CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Christopher Waller
Governor, Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Fed’s Waller Doesn’t See Sustained Inflation from Iran War

📅 Mar 06, 2026 Bloomberg Podcasts 10 MIN 788 VIEWS 20 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller discusses the potential inflationary impact of war with Iran, US payrolls, ongoing risks from tariffs, and his view of private credit markets on “Bloomberg Surveillance.”  Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller Friday said he doesn’t expect the Iran war to have a sustained impact on inflation. While consumers are likely to experience sticker shock as gas prices rise, policymakers will look through any one-off increases, he said. “For us thinking about policy going forward, this is unlikely to cause sustained inflation,” Waller said Friday in an...

Questions asked in this interview

10
  1. 0:00What's your assessment of developments in the Middle East and ultimately what it means for you and the committee?
  2. 1:27Is that your experience of things?
  3. 2:16Does this just push out the time period for companies to sit on their hands, not invest because they don't know what's going to happen?
  4. 3:27What would it take to get you to back off on that feeling?
  5. 4:29In other words, would you be less inclined to cut rates if there is strength that's demonstrated in the labor market today?
  6. 5:33Let's say we see the weakness that you see right now and you talk to people in your district and B, that you speak to in the different districts as well as beyond, how much do you think the Fed should react to this?
  7. 6:55What's good to you? What does good look like?
  8. 7:54How would cutting rates by 25 or 50 basis points help the labor market if companies are sitting on their hands because they're still waiting for tariff news and we've got a war going on?
  9. 8:24But does it make a difference to the CEOs?
  10. 8:46Because that is how with this economy, some people might say in a bigger way than the Federal Reserve or for that matter, public markets have. What is going on?
Lisa Abramowicz 0:00 ↗
What's your assessment of developments in the Middle East and ultimately what it means for you and the committee?
Christopher Waller 0:03 ↗
Yeah, I mean, I guess it's exactly the thing is what you're going to see is you're going to see a spike in gasoline prices after the American citizens are going to see when they go to the pump and they're going to stare at it and be a little shocked in terms of how things go. But for us, thinking about policy going forward, this is unlikely to cause a sustained inflation. One reason we don't look at energy prices more, we look at core because it's a better predictor of future inflation. You're going to see this. But once these kind of supply chain issues that you laid out, Lisa, once they unravel, this will start coming back down. So it's kind of very odd to think about the Fed maybe changing rates six months from now based on this. If it's unwound in a like, as you said, in a couple of weeks or even two months, it's not going to be a big factor down the road. So this is why we never look at energy prices. They bounce up, they come back down. It's not that. It's something that we don't feel sympathy for people, that that's what they have to pay when they put gas in their cars. But for us, thinking about the longer term in terms of policy, this is something we're just going to kind of put off for now. When does it become something bigger? If it's over, it becomes bigger. If it becomes more permanent, because then what's going to happen? You're going to see this jump in prices, then it'll start bleeding through to other parts of the economy. Energy is a big party, feeds into everything else, and then somehow those energy costs get passed along. Like everything else, we were more worried about economists on any given day.
Lisa Abramowicz 1:27 ↗
Lisa, Mike, myself, and then talk about the experience of the seventies and coming out of the pandemic and they'll say things like that. Officials of the Federal Reserve are somewhat conditioned, scarred by some of that. Is that your experience of things?
Christopher Waller 1:38 ↗
Well, in the seventies, remember, we didn't just have one. We had massive oil shocks. If you take 73, the price of oil quadrupled overnight. It went from $4 a barrel to $12 a barrel or it went from three to whatever the numbers were. But that was a shock and it never came back down. And then there was another one. Every time we turned around, there was another oil shock, then Iran oil embargo in 79. So that was kind of a problem with the oil shocks. They just kept coming and coming and coming. So it's not clear this will be one shock after another after another. So that's why I'm more willing to say this is, I hate to say it, but more like a one-off event than what we saw in the 1970s.
Lisa Abramowicz 2:16 ↗
Well, as Roseanne Roseannadanna used to say, it's always something as if it's not just the oil shocks. It's the whole idea. Now we're going to have a whole new round of tariffs coming through the economy and we've got this low fire, low hire economy. How long do you think that continues? Does this just push out the time period for companies to sit on their hands, not invest because they don't know what's going to happen?
Christopher Waller 2:39 ↗
Yeah, I mean, this is one of the things I've been concerned about since last June, is how weak the labor market has been. There were a lot of factors last summer that were driving this kind of low hire, low fire. It looked like maybe in January we might be turning a corner. We'll find out today whether that was, as I said last week, signal or noise. But, you know, when you're in this world in which the labor market, even with 130,000 jobs, it was really concentrated in a couple of sectors, 8% of the economy, the labor market wasn't doing anything. It was zero negative. So that kind of fragility wouldn't take much for some sort of a serious shock to sort of start pushing people in another direction. Whether this is that kind of shock or not, we'll start finding out. Yeah, it's early because of course, these are going to be January numbers.
Lisa Abramowicz 3:27 ↗
Yeah, but you've been on record as saying you'd like to cut more because you're still worried about where the labor market is. What would it take to get you to back off on that feeling? Because if we get the same sort of numbers we had in December, it still shows very narrow breadth of hiring and it still shows some reasonably good numbers for hiring.
Christopher Waller 3:52 ↗
Yeah, even with the January report, like I said, it was all concentrated in a couple of sectors. So that was good. They were robust. We got a big number, well above everybody's estimate of break even, but the concentration didn't give me a lot of comfort that the economy as a whole was doing really well. So that's where, you know, my brain is telling me the number was good, the economy looks okay. It was above break even. But my guts are telling me it may not be that good. And that's where I'm waiting to see what today's numbers. I'm almost certain it's going to get revised down because they have this been a pattern in January the last few years.
Lisa Abramowicz 4:29 ↗
So pair these two ideas. The idea of the oil shock that's creating some concerns about inflation and then a labor market that kind of is in question. Right. Is it decelerating or is it accelerating? How much has your reaction changed potentially to Friday's after today's report, given the fact that we do see energy prices pushing on inflation? In other words, would you be less inclined to cut rates if there is strength that's demonstrated in the labor market today?
Christopher Waller 4:53 ↗
Yeah, that's kind of what I was hinting at last week, that if we get another solid jobs report than last month, this month, it looks like the labor market is turning around. A lot of the downside risk I've been worried about for six months is kind of going away. We got a high, we're going to get a hot PCE number given what we already have seen coming in. That's going to probably print from everything I've seen by 2.4. Okay. Usually that comes down again, we've had this January, in fact, we have some more passes of tariffs. But because that inflation's hot, it's going to look even worse now with the oil prices, at least on headline. And then if you get a solid job, it does say there's. You can sit there and wait.

10 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Waller, C. (2026, March 6). Fed’s Waller Doesn’t See Sustained Inflation from Iran War [Interview transcript]. Bloomberg Podcasts. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/748269/

MLA

Christopher Waller. "Fed’s Waller Doesn’t See Sustained Inflation from Iran War." Bloomberg Podcasts, 6 Mar. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/748269/.

BibTeX
@misc{waller2026_748269,
  author       = {Christopher Waller},
  title        = {Fed’s Waller Doesn’t See Sustained Inflation from Iran War},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Bloomberg Podcasts. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {mar},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/748269/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}