Giacomo Sofia41:26
I guess, Daniela, this story describes really very well how the subject that we want to talk about during the next week might really impact the life of a person, of an individual like Brandon and his family. And this brings us quickly to the heart topic that we want to discuss today, which is about safety in the workplace. In a few minutes we'll have with us three of our plant managers with whom we'll be discussing about the practical issues that every day we need to face in the shop floor, daily life of the factories. But first of all, I would like to ask all of us: where are we today? Where are we starting from when it's about safety in the workplace? And to give you a baseline, to give you a reference of what we're talking about, I want to introduce you to two topics. The first one is a number, is an index that is internationally recognized and that measures the number of events in a shop floor that cause an accident, an accident that will imply at least one day of job duty for the person involved. And then that number of events in this index is normalized to the worked hours in that given factory with the objective of giving the ability to benchmark this index between factories of different sites. The index is called the index of frequency, typically referred as IF. Obviously, the highest this index, the worse the performance. We as a company used to measure this index since a few years, and over the course of the year we definitely scored an improvement on how the company is doing in that sense. But if you look for a second at the picture that is on the screen now, you can see that in the last three years actually this index is like plateauing and eventually this year worsening. You see that in 2019 the index was 1.32, in 2021 22, but now this year, year to date September, we are at 1.59. The where I want to recall your attention is the fact that more mature industries, industries that are recognized for having already a good level of practice in managing safety at work, typically score this index below one. So for us there's still a long way to go.
Typically this index is also compounded by a second one that is called the index of gravity, referred as IG, which fundamentally introduces another element which is the length of the absence from work of persons that have been involved in an accident. And also in that case we are measuring it since a few years and we are reaching a certain plateau, actually again in this graph you see how this year again we are worsening in that sense. And also here we have a certain gap from industries that are more mature in managing safety in the workplace. But let me give you something another reference, something that probably is closer to a quick understanding. Every year in Prysmian Group we register about 400 accidents, accidents that again imply the fact that the person involved will be obliged to miss at least one working day. And think about that: next week we'll spend the full week talking about safety, talking about safety in the workplace among us across the world in all Prysmian Group. And during that time, during that week, probably statistically eight colleagues of ours will be injured to some extent, they will have an accident and they will be missing their job for some days. The second point of reference that I want to give you is what is referred to as the pyramid of Heinrich. This is a theoretical exercise to describe how events should be reported and scored in a factory which is used to a proper management of safety at work. And if you bear with me for a second I will try to explain the meaning of it. You see that at the top of this pyramid there are the lost time accidents. Just below, the accident that did not imply any loss of time, so meaning that the person who was hurt could go back to work fairly quickly. And below that there are the so-called near-misses, so events that happen in the factory that did not end up in any accident for an individual but might have been dangerous and might have implied an accident. And just below that again the so-called unsafe conditions, so situations where basically nothing has happened but people were able to spot out circumstances in which the working conditions were not proper and eventually potentially exposing people to danger. Now in a mature environment there is a high number of unsafe conditions that are spotted out, there is a fairly good number of near misses that are reported and properly investigated, and then there is a according to these statistics a certain number of course of accident as well with lost time or non-lost time, but the ratio between those events stays more or less as this pyramid is describing. Now in Prysmian Group we have a formal process where we know how to record and report near misses and we know how to report and safe conditions, but we don't have a level of maturity such as the ratio between those different items stands as the pyramid would require. We don't have yet a real measuring of the overall perimeter in that sense. We are starting just now. But if hypothetically we were now projecting out the overall Prysmian Group would be in terms of this pyramid, probably the pyramid will look like the one that you see now on the screen on the side of the theoretical one. For that reason I expect all of you to be proactive, take initiative and report all the unsafe conditions that you think you have spotted out on the shop floor, or properly report all the near misses that you have been witnessing. Speak to your supervisor, speak with the leadership in the factory, talk to the HSE director, talk to the plant manager. It's very important that we become consistent in this process. It is only by enlarging the base of that pyramid that we will create the conditions to reduce the number of accidents at the top of it. And so we need to shift our culture as a company from a culture of managing accidents to a culture of preventing them. Thank you.