CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Scott Galloway
Founder; Host of The Prof G Pod; Co-host of Pivot and Prof G Markets, Prof G Media

Six Feet, Six Figures: The New Dating Bar

📅 Aug 13, 2026 The Prof G Pod – Scott Galloway 64 MIN 261294 VIEWS 48 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Scott Galloway speaks with neuroscientist and author Debra Soh about why young people are having less sex, and what that decline reveals about intimacy, loneliness, and human connection. They also discuss how dating apps have turned romance into a winner-take-all market, how pornography and AI offer frictionless substitutes for relationships, and why growing resentment between men and women is making it harder to find lasting love. Follow Dr. Soh, @DrDebraSoh: https://x.com/DrDebraSoh Your closet could use more Prof G. Shop the merch: https://merch.profgmedia.com Timestamps 00:00:00 - In...

What Scott Galloway said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Scott Galloway interviewed neuroscientist Debra Soh about her book 'Sexinction,' which argues that society is having less sex than ever, driven by technology, dating apps, and pornography. Galloway proposed several theses: digitized mating creates a winner-take-all economy, fewer venues for men to demonstrate excellence reduce mixing, and women's expectations (like the 'six feet, six figures' rule) have become unrealistic. Soh agreed with many points, adding that dating apps are incentivized to keep users single, and that men are not 'leveling up' as fast as women. She also discussed the role of AI pornography, which she tested and found 'insanely realistic,' and the impact of the anti-alcohol movement. Galloway and Soh agreed on the need for more compassion between sexes and criticized DEI initiatives, with Soh advocating for their removal. Galloway also asked Soh for advice for young men and women, and she recommended positive mindsets, diet, and exercise.

Key takeaways

  1. Soh said AI pornography is 'insanely realistic' and can replace in-person sex, reducing motivation to pursue real relationships.
  2. Soh argued that dating apps are incentivized to keep users single, contributing to dating app burnout and less sex.
  3. Soh stated that women's expectations, like the 'six feet, six figures' rule, have become unrealistic, but men also need to 'level up'.
  4. Soh recommended that young men try cutting out porn for 30 days if it affects them negatively.
  5. Soh said that more young women (under 25) have a negative view of men than young men do of women, citing a poll.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
40% bars and pubs closed in the UK since COVID metric 8:35
8% of population meeting six feet, six figures criteria metric 10:23
70% to 80% of long-married couples where one was more interested metric 8:35
50% of Gen Z with anxiety or diagnosed anxiety disorder metric 39:45
30 days recommended porn-free trial for young men commitment 34:05
12 weeks of cutting ultra-processed foods to see depression remission timeline 42:54
60-40 female-to-male ratio in college metric 52:24

Chapters

  1. 0:00The Sexinction trend and causes
  2. 4:04Digitized mating and winner-take-all
  3. 8:35Venues for courtship and mixing
  4. 16:22Men leveling up and women's expectations
  5. 24:20Anti-alcohol movement and Gen Z anxiety
  6. 27:42Return to historical mating patterns
  7. 31:40Pornography and AI's role
  8. 42:16Advice for young men and women
  9. 47:26Bias in media and podcasting
  10. 50:31DEI and academia critique

Questions asked in this interview

6
  1. 2:03So if people are less interested in having sex, what is taking its place? Why are people less interested?
  2. 5:21So what is the image that you feel you need to project online?
  3. 10:23... women are leveling up, creating just a gulf in qualifications or quality, and two, at the same time, women's expectations have become somewhat unreasonable, therefore just creating a gulf of expectations that is not breached or crossed?
  4. 20:17But also it's going in the end, don't you want to eventually find someone and fall in love?
  5. 29:15They say, "Okay, if I want a family, I can do it on my own." Nowadays, having a boyfriend is, quote, embarrassing anyway, right?
  6. 59:50If anything, I think it's sometimes people are trying to help you because why would they bother giving you that feedback otherwise?
Debra Soh 0:00 ↗
When you have an orgasm looking at porn, it activates the same brain network that is activated during sexual activity. So it is basically like having sex to some extent, or you are being tricked into feeling as though you're having sex even though you're not. You're watching something on a screen. If you have porn in your pocket available at any point in time, and there's an unlimited number of partners on there, and you can find exactly what you're looking for in terms of what the partner looks like, how she behaves. Now, if you have AI pornography becoming so popular where you can just basically tell the AI what you want it to do, and I've tested these platforms out myself, and it is insanely realistic. It scared me how realistic it is.
Scott Galloway 0:45 ↗
Dr. Soh, where does this podcast find you?
Debra Soh 0:48 ↗
I am in Toronto.
Scott Galloway 0:49 ↗
Toronto. Born and raised, or?
Debra Soh 0:51 ↗
Yes.
Scott Galloway 0:52 ↗
Okay.
Debra Soh 0:52 ↗
Yeah. And we're in this, we're summertime right now, which is the best time of the year.
Scott Galloway 0:56 ↗
Yeah. It's a wonderful, it really is a wonderful city. I think of it as sort of a clean New York. Um, did your parents immigrate there, or how did you end up in Toronto, or how did your parents end up in Toronto?
Debra Soh 1:06 ↗
Yeah, my parents are originally from Malaysia, and I have to say I love New York, too. I agree. I tell people all the time Toronto is like a smaller version of New York, and they're always, if they're Torontonians, they tend to be a bit skeptical, but I do love New York. Um, but yeah, they came over here, and um, yeah, I love the city. I've moved around a bit for school and things like that, but I've always come back.
Scott Galloway 1:25 ↗
By the way, congratulations. You're blowing up, for lack of a better term. And I immediately forwarded to our producers and said, "We have to get, we have to get Debra Soh on the podcast. I love, I love the work you're doing." The first line of your book, Sexinction, reads, "Society has never been more sexualized, yet we are having less sex than ever before." And one piece of data you cite is that in the United States, one in three men and one in five women across all adults, regardless of marital status, report not having had sex in the last year, according to the General Social Survey. Can you give us a rundown as to why this is happening? What is the sexinction, and what's causing it?
Debra Soh 2:03 ↗
Yes. Well, thank you for your kind words, too. Um, so I had noticed this trend starting in 2016 because that was the first time data had been published showing that there is this decline in sex that was happening across America. And so in that study, it showed it was based, as you said, on that sample of data that is nationally representative of Americans, showing that millennials were the first generation to be showing this very pronounced decline in sexual activity, and this was expected to continue on for Gen Z. And since then, more data has come out consistently showing that there is this trend across the globe. It doesn't matter, as you said, marital status, age cohorts, of people having less sex than ever before, and it is most pronounced in millennials and Gen Z, and among those generations, among young men in particular. So Sexinction, my book, is about trying to understand why is this trend happening? What is taking the place of sex? And my interest in sexual inactivity is partially because I used to study human sexuality scientifically, but also because it, to me, is a reflection of emotional intimacy and connection more widely. So if people are less interested in having sex, what is taking its place? Why are people less interested? And if this is even happening among married people and people who are partnered up, I don't think that's necessarily a good sign of where we're headed in society. But also, I wrote the book as a guide for parents because we know so much more now about social media and screens and how technology has the potential to really derail young people's development. And in Sexinction, I talk a lot about how I think Gen Z has unfortunately been, to some extent, a guinea pig generation because many of these technologies, they grew up not knowing a world without them. And I don't think parents should be blamed for that. But now that we do know more, hopefully being able to prevent further harm potentially to future generations and to adults as well, because I do think we're also being affected. Just because our brains are more developed doesn't mean we're completely immune to these changes.
Scott Galloway 4:04 ↗
So I want you to, I'm going to put forward a number of theses. I think about this a lot because I, you know, I believe the most rewarding thing in life is relationships and sex, which has, you know, you hear the word sex and your brain just starts firing in a lot of different ways. And I think in a lot of ways people connotate sex with something sort of nefarious or not wholesome. But the reality is sex is a fantastic bridge or on-ramp into a relationship. And if we have less sex, I think it's going to mean we have less connection, less relationships, lower birth rates, and just generally less anxiety. I'm less anxious and less depressed when I'm in a relationship. And not even, not just sex and companionship, but even things like touch. I wonder if we're just touching less. So I want to put forward a number of theses around why this is happening and have you tell me where I'm right and wrong. Um, technology consolidates a market. It consolidates commerce, Amazon, social media, search, you know, 50 and 93% shares respectively. And mating has become digitized. And as a result, it's become a bit of a winner-take-all economy. And the thesis is there's a small number of people having a lot of sex and the rest having a lot less sex. Where do I have that right and wrong?
Debra Soh 5:21 ↗
I think that's very much true. I mean, I have an entire chapter in Sexinction about dating apps and social media and how that alone has really warped our perceptions. And I can only imagine what it's like to grow up with this technology and not really know what it's like to meet someone and not be able to look them up online and creep them and find out all these things about them. And at the same time, you as a potential single person trying to find somebody, you know that anyone who's interested in you is going to do that to you. So what is the image that you feel you need to project online? So that's a lot of pressure for young kids. Um, the other part of that is, as you mentioned, because it is, well, I'm not sure if you said this explicitly, but it is a commercial enterprise. So these platforms are incentivized to want to keep you on there. So something like dating apps, it's not really in their best interest to have everyone find someone and end up happily married and never need to use that technology again. So I mean, I understand that and I respect it. It's, you know, it's a product like anything else. But I think when we outsource our personal lives and especially things like emotional intimacy and sexual intimacy to these platforms that are not necessarily looking out for our best interests or treating us as individuals who have dreams and the desire to fall in love, um, that can be potentially very unhelpful and frustrating to people. And I think nowadays a lot of people are experiencing dating app burnout. So social media too, that's really affected, I would say, how, not even, I mean, there's a huge body of research literature about the effects on how it has detrimentally affected their self-esteem, their body image, both the boys and girls in terms of body dysmorphia, muscle dysmorphia in young boys, plastic surgery in young girls. Um, you know, even in Toronto, I see young women all the time walking around, they're teenagers and they have injectables, which is crazy to me. But then the other thing is, so you have, you feel this pressure in terms of your body, but then also I think adults also are similarly affected by the types of partners they think that they should be pursuing, what they think they need to look like to attract other people, what they think they deserve. Um, the whole trend of looksmaxxing is based on this erroneous idea that young boys need to look like a super hyper alpha masculine gigachad guy when most women don't really care that much about what a guy looks like. Like yes, you want something you're attracted to, but for women especially, that handsomeness and that attractiveness is based on many other factors as opposed to just purely how tall you are, how strong is your jawline, how muscular you are. If anything, most women don't want to date a really jacked guy because they find that scary. So social media, dating apps, I think, and now we have things like AI chatbots, which I talk about in Sexinction, also pornography, creates this entire ecosystem that I think is a hall of mirrors and then also offers these potential replacements for in-person sex or in-person connection that doesn't really fulfill us, but they do give this perception of fulfillment. So I think that's also a way for some people, especially if they are struggling in their mental health, to avoid having to go through the trouble of actually getting dressed, going out, working on themselves, having social skills, interacting with people, dealing with rejection, not necessarily getting what they want. And then I have another chapter in Sexinction that talks about biological influences. So things like the birth control pill, potentially low testosterone, environmental toxins that may also be affecting us on a level that we're not fully aware of. And until those things are addressed as well, I don't think we're going to be able to fully fix the issues that we're facing right now with this crisis.
Scott Galloway 8:35 ↗
My dad always used to say that men get turned on with their eyes and women with their ears. And he said you need to develop yourself and your rap and be funny. It's like, be in reasonable shape, be a reasonable dresser, but it's more about your voice and what you say. Uh, for men, uh, let's talk a little bit about venues. And that is, generally speaking, again, I want you to push back where I have this wrong, but if you talk to couples who've been married longer, 30 or 40 years, 70 or 80% of them will say that one was much more interested in the other in the beginning. There's very rarely that kind of, you know, romantic moment where someone drops the scarf and they look at each other and they're both in love. That typically is not how relationships play out. And usually it was the man that was much more interested in the woman because, uh, just to be frank, men are less choosy. Men feel like they have an obligation to spread their seed to the four corners of the earth. Women have an obligation to put up a much finer filter and pick the strongest, smartest, and fastest seed. And it's the reason why our kids are taller and smarter than we are. But the venues to demonstrate excellence, where a man can demonstrate excellence and valor and go through the courting ritual, which my animals have, where the male tries to impress the female, there's fewer venues to demonstrate excellence. People have remote work. People aren't going to church or religious institutions. 40% of the bars and pubs have been closed in the UK since COVID. So is some or a lot of it just the fact there are fewer places, quite frankly, for men to break through and demonstrate excellence and establish that kind of overtime excellence? He was kind to his parents at temple. He was great at work. He had great friends. He was really funny. I like the way he danced. Isn't a lot of this that we're just not mixing as much?
Debra Soh 10:23 ↗
Yeah. And I would agree with that, and I think I tried to be as fair across the board in terms of pointing out what both sexes are doing right and what they could be doing better. So I would say in terms of, there's definitely a novel dynamic between the sexes. There's this, I partially, this hostility that I see fermented by online content, but also I think post-MeToo that's made things a lot more complicated for both the sexes. And I don't blame men for this because I think most young men are understandably terrified to approach a woman in public because they don't want to be labeled a creep. They don't want to potentially be filmed and put on social media or on the internet, have their life ruined forever. Um, and then I also think, like you said, with the, it's not as, just more generally, can't date at work. It's not as socially normal to talk to strangers anymore. People feel very much like everyone's always on their phone. So those things combined, I think men need to be the pursuers. And like you, I've found the same thing with couples that are happily married. Usually the man was more interested in the woman and he probably is a little bit more in love with her than she is with him, which is probably not a popular thing to say, but that's generally what I found. And I've talked to lawyers who work in family courts and they say similar things. So I think that is because men naturally need to feel like they're invested in their partner and they need to know that they put the effort in. So if you have a whole generation of young men who are disincentivized from pursuing women because society tells them you don't want to be creepy, you don't want to be a harasser, they're also, say, if they're struggling with low testosterone, they're lacking not just in terms of their libido but also their motivation more broadly in life. So one of the, I would say, main reasons why young men do strive to be successful is because those markers of success help to attract women, because women on average tend to prefer partners who have resources, who are as successful or more successful than they are. So if young men are feeling lethargic, they don't have the energy, they don't have motivation or focus, they're not really interested in pursuing goals, that's a turnoff to women. And then, and again, if they're struggling biologically, that's not their fault. But then I also think there's, in our culture and systemically, there's a real push to support young women in their success almost at the expense of young men. So you have initiatives like diversity that explicitly penalize young men or men more generally, especially white and Asian men, for no reason other than the fact that they are men. And I've had colleagues, former colleagues in academia, tell me that they have come across job postings, I've seen them myself, where they explicitly say this person needs to be a minority, either a woman or some other minority status, to apply. So basically men are excluded from these job applications, which is nothing more than discrimination. It's wrong. So I think there's this sense that if we care about men or we are sympathetic toward them, that is somehow a cost to women, that's a threat to women. Women are going to be sent back to the kitchen, not have equal rights, not be allowed to pursue their careers. But then you also have with this online discourse, because it's become so polarized, and young men today are saying, "Well, what did I do to deserve this? I have no issue with women. I just don't like being discriminated against." So then you have these influencers come in and say, "Okay, you guys want someone who tells you you're not toxic and that masculinity is great. We're going to tell you how to be really, you know, dominant and really discriminate against women. Tell them that they have no rights. They just don't deserve equal rights anymore." And then you have the opposite side of that, of female influencers saying to young women, "See, this is why you can't trust men. This is why men are all sexist and misogynistic." So it keeps going on back and forth and back and forth. So going back to your earlier point, I do think, yeah, it's more important that your partner is kind to you, compassionate, supports you, both of you care about each other, put each other first. Those things like agreeableness and personality factors are much more predictive of success in a marriage. But I also think because people spend so much time online and the younger generations do, and that's their primary way of meeting people and interacting now, they're being fed this ideology of what they need in terms of how their partner needs to look and the status that person brings to the table, as opposed to, like you said, is this person, what are they like just on a day-to-day basis? Do you like being around them? Do they make you laugh? Are they nice to people? Can they have a conversation with a stranger? Things like that. So it feels as if the gulf between connection is getting wider and wider. And so, and this is a wonderful thing. Women are ascending. Women no longer, I think, or not nearly as many women feel the economic need to partner. They can take care of themselves, and that's great. And naturally speaking, in a marketplace, as one party increases its game, their expectation should naturally increase. I think that's fair. And men, simply put, need to level up in terms of their own plan, their own economic viability, their own emotional viability, their physique, their dressing, making an effort, being creative, you know, just showing up, making an effort, leveling up. And I think a lot of people would agree men aren't leveling up at the same pace that women are leveling up. So it's understandable to think that women might complain there aren't enough economically and emotionally viable men out there. At the same time, and I want you to critique both of these assertions: women's expectations, because of online, what I keep seeing online when you have these women talking about is I keep hearing six feet, six figures, like that is the bare minimum, like they're being reasonable, of course, six feet, six figures. And if you take out married men, obese men, over the age of 50, it's like 8% of the population. So do you agree that one, men aren't leveling up at the same rate that women are leveling up, creating just a gulf in qualifications or quality, and two, at the same time, women's expectations have become somewhat unreasonable, therefore just creating a gulf of expectations that is not breached or crossed?
I write about the three sixes rule in Sexinction, which you mentioned. You mentioned two of the three sixes. I think you maybe are trying to be polite and not mention the third one, which has to do with size down below. So yeah, women, there is this essentially this lore, I guess, or perspective that women should seek out a man who is a top-tier male specimen in terms of his height, how much money he makes, his supposed ability to fulfill you sexually. Although I will say that it's not necessarily length. Other factors matter. This has been documented by the scientific research. But I do think women should be allowed to want what they want. And there is an evolutionary or historical reason why women have these preferences somewhat ingrained in them, in that yes, someone who is taller than you or a partner who is taller than you can physically protect you. He probably is going to be a more successful provider as well. So the six figures annual income speaks to that. And I guess the sexual fulfillment has to do with you being happy in the relationship. But at the same time, it's gone a little bit off course because those are not really metrics, as I mentioned earlier, that are going to point to relationship or marital success long term. And there are surely plenty of men out there who do meet these three sixes who are still jerks and who are not going to necessarily be husband material. So you take this issue, and what I want to say too is that when you have the influencers, right, these manosphere-type influencers who are pointing to hypergamy and saying, "See, this is why all women cheat, this is why women can't be trusted, this is why women have, quote, delusional standards," I'm thinking, but it's no different from men having their standards in terms of men tend to want to date women who are younger and who are attractive and who are symmetrical because these are all indicators of fertility and reproductive health. So I think both sexes should be allowed to want what they want. I'm just trying, you asked for criticism, so I'm trying to push back on these ideas from whatever angle I can. But I do think it's gone to the point where it's so unrealistic now for both sexes. But combine that with the fact that women are excelling in terms of their same-age peers. So women are doing better in terms of education and occupation. So there is a smaller pool of viable men, viable successful men for these women to choose from. So all women are basically fighting over the same pool of smaller, the smaller pool of men because men don't tend to care as much about a woman's success. It doesn't matter how successful a woman is, she's going to be fighting after the same pool of men. And then the vast majority of men who are not as successful have basically been shut out of the dating market. And so now they're going down the route of these other replacements like the chatbots, the sex robots and sex dolls, pornography. And instead of society recognizing that there's a problem here and that we should stop discriminating against men, we should try to tone down this animosity between the sexes, it's saying, "Okay, we're just going to give you guys, quote, solutions." So we're going to tell women, "Okay, if you want to, say, have a family, you want to get married and have a family," not to say that everyone has to do this, but if you do choose to, for women, our biological window is much more unforgiving than men's. So if you get to a certain age and you don't have a man with whom you'd like to have a child, now society is saying, let's normalize this idea of women having children on their own, like basically electively having children on their own, which I can imagine for many women, if you get to a certain age and you'd like to have a child and you don't have a partner, it's not my place to judge someone who decides to do that. But I also think ideally, I think it would be preferable for anyone would say it's easier to have two parents as opposed to mother. Let me just be clear, it's harder. I experienced it. It's harder to raise a kid on your own.
Scott Galloway 20:17 ↗
Mhm.
Debra Soh 20:17 ↗
And I think also for the children, like they ideally would have both parents in their life as well, as opposed to being brought into a situation where it's, you know, by design single motherhood. And society saying almost encouraging women, freeze your eggs at a young age so that you have all the time in the world. This is the narrative that you have more time, say, so you can focus on your career, which is great. But they don't, my sense is the messaging is not so much this really should be a last resort and you should still prioritize trying to find somebody because again, this is not a sure bet that it's going to work. So I think reproductive tech, you know, I have a chapter on that. Again, I think if people find it helpful for them, that's their right. I'm not judging anyone, but it's more that these are band-aid solutions and they're not addressing the real problem. And unless we address the root problem, it's only going to get worse. And so also with the men to basically say, "Okay, well, let's just let you guys have your sex robots and your sex dolls and you can go off and as long as you're, you know, having your orgasm and you're not bothering anyone and you're not lighting anything on fire or destroying things, then we just ignore you and let women continue succeeding." I don't think that's good for society either. And also, women want, as I said, to date men who are successful. So I would ask women in this audience. I've got a lot of pushback about Sexinction from young women saying, why should we care about young men or why should we care about men? You know, men have done us dirty for so long. It's time that they get a taste of their own medicine. But that's really not a very positive outlook. But also it's going in the end, don't you want to eventually find someone and fall in love? And if you can't find someone, it doesn't help anyone to sit there and just keep, you know, digging your heels in and saying, "We're not giving the other side any room."
Scott Galloway 22:03 ↗
Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. If you're a small business owner, you don't need me to tell you how much hiring great people matters. But the time and resources you have to spend to get it right are precious commodities. Sourcing, connecting with, and screening candidates can quickly eat into time better spent on your customers. That's where LinkedIn Hiring Pro comes in. It's designed to be your hiring partner, helping you source the right candidates faster. That way, you can hire with confidence without making it feel like a full-time job. LinkedIn Hiring Pro simplifies the entire process all the way from writing your job post to shortlisting candidates and running AI-powered initial interviews. Plus, it does it all through a conversational interface where you can just describe what you're looking for in plain language. LinkedIn says nearly 60% of hirers find someone to interview within a week. With Hiring Pro, you spend less time searching and more time connecting with the right talent. So instead of sifting through piles of resumes, you get a tight, high-quality shortlist that actually moves things forward. Join the 2.7 million small businesses using LinkedIn to hire. Get started by posting your job for free at linkedin.com/pro. Terms and conditions apply.
Support for the show comes from Everybody's Business, a podcast from Bloomberg Businessweek. Sometimes you want a macro view of what's going on in the economy. You might be wondering why the price of groceries is going up, or why every brand is trying to sell you an experience, or why it's harder than ever to find fun activities that don't cost an arm and a leg. Everybody's Business gives you the big picture you need and shows you how it impacts your day-to-day life. It's hosted by Max Chapkin and Stacy Vanic Smith. Everybody's Business is a show for people who don't need to be finance pros, but are financially curious. The great thing about this show is how it breaks down the domino effect of huge economic forces, including the Fed and interest rates and tariffs, and how they impact people, including you and me. Also, it's fun and it won't financially ruin you. In fact, listening to the show is totally free. You'll come away entertained but also feel smarter. So wherever you're listening or watching now, search for Everybody's Business and subscribe. Trust me, your ears and your group chat will thank you. I'm a huge fan of Bloomberg and Businessweek. I think they do a great job.
Yeah. You bring so much grace and like data and, you know, you're so articulate around issues I think we're all feeling. It feels as if the genders have done a great job convincing themselves that it's the other gender's fault. And a couple things. One, I'm curious what your thoughts are. So I think for the first time since they started tracking it, the majority of young people don't drink. And what I've said, and I've got a lot of pushback for this because alcohol ruins a lot of lives. If you have addiction, you should be very careful. But I have found generally speaking that alcohol can play a productive role in overcoming inhibition, in establishing initial contact, establishing initial physical contact, and that leads to physical intimacy and relationships. And I'm not suggesting everyone go out and start doing tequila shots. I'm suggesting that the anti-alcohol movement has a knock-on effect of less connection, initiation, and less sex. Your thoughts on the anti-alcohol movement?
Debra Soh 25:23 ↗
I see what you're saying. I personally don't drink, but I don't think that everyone has to abide by those rules. I think what matters is that, like you said, people have insight into their own behavior. And I've heard you say before that when your mood is low or you're feeling depressed, you avoid alcohol and cannabis, which I think is very smart because, yeah, there is, I used to work with patients with addiction. And for sure, there's a high propensity, especially if you have a biological predisposition for addiction in the family, that I don't know if you do or you don't, but just in general speaking, more generally, that it's a potential risk that someone might lean on those substances a little bit too much if they are going through a difficult time. So I think for the average person, say, who isn't as affected or isn't at risk, I could see that because generationally, Gen Z tends to be more risk-averse. I think that is a symptom of the widespread anxiety that they experience. Roughly half of Gen Z has anxiety or a diagnosed anxiety disorder. So very many of them are on medication for it. Also very many of them are on antidepressants as well. So I think anything that could help them be a little bit less inhibited would be a good thing. But I guess my concern would be for some of them, especially if they are struggling with underlying mental health issues, if they were to start using substances as a way to help make them feel a little bit more socially lubricated, would that potentially bring other issues to the fore in terms of, okay, now you're struggling with dependence on these substances. And so the issue may not be that you're too scared or uptight in social situations, but that you need to take it before you go. I think ideally just for people struggling with anxiety to know, especially young people to know, because I talk to so many Zoomers and they're so sweet and they're so smart, but they're aware, they're aware that they struggle socially and with anxiety. And it's just to let them know it's very normal to feel that way, especially when you're young and you're still figuring yourself out. And that doesn't mean that you now don't go off your medication just because I say this, but talk to your care team. But I do think the solution isn't necessarily to medicate people or to tell them that they have something, you know, severely wrong with them or that they need to, I don't know, that they don't fit in or whatever, that it's something particular to them. But it's just this is a normal part of human life and just because other people seem like they have their act together doesn't mean that they necessarily do.
Scott Galloway 27:42 ↗
Where we're headed. Isn't this in many ways, if we take the aperture back, aren't we returning to the laws of the jungle or quite frankly the way that the world has been through most of history? That I think the greatest innovation in history isn't vaccines or the iPhone. I think it's the American middle class. And only 40% of men throughout history, I understand, have reproduced and 80% of women. The majority of men throughout history have not had the opportunity to reproduce because the majority of the spoils have gone to a small group of people and they can engage in what I would loosely refer to as Porsche polygamy. And then after World War II, we created this amazing thing called the middle class where we had a bunch of 7 million men returned from overseas. They were handsome. They were fit. They looked good in a uniform. National Highway Transportation Act, GI Bill, and we made them economically viable and quite frankly attractive, and they started mating a lot. And now it appears with income inequality, we're moving back to the way the world has been throughout most of history, and that is a small number of men have a disproportionate amount of mating opportunities, and the rest have almost none. Isn't where we're headed back to quite frankly that the way the world has been through 99% of history and we're moving away from what was an anomaly, a wondrous anomaly where someone of perfectly average attractiveness as a male could expect to find a mate and enjoy that. But aren't we headed to something that has been more normal than not throughout history?

20 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Galloway, S. (2026, August 13). Six Feet, Six Figures: The New Dating Bar [Interview transcript]. The Prof G Pod – Scott Galloway. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3002639/

MLA

Scott Galloway. "Six Feet, Six Figures: The New Dating Bar." The Prof G Pod – Scott Galloway, 13 Aug. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3002639/.

BibTeX
@misc{galloway2026_3002639,
  author       = {Scott Galloway},
  title        = {Six Feet, Six Figures: The New Dating Bar},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, The Prof G Pod – Scott Galloway. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {aug},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3002639/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}