Joining me now, Mohamed El-Erian and Joe LaVorgna, SMBC chief economist and former Trump Treasury official.
Okay, gentlemen. Hang on a second. I want to talk about today's inflation numbers that came out of the income and wage report, the PCE deflator stuff. Joe LaVorgna, everyone — the last three months the inflation rate is only 2.0%, 2%? The three months 2% excluding food and energy.
Now, in this PCE report, here's what I don't see people talking about. The last three months the PCE deflator, the whole deflator, the last three months is, Joe, 1.0%. Okay? Now, people are saying the year-on-year 3%, that's a terrific number. Yeah, sure. But I'm just saying the three-month number, the top-line number was only 1% at an annual rate. And the core was 2%.
Now, that tells me, along with the CPI that has a similar pattern, that the inflation rate is coming down in the last bunch of months, and the Federal Reserve should be very, very, very hesitant to raise their short-term interest rates.
Go ahead, Joe. Take that on, Joe.
I don't expect — I've been arguing back in May the Fed would hike at least 100 because we have a boom, it's just not a disinflationary boom. The market now is actually pricing 125 in total hikes. The three-month change looks great. The problem is it looks like an electrocardiogram and it's got that very weak June number. So if you pencil in a reasonable estimate for September, that three-month rate of change is back up over 3%.
You've got commodity prices at a near 52-week high, M2 growth accelerating close to 6%. The economy booming, the AI buildout ultimately will be disinflationary, but in the short term it's doing the opposite. Inflation's going to move higher, Larry, and that's why I do expect the Fed to hike again in December.
So let me get this right, Mohamed El-Erian. Technology advances are inflationary, M2 is inflationary — by the way, 6% is a very modest number. I don't understand when my friend Joe LaVorgna says these things. I do not understand that. The last several months the inflation rate is coming down, and the Fed — even if you hold these anti-diluvian views that I'm hearing about — the fact remains the Fed should wait, wait, wait, wait before they start raising rates, Mohamed.
Yeah. What Joe is talking about reminds me of what happened in the early '80s when we had way too little fiscal policy. And the result of that is that we unnecessarily weakened growth, and we had to wait for quite a while for a productivity shock. This time around the issue is that we are funding a massive innovation. The demand side comes before the supply side. You've got to make room for that funding. We're very proud to have capital markets that are willing to fund the innovation, but it comes at a cost. Today the 10-year went up to a level we haven't seen since 2002. The right response to what's going on here is not to increase interest rates to damage the housing market, to damage the car loan market. The right response is fiscal containment, and it also has the advantage of lowering interest rates.
Well, look, the capital markets for the new technologies, the AI technologies, the superintelligence technologies as Mr. Trump calls them, the capital markets are funding a huge amount. And that's competition for the Treasury. But also this is supply side. You know, you've got 100% expensing for capital goods. You're in a capital goods boom. The last three months, the last I saw, durable goods orders are up almost 20% over the last three months. That is profoundly disinflationary. You're putting more goods on the market. You're building the infrastructure to create more goods in the next five years, in the next ten years. And also you've got unit labor costs from the labor market in one measure less than 1%, in another measure just over 1%. Joe LaVorgna, that stuff does not — that's not a creak of inflation, that says there's no inflation out there.
Larry, you're talking about unit labor costs. You sound like a Phillips Curvier.
Mohamed is right, the demand is being lifted, no question. A similar story unfolded back in the late '90s. But when the Fed began raising interest rates, the core PCE deflator was about 1%. So what everybody's missing is the fact that the Fed has overshot the target for five-plus years. And on the fiscal side, I would love fiscal consolidation. We're still running a deficit that's over 6% of GDP, so the fiscal is actually working against us. I love the supply side. We're going to get that capital that's going to lift incomes and living standards, it's just not happening in the very short term, like the next 3 to 12 months, which is the window where the Fed is operating.
The last two years, two years, eight quarters, nonfinancial corporate productivity, which is what Greenspan used in the '90s when he was at the height of being the maestro — eight quarters today, nonfinancial companies, okay? Take the banks out because you can't measure productivity at a bank. The fact is it's grown at 3.1%, Joe LaVorgna. Go and look it up.
And if inflation is 2%, Larry, that's 5 nominal, we're running 6 on M2. So what? I mean, that's the —
If you're going to rely on that M2 model — Mohamed El-Erian —
I'm looking at commodity prices —