Nicolaj Reffstrup12:55
Well, I totally recognize what you're talking about. Like, a lot of the gain from a project like this you get from just putting objectives out there and being transparent about them too, and through that, you kind of commit to a process. But if I kind of take one step back, the idea of the Ganni Lab came partly from a Swedish company that produces green energy, so Vattenfall set out to build a carbon-neutral baby crib, which is a pretty random product for them, but they just used this to serve as a case for them. So they went to extremes to get there and in the end found that the production cost of that baby crib would be around 28,000 or something like that, but it would be carbon-neutral. So partly inspired by that, we too wanted to create an impact-neutral fashion collection at whatever cost—at least hypothetically. The bad thing is, we didn't succeed in that, unfortunately, but I don't think at the moment it's possible at all. A good thing though is that we learned a lot through the process and found that most of those learnings kind of transitioned into our day-to-day business right away. It was kind of seamless, actually, and probably because we had so many representatives from across the organization. So we focused on cotton, viscose, and polyester as these are our biggest volume fabrics, and then we decided to only use market-ready fabrics as they could be scaled right away. So as a result, we went from just 4% responsible fabrics when we started out to close to 73% in our latest Spring/Summer 2021 collection, which is just over a 12-month process. And in the process, we also prioritized traceability, so we reached 75% traceability—which is kind of a weird concept to me at least—but that means that we got to the raw material stage. However, it was difficult getting further than that, especially working with recycled materials; it can be tough to verify and track. We worked with Quantis, which is a life cycle assessment provider; they measured and validated our carbon footprint and all the data and the improvements we made. So it's important when you engage with a product like this that you make yourself aware that this is gonna cost you money. I mean, there's no free ride or free lunch, and you cannot pass the cost on to the consumer; she's not ready to pay a premium yet. So for instance, we found that responsible fabrics are typically 8 to 10% more expensive than conventional ones, but sometimes up to three times the cost of a conventional fabric if you want to use very innovative, super interesting new materials. Otherwise, we also spent a lot of money on workshops, courses, software tools, team certifications, consultants, etc. We worked directly with 11 different suppliers, and we probably spent more than 150,000 euros just in direct expenses, and add to that salaries and a bit of capex. So it's not a free ride. Anyway, we're kind of running out of time, so I'll jump to my last question for you, and that's about SMEs. So why did the UNDP decide to engage in the accelerator program with the SMEs and not the big guys?