Today we have with us someone who has consistently decoded before most others how consumers think, how trust is built, and how value is created as technology changes our world. Founder of CRED, a prolific angel investor with nearly 300 bets across the ecosystem, and one of India's sharpest original thinkers. Ladies and gentlemen, please put your hands together for Kunal Shah. And as Kunal walks up the stage, I'd also like to introduce the very articulate writer and journalist who will be leading this conversation for us. Samita Sharma is from the Economic Times — she's a journalist who has tracked India's new age companies and tech ecosystem as closely and has decoded them with simplicity. Welcome Kunal. Welcome Sam. It's over to you all. Yes, you can clap a little bit more. It's absolutely allowed.
Thank you everybody for coming today. The markets didn't give me the confidence that I'm going to see so many people here. We have with us Kunal Shah and we're discussing wealth creation in the age of AI: who wins and who doesn't. Just a brief — I've always felt that Kunal is somebody who has very sharp understanding and takes on mostly everything that concerns any of us. So super looking forward to this chat. Kunal, I want to just start — I'm assuming most of the people here are already in the workforce or are prepping to be mid-career professionals. I think this is a super relevant topic, right? And it sort of just ties back to the entire discussion on jobs and AI. Eventually your jobs take you to creating wealth. So I want to jump right in and ask you: where are you at when it comes to jobs and AI? There are two schools of thought. One which says this entire AI apocalypse is all fantasy, and then we see what we are seeing with all of these big companies cutting jobs. So address the elephant in the room. Where are you at?
Thank you so much. First of all, how many of you use any of the apps like ChatGPT or Gemini every day? Awesome. And how many of you have built one agent of your own so far? Okay, that's good. How many of you are concerned that you're going to lose your job to AI?
Okay, got it. Not too many, you know.
Yeah, that's good. How many of you think that your colleagues are going to lose their job to AI? Awesome. Awesome. I think this is a better understanding of what's really happening. So, first of all, let's break down what is really happening. When internet happened — and I mean I'm old enough to tell you that I've lived a time where internet was not there in most of the workplaces or computers were not there —
What are you saying? You can't be...
Yeah, I'm turning 47 in a few weeks.
I'm a few years younger but come on.
When I went to my first job there were no computers.
We had Gmail all the while, Kunal.
No not really, you'd be surprised how long Gmail has been around.
You're much older. Anyway.
So the thing is that if we are looking at that time, internet made information accessible in the air — you could just search anything and get anything. AI has made intelligence accessible in the air. And this is a very hard concept to understand because intelligence was a unique trait that we attributed to humans as a species, and now you can just plug it up in the air and suck it in and actually accelerate materially. The second thing is that we forget that the largest employer of the world is actually inefficiency. At the pace inefficiency is going away, current jobs are getting displaced or changed materially. A lot of people worry about job layoffs. I think the thing we have to worry about is per capita income not growing. There are enough people in India who are still doing liftman jobs and ATM guard jobs and they all have jobs. There are rickshaw drivers operating without maps who make less money than people with apps on their phone, but they exist. The income delta between people who use technology and AI versus those who don't is going to be wide. The world has interesting ways to keep people employed, but the real question we have to worry about is per capita income growth. A lot of us are waiting for our companies to teach us AI or some workshops to teach us AI or show up at this event and learn something. The truth is everything is up there. If you are really keen to learn, you will figure out everything on your own. The problem is there is a huge shortage of self-motivation and self-discipline because now every single thing is transparently available. You can build anything, create anything, research anything. The question is how many people are actually using these tools for better stuff. A bulk of people are still using AI for frivolous use cases and not for what it is truly capable of.
What do you mean frivolous use cases?
Well, we are just still editing pictures and videos and talking to ChatGPT like a friend and getting rid of our real friends. How many of you talk to ChatGPT as a friend? How many of you have friends who are talking to ChatGPT as a friend? Already quite a lot. Many of you are going to be shy to talk about it, but it's quite a big phenomenon. How many have done astrology on ChatGPT?
How many of you have done therapy on ChatGPT?
Okay, good. So are you saying that's not a great use case and people should not be using it?
So first of all, if we're talking about wealth, the most valuable wealth you have is time. And what you do with time becomes even more important than it was before. I don't know if you know this — India is now at 35GB usage per capita per month, which is much more than any other country in the world. And 35GB usage requires a lot of time to be wasted. No matter who we are — Elon Musk, Sam, Kunal — everybody has only 24 hours. What we do with that time is becoming even more important for wealth to happen. It has become extremely easy to waste time in the world we live in right now. We have the same device that can make us super intelligent or super dumb very fast — within weeks you can see yourself go in opposite directions. My worry right now is productivity as a concept. By the way, the word efficiency and productivity does not exist in most Indian languages. That vocabulary is not in our core DNA. We don't value time as much and I think that is what's holding us back.
Literally, there is no word?
Yeah, there is no word for efficiency and productivity in any Indian language. Most of you can ChatGPT and find the answer but you'll find it's actually surrogate words, not actual words for it. Productivity and efficiency words came from the Industrial Revolution where time became valuable, and we are still to realize that. For example, most jobs in the Western world are hourly jobs. We have never been paid on an hourly basis so our brain doesn't work in hourly mode.
So what does all of this mean, Kunal, when you look at the world right now? People in the tech world are super clued in. My observation is that it's literally 1% of the population which is really aware about how stark the chasm is between what we know and what 99% of people across the world are aware of in terms of what AI is going to do to their jobs. And wealth creation is obviously a consequence of that. How do we fix this? I know you and I were chatting about this and you said when has it ever been an equal world in terms of wealth. But this is really stuck and it's in your face. There is this one constituency in Silicon Valley — just like how the gold rush happened in California — and they are so aware, they are the beneficiaries of everything happening around AI. And then there is the rest of the world. How do we keep up and even get to partake in that wealth creation which is definitely happening and will happen?
I would say China is not too far away. The gap is getting wider and wider in terms of sheer awareness. It's become hard to even keep up on a weekly basis what's happening in the world. When I meet people socially, what they talk about AI seems so ancient because it was something from last year, and last year feels like an ancient time now. Everything comes from intrinsic motivation. India has a very unique tendency when it comes to these situations. Remember COVID — we had only two modes: apathy and panic. There was nothing in the middle. We didn't give a damn and then we panicked like crazy. I feel we are going to go through the same phase with AI. Right now we are in a phase of apathy because it doesn't seem to be impacting us. But as soon as it starts getting close and there are second and third order effects — let's take banks. Banks today form 30 to 40% of India's market cap. A lot of stability comes from lending, and IT/BPO jobs form 30 to 40% of banks' books. Even if 10 to 20% of jobs get impacted, the safest part of the book starts getting impacted, which means 30-40% of India's market cap is at risk. I don't think anyone's talking about that. We don't think in second order effects. We tend to stay at the surface level and our curiosity ends at reading something quickly on a tweet. For example, a lot of the jobs that were outsourced to India are significantly more likely to get impacted versus jobs that were not outsourced, because their complexities were different. I talk about journalism right now — there are things you assign a junior person to do that can now be done through ChatGPT or OpenAI. The gap is getting wider. To be eligible for a job, the college graduate is going to have an even bigger struggle than before.
It's super scary, right? That entry-level trap. How do you fix that? Because what you're saying is what all industries are talking about, it's just that not too many people have actioned it yet. I'm assuming between the ages of 20 and 25 is when you hone skills to become a middle manager and rise up the ranks. If you don't get those people into the workforce, how do they even get to the second and third stage?
And Sam, we're talking about this today in May 2026 when AI is evolving exponentially every month. By the time we talk about this in a year, the issue may get even more stark. The issue is who's supposed to fix it. We have gotten addicted to somebody else solving this for us — the government will come and solve this, or my company, or my parents. A large majority of Indians are still doing arranged marriage. The point is that we are in a time where everybody's on their own and they need to operate with very high agency, solve for themselves, become very good at things because the time you need to become good at something has completely shrunk through all of these tools. The question is: are you doing something about your time or not? It's also the time you can waste your time the most. The reason I worry about India specifically is that when you have such large data usage, when you have a large young population, when you have jobs that can potentially get impacted through these tools at entry level — we are looking at the impact getting more severe unless we create a mission-oriented mindset saying we need to ride this wave.
What is that space that we'll have to create? Because for the longest time the services industry had the cost advantage in India, and the IT and BPO industry — if that goes away, where are we putting our graduates?
It's a good question. I used to run a BPO company before, a large outsourcing setup out of India for US companies. I remember this line all the American companies used to say: 'Do what you do the best and outsource the rest.' The thing is that the word 'outsource' was not outsourced to a country. It was just 'outsource.' The word outsource will get replaced by agents, by AI, by robots, and so on. People will keep doing the best stuff themselves. The question is: have we built resilient industries and capabilities that can survive? We have multiple issues to start with. Female per capita growth is not happening. Our per capita income is lagging because female participation in labor is not to the level the world is expecting us to have.
My guess would be sub 10% right now for banking, sub 20% for credit cards, and for AUM across wealth would be even similar small numbers. How do you expect the country to get richer with one gender working? It's never happened unless you find oil, which will magically make all of us rich, but it's unlikely to happen. Every country has grown by getting both genders working.
What do you think are three actionable things at this point that one can look to do? I know you spoke about taking things in your hands, building things, using AI to do things which are more productive. But what should a 24-year-old be doing right now?