Back
Kevin Lygo
Managing Director, Media and Entertainment, ITV plc

Meet The Controller: Kevin Lygo, ITV

🎥 Aug 26, 2016 📺 Edinburgh TV Festival ⏱ 52m
Introduction ...
Watch on YouTube
Transcript (77 segments)
H
Host0:01
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Fin Tree and to those of you poor souls who are in the Tinto... clearly Kevin Lygo at the Pentland would have sold out as well. So thank you all very much for coming. Sorry for the overspill. If you need to talk about Kevin, you are indeed in the right place. He is the right man. He's urbane, he's charming, he has a way with words. He's certainly the only TV senior executive who's called this year's MCT tager lecturer odious. Now he may not look like a man under pressure, but when he took over as director of TV ITV six months ago, he inherited ratings at the lowest for two years. Yet ITV had a profit rating of 900 million and some of that profit is down to Kevin himself as head of ITV Studios. He spent five years hoovering up ITV companies and building a production house with a turnover of a billion pounds. Now he's channel controller and he's already talked about the performance of some of those companies today. He talked about that. So what does that mean for the indie sector? We'll be talking about that. We'll be talking about everything from factual entertainment – what is that? Particularly that elusive baking show, cooking show he's looking for. From the love affair that he has with Piers Morgan to the weird and wonderful scheduling and the acquisition of The Voice, a slam dunk hit or as Shane Smith would have it, vapid, vacuous [bleep]. Yeah, um, Kevin, welcome to your Meet the Controller session. You are essentially the newest controller of essentially a big station. It's been a while since we were last here, it's six years. You were director of Channel 4's director of Television. Time for your 500 questions or should that be another time? Um, does director of TV ITV better being director of TV at Channel 4?
K
Kevin Lygo1:47
Oh heavens. Um, it's very different. And yet spookily familiar. No, I look, they're different jobs. The ITV job is a wonderful thing to step into and I'm very glad I had you know a long time – five years at Studios – to prepare myself for this role. No, I think that one sore a view of ITV that perhaps you wouldn't have known from outside. So I can't really compare the jobs. Channel 4 was great, this one's going to be great.
H
Host2:23
That's what we're going to talk about, okay. Um, Britain's biggest commercial broadcaster. Shareholders are kicking – they're very happy, yeah – ratings are down. But does Adam Crozier worry if anyone's watching? He is an inscrutable man and I don't know if he worries or not, really. Have you never asked him? Never said you're making a shedload of money for shareholders but look at those ratings. No, I... we... no. Right, okay. So let me just explain to you that as you know we've done away with any kind of human interaction by hands up. At the session this morning, the leader session, there were very few hands up. I want lots and lots of app questions. I'll take as many as I can through the whole session. App questions come from within here and come from people watching on YouTube. Kevin has lots of views and lots of things and I've got lots of things to ask him. He's also going to show us some of his important work, very important work. Yes, so we definitely want as many app questions as possible. Um, as you know now the way that we are running this is we're asking certain industry people who like to be on the telly what they would ask Kevin. To ask Shane of you... what? God, okay, it's a gotcha. We've brought him along. Shane, let's hear first of all from cracket elain hacket.
E
Elaine Hackett4:04
Hi Kevin, how are you and your team at ITV going to make ITV a little less posh? Too posh to push? Is it? Are you too posh?
K
Kevin Lygo4:15
No, I wouldn't have thought that's the first time I've ever heard that as a criticism of ITV. No, what she's getting at quite rightly is we are the... you know, the keys in the name? The broadcaster. And we want to appeal to everybody for as much of the time as we possibly can. So I really don't know what is downtown a posh program, therefore not mainstream or something. I don't know what you're on about.
H
Host4:44
Well, well, maybe she... let me just run a few past you. As you can tell, I'm very working class. I know, I know. And you love using big words. You used the word 'bantine' this morning. People were so pissed from last night. Did he really say 'bantine'?
K
Kevin Lygo4:57
Well, that's not that unusual a word, is it? I think I used the word 'iconoclast' and put it in a Byzantine context.
H
Host5:02
So right, yeah, let's talk about what's posh. Inside Aspreys, Mr Selfridge, you're about to do Lady Colin Campbell, stately homes, you've done Norland nannies. Right. Is that an irony television or is it because you believe that that's what your audience actually loves?
K
Kevin Lygo5:25
I think some of those things they love if they're good they love them. The lady see is a one-off documentary, strange to pick on. I don't think making shows about stately homes is a sort of elitist thing; it depends how you do it. So no, I am slightly at last surprised by a question that would say that we're too posh. So I think no, that's not a worry I wake up to in the morning.
H
Host5:50
And can you relate to the mainstream audience that you're looking for at ITV? What I mean, it's the whole thing about the DNA. What is the ITV audience?
K
Kevin Lygo5:55
I think so. All my life – I'm genuinely people are always quite surprised but I've sort of never missed an episode of Coronation Street in about 50 years, sad that I am. But no, I think that great heritage, you know, I've been working in television forever, and from Granada and LWT, I think that's the great DNA mix of what makes ITV wonderful and distinctive. There's talk of a sort of Northern sensibility and I think there's some of that from the old Granada days, and I think that's about an honesty. It's about, you know, we joke about heart; certainly in our dramas you see that the more successful ones are definitely more overtly emotional. You can see it through all our programming. I think we are at our best when we're dealing with real issues of people, real emotion. So it's the emotion of Long Lost Family – you can't watch an episode of that not cry at some stage. And if we go back to our soaps, at their best they are properly emotional.
H
Host6:55
So yeah. Well, let's find out how you are going to win more viewers and win viewers back. There will always be a lot of crime-based drama on ITV, there always has been, there always will be. It's a very broad genre in itself, so from soft marle or midi murders through to some gutting thing murder, there's a lot in between. And what I loved about The Durls was the sort of spirit that Simon and I caught of a sort of shad vivra, a family love. It was just, you know, at the end of a hard day or the end of a weekend – that was on a Sunday evening – I thought it was the perfect sort of show for family viewing. And I was delighted that it's there and we've commissioned it for a few more series. So I think it's just a beautiful – I mean, who didn't like The Durls? Don't speak. App questions come in: if I could wave a magic wand for you, what problem would I fix for you at ITV?
K
Kevin Lygo8:22
Oh gosh, actually I've got trouble with my chair leg. No, I suppose it's because you're the right demographic – you have trouble with your legs at that age 60 to 62. Chair legs. Although you don't – your legs? No, my legs are very nice, thank you. The task is the thing about broadcast is sort of an endless job; there's always another problem around the corner. Today's problem you kind of solve and then there's another one. This ongoing thing makes the job so interesting and such a challenge for us all.
H
Host8:59
But the way that you're starting to try and solve that is by bringing in key talent. Your biggest poach, one of your big poaches, was Polly Hill for drama. Is she actually finally getting to work? She started this week, but the license fee payer has been paying for her to sit at home for the last five months. Is that a good use of license payers' money?
K
Kevin Lygo9:24
That's a question for the BBC. No, I don't believe in it. If somebody was leaving me, I'd wish them well and [bleep] off – you can start tomorrow, I don't want to pay you while you're not working here. So I wish she started anyway; she has started now, which is great. The first thing I wanted to do and had to do was get a team around me of people that I thought were the best I could find for these jobs, and I've gone to some familiar people that I've worked with before and some I didn't know Polly at all until now. They've just about all now starting; there are a few more to arrive in Sue Murphy's team. I'm very happy with that. That is the absolute starting point for me, because I'm not going to commission every show and be on every show, so I need people who are trusted, like-minded but happy to argue with me, and help select the shows.
H
Host10:21
So as Jay said, after the scorched earth policy that you left at Channel 4 – yes, my words, not hers – it took her a while to build up her team. Now she's seeing that. So have you gone for people and you haven't got them? I mean, what I heard was that a serious amount of BBC commissioners lifted the phone to you when you got the job. Is that true?
K
Kevin Lygo10:44
Oh, shame on you, Kirsty. Look, I think it was a sign that ITV must be a wonderful place to work that a lot of people wanted to come, and they did. Yes, some people at the BBC – the BBC is always going through some sort of revolution, so it's an unsettling place. I think whenever there's a sort of new surge and a new energy, people think that might be a good place to be. ITV has been on a cycle and it's come to the end of that cycle, and now it's a new one, so people want to be part of that.
H
Host11:14
So what is Polly? Because she's got less – maybe has she got less money to play with than she had at BBC?
K
Kevin Lygo11:19
Oh good heavens, yes. So what are you looking for? What kind of drama? You talk about the emotional heart of drama, and you're not going to be able to afford much, are you? Well, we still make a lot of drama – we make you know 150 hours, much more than I mean I'm saying than what she's not going to be able to bring through the pipeline to 2018. You're looking for 2018, 2019 dramas. Yes, you're looking for a lot of drama, yes, because we've always made a lot of drama and hopefully we always will. We're a commercial broadcaster, so sometimes the money pinches, but we still need 150 odd hours of drama every year. The challenge for Polly will be that the best writers in the country are working for ITV? We're not sort of Channel 4 or the BBC; we're not necessarily a learning slope for people to come through. So we want the best we can find. We want Sally Way writing for us, Russell T Davies, K M – these are the people I hope we can entice to come and do their best work here. But alongside that, there's plenty of room for other writers that are a bit more up and coming, but we're not in the experimental game. Our dramas need to get a large audience, and that tends to suggest experience, track record, people who understand what writing in the mainstream is really about. It's very hard, and that's why there aren't that many huge hits.
H
Host12:52
So is that why ITV has hedged its bets and brought back Cold Feet?
K
Kevin Lygo12:56
I don't think Cold Feet – there's been a lack of success, I think everyone would agree, in non-genre based programming. Crime and period thrive all over the place on BBC and on us. It's interesting that the highest rating dramas just about on ITV are both quite long in the tooth now – Doc Martin and Benidorm – they show no signs of weakening, but they're not crime, they're fun, they're lovely, they're life-enhancing. The Durls in a sense is part of that new wave. Cold Feet was a look back at what really undoubtedly was the sort of leader in this area, and that would have been Cold Feet. The idea of bringing it back, which was Peter's not mine, was they – would you have done it? I don't know actually. I'm probably less inclined to reboot things generally than has been the case. Blankety Blank for a one-off at Christmas is a completely different thing. I would say there's been a lot of it and you do it with much consideration.
H
Host14:12
Because what I was going to say was, all this talk – you know, if we talked about millennials once we've talked about millennials a lot – if there's one thing that's very hard to find, it is a good relationship drama. I remember the first run of This Life, I thought it was fantastic. It's incredibly difficult to get. If you want to get that kind of 30-something thing, you're going to have to do something that Cold Feet did all those years ago for millennials probably. And we want to try that. Are you actively looking for that?
K
Kevin Lygo14:38
No, Polly will be actively looking for that, I think. But there have been attempts at it on both BBC and ITV, and we can't quite remember them because they didn't quite work and they didn't come back. It's a more brutal world. I'll try my damndest, because it's my nature to give things a bit of a chance, but on ITV when things don't work at first, I think the received wisdom would be they're not going to work. This would lead to why historically comedy has never been an enormous part of ITV peak time output. Sitcom – the BBC and Channel 4 have had much richer heritages in that because they take a long time to get right and bed in. We haven't found many successful sitcoms over the years.
H
Host15:31
Well, let's take a question on the app: where is the sixth episode of Coronation Street going to fit in the schedule and with that being there for reduced 30-minute factual opportunities?
K
Kevin Lygo15:41
It's obviously I'm not going to tell you where it's going, but it's going to go in a marvelous place that everyone will be thrilled with. It's going to be a big hammock for other content? It might be. It's not going to come in until much later next year because I wanted to get it absolutely right. One thing is for sure: I can't muck about with Coronation Street. It's the most arguably the most important show on the channel. An extra episode is great if you're a Coronation Street fan as I am, but it needs to be very carefully handled both in the production sense – the complexities of going from five episodes to six is weirdly disproportionate. I'm very fortunate having Kate Oates, the new producer of the street, who has come over from Emmerdale where they've been making six episodes for several years now. So it involves quite a change in production.
H
Host16:34
Quick question on the app: do you think Ruby Solomon could pen some great drama for ITV?
K
Kevin Lygo16:38
No, no, Ruby Solomon? Oh, I wrote a drama and I called myself Ruby Solomon and it tanked. It didn't tank at all, it was one of the great dramas of our time. But yeah, enough.
H
Host16:53
Okay, we can take now a question from the video wall. That comes from head of documentaries at STV Productions, Mick Mavo.
M
Mick Mavo17:03
Hi Kevin, how important is factual going to be in the new ITV schedule and how do you see it evolving over the next year?
K
Kevin Lygo17:12
So you know, factual's doing pretty well on BBC and Channel 4. A bit of a car crash for you? Not been our greatest thing. To answer the first part of his question, there's going to be more factual because in an era when money is always tighter, when entertainment and drama seems to cost more, you do therefore a bit less of it and factual steps into the breach. Last night was a perfect example – BOV starting with 10 million viewers. This is extraordinary. Factual can deliver audiences that ITV would be delighted with. The challenge for us is to find returning series. It's so obvious – please do it. Find returning shows that we can do at any kind of length that are mainstream hits. We need to be looking everywhere but the traditional successful dramas of cookery, travel, makeover. We haven't got really big hits in this area, and it's important for us to get a lot of those going.
H
Host18:31
So you are looking – you're absolutely fishing for a cooking show?
K
Kevin Lygo18:35
I'm looking for a cooking show. Not at any price, only if we find one we like. I want us to be able to sleep at night that we tried every single producer in the country, looked at every format in the world. But you think you're in the market but you aren't getting the right ideas? No, we've only just put the word out. The word is out. Baking or cooking or barbecuing or sautéing – what do you want? We won't know till we see it. MasterChef, Hell's Kitchen, BOV are very different shows but they're all successful. I can't see why ITV shouldn't have a show like one of those that can do that kind of job and satisfy our audiences and advertisers. That's just one thing. There's talent to look at, formats to go, producers to work with. The word is out. We're looking at a consumer show – ITV hasn't had a consumer show in living memory. The Martin Lewis Money Show is incredibly successful for us, a small show about finance that does 4 million viewers. We need to bury ourselves in these areas to find good stuff.
H
Host20:10
So Thursday night – let's start with Thursday night. It's going to be crime night? All your big crime shows on Thursday. I thought you meant personally. I don't know about Thursday, I've certainly decided that I think – but you want to throw the schedules? Scheduling is scheduling. ITV changing? You're doing different things – for example 500 Questions at night, and 500 Questions going another time? No, that's just sort of [bleep] up. I think what we got to do with the schedule is make it a bit more lively and exciting, at the same time not throwing up the baby with the bathwater, treating shows in the best way. When you have a show that you believe in – this has come up in other sessions – it's not only some really good shows have not worked because they weren't in the right place, they were up against something too big to shift on another channel. We've got to be really careful with shows that we believe could be a proper hit for us, a show that can run and run for years.
K
Kevin Lygo21:23
But you talk about the fact that it's not – generally you're not going to be experimental, you were talking particularly about drama there. But what you're looking for is the alchemy of extraordinary factual offering. Are you prepared to be quite out there about what you put out in factual?
H
Host21:40
Yes, I think so. Look, we're all very experienced professional people who've worked in this area a long time, and we're not going to put something stupid out like Shane suggested. It's about finding shows that we just believe we need. It's a great opportunity for producers at this point – indies that we need so much of this programming, we will be trying many new shows.
K
Kevin Lygo22:08
But you talk about the fact that it's not factual, it's factual entertainment, so not straight factual but factual entertainment.
H
Host22:15
Well, I don't know, the difference is so blurred. You can call it what you like – it's factual programming that is popular. That can be documentary, observational documentary, fixed rig, factual entertainment with a format. I don't really get hung up on what it's called. We know what we mean. It stretches from Long Lost Family through to a documentary about a single crime. We've got The Killing of Sad Heartley coming up. It can be all sorts of things. People shouldn't worry about is it factual or fact end – I don't know.
K
Kevin Lygo22:56
Aren't you sending a signal out changing it to be the leader in factual entertainment, as opposed to what?
H
Host23:04
Well, if it's just factual, it's just any program you put on television that has content which is entertaining. Sure. I think entertainment is the key ingredient for factual on ITV. We are unashamedly an entertainment channel, really. Long Lost Family is not flip or cynical; it's really emotional but it's also entertaining. We are entertained by it. That's what I mean. But are we going to do a serious history of the Byzantine Empire? No, we're not. That's sort of specialist factual; we're not so interested in now.
You were also asked for a clip from a show that exceeded all your expectations. What's called the surprise hit clip? There's a lot of crime docs all over the place on ITV, and this first site looked like another one but it rated higher than anything. It's probably bar the old sort of royal or anent deck based documentary – have you done an anent deal? You bet we have. Oh, a deal? No, Christ no. But with factual, I think with Killer Women it was extraordinary. Access to someone who committed a murder who wasn't some sort of demonized person; it was Pier as an entry point into this, and someone who could bridge the Atlantic gap naturally and ask questions that not everybody would ask in a typical blunt effective way. It was riveting, and they were very well made films – nothing trashy about them. That's an indication of what can really work on ITV. Instead of these films often getting lost, our thinking at the moment is: is there a sort of strand, like an old-fashioned way of crime and punishment, where we do a 12-week run in the same place so audiences know exactly where it is and what they're getting? Some might be presented, some not, but the whole thing is a kind of strand. So you know, if it's Thursday or Tuesday or Wednesday, it's a place where you know what you're going to get and we deliver wonderful stories told in this way. For producers in here, if they want to make an offer on crime or whatever and it's about talent, they just have to sign Piers Morgan up for everything.
K
Kevin Lygo25:58
I wouldn't do that because you said yourself talking about modern day crime shows. Is it rhetorically through Trevor McDonald and Piers Morgan? The answer to that rhetorical question now appears to be yes. No, I don't think they do some honestly. In crime, Piers has done three hours out of 50. Both Piers and Trevor have, more Trevor because of his longevity and association with ITV and his stateliness. He does really well, but it's not disconnected with the fact that he's made really good shows going into American prisons or Mafia women. Somehow Trevor is our conduit into this strange world. Piers has done a bit of that as well. The point is shows can be presenter-led but they...
There is European data that looked at the algorithm of the kind of shows that would do very well for ITV. Essentially, there are shows presented by Joanna Lumley about dogs that have a reunion. This is for the audience: please app in with your ideal celeb journey. Janette Cranky goes to the Kremlin was one from a producer. When I came and looked at all the ideas, there was one that was the second worst idea after monkey tennis in the Alan Partridge Show: Joanna Lumley In Search of the Lost Ark of the Covenant. I saw it on a piece of paper and thought, surely we haven't gone that far. But if she could find it, I'll commission it.
H
Host27:50
Let me just check on these. Here's one: does the failure of 500 questions prove the entertainment slant can't play in midweek prime time, or is it just a bit [__] shame on you?
K
Kevin Lygo28:05
It did drop mass, it did drop inheritance from Coronation Street at 2.5 million down to 1.9 million. It was a show that has been around a while, a series of two in America. It was an attempt at copying Millionaire, which was a fantastic show and the glory days of ITV. This one looked a bit derivative to me, felt and smelt like that. I watched it and found it hard to follow. But it was worth a go, and I thought Giles was good. It hasn't finished yet, so let's wait till it's all gone out, but there's no recommission. Playing entertainment midweek is a big thing. That's the shift from Paul with dogs to more midweek traditional shiny floor entertainment. ITV has always done that, from the Des O'Connor show to the midweek podium show. It's bringing a flavor and new people to the channel. For example, we have Harry Hill. TV Burp was a wonderful ITV show, one of the few pure comedy shows that worked well. Harry is a peculiar wonderful talent we wanted to keep hold of. We made a number of pilots and have now commissioned a panel show pre-watershed with Harry, which is an example of what we hope to do more of. With scheduling, the ITV audience plans what they watch, and we want to give them a shot in the arm. I don't think there is such a thing as an ITV audience; we want everybody. I don't like the assumption that the ITV audience is just soap watchers. There are huge amounts of people who don't watch soaps, and we need to appeal to them for advertisers and the channel's feeling.
H
Host31:18
You famously can big brother, you're not afraid of canning things that don't work. The app says: are you the man to finally say enough is enough and pull the plug on X Factor?
K
Kevin Lygo31:28
No, I'm not that man. X Factor is still a wonderful show, an enormous hit. It's a curious thing about entertainment: 10 or 11 years ago, people didn't think about how long it would run, they just made a great show. These shows can run and run. Most high-rating shows on all networks have been around a very long time. That's a good thing, and we embrace it. Part of why I restructured is to have someone like Siobhan Green look after those long-running shows. My job is to hand them on to the successor. They come along so seldom that we must keep them alive and refreshed. X Factor gets 8 million viewers; it's fine. We need to work at it, and a new team can bring energy. This series launched today, going back to basics with Dermot and three familiar judges. It's a winning brilliant format. I think we'll look back at this moment as the golden era of entertainment: The Voice, The Voice Kids, X Factor, Celebrity. These are huge shows that have proved incredibly resilient.
H
Host33:36
So why did the BBC not do well with The Voice? It did okay. Is it more of an ITV show? Is there ITV stardust that can be sprinkled?
K
Kevin Lygo33:49
I don't know. It was a good show and rated highly. It was tough for us to launch shows against it. When Dancing on Ice was cut years ago because it was going down in ratings, nothing we've done has achieved those numbers. TV types can get bored more quickly than the audience. I hadn't watched Dancing on Ice until I came to ITV. It was a lovely family show, brilliantly produced. I wish it had gone on a bit longer.
H
Host34:39
So does that mean, because you now have Saturday takeaway and everything else, you are not looking for more Saturday night entertainment shows?
K
Kevin Lygo34:47
I'm a greedy bastard; you can never have enough. I also think about shows that go before the meat in the sandwich on Saturday night and after it. Earlier evening, what works well? TV Burp, Ninja Warrior have done really well. There's opportunity for slightly cheaper, properly funded family entertainment at 6 or 7pm before the big juggernauts, and then after them, what do we play? They're often over by 9 or 9:30, too early to give up. So finding something that sits after those big emotional talent shows would be very valuable.
H
Host36:06
All right, let's go to our next question from Katie Lander from Fine Strip Productions. Katie Lander: Hi Kevin, if I brought an idea or format to you and you had a similar one from one of your ITV production companies, you'd go with them because you own the IP. What incentive is there for me to bring my best ideas to ITV?
K
Kevin Lygo36:31
A lot of questions are coming in on this. Indies are worried that if you liked a production company, you would have brought them in. Will everything be in ITV Studios? If someone brings a similar format, what would you do? Who do we like best? Which came first? They won't be quite the same. It's in the making: who would do it best? Most of our entertainment is not made in-house, same with drama. We want the best ideas. Never assume someone won't like your idea. There's probably no better platform in the UK for entertainment shows than ITV. If you get a show on ITV, you'll almost certainly get it away elsewhere around the world. It's a wonderful showcase. From my days running studios, you need a show on these main channels to get sales and build your business.
H
Host37:45
But are you seriously saying that you want all these acres of factual programming, but you've also got these production companies that will be tapped up before the rest of the indies because you have to feed them?
K
Kevin Lygo37:58
We don't have to feed them. When you're in those companies, they don't feel they get an easy ride from ITV the broadcaster. I completely accept it can feel that way from the outside. Of course, the holy grail is a show from in-house that we own and control, but that isn't the case. Look at all the shows we've been talking about; the clips I've shown today are all made by independents. That's by luck, not design. We spend hundreds of millions with the independent sector and always will. It's vital for the broadcaster to survive. There's a lot of opportunity, particularly in entertainment and factual.
H
Host38:54
There's enormous scope. You say you're looking for big ratings in factual. To get those figures up, does that mean working particularly with big companies?
K
Kevin Lygo39:04
I don't really have a view. The history of hits tells you they usually come from somewhere you couldn't have spotted. Commissioners and producers get on with some people better than others, and work tends to beget work because you're in more constant dialogue. But we have shows with people who just do one show, and with big companies like Fremantle.
H
Host39:55
The one thing about not having hands up and having the app is that people feel free to be a bit ruder. How few people have to watch Good Morning Britain before you run the test card instead?
K
Kevin Lygo40:07
Good Morning Britain is fine ratings-wise now. It has been the problem child since GMTV stopped, but with Susanna and Piers, it's in really good shape. It's not going down, it's commercially viable, and it's a good show. It's hard to expect the audiences we had 15 years ago. There was a time when it was a real issue, but that's not the case now. It's not the butt of people's jokes anymore.
H
Host40:53
On the app, we're getting tons of the same question: do you want BBC off ITV itself? I prefer EastEnders.
K
Kevin Lygo41:03
4 million these days is a really good rating. If you made a show that got 4 million at any time, that's good. There's an interesting thing going on with ratings, particularly in drama. There's a tendency for dramas to get below 5 million on the overnights. We're still looking with a historical perspective. I don't know the answer, but there's something going on. A BBC drama launched Monday night, 'One of Us', good with stars, but only 4.2 million. We had 'Home Fires' earlier in the year, a good show, but 4.5 million on overnights, and we're spending £800,000 an hour. It should do better.
H
Host42:31
I'm going to watch very carefully from now on what shows do on BBC1 and ITV in ratings terms. Even 'Downton Abbey', our biggest drama, was 8 million by the end. If that's the freak end of the hit, maybe we need to reassess what a hit is in drama. That leads to what you've taken on: Victoria. She lived a very long time, so you're not going to kill her off at 35. You've started this, you're going to have to finish it.
K
Kevin Lygo43:07
You keep going as long as it's working. The team have a good idea of what the next series will be. Hopefully the next six years, but we'll see. Victoria starts in two days. In six weeks, we'll know what we really think about it, how people respond, and how well it does. I'm confident it's going to be good.
H
Host43:44
We can take one final question from the video wall. It comes from RDF managing director Jim Allen. He's lost all his hair. Kevin, entertainment shows are increasingly bought on overseas formats that have already aired, yet the biggest entertainment hits are Britain's Got Talent, I'm a Celebrity, Strictly – basically homegrown British ideas. So what's wrong with the British entertainment idea sold and bought off paper?
K
Kevin Lygo44:14
He's turned into Al Murray, or Alf Garnett without the racism. He's absolutely right: the best thing is homegrown entertainment. Most of our entertainment is homegrown. We don't take that many formats; most formats travel outwards from us once they've been on ITV. I would prefer in most instances to have homegrown stuff. Little Big Shots is an exception. But you never say never; of course we would take another American format if it's right.
H
Host44:49
There are a few questions coming in. We've only got a couple of minutes. Why haven't ITV found a sitcom that works well for them? What do a sitcom and ITV need?
K
Kevin Lygo45:00
Sitcoms are really difficult. The BBC is struggling too. They need time. When Only Fools and Horses first came out, a reviewer joked 'only a fool or a horse would watch this crap'. How wrong they were. Our soaps, particularly Coronation Street, have a role. They are genuinely very funny at times, quintessential sitcom material, character-based. The spread of episodes – 12 episodes a week of Emmerdale and Corrie – has taken up slots but also feeds the soul's need for comedy based on character. We will try. I've commissioned a sitcom with Jack Dee which will arrive late next year. The pilot was really funny. We will continue, but we have to be careful because so few have worked.
H
Host46:31
Having failed to find much of an audience for Beowulf and Jekyll and Hyde, is ITV giving up on tea-time fantasy drama?
K
Kevin Lygo46:45
I still think the theory of it is nice. In my dreams, on a Saturday, the reason they came about was that entertainment from 5:30 to 10:30 was all roaring crowds and lights. Something like Merlin or Robin of Sherwood would be a nice change. There's also an international appetite, so for Studios it can be profitable. But those shows didn't work for their reasons. At the moment, we're not there, but I wouldn't say never. If we had more money, you'd want shows like Primeval, which was the last one that worked on ITV a few years back.
H
Host47:53
You've been in the job six months. Is it tougher than you thought it would be?
K
Kevin Lygo47:57
No, not really. It's always difficult because there's always a challenge. What's refreshing about ITV is that there's a black and white thing about success. Running public service channels, you can hide a bit with 'it was important work' or 'it won a BAFTA'. For us, it's about reaching a wide audience that satisfies our ratings and advertisers, and keeps us in business.
H
Host48:34
But on that basis, you satisfy your advertisers and shareholders. Do you think being non-experimental is going to work for the next generation?
K
Kevin Lygo48:43
If I said non-experimental, that's not what I meant. We're not out there on the fringes, but everything we try is new and different in our minds. To expect 3, 4, 5, 9 million people to come to a show, it's unlikely to be a beautifully crafted niche little thing. It's a broad sweep. Producers must honestly ask themselves if they would sit down and watch it. Often they second-guess. It'll only work if you really believe in it. Every show that works is born out of genuine annoying passion from producers and writers. And nothing called 'The Great British' anything anymore.
H
Host49:48
And how long before ITV is sold?
K
Kevin Lygo49:50
We're hoping by next week. ITV is a wonderful company, genuinely well run, with £900 million profit. It's an extraordinary British success story, not as dependent on advertising as it used to be, with a big studio arm. We should glory in the fact that ITV is in such rude health. It enables us to keep spending on programming and maintain investment in news, which is so important. ITV's success sits side by side with the BBC.
H
Host50:34
I've got a few random questions. Little Big Shots, The Voice Kids – don't you feel you're saturating the market for your other shows like BGT? No, fine. Let me get another one. You've changed your key positions in your commissioning team. What wasn't working?
K
Kevin Lygo50:57
The ratings were challenged. There's no blame to anybody. You can't stay in commissioning jobs for that long; you give it your all and need to refresh. That change has happened. ITV is in pretty rude health. The bedrock is the success of our daytime – The Chase and Tipping Point are massive hits. The soaps are a god-given gift we must never take for granted. Saturday night entertainment – the worst thing would be if I didn't have all these Saturday night juggernauts. Finding new ones is the hardest job in telly. We've got all these great shows, so the bedrock enables us to try new things, experiment, and continue ITV's success.
H
Host52:16
Okay, we've had one celebrity journey in. I want to know if you commission this: Nigel Farage goes to the North Pole and doesn't come back, probably on a husky. That would do it. Yes, so there's no reunion in that one, but there is a celebrity and a journey. We wouldn't do that. Kevin Lygo, thank you very much. Thanks to the sponsors. Broadcast done.