CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Dan Ives
Managing Director & Global Head of Technology Research, Wedbush Securities

Pope Leo calls out Jensen Huang, Anthropic hot takes, AMD's World Labs deal | Sozzi Unleashed

📅 Sep 29, 2026 Yahoo Finance 30 MIN 3409 VIEWS 51 SEGMENTS · 4 SPEAKERS
Brian Sozzi unpacks Anthropic's IPO prospectus as reported by Reuters, including a nearly $42 billion loss last year and, per the Financial Times, a risk factor warning its technology poses an existential risk to humanity. [TITLE, FIRM] Dan Ives weighs in on the IPO, Nvidia and what it means for OpenAI. Plus Pope Leo calls out Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI safety, AMD's $8.2 billion deal for Fei-Fei Li's World Labs, Oura pulling its IPO, former Disney CEO Bob Chapek on his new book, and why tech valuations have collapsed despite the rally. Sozzi Unleashed is hosted by Yahoo Finance Executive...

What Dan Ives said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Dan Ives, Managing Director at Wedbush Securities, discussed the Anthropic IPO leak, calling it a 'head scratcher' but emphasizing that the focus should be on growth and the trajectory of the AI revolution trade. He noted the tug of war between safety and growth, referencing Dario Amodei's essay and pushback from Jensen Huang, Satya Nadella, and Alex Karp. Ives dismissed the existential risk factor as 'alarmism,' comparing it to geopolitical risks at TSMC. He argued Anthropic is the 'hearts and lungs' of the AI trade, and going public is bullish for transparency, similar to SpaceX. He downplayed Oura's IPO delay as not a signal, stating we are only 15% through the $4-5 trillion AI spending cycle, calling it a '1997 moment' not a 2000 bubble. For Nvidia, he highlighted physical AI as the 'holy grail' and praised Jensen Huang as the 'adult in the room.' He sees OpenAI benefiting from Anthropic's IPO, with a 10-12 year buildout ahead.

Key takeaways

  1. Anthropic's IPO is bullish for the broader tech trade, providing transparency and a healthy market process.
  2. We are only 15% through the $4-5 trillion AI spending cycle, making this a 1997 moment, not a 2000 bubble.
  3. Physical AI will be the 'holy grail' for Nvidia, with spending multitudes more than current levels.
  4. The existential risk factor in Anthropic's prospectus is 'alarmism,' similar to geopolitical risks at TSMC.
  5. OpenAI will benefit from Anthropic's IPO, as both are centerpieces of the AI trade in a 10-12 year buildout.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
15% Portion of $4-5 trillion AI spending cycle completed metric 17:41
$4-5 trillion Total AI spending expected over the cycle guidance 7:29
10-12 years Duration of the AI buildout timeline 20:49

Chapters

  1. 0:00Anthropic IPO leak reaction
  2. 15:32Existential risk factor debate
  3. 16:23Anthropic's role in AI trade
  4. 17:41IPO market signals and AI spending
  5. 19:15Nvidia's future and physical AI
  6. 20:12Jensen Huang's response to Pope
  7. 20:49Implications for OpenAI
  8. 21:40Valuation and market skepticism

Questions asked in this interview

10
  1. 13:16Dan, what do you think about this Anthropic?
  2. 14:03Dan, you think they come public?
  3. 14:14And then you've been at this game a while. Who even leaks this stuff?
  4. 15:09How could I put money into a company that might kill me and my family?
  5. 16:16Are they too big to fail?
  6. 17:29What are these, what's the signal from that to the average investor?
  7. 18:37Like what does next year look like for this company?
  8. 20:08You think Jensen responds to the Pope?
  9. 20:37What does this all mean for OpenAI?
  10. 21:31You really mean to tell me the market's going to underwrite a $2 trillion valuation on Anthropic?
Brian Sozzi 0:53 ↗
Before we get after it, I got to get a public thank you to Dario Amodei because I'm on one hour of sleep, my man. So, you're getting a heater today on Unleashed. That Anthropic IPO leak. You got to be kidding me. I've never even seen stuff like that before. Also, what I have not seen before, and this is a story tailor made for all things Sozzi Unleashed, the Pope letting Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang have it.
I read that the head of Nvidia claims that he has found some way of inserting into AI certain guardrails, if you will. He's the same one, however, that says there should be no limits placed and that no government regulation, etc., etc. This is a problem that I think we need to sit down and talk about.
I did not have this on my bingo card that the Pope would be taking the fight to Nvidia co-founder Jensen Huang. But you know what? I've seen a little bit of everything this year. A little bit of everything. We got IPO leaks. We got the Pope mentioning Nvidia and Jensen Huang. I mean, this has turned out to be a big year. Now, let's get into this tech because it's been a hell of a 24 hours in all things tech. And that's where I start. I'm picking up on something weird in the markets and it really has only started the past few hours or should I say the 24. That's in large part why I've only gotten one hour of sleep.
Dario, first is the Anthropic IPO leaked to Reuters. I've been at this gig many years and I can't recall seeing an IPO prospectus of a very important company set to come to market being leaked. But when I saw this and it was late, it reminded me of when during the great financial crisis, government officials would leak stuff to the press to see how the markets would react. They would do this all the time. It was around the clock and I hated it. I wouldn't discount this happening here with Anthropic. No idea who the leaker is. Of course, Reuters ain't going to give you those details. Could be at Anthropic. Could be on the deal team. Could be a lawyer. Whatever the case is, I think this was a trial balloon to see how this size IPO maybe around $2 trillion or so. And you can check me, you can go to the Yahoo Finance private market page. You can check the valuations on the companies. In fact, I just put out a chart on this on my X account about 7 minutes ago will be digested by a market looking top-heavy with yields on the rise and growing concerns on AI safety. I will tell you this, the sentiment on X on this one hasn't been great for Dario and Anthropic. Many are questioning how a company losing mega billions is somehow worth $2 trillion. That's a big number.
Along the same line of thinking, it's also weird health tracker Oura decided to pull its IPO indefinitely. Oura is doing well financially, but similar to Anthropic, the ring maker has had to digest several weeks of negative headlines from Apple reportedly exploring a new health device to Meta pushing deeper into hardware. Now, I should say those glasses that Meta dropped, you can hear things from them. You can see things through them. But they're not going to track your heart rate dot dot dot yet. I'm wondering if Oura, Anthropic, and Open Eye even go public this year. If they don't, that's a knock on this great bull market. Many have been feasting on like Anthropic feasts on the energy grid. It feasts all day on that grid. That's why all our electric bills are going up.
Now, I want to get more into this Anthropic IPO because like I said, I haven't seen anything like this before and it has been a heck of a 24 hours. Now, Reuters had the inside look at this IPO and I want to take through a couple things here. First is this. Let me start what Reuters actually reported here. Now, of course, the company's not commenting on this $41.97 billion loss last year for Anthropic. That is massive. And you're going to sit there and tell me, Brian, yeah, well, the company had charges. It's doing this. It's doing that with its accounting. I could care less. I do not care. The headline for me is this. Anthropic lost almost $42 billion despite all the growth it's seeing. This is bananas. And again, shout out Reuters from one newsroom to another. Appreciate them dropping that story late at night. That's why I got 1 hour sleep. Thank you, Dario. Thank you, Reuters. Lot of money losing going over there at Anthropic. And there is no end in sight to this company turning profitable. I'll just be honest with you.
Number two here for Anthropic is the leak itself. Are you kidding me? This is bananas. I just mentioned I have been doing this for 20, 22 years. I've never seen a prospectus leak to a media organization. And if it had happened and I missed it, it was never of a company of this importance. This is bananas. Never seen this before. I think this provides next to no confidence in this company being a strong public company with strong internal controls and a strong management team. This is awful. I don't care where the leak came from. This stuff should not happen. Especially when you are potentially going out to be the richest, wealthiest IPO in the IPO of the entire world. Like this should not happen.
Next up, and this came via the Financial Times this morning, which I caught on the train. Shout out to the Financial Times who also apparently got a look at this prospectus. All prospectuses have lengthy risk factor sections. And from the reports that I've seen, the risk factor section in Anthropic is pretty enormous. I should say even 10-Qs, 10-Ks all have risk factor sections. It is what it is. They have to point the risk out to investors. Buried apparently in this risk factor section for Anthropic is this them warning about an existential risk to humanity because of their technology. And this is going to be a public company and we're okay with this. This is not normal. I've never seen a risk like that. But best believe if OpenAI when they file and they eventually will, they're going to have the same risk. This is not normal. At what point do regulators step in here and start to regulate these companies? They were badly burned by the social media companies. Badly burned. How could we have a company again reportedly because the filing has not been made public say that their technology could provide or be an existential risk to humanity. This is mind-blowing stuff. I've never seen anything like it before. But again, it really brings to light the risks should Anthropic do go public, should they go public about the risk of this public company every time they report earnings. That is always going to be in the back of your mind and I think is ridiculous.
Now, lastly, I will say this. One surprising winner from all of this could be Salesforce and Marc Benioff. And Marc invested in Anthropic, I believe in 2023, $50 million. He invested in subsequent rounds. The last funding round, and you can see some of the funding rounds here that my team pulled up here for all things Anthropic. That valuation for the investment that Salesforce and Benioff made was about $5 billion around a $1 billion valuation Anthropic. So a $2 trillion valuation, Benioff could be sitting on over $10 billion in unrealized gains from that investment. That could be a big windfall to Salesforce, which is investing aggressively in all things AI. This has been a heck of a 24 hours. You can go to the Yahoo Finance homepage and check this out. We've been all over this story. Continue to read it. Continue to digest it because the next shoe to drop inevitably is that they actually file this IPO.
Now, number two here is another deal that I'm watching here in an IPO is in fact a deal. It's Lisa Su. This is the I think the third time I've done a segment on Lisa Su since Unleashed went up and they made an $8.2 billion acquisition of World Labs and the godmother of AI Dr. Fei-Fei Li. We have now the godmother of AI and Fei-Fei working alongside the godmother of AI chips in Dr. Lisa Su. And here are a couple things that I think stand out to me. One, and I put this out on X. There you can see we got Fei-Fei Li, godmother of AI. We got Geoffrey Hinton who used to work at Google as well. Fei-Fei used to work at Google in the cloud business. He's seen as the godfather of AI. I'm just going to draw in Lisa right now in real time. Little stick figure. The godmother of AI chips. That's Lisa Su. And I just thought of that in real time. I'm sorry team. I didn't think of that before so we could put her face on there. But I put out there one and I'm getting a lot of negative feedback on this. You know, that potentially Fei-Fei Li could succeed Lisa Su as CEO. And I put that out there not because I think it might actually happen. I put out there for discussion. People are just ripping me. Ripping me. But shout out Patrick Moorhead. I think this is a very good take. Longtime tech analyst Patrick, love his work. Fei-Fei may not be the ultimate successor for Lisa Su. They're both young. I don't think Lisa is going anywhere. That's not the point. $8.2 billion. What you essentially have is AMD spending to get really top, top, top AI talent from World Labs. Fei-Fei Li has amassed impressive, impressive talent in World Labs. So that's good.
Now number two, this will also help AMD better design its chips for the future of AI. World Labs is sitting on amazing insight, amazing data. This will help AMD better design its chips. And then last but not least, and I mentioned Lisa Su, I mentioned Fei-Fei. You know how you now have arguably, you see what Meta is doing. They hired the MongoDB CEO yesterday, which I just don't agree with that. I mean, MongoDB CEO, what the hell are you doing, my man? You can't leave the day before your investor day. That's embarrassing. Shame on you. But you now have the two best AI recruiters in the game here. Lisa Su, Fei-Fei Li, atop this company. Fei-Fei is going to be chief scientist reporting directly to Lisa. Name me a better duo to go and work for. I can't find it. People are gonna flock to work with these two. Two of the best leaders in the tech game.
Let's go from tech to a little Disney here because amidst all my obsessions with AI and in tech stocks and Nvidia and Micron, I mean, look out for that Micron report tomorrow. I think Micron's going to say something tomorrow about capital returns. Nonetheless, I'm also watching Disney. Netflix is having a terrible month. Stock price has been in the garbage. It's been terrible. YouTube has eaten their lunch. You go back to the Sozzi Unleashed page. You can see the work I did on Netflix last week. You can see what we did on YouTube eating up Netflix's market share. Horrible run, horrible month, horrible year, frankly, for Netflix. It is what it is. I'm just reporting the facts. I'm also watching Disney stock also under pressure despite the return of football. So, Disney under pressure. Maybe the prices at Disney parks have gotten too expensive. Whatever the case is, not a good run for Disney shares. Not a good run for Disney investors. So, it was a great time for me to catch up with Bob Chapek out with a new book, Behind the Castle, where he's just letting it fling against his boss, Bob Iger, who ousted him. Take a listen.
Bob Chapek 11:55 ↗
I mean, we're in trouble. We're in financial trouble. And the support I get is an interview with the New York Times with Ben Smith that Iger did and announcing that he is reasserting himself as CEO. But you know Bob always acted like he can get his job back whenever he wanted. So, the company needs a growth vehicle. And if it's not going to be streaming, if the company goes to a distribution agnostic sort of strategy, which I've heard some rumblings about, then you need a growth vehicle.
Brian Sozzi 12:32 ↗
Thank you, Bob, for showing up to Yahoo Finance HQ. Really enjoyed the book. I encourage everyone to go get it because it was good. Just like I mentioned at the top of the show where I have not seen an IPO prospectus leaked, I have never seen a CEO of this stature in Bob Chapek go against really the CEO of all CEOs in Bob Iger. Never seen that before. Unbelievable. All right, let's get back onto tech because I want to drill in really into this Anthropic, all things Anthropic. We got some Micron. We got Nvidia still making news. And I want to welcome in Wedbush tech analyst. That is Dan Ives. Dan, good to see you. I'm kind of upset you're not on my new set, man. I rolled out this whole new set. You're coming to me remote, dude.
Dan Ives 13:11 ↗
And I'm in Vegas. I thought maybe you'd be here, but like what are you going to do?
Brian Sozzi 13:16 ↗
All right. Well, you're still getting my dollar sign. Dan, what do you think about this Anthropic?
Dan Ives 13:24 ↗
Look, I mean, this is the event everyone's been waiting for. Now look, in terms of the leaks and things like that, that's obviously, you know, a head scratcher, but look, I think it all comes down to like when they file, how investors ultimately play this name because I think the big focus is going to be more about the growth and what the trajectory looks like over the next few years because look, they're at the centerpiece of the AI revolution trade. And you think about Dario today with Trump and many other leaders at the White House. Look, it speaks to this tug of war we're going to see between safety and growth.
Brian Sozzi 14:03 ↗
Dan, you think they come public?
Dan Ives 14:06 ↗
I mean, I think it's probably the same chance that you're mentioned more than the bar.
Brian Sozzi 14:14 ↗
Well, I mean, I'm trying to think like why would this even leak if they were not trying using this as some form of trial balloon on a reception on a potential reception in the public markets? And then you've been at this game a while. Who even leaks this stuff?
Dan Ives 14:30 ↗
Look, I mean, things have happened in the past like where we've seen some things like this. But look, I think it just comes down to like you go back to the Dario essay, the safety, we have to slow things down. There have been a lot of things that have gone on where I think it's confused investors because it's sort of talking out of both sides of the mouth. I think the reality too is that just going back to like the Dario essay to today, Jensen, Nadella, you know, obviously Karp, you know, I think many have come out pretty strongly against the concept of what Dario was talking about.
Brian Sozzi 15:09 ↗
Dan, what is, is there a moral issue here? The risk factor section for Anthropic reportedly saying their technology is an existential risk to humanity. I like, I've never seen anything like this before. How could I put money into a company that might kill me and my family?
Dan Ives 15:32 ↗
Like there's definitely unprecedented, right, in terms of a risk factor like that. But I would, I mean like they're not similar but we just even go back to like Taiwan Semi and right, I mean you know me and you that have covered tech for so many decades like that's another name like there's a risk like you know in terms of like geopolitical in terms of Taiwan but I think investors they understand that this is a risk again I continue to view this as kind of a shock or risk relative to what I believe is something where guardrails will be put in. Technology always goes ahead of the regulation, but I do think there's some alarmism that's going on here as well.
Brian Sozzi 16:16 ↗
Dan, $518 billion in obligations for Anthropic. Are they too big to fail?
Dan Ives 16:23 ↗
Look, I think Anthropic is the hearts and lungs of the AI revolution trade and that goes for OpenAI as well. I think part of, I almost view it as me like, you know, looking at it the wrong way or misguided or whatever when everyone talks about the circular financing trade and that's some sort of negative doomsday deal. I view it differently. I view it as you are essentially building out a new economy over the next 10 years in terms of the AI economy from data centers to chips to GPUs and for the first time in 30 years US is ahead of China when it comes to tech. Anthropic's at the center of that. I do actually think for tech them going public is bullish for the broader tech trade, more transparency. And I think that's something that investors will crave and look just like we saw SpaceX, it comes down to what reception will be because on the private side, it's different than when public investors because there's a market, there's demand, there's buyers and sellers. And I think that that's a healthy process.
Brian Sozzi 17:29 ↗
I think Anthropic would have liked to go public a couple months ago. Now we have Oura delaying its IPO. What are these, what's the signal from that to the average investor?
Dan Ives 17:41 ↗
I personally wouldn't put a stat that signal to this. I mean that's my, I mean it's look there's going to be, there will be some choppiness in IPO market, you know, just given what we see depending on different areas of tech but when it comes to the AI trade and when you talk about Micron, you talk about just overall growth and where this is going like, size is my view like we're only 15% through the spending, the four to five trillion that's going to happen and it's hard for an investor to just not pay attention to that or not participate in that. And I still believe this is a 1997 moment, not a 2000 bubble moment.
Brian Sozzi 18:23 ↗
Well, Dan, if we're only 15% through it and Anthropic wipes us all out, I mean, there's no more to get through.
Dan Ives 18:29 ↗
Look, if that happens, at least I want to, you know, be in a Corvette, you know, driving, you know.

19 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Ives, D. (2026, September 29). Pope Leo calls out Jensen Huang, Anthropic hot takes, AMD's World Labs deal | Sozzi Unleashed [Interview transcript]. Yahoo Finance. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2949269/

MLA

Dan Ives. "Pope Leo calls out Jensen Huang, Anthropic hot takes, AMD's World Labs deal | Sozzi Unleashed." Yahoo Finance, 29 Sep. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2949269/.

BibTeX
@misc{ives2026_2949269,
  author       = {Dan Ives},
  title        = {Pope Leo calls out Jensen Huang, Anthropic hot takes, AMD's World Labs deal | Sozzi Unleashed},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Yahoo Finance. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {sep},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2949269/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}