CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Dan Ives
Managing Director & Global Head of Technology Research, Wedbush Securities

What the Bond Market Is Really Telling the Fed

📅 Oct 28, 2026 Einstein & Ives 10 MIN 22 VIEWS 61 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Dan Ives and I talk through tomorrow's Fed decision, the 10-year below 5%, oil's pull on inflation, the midterms, tech earnings, and SpaceX. Filmed October 27, 2026 📈Learn How to Trade the Stock Market from Peter Tuchman AKA the Einstein Of Wall Street: https://wall-street-global-trading-ac... 📲Follow Peter on Socials:   / einsteinofwallst     / einsteinofwallst   https://x.com/EinsteinoWallSt Check out my other Youtube Channel: @EinsteinofWallStreet DISCLOSURE: This interview is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy...

What Dan Ives said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Dan Ives, Managing Director and Global Head of Technology Research at Wedbush Securities, discussed the Federal Reserve's upcoming rate decision, attributing the previous rate hike to the bond market's need for a signal to prevent inflation fears from pushing the 10-year yield higher. He predicted a hold at the next meeting, citing the 10-year below 5% and cooling ex-oil inflation. Ives argued the Fed cannot base policy solely on oil, which is controlled by a few countries, and noted that Powell faces a balancing act. He linked the bond market's expectations to the midterm elections and a potential resolution of the Iran conflict, which could drop oil to $70. On tech, Ives called earnings a 'supercycle' validation moment for chip demand and capex. He dismissed Elon Musk's neocloud consolidation prediction as a competitive statement, noting SpaceX's $40 billion raise. Ives compared the neocloud situation to a 'SaaS apocalypse 2.0,' driven by credit spreads and rising capital costs, and remained bullish on the market post-midterms.

Key takeaways

  1. Ives expects the Fed to hold rates at the upcoming meeting, with the 10-year below 5% and ex-oil inflation calming.
  2. The previous rate hike was necessary to signal to the bond market and prevent the 10-year from rising further.
  3. Oil could drop to $70 a barrel if the Iran conflict resolves, but the Fed cannot base policy on oil alone.
  4. Tech earnings are the 'supercycle' validation moment for chip demand and capex, the most important market factor.
  5. Neoclouds face a 'SaaS apocalypse 2.0' due to credit spreads and rising capital costs, creating winners and losers.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
82% Probability of rate hike spiked to before the Fed raised metric 0:26
$70 Potential oil price per barrel if Iran conflict ends price 2:41
800 to 1,000 Data centers to be built in the US over five years metric 5:55
$40 billion Amount SpaceX raised metric 9:03
50 cents on the dollar or 20 cents on the dollar Software stocks sold at during the apocalypse metric 9:26

Chapters

  1. 0:00Fed rate hike rationale
  2. 1:51Oil and inflation dynamics
  3. 5:38Midterm elections and market
  4. 5:55Data center growth and regulation
  5. 8:02Tech earnings supercycle
  6. 8:35Neocloud competition and Musk
  7. 9:26SaaS apocalypse 2.0
  8. 10:25Year-end market outlook

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 0:02And as you just mentioned there, obviously, you know, when we can't, let's go back to last Fed Day, right?
  2. 0:26What do you think was the most significant thing that made them change their mind?
  3. 1:28Oil is the most inflationary component, I think, of an economy, isn't it?
  4. 2:35And when that happens, regardless if it's two months or six months, right?
  5. 3:27Is it just off of oil or is it one thing?
  6. 3:44You just sort of opened my eyes to that because I've always said when people ask about the oil market, I say, you know what, I don't like trading in markets where I don't have an edge, right?
  7. 5:08Is it because people believe that the Democrats are pro-regulation and anti-market?
  8. 5:31Can you wait till we're just done, like five minutes?
  9. 6:25So, if a data center gets voted in one state, it will go, right?
  10. 7:00After a... no matter who wins?
  11. 7:10And the midterms happen what? Every four, is it?
  12. 7:59What's your analysis of what's coming?
Einstein 0:02 ↗
Hey everybody, it's me Einstein and Wall Street here with my man Dan Ives at Brew Markets. We just came back from doing a really fun panel here with Morning Brew, and amazing. And so let's talk about it. It's Tuesday. Obviously, tomorrow is Fed Day. Okay. And as you just mentioned there, obviously, you know, when we can't, let's go back to last Fed Day, right? We do know that for a while there it did not look like they were going to raise rates.
Okay. And then what do you think was the most significant thing that changed Fed Chairman's mind days before it? Because we know that the probability was, and there's a whole market in this, that, you know, the probability market on whether it's on Kalshi or it's on Polymarket or it's the overall Federal Reserve, it was a 50-50 chance that they were going to raise them, and then the night before it spiked up to 82% and they raised them. What do you think was the most significant thing that made them change their mind?
Dan Ives 0:54 ↗
Now, that first one they had to raise to send a signal to the market. Okay, the 10-year, the bond market basically needed to see a raise because if they didn't raise, the bond market would just get so scared about inflation, ultimately what that was going to be, and you could argue the 10-year would be even a lot higher today.
Einstein 1:13 ↗
Really? Okay.
Dan Ives 1:14 ↗
I think you've seen the 10-year come below five. You're seeing the inflationary data, some bad, but then in other areas, you know, maybe ex-oil is starting to calm down. That's why I think you get a hold at the meeting.
Einstein 1:28 ↗
You get a hold at the meeting, but isn't it curious though why, I mean, I think obviously one of the most inflationary things is oil, right? Why have we disengaged the significance of oil above 105, 110 for months and months? This is a one-day war that's lasted six months, eight months. Oil is the most inflationary component, I think, of an economy, isn't it?
Dan Ives 1:51 ↗
No doubt.
Einstein 1:51 ↗
Okay. And but we've completely disengaged it when it comes to that. I mean, we know that the tool that the Fed has is to raise interest rates to combat inflation. But so, but you're feeling that the bond market was the most important thing that's ignited that demand by the new Fed chairman to raise interest rates. The bond market's basically saying that, like the midterm elections, which feels like it's, you know, it's probably some sort of blue wave or something, you know, similar at least at a minimum gridlock and potentially a blue wave.
Dan Ives 2:22 ↗
Look, that combined with Israeli election this week, like the market basically, I think, is saying like, look, you're going to see the conflict in Iran one way or another come to some sort of close.
Einstein 2:35 ↗
Gotcha. And when that happens, regardless if it's two months or six months, right?
Dan Ives 2:41 ↗
I mean, oil, then all of a sudden you're looking at $70, correct? You know, a barrel of oil again. So, I think, and it's always tough because the Fed can't just do policy off of what's happened with oil, right?
Einstein 2:56 ↗
Okay.
Dan Ives 2:57 ↗
You know, that's more OPEC and whatever. So, I think that's why, for Powell, it's a balancing act that he's trying to do right now.
Einstein 3:05 ↗
Okay, that's super important to know that they cannot run their mechanism around inflation all off of just oil.
Dan Ives 3:14 ↗
No, right. I mean, they are the big arm. That's actually a huge part of like the Fed. If you go back historically, like a Fed mandate, like you cannot do it just off...
Einstein 3:27 ↗
Is it just off of oil or is it one thing? I mean, what the mandate says, not one thing, let's provide everything.
Dan Ives 3:32 ↗
So many different data points, but when it comes to oil, because of just the ebbs and flows and the vol, and because oil is basically controlled by a handful of countries anyway, right? That's always...
Einstein 3:44 ↗
And that's curious, thank you for that. You just sort of opened my eyes to that because I've always said when people ask about the oil market, I say, you know what, I don't like trading in markets where I don't have an edge, right? The bottom line is the Saudis can release or contract their relationship to how many barrels of oil they want to put into the market or take out and completely change the whole dynamic. That can happen from one day to the next, and so you're right. So the Federal Reserve needs to understand that it can't be just one data point that makes them make a decision that will throw... they look at it responsibly.
Dan Ives 4:17 ↗
And that's why Powell is going to do the hold, and we have to see as this all plays out. But it's like me and you have talked, it's like if I told you six months ago oil, 10-year, right, I said, where's the S&P? You'd say a thousand points lower. And I just think the market is telling you that based on tech, based on growth, that's what's going to drive this market higher.
Einstein 4:44 ↗
Right. And so just a little bit of inflation is not going to make all the difference in the world.
Dan Ives 4:48 ↗
Look, and the problem is that also a lot of the inflation, you could argue it's a capex boom. It's unprecedented. And it's also why like China is in a bear market, right? Because it just comes down to like the US is so far ahead of China, right, when it comes to tech.
Einstein 5:08 ↗
Okay, let's talk about the midterms for a minute. We know the reason that the midterms weigh so heavily on the market, even though historically, I don't know if they do, but they do in a microcosm of a way. Is it because people believe that the Democrats are pro-regulation and anti-market? That's...
Excuse me, sir. Could you do me a favor? Can you wait till we're just done, like five minutes? It's okay. No problem. Oh, no. Thanks. Thanks.
Dan Ives 5:38 ↗
I mean, everyone's perception is that the Dems are anti-market, pro-regulation.
Einstein 5:43 ↗
Well, no, it's really around data centers that they're anti-data center and pro-regulatory. I think that's why this is so... And do we really feel that or is that just...
Dan Ives 5:55 ↗
Yeah, I think that's almost factual, right? Yeah. I mean, I think it just comes down to like 800 to 1,000 data centers are going to get built in the US over five years. So look, this is a pivotal time, and that's... but also I tend to think like you don't want to get over your skis in terms of the concern because I could argue if Democrats, if there is a sweep, a lot of it goes state to state in terms of the data center.
Einstein 6:25 ↗
Yeah. So, if a data center gets voted in one state, it will go, right? Well, look, all they have to do is look at the economy of scale of their state and they're going to go, 'Wait a minute. This is going to create major jobs. It's going to bring in a lot of money. It's going to benefit us in a big way.' Right. And we do know that President Trump has already said that any data center that's built is going to have to deal with the energy impact.
Dan Ives 6:46 ↗
And Trump will, and he'll veto things, and exactly.
Einstein 6:51 ↗
I'm just... look, if you look at the market after a midterm, right, bullish.
Dan Ives 6:57 ↗
Extremely bullish in terms of what the market does after a midterm.
Einstein 7:00 ↗
After a... no matter who wins?

30 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Ives, D. (2026, October 28). What the Bond Market Is Really Telling the Fed [Interview transcript]. Einstein & Ives. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3153828/

MLA

Dan Ives. "What the Bond Market Is Really Telling the Fed." Einstein & Ives, 28 Oct. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3153828/.

BibTeX
@misc{ives2026_3153828,
  author       = {Dan Ives},
  title        = {What the Bond Market Is Really Telling the Fed},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Einstein \& Ives. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {oct},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3153828/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}