Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok discusses the impact of DOGE layoffs on the labor market, and the effects of tariffs on the consumer. He speaks with Bloomberg's Jonathan Ferro.
See omnystudio.com/listener (https://omnystudio.com/listener) for privacy information.
Bloomberg Talks curates top interviews from around Bloomberg News. Hear conversations with the biggest names in finance, politics and entertainment. On Bloomberg Talks, we round up interviews with Fortune 500 CEOs, government officials, well-known investors and business leaders.
Listen to more Bloomberg Talks: • Bloomberg Ta...
Questions asked in this interview
7
0:28Do you sense an inevitability now that we are beginning to see that?
1:19What is our capacity to absorb shocks now? Has that been reduced?
2:54Do you buy that there is some truth to the detox argument?
3:37Do you continue to see that, even though the shocks that we're seeing right now to policy might have a bigger ramification on growth than you had previously expected?
4:42Do you agree that that's more prudent at a time where there are these stagflationary forces starting to loom?
6:15In the news conference on March 19th, next Wednesday, how does Chairman Powell address those issues? What are you looking for?
7:00How do you manage through the cycle with that in mind?
News, investors assessing the market impacts, consumers and businesses already readjusting. Torsten Slok of Apollo writing: this is a wait-and-see economy, consumers are more reluctant. The bottom line is that this eventually leads to a slowdown in the hard data, and markets should prepare for that scenario. Torsten joins us now for more. Torsten, good morning.
We've seen the shift in the soft data. The last time we spoke, you raised the issue — I believe Lisa asked you the question — would that soft data bleed into the hard data? Do you sense an inevitability now that we are beginning to see that?
If you're looking at the high-frequency data, so over the last several weeks we have seen — and I know some of these indicators are a little bit special — but we've seen the number of people who are going to movie theaters, the number of people going to Broadway shows, if you look at the TSA data for how many people are flying airplanes, even if you look at how many people are visiting the Statue of Liberty here in New York City, all that has actually started to weaken. And now we get another soft data print here at 10 with the Michigan sentiment for consumers. So overall, it is still a little bit too early, but given that we have this wait-and-see situation both for consumers and for corporates, it does make sense that the soft data should eventually begin to spill over to at least some weakening in the hard data.
One feature of this cycle that I think a lot of people underestimated — you're not included — is the resilience of this economy. What is our capacity to absorb shocks now? Has that been reduced?
Well, that's a very important question because that depends on the nature of the shocks. And we're facing two shocks at the moment, namely DOGE, which is laying off government workers. Estimates suggest that there will be around 300,000 workers that might be losing their jobs. Remember that for every federal worker there are two contractors, according to Brookings. So Brookings studies show that in total, true employment in the federal government is roughly around 9, 10 million people. So if you now think about the total number of households is 130 million, and someone in a federal worker or contractor lives together with someone in the private sector, you get that as much as 10, 15 percent of all households in some way or another is being impacted from a sentiment perspective by DOGE alone. And tariffs, of course, also in particular impacts anyone who's associated with trade with Canada and Mexico. And you have that that is also a particular, of course, across the border to the north and to the south, playing a significant role in a number of states. So the bottom line is it's not only tariffs and trade war, it's also the combination of the risk that government workers and contractors potentially losing their jobs that are the main reasons why the soft data is weakening the way it is. And it's not only consumer soft data, it's also corporate. If you look at the capex planning from the regional Feds — Dallas Fed, Philadelphia Fed, New York Fed — that's showing that businesses in those districts are saying we're beginning to cut back capex plans. Likewise, NFIB, also Roundtable surveys, capex planning is also moving lower. So both consumer confidence moving lower, corporate confidence moving lower, it is a precursor for a slowdown coming in the hard data.
There's an argument being made that if what was propping up the United States economy was government spending, it wasn't that strong to begin with, and this is actually somewhat of a withdrawal from a sugar high, from an incredible amount of fiscal spend in the direct aftermath of the pandemic. Do you buy that there is some truth to the detox argument?
In the sense that if you look at hiring in non-farm payrolls over the last two years, 25 percent of jobs created in 2023 and '24 were government jobs. The previous years it was like 5, 10 percent, much, much less. So a very significant part of jobs in the last two years have been coming from the government sector. So it is true that job growth has been slowing in the private sector even going into these shocks that we're looking at at the moment.
9 more exchanges in this transcript
Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.