewer numbers, more people, but also interesting. I look forward to seeing you again. Until then, we wish you all the best, have a good time, stay healthy, and see you soon.