Back
Elad Gil
Co-founder of Color Genomics, Color Genomics

How Silicon Valley’s Most Prolific Investor Picks Unicorns | Elad Gil Interview

🎥 Aug 01, 2024 📺 BlackNova Productions ⏱ 48m
Episode 635: Sam Parr ( https://x.com/theSamParr ) and Shaan Puri ( https://x.com/ShaanVP ) talk to Elad Gil ( https://x.com/eladgil ) about the three things he looks for when betting on startups, how he became an early investor in Anduril, plus 3 business ideas he thinks someone should go after.  — Show Notes:  (0:00) How to be successful in angel investing (3:00) How to create a bankroll  (5:00) Making the great works of history available to anyone anywhere (7:21) The 1 thing that matters in a business (10:21) How to master a new topic like defense tech (12:15) Investing in Anduril in the fi...
Watch on YouTube

About Elad Gil

Elad Gil, co-founder of Color Genomics and a multi-stage investor, appeared on two podcasts in early 2024 where he discussed his views on artificial intelligence and startup markets. On the Knowledge Project podcast, Gil stated that AI is "dramatically underhyped" because most enterprises have not yet adopted it, and he predicted that within a few years the industry will be "selling units of cognition" — effectively renting AI-driven labor equivalents. He also said that if an AI company is not seeing explosive growth quickly, "something's fundamentally broken." In a separate appearance, Gil argued that generative AI has shifted the business model from selling software seats to selling "human labor equivalents," citing the example of Harvey AI in the legal sector. He noted that foundation models have "instantly plugged into a massive set of markets" including all white-collar work and code. Gil also said that while there are times to be contrarian, the current moment favors consensus, adding that investors should "maybe just buy more AI." He attributed the sudden openness of previously closed markets to both AI's capabilities and the fact that "every CEO is asking themselves, 'What's my AI story?'"

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Elad Gil's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (103 segments)
I
Interviewer0:00
All right, today we were sitting down with one of the smartest people that's ever been on this podcast. His name is Elad Gil and he is a prolific angel investor. He's a guy who has invested in something like 40 plus billion-dollar companies all at very early stages like Airbnb, Airtable, Anduril, Retool, Rippling, companies that we've all heard of now in the tech space. He was an entrepreneur, he got acquired by Twitter. He was one of the first 100 employees at Twitter. He was early at Google and he's been very early to waves. He was doing longevity before longevity was cool. He was doing AI investing before ChatGPT came out. So, we love talking to people who are like this that are both very brilliant, very accomplished and seem to be skating where the puck is going. They sort of know what's coming around the corner and they've proven that in their career. So, we talked to him about how he's been such a good investor, what he's looked for and his approach and how it's pretty different than most investors. We talked about his ideas, so things he wants to see built and projects he's working on right now and then a little bit of life advice at the end where he left us with a kind of an amazing tidbit or a nugget about what's made him such an interesting person. So, enjoy this episode with Elad Gil.
The intro for you is basically you're a super angel investor. You've invested in a bunch of companies. I think you have something like 40 plus unicorns in the portfolio and impressively at least 20 or 30 of them were very early stage, so seed stage, series A, pre-seed, some somewhere there. That's wild. As somebody who's invested in I don't know, 100 companies myself, I look at what you've done there and that is prolific. And so, first question is like, you know, there's a block of wood and I don't really know how to hack how to chop into this. So, I'm just going to swing one blunt swing here. How the heck are you doing this? Why? How have you had this success in angel investing?
E
Elad Gil1:54
Yeah, I mean, I guess it's probably two or three things. Number one, I think I was just lucky, you know, so I think I started investing in a good time when there was a lot to still be done in SaaS and consumer and a variety of areas. Now, obviously, it's also true in AI. I think secondly, I tend to take more of a market-first approach than most early-stage people. I focus on the market and product market more than the founders. And obviously, founders are incredibly important. I started two companies myself, so I hope that founders are incredibly important, but I also think that what you're actually building and which market for whom matters a lot. And great people crushed by terrible markets and I've seen reasonably mediocre people do really well. And then lastly, I think I really try to follow the technology and the changes that are happening in technology. And so I got involved with a lot of generative AI companies quite early, you know, Perplexity and Harvey and things like that, simply because I was really keen on generative AI and sort of ML-related stuff. And so I started investing in all those things 3 years ago before ChatGPT was out and before Midjourney and before these things really became a trend. And so I think sometimes you end up early in some important areas simply because you're kind of technology-first or market-change first.
I
Interviewer3:00
Were you just doing your own money at first or did you have a fund from the get-go?
E
Elad Gil3:03
No, initially I was just investing my own money and then I ran out pretty fast. You know, I hadn't made that much money at Google and I invested almost all of it. I invested like over 50% of it. And so I just started running out. As I started doing that,
I
Interviewer3:16
That mean running out? Like how? I guess you initially had wealth from selling your business, I guess. And then like you just put all of it into private companies. How much
E
Elad Gil3:26
I put a huge amount of my own money into private companies, yeah. So, you know, one of my big regrets is somebody pinged me on the SpaceX round when it was like a $500 million company and I really was excited about it. I thought it was such an interesting game I didn't have enough money for the minimum that they had as check sizes.
I
Interviewer3:50
And so what did I guess you know, I had that point early in Silicon Valley where I initially had no money. So, I was like I was helping friends. I was like, 'Man, I can't believe people aren't investing in this.' But, I myself didn't even look at myself like an investor because I just didn't have a bankroll. Then, I realized, 'Wait, that's stupid. I got to think like a founder here and get resourceful and figure out how to get money to invest in these companies. So, where did you go once you deployed your own capital? Where did you go to get the money right away?
E
Elad Gil4:13
Yeah, you know, I started effectively raising small sort of what are known as SPVs, and then that morphed into funds, and now I kind of have a turducken of different things where there's like different layers that I can do in terms of personal investments, fund investments. You know, very large things would be fund plus SPV. So, for example, I led Anduril's Series D, or I co-led the last two rounds for Applied Intuition, or I've you know, I've led rounds for lots of different companies at this point.
I
Interviewer4:40
How many other partners are there at your shop, basically? Are you the guy?
E
Elad Gil4:45
You know, I've recently hired a few people to kind of help me in different ways. I think fundamentally, what I want to do is continue to build things, work on things, think about technology. Like, just take I would have to call it almost like the anti-VC approach and be builder first. And so, there's a lot of side projects that I or me and my team are now working on. You know, we're working, for example, Shane's helping me with we're trying to take the thousand most important books that are off of copyright and translate them into dozens of languages using AI, and then create audiobooks off of all of them so people can download the great works of history from anywhere in the world in any language. You know, we're doing stuff like that. And so, that also forces us to really use different AI tools, and let's look at 11 versus Cartesia versus you know, OpenAI, and let's How do you actually translate a long-form book with high consistency, and how do you QA that?
I
Interviewer5:45
Are you doing that because you're like, 'This could be a business,' or are you doing that because you're thinking to yourself, just this is an interesting project and in doing this I will discover interesting things?
E
Elad Gil5:56
I'm steering cuz I think it's like cool and societally useful. I don't I mean like there's multiple aspects of why to work on something like this and I think it's a little bit less short-term and more like this seems useful and interesting.
I
Interviewer6:11
But were you always that way? Because like I just recently I guess I could say I'm financially secure and it took a few years before I just recently started feeling like I want to do blank because it's cool. I don't really care necessarily if it's good for the world, but it seems like you have a little bit of that mindset of like this is good for the world. Are you wealthy and successful because you always had that attitude, or do you have that attitude now because you have security? Do you know what I mean?
E
Elad Gil6:37
I've always been that way and so, you know, I started off I did degrees in math and biology and I did a PhD in biology cuz I thought it was societally useful. Like you're not going to make money as a PhD in biology, you know, unless something magic happens. And so my driver has always been what is useful societally. I think the one other thing I'd say about it is it forces you to go deeper than people tend to go on some of these things that they're just kind of oh, this is an interesting investment or whatever. I think you actually go to that next extra level of depth in using things hands-on and all the rest of it that I think also matters just in terms of gaining real intuition for certain things. And I don't think you need to be a practitioner of everything to understand the thing that you're a practitioner of, but I just think it in some cases it can help a lot or it really allows you to hone in on what's important. And that's true of many businesses. Usually most businesses have one or two things that are the fundamental aspect of that business that matters and everything else is just noise or check the box or whatever and I think that where people tend to sometimes either start the wrong things as founders or invest the wrong things as investors is they get too wrapped up in what are the five things that matter for this business and usually there's one, maybe two.
I
Interviewer7:45
What's an example of like I'm not sure which industry you care about most, but what's an example of one of these things where people care about five things, but you're like, 'No, this is the only thing that matters.'
E
Elad Gil7:58
Well, I mean, I guess early on with Stripe, their one insight was how do we just get every developer using this product? We're not going to worry about mid-market and then enterprise, we're not going to worry about any other things. How do we get every early stage technology company that matters on us?
I
Interviewer8:13
That sounds great. When you tell that story, I'm like, 'Yeah, I'm on board with that.' But I own a business now, and it's really hard to come up with that insight.
E
Elad Gil8:22
I think it's hard, but I think the flip of it is that's usually the key question. And again, different types of businesses may have that characteristic or not, right? And so, sometimes it's two things or, you know, some complex businesses may have more, you know, and I invested in Anduril, there was a very clear there's kind of like five things I thought a next-gen defense tech company had to do in order to become a prime, which is, you know, one of the really big companies in the market, and I thought without it, you're just not going to make it. And so, sometimes it's more complicated, but I think 90% of the time plus it's boiled down to one area of belief or maybe one thing that you just need to see happen in the business to believe that everything else will fall into place.
I
Interviewer8:58
It's also like it's also hard now, but easy later, right? If it's hard to figure out what the one thing is, okay, you take some upfront difficulty to sort of make a bet or to figure that out, but then from there on out, your operating philosophy can be a lot simpler because you're now Stripe, you know who you're focused on, you know who you're catering to, and you don't have to have these like the decision tree becomes very, very simple later if you did the hard thing up front.
E
Elad Gil9:20
And it evolves over time, right? The complexity of these businesses often comes later as they become multi-product and international and, you know, all the rest of it, and that's normal. It's just early on usually there's a key insight that drives it.
I
Interviewer9:33
You said you invest in markets, and Anduril, when it was first started, most people still don't have any idea about that industry. When you're trying to like master a topic like that, what is your process?
E
Elad Gil9:45
Yeah, with Anduril, the main reason I got interested in defense tech was because the big tech companies were running away from it, right? Google had shut down Maven. And I was like, well, of course we're going to need national defense. Whether you're a Democrat or Republican, like of course, you know, like you want to protect Western values, there's conflict in the world, there's bad actors, like
I
Interviewer10:02
The push back on that I'd be like, yeah, but there's like I'm ignorant to the industry, which is why it's easy for me to push back. I would say, yeah, but there's like 10 other companies in that space, you know, they got it covered. Like how do you learn enough to know that there's like an interesting opportunity?
E
Elad Gil10:17
Yeah, I mean, I guess it's a bunch of stuff. One is obviously you just read what you can, right? Two is in some cases you look at market structure and growth rates and that kind of stuff. Third is you look at technology shifts.
I
Interviewer10:28
I want to break down on that. What's your resource for the second one?
E
Elad Gil10:31
We just go and do the work. I mean, you look at what are the companies and obviously there's like analyst reports and market research and all that stuff, but you can also just ask, okay, how many players are in the market? Is it consolidating or not? What's the growth rate on it? What is the margin structure and the approach they're taking as a business, right? So, for example, the traditional defense tech companies are what are known as cost plus, which means if you have a million-dollar drone, they charge 5%. So, they can't make more than 5% margin, so they make 50k a drone. You're Anduril, you can sell 10 better drones for a million dollars. You make 50% margin, which is traditional hardware margin, you make 10 times the margin dollars. And so, one of the things that people don't appreciate about Anduril as a business is it's a market cap expansion in the defense world because you have a higher margin, higher leverage business, right? And so, you need a different business model, which they've come up with. So, this is just a bunch of stuff like that, right? So, you look at yeah.
I
Interviewer11:24
How early did you invest in Anduril? I think you were the first like the very first round. It was just the founders, yeah. And so, did you hear Palmer talking about this, then you go research the market, or had you just independently been curious about this market and then
E
Elad Gil11:37
No, it's back to what I was saying earlier, which is Google shut down Maven. And I was like, oh my god, the big tech companies are running away from this. What a wonderful opportunity for a startup. And so, I actually called one of the people at Google that I knew who was working on Google Cloud, which the Maven team was part of at the time. And I said, 'Hey, did all the people who wanted to do Maven quit in protest?' And he's like, 'No, no, no, it was all the people who are against Maven quit. The rest of the people are still here.' So, he's like, 'Okay, where do I find somebody who wants to work on this?' And so, I just started poking around and I ran into Trae at something, and we started talking, and he mentioned he was working on it. I got super excited about it. So, I invested in their first round. Or they were kind enough to let me invest in their first round, I should say.
I
Interviewer12:17
That's way more impressive than meeting Palmer. Like, the fact that you came to that similar you guys were sniffing around the same stuff independently. That's pretty impressive. Well, yeah, but I'm also you know, the best people I get with they tend to have the same laid-back approach as you, which is just like, 'I don't know, I just kind of do the work. I think I was fortunate, blah blah blah.' Then you start to peel back layers, and you're like, 'Oh, so this thing you called luck was actually you I read that Maven story, too. I didn't think to myself, 'Wow, what a wonderful opportunity.' I just moved on with my life, right? So, you know, I don't know if you've read the four levels of luck thing, but I think number two or three is luck favors the prepared mind, meaning because you know what you're looking for, you can actually spot luck when it presents itself. Whereas, the average person might see that same thing and not understand what they're looking at. And so, when you saw that Maven story, you saw the opportunity that, 'Wow, if the big technology players are running away from defense, this huge category, that means there's an opportunity for a new technology company in defense.' And so, what yeah you know, what I find fascinating is peeling that back and actually understanding like, 'Wow, that was incredibly intentional.' And I get what you're saying that not every one of those rabbit holes you go down leads to an Anduril seed round, but the fact that it ever did is remarkable cuz that's like a career making, you know, single investment even, let alone the other 40 that you did like that. I also want to go back to like you said something about you know, market first and there's that great quote like when a great entrepreneur meets a bad market, only one of them keeps the reputation the bad market. And so how what's another example from your portfolio that you can think of that drives home this kind of like market first where the market first approach led you to do something that worked out.
E
Elad Gil13:39
You know, I did a lot of crypto investing in like 2017-ish 2016 through 2018. And that was because there was such an obvious change from an adoption and sort of technology basis there. You know, the AI stuff is another one. You know, all the AI companies I invested in was a little bit like hey, the market's shifting, the technology's shifting. The flip side of it is there's lots of things that I invested in that only in hindsight could I come up with a theme, right? I invested in Notion, Airtable, and Retool within I don't know, two years of each other or whatever the time frame was, but at the time there was no low-code no-code kind of thesis. It was just hey, these are really interesting founders working in interesting areas. And so in hindsight there was a market or at least there was a trend, but at the time it was just like these are smart people working on good stuff. And so it's a little bit of that how do you balance both of those perspectives and sometimes your thesis driven and sometimes you're just like, you know what, the thousands of great founders out there working on ideas are going to come up with better ones than I am. And so you know, let's have an open mind on everything.
I
Interviewer15:02
I think it was on the information or something like that they talked about how you had just raised like a billion dollars and that you famously didn't have any employees. And Sam Altman has this or I don't know who said it. I thought it was Sam Altman where he said something like a one or two person billion dollar company is going to be a thing now because of AI. But that's kind of what you've already done.
E
Elad Gil15:42
You know, it already existed before that. Minecraft was like, I don't know, what, three people when Microsoft bought it. But that's sort of like what you're doing. Like you've got a pretty huge business with two or three or however many people you have or up until recently, I think according to these articles, you had like two people. I mean, I think there's a long history of this kind of stuff and if you look at the world's biggest hedge funds or you look at a lot of later-stage firms, they tended to have that structure, right? And so, or if you look at a traditional investment firm, there's usually one or two people who do most of the good investments. I think in general, there's this odd collapsing down to a handful of people in many types of endeavors. But the reality is there have been multiple businesses that have hit enormous scale that have been quite small and I think Minecraft is really a canonical example of that. Again, there's also the need to go big sometimes, right? Sometimes you want to win the market and you should hire a ton of people. And so, I think the future of two-person companies, at least in the medium term, is very overstated. I think the AI is largely going to be business as usual and certain types of teams are going to shrink a lot, right? I'm an investor in a company called Dakagon, for example, that's working on the customer success side. And that's an area where I think there'll be enormous leverage to existing customer success reps, but probably there's an overall shrinkage in that industry if you look at things like what Klarna announced around their use of AI in customer success, right? So, I think certain teams will get impacted first versus others through AI. I think the two-person AI company is largely in the future, but there are historical precedents of this happening before AI, right?
I
Interviewer17:02
Do you measure I mean, obviously you measure, but I guess like what is the metric that you keep track of for your own investing? So, like you know, at the top of this we talked about number of unicorns, but you can look at IRR, you can look at your DPI, you can you know, I did a deep dive on YC the other day and there's like some insane number I'm going to butcher it cuz I don't have it right in front of me, but like Sam, I don't know if you know this, but like the first 10 years of YC they basically turned like something like $12 million into like $10 billion of value for them from themselves cuz they were writing super small checks early on and getting basically like 7% but it even diluted down like Airbnbs, the Dropboxes, like the even just the top five companies, they let's say they net own like 2% of these when they go public. I mean they basically had a 320X on their money in that first decade. And then a lot of people now think that they're, you know, maybe have they've sort of lost their touch or the batch sizes are too big or the valuation's too high and actually like their hit rate has gone up even as the batch size has gone up. It's pretty wild. Eli, do you have a metric that you look at that you kind of you're proud of or that's the main metric for you how you've done in terms of the actual money in, money out?
E
Elad Gil18:14
You know, the most important thing to me and obviously, you know, I want to be a fiduciary for other people's money, a lot of my own money is in the funds I invest, etc. So obviously there's a financial return aspect of it, but to me the most important things are probably twofold. One is making sure that founders view me as a useful and positive resource. And two is being involved with the most important technologies and technology companies in the world cuz I think that's how you drive societal impact. So I view technology as a lever on the world, right?
I
Interviewer18:54
I'm not an angel investor, but you're such a hard person to compete against because you're like, you just it's very strange that you're an investor because you don't seem like you're money motivated. You know what I mean? And that's a really challenging person to compete against because that's the type of person who wins in a lot of stuff. It's the one who's not actually caring about the money, but who's caring about missionary versus mercenary type of vibe. Do you know what I mean?
E
Elad Gil19:20
Yeah, I know what you mean. I think Naval has a great framework on this because you know, John Doerr used to ask you know, are you a missionary or mercenary to founders in the 90s? And of course you had to say I'm a missionary, right? Like how could you possibly say you're a mercenary? And Naval's framework is like, well, of course early in your career you're at least partially a mercenary. Otherwise you're never going to find the opportunity and go win it. And then later in your life you're a missionary, right? You're not zero sum, you're trying to do things for the greater good. And then once you've made it in your career you should become an artist. You should be doing it for the love of the craft. And now for each person there's a different mix of that over time. And I think, you know, for me the motivator is very much technology is a lever on the world, right? That's why I was trying to do biology, that's why I did tech, that's you know, it's like how do you do the important things in the world? Now, if you're working on the most important problems in the world with the best people, then probably you end up with a good financial return. Because you're in the middle of the stuff that matters, right? But that doesn't have to be the motivating goal. And that's why sometimes I don't know if you've ever sat at a dinner which is all BCs, it's like really boring. Because you're surrounded by at least a subset of people who are very money driven and the conversation
I
Interviewer20:22
I'll give you an example. One time I was sitting at a friend's wedding dinner and I just happened to get seated at a table where a lot of the other people were his board, which meant a lot of investors. And I sat next to somebody from a well-known firm. And I said, 'Hey, what are you interested in these days?' And he said, 'Crypto.' And I said, 'Oh, great. We can talk about distributed consensus and trustless systems and censorship resilient products and all this stuff.' And I said, 'That's great. Like what are you excited about in crypto?' And he looks me in the eyes and he says, 'You can make a lot of money at it.' I was like, 'Ha!' I thought he was joking, right? I started laughing. I'm like, 'Oh, that's so funny. No, seriously.' He was like, 'No, that's it.' And that's not a really interesting conversation.
Well, one of the things I liked is that on your website you publish some ideas that you're interested in or you're working on right now or you want people to come help you pull off. I'd love if we could rip through a couple of these. Let's start with one that caught my eye. You said, 'I want to do a new chain of K through 12 schools inspired by ancient Greece.' What's that all about?
E
Elad Gil21:39
Yeah, I mean I think fundamentally anybody who has kids realizes that, you know, there may be certain aspects of the education system that are emphasized and de-emphasized. And it feels like there's four or five things that are really useful for kids to learn. And I think it'd be great to try and help establish something that could be used broadly across, you know, cities or regions across the country that would really focus on some of those basic aspects of learning. What did the ancient Greeks do? What did the ancient Greeks have to do with this? It's just used as an example. Really what you need to find is what is the framework that you're going to use to apply so that you have some compass and consistency. And there's a certain emphasis on reasoning and logic and thinking and discourse and debate that I think was resident in that time. There was an emphasis on mathematics. There was an emphasis on writing. There was an emphasis on trying basic forms of understanding. You know, that's when you had Archimedes and levers and that's when you had really interesting mathematics emerge and that's when you had great philosophical treaties written. So, you know, I think there's a lot of That's also when you focus a lot on beauty and art. There's a lot of emphasis on the physical and being physically fit and resilient. So, there's a lot of stuff there, you know?
I
Interviewer23:02
I remember when I lived in SF from 12 to 20. And I think there was a handful of schools that were started for elementary kids. Was AltSchool one of them? And was there a wonder school? Does that ring a bell?
E
Elad Gil23:19
Yeah, those were more kind of like, 'Hey, we're going to use technology, etc.' I don't think that there's any need for technology. I think you just need a couple good teachers and like a reasonable curriculum. And so I again, I think it's not that I'm not trying to reinvent the school system. I just think you could go back to certain types of basics. It's interesting there's a school in San Francisco called Proof School, which I think is fascinating. I think their line or motto is like for kids who love math. And they have a very strong emphasis on mathematics in their curriculum and you know, kids are doing machine learning in like 10th or 11th grade and I find things like that kind of inspiring where they're like, 'Okay, we're going to take a different lens on it and our lens is just kids who love math and let's find out what's the right curriculum for those kids.' And maybe some of the early literature classes emphasize sci-fi cuz those are the types of books they like. And maybe the history we focus on is XYZ versus something else. And so I just think that's a good example of like a really
Smart approach to schooling. There's a variety of people who've done these differentiated approaches.
I
Interviewer24:20
What's your plan with this school thing? Are you looking for a kind of entrepreneur to spearhead it? What are you looking for? Are you looking for a DRI?
E
Elad Gil24:28
I think, you know, traditionally there's this directly responsible individual or DRI problem, right? It's really easy to come up with ideas. And then usually you need help executing them. And so, it's something that I'd be happy to sponsor. But I really would need to find somebody who can drive that sort of thing day-to-day. You know, my kids are very happy in the schools that they're currently in. So, it's more just something that I think would be societally useful to do more broadly. And then especially if you can do it as a chain, then you end up with some sort of consistency and the ability to bring it to different populations that may not have access to this sort of schooling and other things. And so, I think there's a really interesting project to be had there.
I
Interviewer25:05
What other ideas, Sean, do you have listed there? There's one cool one. You said you got a PhD in biology and you talked about longevity. You've looked into a lot of longevity. You funded clinical trials and you said something that I was curious about. You said there's some exciting things that are going on in longevity. You mentioned a company called BioAge and how they have a new drug for muscle. Okay, you have my attention. What is the new drug for muscle and generally what's exciting to you about that space?
E
Elad Gil25:29
Yeah, I mean BioAge is a company that just went public and is in their quiet period. So, there probably isn't a ton I should say about them. I was an early investor there and a board observer and I think I was the first investor in that company actually. The CEO is this really exceptional PhD and postdoc. I think she did her postdoc at Stanford in biocomputation of aging. And you know, they now have different drugs in different phases of clinical trials or pre-clinical work and all that should be in their S-1 and in their public financial materials that I'd encourage people to go look at. But in general, I think that aging is an area that's been dramatically under-invested in and part of that is because of the structure of big pharma and you know, that industry tends to have very old companies, right? Sort of driving the agenda which has its own implications and then obviously it's highly regulated. But also if you just look at the National Institutes for Aging which is a very small budget relative to the NCI for cancer or other parts of the NIH. And most of that budget just goes to Alzheimer's. And so, actual fundamental research into aging is quite sparse. We know that aging is a developmental program that can be perturbed, right? I actually worked on that for my PhD. I worked at the intersection of aging, longevity and extreme longevity, cancer and insulin. There's certain evolutionarily conserved pathways that if you tweak them, you end up with organisms that will live a lot longer, right? You can knock out a gene in C. elegans that lives two to three times longer, for example, as a healthy adult. And we know that there's drugs that do that in mice, etc. Genes that do that in mice, which means you can do drugs.
I
Interviewer26:59
I like how you're saying we know as if me or Sam know anything. We don't know this. You smart PhD people know this. And can you explain in layman's terms what you just said? You said there's like... Every time he talks, he'll say a sentence and there's like five things that I'm like, 'Wait, what?' Yeah, five tabs need to open in my browser. So, okay, C. elegans they're living two times longer. You said that aging is a something-driven thing. I...
E
Elad Gil27:23
I would say developmental program. So, basically, there's a few different theories of aging. One of the theories of aging is you just accumulate a bunch of damage over time and systems break because of that damage.
I
Interviewer27:34
Mechanical damage type of thing.
E
Elad Gil27:35
It's just mechanical damage. You get hit by sunlight and UV and whatever. And then there's another view of aging, which is this more almost like a developmental program that's regulated by signals in your body just as, you know, when you go from a baby to an adult, that's just a developmental program. And if you look at different organisms, different organisms will have different clocks for aging, right? And so, why can turtles live so long? Or why do certain animals die so young? Right? And you're like, 'It's just a developmental program. They have a set lifespan that's genetically defined.'
I
Interviewer28:10
And why would that be the case? Like, why would we have an off button? Every single...
E
Elad Gil28:15
These theories and who knows? I mean, I don't know. There's theories, but I don't know which theory is right. The other piece of information that we have is that we know that there's certain drugs that will extend lifespan in multiple organisms. So, you take a drug or you give a drug to something and it lives longer. Rapamycin would be an example where in mice, mice will live 10 to 30% longer based on their sex, right? So, female mice, I think, will live longer than male mice on rapamycin. And then there's knockouts that you can do in genes and if you knock out a gene, certain organisms will live a lot longer. And that means that you can develop a drug for it, right? That's how the drug industry works. You can do a drug that mimics a gene knockout or a gene upregulation and you end up with the same effect. And so we know that you can make things live much longer. And there's very little being done in people around that. And so the question is why, right? And imagine if you had another 30 or 40 or 50 healthy years.
I
Interviewer29:17
And when you say the question is why, well what's the answer? Is it that it's not funded enough, it's not safe enough, there's some other commercial disincentive or?
E
Elad Gil29:26
Yeah, there's three things. Well, it's not funded enough for all sorts of reasons. Second is from a regulatory framework perspective, until very recently the FDA did not have a good definition of what it means to build an aging drug, right? Because in general, point three in the broader medical world, aging is not considered a disease, it's considered a natural state. And so why would you develop a drug against a natural state? And so there's a company called Loyal which is doing aging in dogs and they actually defined a series of endpoints.
I
Interviewer30:00
Is that Kevin Rose's thing? Kevin Rose invested in it? I think he talked to us about it.
E
Elad Gil30:03
I don't know.
I
Interviewer30:04
Yeah, that's like my favorite longevity company. It's like yeah, forget the humans. Let's save the dogs. I'm all about it. I think it's both going to have an easier regulatory pathway but also good for society. Like sure, my dog living longer. I support nothing more than that. Does that... What have they found? Is that working? I haven't kept up with the actual science of the company.
E
Elad Gil30:27
Yeah, I don't know. I'm not an investor there. I think the founder is quite good. I just haven't been involved there. You know, as I mentioned, one of the main things I've been involved with in that area is a company called BioAge which again just went public and there's all sorts of information there in the domain now about them that is worth looking up.
I
Interviewer30:45
You know, what was that crazy quote? It was like what Silicon Valley nerdy people are doing for fun, that's like what everyone else is going to do in the next 10 or 15 years or something like that. Do on the weekends. Not because I know it's going to be a lot of veganism, which sounds awful. Well, that's what I was going to ask you, which is like you kind of fit that stereotype, you have a lot of resources and you're in the know with a lot of interesting new things. Are you taking any interesting pharmaceuticals? Are you doing Metformin? What do you think is interesting right now that you think will be a little bit more popular in two, three, four, five years?
E
Elad Gil31:19
Yeah, the honest answer is I don't know. I've tried to stay away from taking anything chronically unless I think it would have a huge impact and so far there isn't anything in the market that would really map to that. You know, a lot of it honestly is like do you exercise? Do you sleep? Do you eat well? You know, there's reasonably good data around rapamycin that people should work with their doctor on and sort of figure out if it...
I
Interviewer31:41
But you're not.
E
Elad Gil31:43
No, yeah, I haven't done anything there. So again, I've tried to wait until there's something that I feel is big enough impact. Some people for example in the aging community will take a certain subclass of statins for heart disease and neuro and then they'll take some baby aspirin similarly for heart disease. So there's some people who've done some things. Again, you should talk to your doctor about if you want to consider stuff like that. I haven't done anything like that because I just don't want to take things every day.
I
Interviewer32:18
When Sam says that quote about you know, what the nerds are doing on the weekends, what they're tinkering with in their spare time is what we'll all be doing 10 years from now.
E
Elad Gil32:26
Yeah, I'm just going straight to heart core gene therapy. So I'm just going to... No, I'm just kidding. I'm going to CRISPR my genome.
I
Interviewer32:32
But are you kidding? I mean, it sounds pretty cool.
E
Elad Gil32:34
Yeah, I think a lot of that stuff feels very premature to me. There are some people doing self-experimentation like that in the public domain. I just don't know that some of those things will work. It's kind of interesting because I feel like when people talk about gene delivery, there's like three or four aspects of it that matter, and everybody focuses now on the CRISPR side of it, which is can you modify a gene in a cell versus can you target it to the right cells? Will your immune system target those cells and turn it off? Like there's all this other stuff. Can you hit enough cells for it to matter? There's all this other stuff that traditionally have been the real issues of gene therapy that aren't being addressed as effectively as the CRISPR cast off. So.
I
Interviewer33:14
You've been interested in longevity earlier than I would say like this current wave of interest. You know, I think not only did you study it in school, I saw on your site you said you personally identified a gene that's involved in lifespan. You funded your own clinical trial at Stanford. It didn't work, but you're like, 'It's okay. I'll try. I'm happy to try again.' I'm curious, what do you think of Bryan Johnson and what he's doing?
E
Elad Gil33:38
You know, I've never met him. I haven't looked deeply into what he's doing, so I think it's great that people are raising awareness for this kind of stuff, but I don't have any specific insight or opinion. I just haven't looked into it.
I
Interviewer33:51
I'm surprised. How come you haven't looked into it? That seems like it's right up your alley.
E
Elad Gil33:56
I've been busy in terms of just focusing on hardcore biopharma for this stuff, right? Like drug development that can benefit society at large. That's what I focus on. So, it's just a different area of focus, right?
I
Interviewer34:07
Hm. What I want to know is are there any ideas on there that are just cool, but not necessarily like a world-changing serious thing? Like do you ever... You know, his monuments thing. Can you talk about the monuments thing? I think that's dope.
E
Elad Gil34:21
Oh, so one thing again, I need somebody to come work with me on this, and I'd happily fund it, is if you look at every society at sort of its peak, they would build large-scale monuments towards progress. And so it's like the seven wonders of the ancient world. Honestly, I don't know if you know the origins of the Eiffel Tower, but it was built in the late 1800s for a world fair in Paris to show off French steel-making prowess. Right? It was an ode to technology and an ode to steel-making because steel was like modern tech. And it was very controversial at the time. People thought it was ugly and all this stuff, right?
I
Interviewer34:55
In America at that period, you know, with Andrew Carnegie. They were built with that idea of let's prove. So like the Eads Bridge in St. Louis, it was the same thing where they would build these amazing bridges and then they would do all these funny things. Like they would get an elephant to walk across it to prove...
E
Elad Gil35:11
Yeah, yeah, to prove that it works.
I
Interviewer35:13
You know what I mean? And there's a flex side of it and there's an inspirational side of it. Like where are there large-scale inspiring pieces of beauty and art in society anymore? Like where have they gone? Why aren't we doing those anymore?
E
Elad Gil35:29
Sphere.
I
Interviewer35:30
That's the last one.
E
Elad Gil35:31
Yeah, seriously. The Sphere thing is amazing. I think that's a real example of large-scale societal beauty, right? It's beautiful.
I
Interviewer35:36
Well, you know what another example that sounds silly is the Blue Angels. And I was having this debate with someone the other day about how much money the American government funds air shows. And I was like, 'That's totally worth it.' Because whenever you go to one of these things, you definitely feel a sense of patriotism and you're like, 'This is awesome. I'm in awe of this.' And same way with going to the moon. You know, in the '60s and '70s, we spent a significant amount of money on this. A lot more than you could argue that we've spent on longevity, which is actually a shame. But there is a history in America of doing things just because, just to flex or just to celebrate. But what was the last thing like that that we did? It's been decades, right?
E
Elad Gil36:21
It's been decades and I actually find it to be quite saddening. And that's actually sort of what you said is once you get to a point where you're financially secure on a human basis, on a human level, you do things for art, for artistic reasons because it makes your soul feel good. I do wish we did that a little bit more as a country. But there was a period between 1870 right post Civil War up to the 1960s or so right around when JFK passed, where there was a series in America where we did a bunch of interesting experiments where you could just say it was just because. You know what I mean? And I really appreciate that.
I
Interviewer36:57
Yeah, and part of that is going to be regulation and then part of that is this odd postmodern cynical thinking, right? There's a very strong anti-progress movement in the US. You know, basically the idea is you buy land and you construct giant monuments that are inspiring. I don't know. I mean, it's pretty simple-minded, but imagine if you walked out in San Francisco and you looked across to the view with the Golden Gate Bridge and Alcatraz and there was a giant statue. This could have been an ode to the future. Do you know how much these things even cost?
E
Elad Gil37:31
You know, the land it depends on where you do it and it depends on the regulatory framework. The land in major metros tends to be the more expensive part of it actually versus the construction. On a per square foot basis.
I
Interviewer37:42
Like okay, let's walk through an example. What's one that you fantasized about? You're like, okay, what if we did this? That would be cool. I would be inspired by that.
E
Elad Gil37:50
An island for sale in the bay that ended up selling, I can't remember for how much.
I
Interviewer37:55
I remember that.
E
Elad Gil37:56
$39 or something just recently.
I
Interviewer37:57
Was that up by Stockton?
E
Elad Gil37:59
It was in the bay. It was actually in the water. It was like a little island and, you know, it was on the market for a while. I actually looked at it a couple times in terms of thinking, huh, maybe this is a thing. Maybe this is an anchor thing, but I just think it's going to be so hard to do anything in the bay area, right? I mean, it's hard enough to construct a public toilet. Like are they really going to let you build a beautiful monument?
I
Interviewer38:21
[Laughter]
E
Elad Gil38:22
On any reasonable timeframe. But there's lots of other metro areas that are much more amenable to this and there's a global version of this and there's a US version. But often in major metros it's the land and then the construction actually isn't that bad because really what you're building is a big statue and in some cases you're building out a base, your foundation under it that may be part of a building, maybe you want to build an elevator up if you have a big viewer vista. But you're not building a large commercial property with all the plumbing and electrical and all the extra stuff that goes into it, right? Often these things are kind of like hollow shells with...
I
Interviewer38:57
And what would it be of? You know, what's our equivalent of the Statue of Liberty or the Eiffel Tower that's just to demonstrate their steel prowess. Like, what do you think would be the modern equivalent that would have some meaning?
E
Elad Gil39:10
I think there's lots of stuff you can do. I actually think, you know, one of the things that the intention around monumental, which is what we're calling the project, is to also solicit ideas from people who live in locales and what do they want, right? What do they view as inspiring and what do they want to drive their children's optimism forward, right? This is in some sense an ode to progress but more importantly it's a way to encourage the future. How do you encourage inspiration in young people? How do you get people jazzed about the future and technology and optimism and doing things and building things and moving society forward? And I think part of this lack of ongoing societal beauty and ongoing great works is a reflection of cynicism that to your point came in in the '60s and '70s and has really kind of spoiled the well.
I
Interviewer39:59
I well, yeah, I mean, that's one of my favorite eras to read about. Basically, in the mid '60s, Malcolm X, JFK, RFK, there's a series of assassinations and one can argue that that was like the death of innocence in America. And so it's kind of an interesting period to read about.
E
Elad Gil40:16
Maybe. I mean, you look at all the stuff that happened in history before that. Some pretty awful stuff happened roughly every couple decades, right? I mean, World War was not a happy time. World War I was not a happy time. The Civil War was not, you know, there's a lot of that's gone down.
I
Interviewer40:30
No doubt about that.
E
Elad Gil40:32
The boomers have internalized things in a different way because they were self-absorbed as a generation. And so, maybe for them it was a big moment, but...
I
Interviewer40:40
It just seems like there was a shift. There was some mindset shift. And maybe that is what it was attributed to. I don't know what it's attributed to. Have you ever, I don't know if you guys Sean, you definitely have maybe you have actually. Sean, driving a do, do you guys ever remember seeing all these crosses on the side of the highway in the south? I bet Ari has, but you know, there was this guy who was old and he had saved up roughly three or four million dollars and he spent all of that money building crosses on the side of the highway. Now, regardless if you like Christianity or not, it doesn't matter, but I always thought it was so interesting that this guy dedicated that money to that. If you guys don't remember seeing this, it was like a big deal in the south. You would be driving to the south and every 50 or 100 miles you would just see this huge cross. And that's all you saw. Or you would see these billboards that says 'Jesus saves'. Do you remember those?
E
Elad Gil41:40
I guess they could find me on Twitter. You know, I'm at Elad Gil and then I just hope more people go and build interesting things. I think there's a lot to do.
I
Interviewer41:52
We appreciate you.
E
Elad Gil41:53
Great. Yeah, thanks so much for the time.
I
Interviewer41:55
All right, well take care.
U
Unknown41:56
I feel like I could the world. I know I can be what I want to. I put my all in it like the days old. On the road let's travel never looking back.