Lithography will always be there, right? Because you cannot do anything without lithography and there will always be the wish to get better lithography. Better lithography means better resolution, better accuracy and better productivity. And we're going to work on those three axes for many, many years. If we look at lithography, today, thanks to EUV, we mostly know what to do for our customers for the next 10 to 15 years, and we'll still see major innovation in lithography in order to continue to work with our customers on cost and transistor density. So that's the first thing we do know today. And we may at some point introduce an even higher numerical aperture tool, which we call Hyper NA.
Most likely for the middle of the next decade, so we still have time. We still have time, but that's still something we are preparing for because, as you say, we have to look long term.
You're also pushing into advanced packaging or 3D packaging, and this is essentially where you get the components, instead of laying them out flat, kind of urban sprawl style, you build them up a bit like a skyscraper. What is the importance of that? How significant will that be for ASML and why focus on that packaging?
Yeah, there are two reasons why this is becoming important. First, our customers are continuing to drive for more transistor density. So the Moore's Law we usually refer to calls for doubling transistor density every two years. This has been going on for many years and still keeps going. In fact, if you look at AI customers, and you mentioned Nvidia before, they want even more than that. They don't want transistor density to double every two years; they would like the number of transistors to go up by a factor of 16 every two years. That's what we have seen happening in the last two to four years. So you're going completely off Moore's Law and you need even more transistors. Now, we still use lithography to try to put as many transistors as possible per unit of area, but that's not enough.
And if you cannot get enough transistors as you show doing this, then you also have to do that. You made a big step by investing almost one and a half billion US dollars in Mistral, which is one of the leading large language model companies in Europe, certainly a competitor to the likes of OpenAI, Gemini, and Anthropic. You've taken about a 10% stake with that deal. Why?
Well, we saw AI as a huge opportunity for ASML. If you look at ASML, we invested a lot in R&D, four and a half billion euros every year to develop our product. Of course, we invest a lot in hardware, and we also invest a lot in software. We saw that when it comes to development cycles, AI could help us enormously with the software, like many companies. But for us to be able to ship our machines to our customers and have people maintain them in the field, we write a huge amount of procedures. We spend a lot of time describing on paper how to work so that people can deal with it. AI can help us reduce the time our engineers spend on that, freeing them to do other things like integration. So we saw a major efficiency opportunity with AI. More importantly, we also believe AI can improve our product because our product generates tons of data.
8 more exchanges in this transcript
Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.
Fouquet, C. (2025, December 13). ASML CEO Sees AI Spending 'Arms Race' [Interview transcript]. Bloomberg Technology. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/555856/
MLA
Christophe Fouquet. "ASML CEO Sees AI Spending 'Arms Race'." Bloomberg Technology, 13 Dec. 2025. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/555856/.
BibTeX
@misc{fouquet2025_555856,
author = {Christophe Fouquet},
title = {ASML CEO Sees AI Spending 'Arms Race'},
howpublished = {Interview transcript, Bloomberg Technology. CEOInterviews.AI},
year = {2025},
month = {dec},
url = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/555856/},
note = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}