Wade Foster30:09
Leaving evidence like so when work happens in the day, there's a shred of evidence of that happening. It's in a meeting note, it's in a comment in your task manager, or something's written in Slack about what's happened. And everything kind of just falls in line with the expectations that you'd already set. Then you're really good to go at that point, or you can course correct in tiny ways as needed, so it's not a huge deal.
Yeah, I think I would echo everything people said. I think one of the most common mistakes managers make when they're managing remotely is they start to micromanage. The way you generally manage is you have trust with some employees—they're skilled, they have experience, you know they'll do their work, and you've communicated certain check-ins. Then there are other people who need you to be more hands-on, maybe they're less experienced or struggling. The way you manage should not change just because people are remote and you can't see them. There's nothing more demotivating to someone used to having a lot of freedom and trust than to go remote and start being micromanaged. Managers should be cautious: lead with trust, and only jump in and ask for more communication if that person isn't doing what you want. As long as you've laid out clear goals, accountability, and how you expect progress to be communicated, you should allow that person to do their thing and only jump in if it's not being done the way you want.
There's a great book called High Output Management by Andy Grove, who was the head of Intel for a long time. In the book, he talks about a concept called task-relevant maturity. What that means is you can have a high performer who works really well in one area, but when shifted to something new, you can't guarantee they'll immediately be successful. Their task-relevant maturity over here is really high, but over here they don't have any. So it takes a bit. I think that applies to the situation we're in right now, where our environment has shifted underneath us. Every one of us has pretty low task-relevant maturity, so it's going to take time to figure this out. This is where Natalie's tip is really important: come up with a set of checkpoints—daily, half-day—maybe start with more regular check-ins while we're still getting used to the work, so we can course correct quickly early on. As we build routine and trust, task-relevant maturity goes up, and you can expand those checkpoints. Managers do one-on-ones weekly with their folks, and that's plenty. You say, 'What's going to happen this week? What's the top priority?' By the end of the week, they've done it, and trust gets built regularly. You don't feel the need to check in every hour. This works for anyone in a new situation—onboarding a new hire who's never worked remotely, or someone shifting roles. You have more regular checkpoints, build trust and routines, and that helps them grow and get the guidance they need. As you both get comfortable, you can have a dialogue and reduce the frequency.
I think selfishly, I'm so excited for all these more traditional companies. There's an opportunity here to learn how to be a manager that values output, not time. The value of remote work is that trust, the ability to empower every person to manage their time and days, with responsibilities around output. We make a promise to each other: I'll deliver this thing, and if I can't, I'll communicate why. I don't care when you do it—you should be able to work flexibly, get up and do laundry, take a long walk. As a manager, I should be comfortable saying, 'Tell me if you're stuck; otherwise, deliver on what we agreed.' Everybody should work like that. It's not a remote thing; it should transcend. But in physical spaces, it's often easier to be a lazy manager and just say, 'My people show up 9 to 5, so they must be good.' I worked in corporate for nine months and was shocked that 60% output was considered amazing. I'm hopeful people start experiencing this and bring it back to the office, because we're not going to be remote forever, but they can learn something in the process.