Back
Alan Armstrong
Executive Chairman of the Board, Williams Companies Inc

"We have to get out of our own way": Armstrong joins Bloomberg TV

🎥 Jun 07, 2026 📺 Senator Alan Armstrong ⏱ 10m
June 7, 2026 Sen. Alan Armstrong joins Bloomberg TV's 'Bloomberg This Weekend' to discuss much-needed reforms Congress ...
Watch on YouTube

About Alan Armstrong

Alan Armstrong was appointed to the U.S. Senate from Oklahoma in March 2026 to fill the seat vacated by Markwayne Mullin, who became Secretary of Homeland Security. Armstrong resigned as executive chairman of Williams Companies, where he had previously served as CEO, to take the position. Under state law, he cannot run for a full term and will serve until January 2027. In media appearances, Armstrong said his primary focus in the Senate is permitting reform for energy infrastructure. He described the U.S. as "the hardest place I can imagine to be able to build critical infrastructure" and said the country "cannot get out of our own way" on the issue. He identified the Clean Water Act's Section 401 water quality certification as "the single most weaponized tool out there to stop a project" and cited a case where a completed pipeline was ordered shut by a federal court over a greenhouse gas analysis that he said was not required by law. Armstrong said he does not support subsidies for any energy source but supports permitting reform that is "good for all of the above." He opposed removing the federal gas tax, calling it a short-term fix that would increase the deficit. Armstrong also described his short, non-reelection term as "liberating" and said it allows him to focus on long-term issues without concern for campaign politics.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Alan Armstrong's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (14 segments)
✨ AI-enhanced transcript with speaker attribution
N
Narrator0:00
Just over two months ago, Mark Wayne Mullen left the US Senate to become the ninth Secretary of Homeland Security. Oklahoma's governor appointed Alan Armstrong to fill the seat Mullen vacated in the US Senate. Armstrong resigned as the executive chairman of Williams Companies. For many years, he was that energy company's CEO. He spent his career in the oil and gas industry.
I
Interviewer0:17
Armstrong will be one of the two senators from Oklahoma until January. State law says he cannot run for a full term, but we have him here today. Senator Alan Armstrong, thank you for joining us. First question is, what do you plan to prioritize in your short tenure that you've got there?
A
Alan Armstrong0:33
Yeah, good morning. You know, this is really simple for me. I've watched as our country has gotten to be at the hardest place I can imagine to be able to build critical infrastructure in our country. And I see it really holding back our country. And so as I've witnessed that from the private side, it's really concerning to me about our future as a country when we have gotten to be the place that just cannot get out of our own way in terms of being able to build critical infrastructure. And you know, everybody thinks that that is just something that's rough on the big bad companies, the pipeline companies, utility companies. Really at the end of the day, the loser in that situation is the consumer and our industries in the US because that really just separates the lack of infrastructure separates abundant supplies that we have here in the US from the consumer and drives the cost up to the consumer. And I realize that if we are really going to be an AI power and continue to be the leader in technology, we have got to be able to get power and energy to those AI centers as well as just our general industry. So that's really what's motivated me. I don't have any doubt in my mind what the high priority is and I've been working really hard to have blinders on to all the other distractions that exist in the role and really to focus on that.
I
Interviewer2:06
Blinders on, clock ticking down. When Kevin Stitt, the governor of Oklahoma, appointed you the position, he said you'd likely be influential in moving the needle on permitting reform. Talk us through that. Where do you see opportunity there? Again, with just a couple of months left in your tenure here, are you optimistic you're going to be able to convince your colleagues there in the Senate, many of whom are there for longer than you, to make headway on that?
A
Alan Armstrong2:30
Yeah, and I'm really encouraged. I do think that really the chemistry is right right now. Obviously, there's some restriction on that going ahead of the midterms and the minority party really not wanting to see any success at times. But I think there's a lot of folks on both sides of the aisle that understand that we are really holding ourselves back as a country by not being able to build critical infrastructure.
I
Interviewer2:57
Where are the places when you say critical infrastructure? What do you mean by that? Do you mean all of the above? Bridges, roads, utilities. Is there one that you think is specifically bad? And like how did this happen? How did we get here? Why are we falling so behind?
A
Alan Armstrong3:12
Yeah, you know, I think we've gotten here because we've somewhat politicized the process of building big infrastructure, whether that is transmission grid, which you know, desperately needs to be built out. And it's not always, you know, what's good for somebody's own backyard, but it's what's good for our country. And that dynamic, I think, stands in the way of us being able to get permitting done. But the way we got here is a lot of different agencies with a lot of different uncertainty in terms of what their real role is in the permitting process. And we've moved from a country that says that the agency's job is to see how we can do it in a constructive and environmentally sensitive way to one that some of our agencies I think think it's their job to stop getting things built. And then we have very powerful NGOs here in the country that work hard to bring litigation against large infrastructure as well. So it's really a culmination of lack of motivation I think by politicians in the short term to see long-term infrastructure. You know, set another way, getting long-term infrastructure built is not going to lower gasoline price tomorrow. It certainly will in the long run but it's not an immediate gratification and therefore it's not a very good mix for politics. And so that's one of the reasons that I find myself in a unique situation to really bring attention to the long-term issue of getting our permitting done here in the US.
I
Interviewer4:52
I'm glad you bring up fuel prices. Yours is a familiar face, I think, to a lot of our viewers. Your voice a familiar one to a lot of our listeners. In your past job at Williams Companies, you were on Bloomberg TV and radio a bunch talking about the oil and gas industry. Let me just ask you about your prescription for getting those prices down. I know if you look at the national average for a gallon of regular gas, it's higher than it is in Oklahoma. I think that'd be kind of reasonable or expected from a lot of folks, they would think that that would be the case. But what in the nearer term? Yes, there needs to be efforts at infrastructure building that out. That'll help us in the medium to long term, but what is the cure here in the shorter term? I don't mean to say there's a panacea, but we hear talk of the White House saying they want Congress to remove the federal gas tax. Are there policy prescriptions you have that might help here in the next few months?
A
Alan Armstrong5:39
Well, you know, again, I think that we should keep things in context. I remind people quite a bit that in June of 2022, retail gasoline average across the US was $5.03. So far, the first week in June, that's around $4.31. So, you know, we've been here before in terms of short-term blips in gasoline prices that are caused by geopolitical issues with, as you'll recall in June '22, that was the Ukraine upset. So, you know, these short-term things are going to happen for sure. And what we need to have is an abundance of infrastructure that doesn't stand in the way. If you think about the difference between Oklahoma gasoline prices and California gasoline prices, those are completely self-inflicted in California. Going from, I think, 43 at one time, refineries out there to, I think, six or seven now. So, you know, getting rid of your critical infrastructure, not allowing pipelines to be built is what drives that long term. And in the short term, I would just say, you know, any of those fixes are not healthy. So if you pull back the gasoline tax, you're just going to be increasing the deficit and ultimately raising taxes somewhere else. So that's not, from my perspective, that is like putting a glove on to fix a leaky pipe and doesn't really get at the really important issues which is getting things like there's a major pipeline that Phillips 66 and Kinder Morgan are trying to build called Western Gateway that would bring product from right here in Oklahoma into the California markets. And those are the kind of things that we really should be focused on particularly the Senate. The Senate really should be the body that is looking long term and thinking about how we set the US up for success long term. And so that's what I'm very focused on.
I
Interviewer7:45
I do want to ask you, I mean, I know with the pipelines, they can be controversial because people do have genuinely sometimes very legitimate environmental concerns, but there's also this issue of renewables in general have become a bit of a bad word in this political climate. And I'm wondering if you think from a business perspective if that's a bit self-defeating. I mean, China, for example, has adopted an all-of-the-above kind of approach, and we've seen as this energy market is under pressure, they've been able to pivot to different options. Do you think the US is kind of adopting a self-defeating policy there when it comes to pursuing all energy options?
A
Alan Armstrong8:18
I absolutely believe that we should be pursuing any and all energy options. And so, and I do think that a permitting reform and any bill that we get done is going to be good for all of the above. I think what I don't support is subsidy. But I certainly support making sure that when we're permitting infrastructure, we shouldn't be making decisions about fuel choices. The permitting process is complicated enough and it ought to be focused around making sure we can build big linear infrastructure in our country to connect supplies with markets that are hungry for that demand and that's what it ought to be focused on. It should not be focused on picking winners and losers as to energy sources.
I
Interviewer9:07
Senator Armstrong, last question to you. I know that Oklahoma has a lot of cattle. I think it's the fifth largest cattle producing state in this country and we see the level of nervousness in Texas as we have the second confirmed case of this new world screwworm there and we've gotten assurances from the US Department of Agriculture this is going to be contained. We've heard from the agriculture commissioner in Texas perhaps more nervousness that the USDA isn't doing enough here. I'm curious from your vantage as you follow this how worried you are as a representative of Oklahoma about where this might be headed and what your hope is from the federal government as we see, you know, maybe the beginnings here of some sort of outbreak.
A
Alan Armstrong9:44
Yeah, we should absolutely take it serious. And it is one of those long-term issues. We need to be prepared for it. And hopefully, you know, we've got the defenses in place to take care of that with the sterile flies. But I think, you know, it's a very serious issue and we should not be taking it lightly. And I know here in Oklahoma, we've got great leaders like Frank Lucas as one of our reps that's a real professional and a real pro in this area. And it's nice to have his expertise weighing in on that issue.
I
Interviewer10:24
Senator Alan Armstrong from Oklahoma. You got two people spent a lot of time in Colorado on the desk today. So, we love the Big Sky states. Thank you so much for joining us. Good perspective there on I think...