CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
David Imel
Co-host, Waveform podcast; formerly contributor, The Verge, Waveform

What the AI overlords get wrong about being alive | The Vergecast

📅 Sep 01, 2026 The Verge 41 MIN 52359 VIEWS 81 SEGMENTS · 3 SPEAKERS
Elizabeth Lopatto recently wrote about Mark Zuckerberg's 6,500-word AI manifesto in her piece, "Mark Zuckerberg doesn't understand how to live." Today, she joins guest host David Imel and senior wearables reviewer Victoria Song for a freewheeling discussion about what happens when we let AI make decisions for us. 0:00 Intro 01:10 90 Seconds on The Verge 02:37 Zuck’s Manifesto Context 04:24 New Tools to Express Our Ideas 08:23 Everyone Can Create a Business 10:35 Experiencing Minds in Art 19:19 Is AI Replacing Effort? 25:05 AI Can’t Give Wisdom 29:42 Hobbies Require Friction 33:41 Loneliness a...

What David Imel said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

David Imel, Elizabeth Lopatto, and Victoria Song discuss Mark Zuckerberg's AI manifesto and Liz Lopatto's article critiquing it. Lopatto argues that AI tools for expressing ideas are unnecessary since most people already have ways to express themselves, and that the promise of easy business creation leads to 'slop.' The conversation centers on two key ideas: experiencing other people's minds through art, and the value of hobbies not being about excellence but about the journey. Imel emphasizes that consuming human work connects us to others' minds, while Song adds that effort is communicated through art, citing Olivia Rodrigo lyrics and Crying in H Mart. Lopatto shares how Terry Pratchett novels were 'good company' during the pandemic. They discuss how AI cannot provide genuine company or comfort because it lacks lived experience, and how convenience devalues effort, comparing AI-generated gifts to the father in Train to Busan giving a Wii.

Key takeaways

  1. Reading or consuming art is experiencing other people's minds, not just consuming a resource; AI-generated art cannot provide that connection.
  2. Love is paying attention; AI-generated gifts or efforts signal a lack of care and thought.
  3. Convenience devalues effort, and AI-generated content feels hollow because it lacks human experience and effort.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
6500 Words in Zuckerberg's AI manifesto metric 0:02
$499 Price of Dyson Camera Jet electric toothbrush price 0:53
8.5% Markiplier's stake in GoPro metric 0:53
80 hours a week Hours worked by friend's father who was Best Buy regional manager metric 25:05
4,000 weeks Average human lifespan in weeks from book 'Four Thousand Weeks' metric 19:30

Chapters

  1. 0:00Zuckerberg's AI manifesto and backlash
  2. 4:05Tools for expressing ideas
  3. 10:37Experiencing other minds through art
  4. 16:14AI cannot provide genuine company
  5. 19:30Effort and inconvenience as value
  6. 22:09Gift-giving as paying attention
  7. 29:41Hobbies and the value of struggle
  8. 32:00Social connection through shared activities
  9. 39:05AI sentiment and what gets lost
David Imel 0:02 ↗
Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of things that hopefully make you feel alive. I'm David Imel. A few weeks ago, Liz Lopatto wrote an article that really stuck with me. It was titled "Mark Zuckerberg Doesn't Understand How to Live," and it came right after Zuckerberg's 6,500-word AI manifesto called "The Future Is for Everyone." He tried to make the case that everyone will have their own personal AI agent that will help you do things, I guess. But Liz has made the case that those are the things that actually make life worth living in the first place. I was having a very long conversation about this with my good friend V Song while I was on the airplane a few weeks ago. And like any group of 30-somethings, we just stopped and said, "Wait, we should just record a podcast," because our conversations are so interesting.
Victoria Song 0:52 ↗
They are.
David Imel 0:53 ↗
They're so interesting. So today we're talking to Liz Lopatto, author of said article, and V Song, author of the text that she sent me in reply to my thoughts about said article, about what it means to be human and why so much of Mark Zuckerberg's manifesto feels so very hollow. But first, here's what's happening on The Verge today. This is 90 seconds on The Verge for Tuesday, September 1st, 2026. Today, Dyson unveiled the $499 Camera Jet electric toothbrush, which uses an integrated camera in the brush head to detect gaps between your teeth. Dyson said that an AI algorithm detects when to blast those gaps with mouthwash, which will effectively take care of flossing for you. The toothbrush also pairs with an app to give you a live stream of the inside of your mouth, so you can see where it's most effective to brush. This is one of those products that nobody really needs, but everyone kind of wants, including me. YouTuber Markiplier has acquired 8.5% of GoPro, making him the biggest individual shareholder in the company. The news comes just a couple of days after he published a sponsored review of the newly released GoPro Mission 1S camera. This morning, GoPro entered into an agreement to merge with Starman Optical, Inc., a privately held optical photonics company. And finally, today is John Turnis' first day as the CEO of Apple, ending a 15-year tenure for Tim Cook. Turnis marked the occasion by tweeting a simple hello on Twitter with no capitalization. Turnis was previously the senior vice president of hardware engineering, so we'll be waiting to see if he makes hardware a key point for the company moving forward. You can read more at theverge.com. That's 90 seconds on The Verge for Tuesday, September 1st, 2026. So, Lopatto, Victoria Song, thank you for coming to the Vergecast. I appreciate you guys taking the time.
Elizabeth Lopatto 2:42 ↗
Oh, thank you.
Victoria Song 2:44 ↗
I love philosophical conversations in which we go like, why are we doing this to ourselves?
David Imel 2:49 ↗
Yes. Yes. I wanted to bring you both on so we could talk about this. Liz, you're obviously a very prolific writer here at The Verge. I like everything that you write. Everyone likes everything that you write. But this article really stuck with me. I just want to see, can you identify the key point that Zuck was trying to make with this "The Future Is for Everyone" manifesto?
Elizabeth Lopatto 3:11 ↗
Yeah, I think he was writing in opposition to, you know, some of the stuff that's been coming out of OpenAI and Anthropic where they're saying, "Oh, AI is going to replace your job and it's going to like, you know, totally disrupt your life, but you know, it's going to be worth it because it's such a big advance, blah blah blah blah blah." And people hate AI now because you know, you say that in public, the investors get excited, but everybody who has a job is like, "I'm sorry, you're building what?" And so you know, there is this like pretty intense backlash that is mostly being expressed against data centers for right now, but you know, AI is increasingly less popular. Like every time there's a survey that comes out, it is less popular. And I think that a lot of it isn't just that, you know, it's being discussed as this thing that's going to ruin your life, but I think that doesn't help.
David Imel 4:05 ↗
Yeah. Yeah. Well, in this manifesto, he kind of establishes a bunch of core ideas that he thinks AI will help everyone with. They're all a little bit outlandish. And you specifically honed in on a couple of them, but I do want to go in on like most of the main ones that he brought up. The first one being that everyone will have new tools to express their ideas.
Elizabeth Lopatto 4:29 ↗
Oh, Christ almighty. We already have tools to express our ideas with, like.
David Imel 4:33 ↗
Yeah. In what new ways are we going to have new tools to express our ideas?
Victoria Song 4:38 ↗
You know, I got to say that one isn't as stupid to me as some of the ones that are coming up.
David Imel 4:43 ↗
Um, okay. Fair enough.
Elizabeth Lopatto 4:45 ↗
That's fair.
Victoria Song 4:46 ↗
Um, yeah. I mean, like, if you have ideas, there are already a lot of ways to express them. And like I can certainly imagine like if you're trying to storyboard something but you can't draw, like if you're a director, you know, that might be helpful to have something that can draw for you so that you have a storyboard so everybody can visualize your shot, right? Like I can imagine this. I'm not saying it's a good use of AI. I'm just saying I can imagine it.
Elizabeth Lopatto 5:10 ↗
Um, the thing that I find, this is like sort of the thing about this, is that most people don't have a lot of ideas that they aren't already expressing. You know, like I have been sort of keeping an eye on like the vibe coding stuff that, you know, people have been doing in our audience and sort of more broadly, and it's a lot of people making productivity tools and like.
David Imel 5:34 ↗
That's such a funny... that's a great point.
Victoria Song 5:37 ↗
Such a funny thing because I wrote a blog, oh, like a couple years back. I was like, why is there no one productivity app that like does everything that I need? And I realized it's just a journal. It's just a journal that I write and like design in my own way because everyone's brain works a little bit differently. So you need different things. And I like, I've never been particularly into templates for how to do my productivity and whatnot. And then as soon as I ditched all the productivity apps, my productivity went way up because I could customize it to my own needs. And so like I could understand vibe coding your own productivity app to do what you need it to do because the like, the templates that are already out there don't work for you. But it's also just kind of like, yeah, I don't know, you could buy a notebook.
David Imel 6:27 ↗
Yeah, and I would say that this is not exactly tools for expressing your ideas. These are tools for organizing your ideas to then have ideas with and do things with those ideas. But to your point, Liz, like it doesn't seem like people are having a lot of unique ideas that they want to be doing things with in the first place.
Elizabeth Lopatto 6:45 ↗
That's right. And like, you know, V, as somebody else who is a member of the notebook society, I just am going to put in a plug for paper. Not only because, you know, you can customize it however you want, but also because there's a fair amount of research that shows physically writing stuff down makes it easier for you to remember. So even if you don't have the notebook with you, you're more likely to recall its contents.
Victoria Song 7:10 ↗
It's 100% true, too. Like, I was going through a period where I was reading books and then really struggling to remember what it was that I had read. And so I started like an active reading journal where after I read a book or after I read like a certain section of it, I'll just go sit down and be like, "What happened during the section I read?" And I'll write that down or like what themes were expressed and what did I find interesting? And it's like not like a super long thing where I'm writing pages upon pages upon pages of it. It's just like four or five sentences of what I just read. And now I have like really great recall for the books that I've read and the themes that were expressed. And like my in-laws were commenting like, "How do you remember everything that you read in those books? I read like books, too, and I can't remember shit." And it's like it just physically writing a sentence down and like having to do the act of that work, it really does help you stay sharp. And that's a thing that I worry about with this concept of like AI helping you as an everyday tool for everything because you're just offloading your cognitive thinking in a way that makes you less sharp, or like that's how I've experienced it. So yeah.
David Imel 8:22 ↗
Yeah. Yeah. Well, there's a lot of these different things that he says everyone's going to have access to. I want to touch on one more right before we get to Liz's main points because there were two in particular that Liz kind of like focuses on in this article. But I really quick want to just address this "everyone will have the tools to create new businesses" one because I found this very funny as well. To all these billionaires' points, they're like, "Oh, everyone's going to have access to these things." But if everyone can just start up a business, then the amount of players in the market are nearly infinite. And so how are you actually going to sell anything to anybody? Like what is a business in this case? You know,
Elizabeth Lopatto 9:01 ↗
Slop. It's just the business of selling slop. It's a slop business. Yeah.
Well, I also want to say something. I recognize that like I'm the staff weirdo in many ways, but like I don't want to make a business. Like I just don't want to do it. Like I have a job because I don't want to think about accounting and I don't want to have to hire my own liable lawyer and I don't like, there are all of these things that go into making a business that you have to think about and that you would, you know, with AI I guess program somehow. Yeah, but I just, I don't, that's not what my goal is in life, you know? I want to write things. I want to write things that are meaningful. And the more time I can spend doing that, the better. And one easy way for me to do that is to have a job where all I do is write and, you know, somebody else takes care of the business stuff so I never have to think about it. Like these, you know, some of these things is just like, yeah, everybody does have tools to make, I don't know, AI music now, but like most of us want to listen to musicians. Most of us are excited about listening to real human beings. Like it's not that like I have been stopped from having some kind of musical career because I like can't really sing. I want, you know, I want to listen to like Mariah Carey because she has a remarkable voice. And so like, you know, there are these things where it's just like, okay, but like I don't care. Like I don't care about this.
David Imel 10:37 ↗
Yeah. I think this kind of pushes us into like the primary part of this article that I really wanted to talk about. And there are two core paragraphs that you wrote that I think really made me think a lot about that. What you're saying right now, when I'm reading a book or listening to music or watching a movie, I'm not just consuming a resource. I'm experiencing other people's minds. That is something that I, I read that and I just was thinking like, yeah, that's the entire reason that we consume other people's work, why we make our own work. Why would we consume something that is just generated when we could actually feel connected to somebody who is trying to express a feeling or thought through a form of art.
Victoria Song 11:20 ↗
It's also the effort that gets communicated through that form of art. Like I was super obsessed with Olivia Rodrigo. "You seem pretty sad for a girl so in love." There's that one of the lines that you're like, "If loving me means crying on the curb at LAX, I wish, I wish, I wish you loved me less." And I'm like, "Oh, that just hit in such a way." And but the robot would not cry on the curb at LAX. The robot's not going to cry on the curb at LAX because her relationship like broke down. It's just not because anytime you talk to one of these chatbots, and I've talked to a lot of AI chatbots and companions for this site, it's just kind of a filtered reflection of you. So if you're talking to yourself in a mirror, but it's all like, there's an artifice that gets really apparent after a bit of how it's just sort of like, oh yeah, I need to engage you more, so I'm going to end everything with a question. Mhm. So it's just, I don't know, like there's something about knowing that she actually probably cried on a curb at LAX that makes that song really hit with a lot of people.
David Imel 12:30 ↗
Yeah. It's just, yeah. Liz, did you have like a specific thing you were thinking about when you wrote that? Was there like a song you were thinking of or like something that you were, I don't know?
Elizabeth Lopatto 12:42 ↗
I was actually, I was thinking about something that happened in 2020. So during the pandemic when, you know, everything was bad, and we were all feeling pretty bad, I went back and reread a bunch of stuff that I loved when I was a teenager, a bunch of Terry Pratchett novels. And, you know, they're not like challenging in the way that Moby Dick is challenging, right? Like you're not like, it's not high art. But what Terry Pratchett is and what I wanted then is just good company. And like every single one of those books is just guaranteed good company. Like something that you're in the company of someone who is kind and who is generous and who is funny and who is like making jokes about Shakespeare or like writing books that are jokes about Shakespeare. And that really was part of what got me through sort of a difficult period was having that kind of company.
David Imel 13:42 ↗
Yeah. And I think that that point about good company, it's kind of similarly to the experiencing other people's minds, right? Like the fact that you use the word company, it's like they're not in the room with you, but they did transfer their emotions and their feelings and their minds onto a page which then feels like you're in the room with them.
Elizabeth Lopatto 14:01 ↗
It's transformative. It's transformative.
David Imel 14:04 ↗
It's good art.
Elizabeth Lopatto 14:05 ↗
And why would I want to just read a book written by a robot who...
Victoria Song 14:11 ↗
Well, it's like a robot can't live, right? A robot can't experience. Like I think sometimes we read books or we listen to music or we experience art to kind of find a connection or like to use Liz's words, company in a feeling that we're trying to express ourselves, right? And an AI who has not experienced loss, an AI who has not experienced grief, who can't understand what it means to like feel some of the darkest, deepest things. Like when my mom was dying, I read a book called Crying in H Mart and that's by Michelle Zauner, who is also known as Japanese Breakfast. She's half Korean, half American. And it was like her experience of losing her mom was a singular experience, but there were things in it that was echoing the impending loss of my mother, which I don't think if I went to an AI and I was like, "Hey, write a memoir of a Korean American and what H Mart and Korean food mean when you're losing a mother who's the only source of that Korean food that you have and what it means to go sit and cry in an H Mart." And then also like it has something poignant about chronic illness and like being a daughter and what it means to be like lost in a creative process to process that, like what are they going to come up with? Yeah. Yeah, like if I have done these experiments to kind of like see, right, like me in the style of that, and it's always just such an empty feeling in it because it's not like the AI is not sitting there thinking about the word or thinking about the emotion and what is the perfect way to express how that loss hits. And when I read that book and I just sobbed for like 2 hours because I was like, "Oh, this is, there's no one in my life currently who can like sit with me in that moment, but this person I don't know has gone through something similar." And it kind of served as a source of comfort and company in a time where I felt really isolated.
David Imel 16:14 ↗
And I think that's honestly the biggest argument against AI-generated writing that I've seen. Like just like how is a thing that can't experience going to provide that company and comfort for someone because AI, like it can't experience good stuff but it also can't experience bad stuff because it can't experience anything. Yeah. So that's how.
Elizabeth Lopatto 16:36 ↗
I also, and maybe this is just again a particular way in which I interact with art, but if I really like somebody, I will read or watch or listen to their entire body of work.
David Imel 16:54 ↗
Yeah.
Elizabeth Lopatto 16:55 ↗
Yeah. And the joy of doing that, and again I'm going to use Terry Pratchett as an example, is you see someone getting the hang of it, you know, like often especially with Terry Pratchett it's a pretty good example, like his first two books, like you can see what's coming but he hasn't quite figured out his style and then he gets better at it and then he gets better at it and then there it is, the trademark style that like everybody knows and loves. And watching that develop is such a joy to me. Like I love that. And you can see it with, you know, with artists like arguably with Olivia Rodrigo as she's like, you know, still developing.
I recently saw, I went down to LA for this actually. I saw a retrospective called Overshare and it is this artist Sophie Calle's work from like 1970 through now. And not only do you get this sense of, you know, how she is personally developing, you also get a sense of what was going on in each sort of period of time. So anyway, Sophie Calle has this like this incredible, you know, arc and a lot of her work is particularly resonant to those of us who are familiar with the internet. She was oversharing before we were all oversharing. And one of the pieces there is a piece she did of her mother dying, and it is a video camera set up next to her mother's bed. And it's, you know, not just the video. There's more than just the video that goes into that, especially in the context of this exhibit of everything this artist has done in her life. Because you know, in some of the stuff around the video, you realize that her mom was like a little mad that she hadn't been the center of attention in Sophie's art. So like this was like her last chance to make her mom like the centerpiece. So there are all these sort of things that occur around art that I think are also interesting and relevant because again you're dealing with a person.
David Imel 19:19 ↗
Yeah. And I think this might be part of the reason why, and we've talked about this on the show before, people are more mad that they've been deceived than they are that this AI stuff is being created.
Victoria Song 19:30 ↗
I think it's because it's the effort, right? Like I read this book, 4,000 Weeks or something about that, and it's about how we spend time and an average person has about 4,000 weeks of being alive. And one of the things... you don't have to tell me that... whatever, but it's just like it was an interesting book because there was a line that stood out to me where he was like, you know, inconvenience is the effort and that's what makes things truly valuable. So I find this like cognitive dissonance when I hear these like tech execs like Zuckerberg being like, things will be easier, things will be so much more convenient when we go to these like tech keynote events where they're talking about how AI is going to help you plan a block party. For some reason they're really into this idea that it's going to help you plan a party. And Liz, I think you get into this in your piece where it's just like, okay, well, father wants to bake, like give a gift to their daughter. AI, tell me what thing to do. And instead of putting the effort in of going like, what does my daughter like, what would make her happy, it's like a recipe that maybe a small child would like. And it's sort of like, well, the betrayal that you feel is that, oh, you didn't put any effort into it. You didn't take the time, you didn't inconvenience yourself in any way. And in some like tangible form, making things so convenient just means, oh, you didn't put any effort into it. You didn't think about me at all. And I recently saw the 10th anniversary of Train to Busan, which is an amazing movie, an amazing zombie movie if you like zombie stuff, but it's a Korean movie and there's this scene in it where the father, they're establishing he's like really busy. He doesn't really spend time with his little daughter and he's like, "Ah, crap, it's her birthday." And he asks someone else, which in my mind is like asking a chatbot, like, "What do kids like these days?" And he gives her the gift and she looks at it and it's like a Wii. And she looks at it. He's like, "What? You don't like Wiis?" And she just looks at the Wii he gave her for the last, you know, gift-giving occasion. And he's like, "Oh." And the conceit there is that she feels that way and she feels unloved and she feels devalued because he didn't put the effort. He put like the facsimile of an effort into it. So I was watching that movie and I was like, oh, for, didn't really put two and two together at the time. I was like, oh, that's what AI makes me feel like sometimes when I find out that something was made by AI. It's like, oh, you didn't put the right... you didn't put the blood, sweat, and tears into it. You just generated it.

38 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Imel, D. (2026, September 1). What the AI overlords get wrong about being alive | The Vergecast [Interview transcript]. The Verge. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3005429/

MLA

David Imel. "What the AI overlords get wrong about being alive | The Vergecast." The Verge, 1 Sep. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3005429/.

BibTeX
@misc{imel2026_3005429,
  author       = {David Imel},
  title        = {What the AI overlords get wrong about being alive | The Vergecast},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, The Verge. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {sep},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3005429/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}