Philip Davies2:53
Great. Thank you, Philip. Thank you. Good afternoon, everybody. It's great to be here. So I'm Philip Davies. I'm the president of EMEA of Siegel and Gale. And we've been going in business since the sixties. So I guess inherently where we're kind of optimists by nature. But since then, our defining Philosophy and way of working has been to deploy simplicity in everything we do. And for us, that's probably as relevant now as it was in 1969 when we were founded. And you think of whatever way of looking at that you like from, if you like the expression VUCA, where everything is volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous and simplicity really is the antidote to that. So when we create brands, when we develop brands, when we create stories. We make sure that they have that thing, which is absolutely fundamental for us, which is about focus and simplicity isn't about productionism or minimalism or anything like that. It's actually that, if you like the pretentious way of talking about it, it's the intersection of clarity and surprise. You know, we need to make things easier to understand, but we also need to engage really, really, really well. So, you know, going back to why we feel that works, look at maybe one of the, it'd be like our first. The first identity we ever did was the NBA logo. And if you can picture that in your minds, it's that, you know, silhouette of, of Jerry West, the L. A. Lakers player. Still exactly the same today as it, than it was in 1969. And we kind of like to think that's a illustration of the power of a simple, enduring idea. Which is, you know, universal it's enduring, and it's scalable as well. And it makes them three billion dollars a year just out of that identity. And it's also. I guess we like to think a logo is measured by how commonly it's used as well. And you'll find that a lot of body parts around the world. So if a, if a logo can be tattooed on somebody, we think that's probably a pretty good measure of a job well done. So you asked also about, prediction, I guess in terms of trying to make sure that brands are able to play a role in people's lives and be genuinely useful to them. And. You know, in looking at that, I would say that really thinking about how brands want to try to speak to people, not in a mass market, but as a huge market of individuals, it's about finding ways that you can personalize without being creepy. Yeah, you want to be part of people's lives, but you don't invade people's lives. And I think the more that we see brands doing that, that's what they have to do. Otherwise, they'll simply be rejected if they don't do that.