CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Alan Baratz
President and Chief Executive Officer, D-Wave Quantum Inc.

Quantum CEO Series: Alan Baratz

📅 Apr 07, 2026 S&P Global Market Intelligence 25 MIN 192 VIEWS 29 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
We kick off the next in our CEO series with a look at quantum computing. Alan Baratz is the CEO of D-Wave and he joins host Eric Hanselman to explore quantum computing architectures, how they're evolving, and how enterprises should be considering quantum computing applications. D-Wave now offers both annealing and gate model quantum computing systems, with different types of problems being suited to each type. While many view quantum computing as a distant future, quantum approaches are delivering business value today, particularly in quantum annealing, where optimization of scheduling and pro...

Questions asked in this interview

7
  1. 0:26And just in terms of quantum designs, what's out there today?
  2. 3:54And that's actually the result of a recent acquisition, right?
  3. 5:13You're talking about the functionality that exists, getting towards quantum supremacy. That's here and now, right?
  4. 10:16I'm curious about what was it that really was the key to the quantum approach to cracking it much more quickly?
  5. 12:58How should enterprises really be looking at and how they classify the capabilities of their and find suitability and assess the options that are available?
  6. 16:44And what are the kind of problems that you're trying to overcome?
  7. 21:11When you start looking at the multi-chip versions of the annealing system, are you still wrestling with a lot of the communications issues?
Eric Hanselman 0:02 ↗
Welcome to Next in Tech, an S&P Global podcast where the world of emerging tech lives. I'm your host, Eric Hanselman, chief analyst for industry research at S&P Global. And today, we have the first of our CEO series on quantum computing. We're going to explore quantum designs and their capabilities. With me to discuss it is Alan Baratz, CEO of D-Wave, the practical computing company. Alan, welcome to the podcast.
Alan Baratz 0:25 ↗
Thank you, Eric. It's a pleasure for me to be here.
Eric Hanselman 0:26 ↗
Well, it's great to have you on. There's been so much—it's been going on in the quantum realm, especially of late. And maybe I'll start with a story. I was at Mobile World Congress in March this year, and normally in, you know, the conference floor, at the stands there, you've got all sorts of things people are using to jazz up their displays and attract people. And normally, there are a whole bunch of Formula 1 racers with their teams there, all kitted out. This year, there were more quantum computers on stands that I saw than there were F1 racers. Which, if that's not an indication about how the moment that quantum seems to be having right now, oh, there is a focus that quantum is here, it is real. Granted, what people were displaying in their stands were what we've come to see, I think maybe as the face of quantum, the superconducting, the chandelier, the gold-plated array that is so stunning. But there's a lot that's going on in quantum beyond that glitzy view. And I guess maybe to start off, can you give us a little bit of a background just in terms of how we ought to be thinking about different types of quantum and where they fit. And just in terms of quantum designs, what's out there today?
Alan Baratz 1:41 ↗
Sure, happy to do it. There are a lot of different technologies that are being used to build quantum computers. Everything from superconducting to trapped ion to neutral atoms to photonics to spin qubits. And each of these technologies have different advantages and disadvantages when it comes to building quantum computers. But at a higher level, there are two main architectural approaches to building quantum computers. One is called annealing and the other is called gate. And what's interesting about these two architectural approaches is that they are each good at solving different classes of problems. So, annealing quantum computers are very good at solving business optimization problems. Things like workforce scheduling or manufacturing plant floor optimization or autonomous vehicle routing. But annealing quantum computers are not very good at quantum chemistry or drug discovery or designing new materials. Gate model systems, on the other hand, are very good at quantum chemistry and materials design, but they are not very good at solving business optimization problems. And so, as a result, both of these approaches to quantum computing are important in the marketplace. D-Wave is a unique company in this space in the sense that we're actually the only dual platform quantum computing company. And what I mean by that is that we're the only quantum computing company that is developing and bringing to market both annealing and gate model systems to be essentially the one-stop shop for quantum so that we can solve whatever hard computational problem you have. If you need annealing, we've got it. If you need gate model, we've got it.
Eric Hanselman 3:54 ↗
And that's actually the result of a recent acquisition, right?
Alan Baratz 3:58 ↗
It absolutely is. So, D-Wave has always been the leader in annealing quantum computing. That's where we started. Our annealing quantum computers are in their sixth generation. These are the largest and most powerful quantum computers in the world. They're the only quantum computers on which true quantum supremacy has been demonstrated. Specifically, we can compute properties of magnetic materials in minutes that would take millions of years to compute on the fastest supercomputers. And they're the only commercial quantum computers today actually being used by customers as part of their business operations. However, we have not been at the forefront when it comes to gate model quantum computing. But, at the beginning of this year, we announced the acquisition of Quantum Circuits. This was a spin-out from Yale University that has developed some revolutionary gate model quantum computing technology that basically has catapulted us to the forefront of gate model quantum computing as well. So, now we believe that we are world leaders in both annealing and gate model quantum computing.
Eric Hanselman 5:13 ↗
Well, to that end, what are some of the problems that quantum computing is addressing today? You talked about optimization problems. I guess a lot of times in our conversations with clients, people talk about quantum as this far distant future, but there's a lot that's going on in terms of problems that are being solved very effectively today. You're talking about the functionality that exists, getting towards quantum supremacy. That's here and now, right?
Alan Baratz 5:40 ↗
So, yeah, so again, this goes back to whether we're talking about annealing or gate. If we're talking about gate model, those systems are not yet commercially viable. They're still very much in the R&D phase, and there are still some very challenging problems that need to be addressed before we will see gate model final computers large enough and powerful enough to solve real-world problems. However, in the annealing space, we are there today. As I said, we demonstrated quantum supremacy. We're the only company in the world that's demonstrated quantum supremacy on a useful real-world problem. And we have customers that are using us as a part of their business operations. For example, we have one of the world's largest airlines. We have one of the world's largest healthcare companies. We have one of the world's largest aerospace companies. We have one of the world's largest mobile carriers. We basically have a number of very significant companies that are leveraging us for a variety of different types of applications. Let's talk about a chemical company. This is BASF, one of the largest chemical companies in the world. So, one of the problems that they were grappling with was how to efficiently fill orders. So, they get orders for different chemicals. They've got a production facility that fulfills those orders by mixing different components together to create the chemicals to fulfill the orders. What they found is that by using our quantum computer, they can reduce the time to compute the scheduling for fulfilling those orders from what was taking them 10 hours to compute the schedule down to just seconds to compute the schedule. Now, why is this so important? The reason why this is so important is because things happen. A supply truck might be late, and the production schedule that they had computed might need to be modified. Well, if it takes 10 hours to recompute the schedule, you know, you're going to have to wing it. Whereas, if it takes seconds, you can immediately recompute the schedule. Another example, we've been doing some work with Anduril and Davidson Technologies, two government contractors. We basically did work on missile defense, very timely application area. So, essentially, what we did was we demonstrated that on a 500 incoming missile simulation, we can compute the solution to neutralize that incoming threat in 1/10 the time. A factor of 10 improvement in the time to compute the solution. Obviously, when you're trying to take out incoming threats, time matters.
Eric Hanselman 8:54 ↗
Time does indeed matter.
Alan Baratz 8:55 ↗
And our solutions were able to take out 10% more threats. So, on the order of 50 more threats were able to be taken out with the solution being computed in 1/10 the time. Here are just a couple of examples. Maybe I'll just give you one more. We are also the only company with a quantum computer that's been able to essentially address large language model training in a real commercial application area. So, this is work we did with Shionogi, a drug company in Japan. And essentially, they had developed a large language model for generating new molecular structures for human drugs. They then retrained that model using our quantum computer. And what they found was that the molecular structures that were being generated were far more well-suited to human drugs. So, they basically got more accurate models that they were able to train faster with lower power consumption. And of course, power consumption is a really important issue when it comes to AI and model training.
Eric Hanselman 10:16 ↗
Well, we're just the other side of our CERAWeek conference where one of the main topics was how much energy AI is consuming. I'm curious for each of these examples. So, if you think about the first with BASF, it seems like that's something that the classical computers could reasonably tackle. What was the difference in a quantum approach that really yielded those results? Is it that there were so many variables? I'm curious about what was it that really was the key to the quantum approach to cracking it much more quickly?
Alan Baratz 10:51 ↗
Yeah, what most people don't actually recognize is that most of the problems that businesses need to solve, the computational problems that businesses need to solve are what we call exponentially hard problems. So, what this means is that the time to compute the optimal solution grows exponentially in the size of the problem. So, when you get to even medium-size problems, let alone large problems that businesses need to deal with, that's outside of the reach of classical computers to compute the optimal solution. They can't do it. There's not enough time. There's not enough time in the universe, right? Or in your lifetime. However, what they end up doing is developing heuristics, simplifications to the problem that allow them to get solutions that they hope are good enough. And that's pretty much how the world works today. It runs on heuristics where you simplify the problem and hope that you're getting good enough solutions. Well, quantum computing is so much faster and so much more powerful that in typically an even shorter period of time, we're able to compute much better, if not optimal solutions. So, it's not that these companies weren't computing solutions before. BASF was computing solutions and they were probably good enough solutions for what they needed, but with our quantum computer, we're able to get them even better solutions much faster.
Eric Hanselman 12:33 ↗
So, being able to not only shorten—well, the trick is not shortening the time, but actually being able to solve the complete question in terms of how that actually gets put together.
Alan Baratz 12:43 ↗
It's a combination. It is better solutions faster. We want to tackle the whole problem, not a simplification of the problem, to allow for better solutions and we want to compute those better solutions much faster.

15 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Baratz, A. (2026, April 7). Quantum CEO Series: Alan Baratz [Interview transcript]. S&P Global Market Intelligence. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3023646/

MLA

Alan Baratz. "Quantum CEO Series: Alan Baratz." S&P Global Market Intelligence, 7 Apr. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3023646/.

BibTeX
@misc{baratz2026_3023646,
  author       = {Alan Baratz},
  title        = {Quantum CEO Series: Alan Baratz},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, S\&P Global Market Intelligence. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {apr},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3023646/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}