Eduardo Delgado1:01:28
And really it's not at the center, it's on the external part of the company.
And why do I say this? Because the traditional customer service model, the historical one, the one we all know, places a technological shield between the customer and the company. And the technological shield asks what you need, filters you based on your request, and sends you to a specialist. And although the listeners cannot see me, the specialist, in quotes, because we all know that when you reach that person, many times they cannot help you, they do not know, they do not have the tools, and they end up bouncing you to another person. They usually tell you that signing up takes three clicks and filing a claim or resolving a procedure takes 40 hours. And that is no coincidence. It is an industrial model designed so that you give up and stay with the company for another month, without being able to get anything out of them. But note what I was saying: most companies put their workers at the center of the equation, but they place them very distant from the customer, and what we have understood is that we do not want to give up the close contact between one person and another. Because in many cases, when you call that company, you think the problem is called canceling the electricity, but really you do not want to lose the electricity in your home; you want to switch companies or adjust the rate. You do not know another way to say it because you lack the training, the professional experience to say exactly what the need is. And it is in human treatment, in a light conversation, where you can truly empathize and connect more genuinely and deeply with the customer. What we do is put artificial intelligence at the service of the basket to answer complex questions, and there is always a person, a human in the loop, reviewing the contracts and all the information that AI uses to prepare this response. It is important that the data is official, verified. But once that is done, I think it is fine for AI to help you answer what the difference is between flood coverage offered by a company like Mapfre, Allianz, or Zurich and another like Ocaso. I gave four names so you understand that none is better or worse, but different ways of understanding a home insurance policy. In addition, this AI that we have designed also accompanies the manager in what we understand they are more, I will say clumsy, though I do not like that word, but rather lazier. We are all lazier. For example, being extremely orderly with what a client has asked, with the date you have to talk to them. How many people do we know in the commercial field who are truly extremely organized? I know none. I would say that I come from a large company like Telefónica in the commercial field, and I can describe myself as someone who knows how to sell, but I would not describe myself as an extremely organized and methodical person. If I start something, I want to take it to 100%. But if you ask me to do something a hundred times, there will come a time when I get bored. So, knowing that the human way of being ends up taking routine as something that has more negative and destructive components for employment than good things, what we intend is for the manager to truly focus on what is important: that conversation, that relationship, that possibility of generating additional opportunities with that client or the client's environment, and to be attentive to accompanying them in the process, truly understanding where the specific need is. There I believe the human being, due to our natural capacity, is irreplaceable. In everything else, in that written communication you send to the company, in that reminder to know if the procedure has been completed or not, machines, sorry, will always be much better than us. If you ask your mobile phone to remind you of something every day, it will do it. If you ask your wife, or if my wife asks me and she listens, I do not want her to kill me, obviously, I will forget one day. That is why I say machines are quite better than us at some things; we have to accept it.
There is a part of growth, of your growth, that I understand comes from the organic positioning you have achieved, that is, the hard work for people to find you on the internet. I do not know if this is, I tell you from experience, a structural advantage or a dangerous dependence on the shifts. I was going to make a comparison with a political leader, but I will not do it, okay? The shifts that Google makes, it makes many shifts and its algorithm changes. It is true that Google, especially in recent months, is adapting, it is costing it, but it is adapting to everything that is changing, precisely because of the AI we were talking about. In your case, that positioning you have achieved is, I understand, key to your business. It is key and we do not want it to be dependent. Let me explain: when we transferred calls to large companies, it was key. If Google falls, if Google brings you down, your business falls. There is a direct correlation and it is your only way to generate revenue. When we talk to investors and they mention SEO dependence, obviously at that time I defended it tooth and nail, but there was a huge SEO dependence. We did not bet on other acquisition models because they were much more expensive, and in a model where you only transfer calls for about 2 euros per net call, there is not enough margin to consider making your brand recognized, investing in advertising, acquiring customers through ads or social media. Those are things where you have to invest large sums of money, and with the dogma of faith that existed and the shifts that companies also made in conversion ratios each month, you could get a very unpleasant surprise. A company like Rastreator invested about 15 to 18 million euros a year in advertising for many years, and each and every one of those years they lost money. Their strategy was different, and that is why the founder, as we were saying before, was happy. She had sold her company for 560 million euros, but during all those years she supported a gigantic advertising investment thanks to investors who filled her case each year; it was not a profitable business. We had approached it from another perspective; we wanted to be cash positive, so we understood that organic positioning was our best opportunity, but almost our only viable channel. Today it is different. Today you can acquire, for each household you serve, an approximate value of about 200 euros per year. That allows you to invest in advertising, allows you to acquire customers in other ways, and above all, you no longer want to be transparent; you want people to recognize your brand, you want people to know what Rans does, and that is why I was excited. When I heard you talk about what we are, before it was quite difficult to describe, even to understand. It happened to me, and I practiced a lot, and still I saw the face of the person I was telling it to and said, 'They are not understanding it fully.' And it is not their fault, it is my fault or the model's fault. Now it does not matter; even my grandmother or my grandfather, may he rest in peace, would have understood it. My uncles understand it, people like my mother, who are older than me, have different consumption habits, and they use the service and are happy. So I think this allows us, even though it is still a structural advantage to be very well positioned on the internet and acquire customers so cheaply, to have other acquisition channels to leverage.
I will give you two data points so you can see. Wherever we go, especially from a communication perspective, I think we have something magical. We communicate from purpose and connect with customers. We have 7 million records of people who have voluntarily asked us to help them. 7 million records. If tomorrow Google sends us to the street, as the Catalans say, nothing would happen because we have a huge volume of customers we have not yet called due to lack of commercial capacity, but it is a matter of time, a matter of time to grow, a matter of time to use that database that is kept properly updated and in compliance with GDPR regulations. But beyond that, I was going to talk about the other project we launched a year ago, which is a social media channel called Rans VIP, positioned on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Facebook. In one year, we have gotten more than 15 million people to see us. That is spectacular. Searches for our brand have grown by 500 or 600% this year. So you realize that now more than ever, with a model that goes very much against what the market dictates, which is that you have to digitize and fire people. We talk about humanizing and generating trust relationships with customers, because that in the long term will create a much more solid and profitable capital structure than any other. We often talk about creating an Amazon of services, and I believe the first step, understanding that the bulk of consumers are currently senior people who have a consumption habit like we said, they will consult digitally but want to talk on the phone with another person, I think we are hitting the nail on the head of the equation and have a future that I find exciting.