Thomas Beahon15:21
Yeah, so I guess you start there, Kevin, by taking a step back and thinking about the market before Castore entered. So there had been very little innovation within the team sports landscape really for a generation. Like I'm 34 and as long as I can remember this market has been dominated by Nike and Adidas. And it was a duopoly. And that's an opinion, not a fact, I don't want to get sued by the good people at those large companies, but it was certainly dominated by those two huge brands. And whenever you have a situation like that in any sector, it generally doesn't provide optimal outcomes for customers essentially, because there's no real incentive for the status quo to innovate. Why would they innovate? They'd be innovating against themselves. So that landscape we felt was right for disruption. We felt that the incumbent had an identical approach, whether it was to kit designs, whether it was to the channels through which they would sell products. The vast majority of sports merchandise historically had been sold through third-party retailers like JD Sports and Sports Direct. The world had digitised, more and more direct-to-consumer brands were being very successful, yet sport had been left behind in that sense. And in our view, Nike and Adidas focused their resources on a very small section of teams at the very top of the market, so kind of the top two or three percent of teams essentially, because that was what was economically rational for them. Nike's share price has come down a little bit this year, but 140 billion dollars odd market capitalisation, it's economically rational only for them to focus on teams at the very top that can move serious volumes of product. So historically the big brands had seen teams as billboards, marketing adverts for them to help them sell more trainers. They hadn't viewed them as individual brands that should be optimised. And I think this will resonate with Kieran from a finance perspective. If you think about the economics of sport — and you have to be careful here because fans don't like to think of themselves as customers, they're fans first and foremost and sport is always incredibly emotive — but a finance person would say that football has incredibly attractive market characteristics. You have, and I'm using inverted commas here, captive audiences. Fans don't change the team that they support. That is true of almost no other consumer brand. So Louis Vuitton is one of the most powerful brands in the world, but most of their customers will also own a Chanel handbag. Apple is one of the most powerful brands in the world, most of their customers will also own something from Intel or HP or Samsung. So that captive audience nature is a hugely powerful thing. You've got unique IP, intellectual property, to the point where football fans will get their team's logo tattooed on their bodies. That is not something that you see for Apple or Louis Vuitton, despite them being incredibly powerful brands. And then of course you've got the scarcity value that, as far as I know, they've not increased the Premier League from 20 teams. So if you're in that elite, that has an inherent value because they're not creating any more, you cannot disrupt, there's very high barriers to entry. So all of those things make it a very attractive market. And the market, in our opinion, had not evolved. There hadn't been innovation around digitisation, globalisation, teams thinking strategically about how do we sell more products in the Middle East, in Asia, in North and South America. That led to a big opportunity for someone to come in and do something different. And I guess to answer your question directly, Kevin, how we kind of pitched ourselves differently — honestly, and this was just my experience thinking back three years ago, the market was delighted to have an alternative, because it wasn't as if the market was working perfectly for everyone. So for Castore to come in — British brand, challenger brand, but most importantly with a digital-first focus — to go and speak to teams and say, look, the world is digitising, your fan bases are digitising, the younger fans that you have will all engage with you via digital platforms, you need to think about this differently, you need to think with a more international and more ambitious focus — that was not something that Nike or Adidas were saying to them. So I would never say go as far as saying it was easy, because it definitely wasn't, but people were really receptive to that digital innovation message.