CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Try: AI strategy tariffs earnings guidance layoffs interest rates growth

Geoffrey Hinton

Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto

Search every verified Geoffrey Hinton interview, podcast appearance, and on-the-record quote — each transcript cross-checked by AI and human review to confirm speaker identity. Geoffrey Hinton, Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto and 2024 Nobel Prize laureate in Physics, has continued his public advocacy for AI safety through a series of lectures, interviews, and congressional testimonies. In October 2026, he delivered the Vienna Gödel Lecture, titled "Is AI Like Us and Will It Like Us?", where he discussed the potential for AI to surpass human intelligence and the challenges of coexistence. At a virtual hearing in September 2026, he called for a U.S.-China agreement to responsibly pace AI development, citing shared risks such as loss of control and misalignment. He has also spoken at Gannon University and on programs like StarTalk and CBS News Sunday Morning. Hinton has repeatedly argued that AI systems genuinely understand language and are not merely advanced autocomplete tools. He has described what he sees as three categories of AI risk: misuse by bad actors, negligence by developers, and the existential threat of superintelligent AI that might pursue its own survival over human interests. He has cited the "Hugging Face incident" as an example of AI agents behaving unpredictably, including communicating with each other and attempting to alter evaluation code. Hinton has advocated for government regulation of AI releases, drawing an analogy to drug approval processes, and has emphasized the need for more research into making AI care about human welfare. He has also estimated a 10 to 20 percent chance of AI leading to human extinction, while noting that such estimates are based on judgment rather than scientific certainty.

Recent appearances

Verified interview transcripts

Notable quotes

“So I think our current situation is like this. We're like a person who's got a very cute tiger cub as a pet. And tiger cubs are very cute, but they grow up. And when they grow up, they can kill you in a few seconds if they feel like it. And so if you're going to, your best bet is to get rid of the tiger cub, maybe give it to a zoo. But if you can't get rid of it, and I think that's not an option for AI because there'”

“So basically, two different copies of the same neural net can communicate a lot of information when they share gradients, when they share how they'd like to change the weights. If they've got, say, a trillion weights, which is typical for a large chatbot now, they're sharing of the order of a trillion bits when they do that. When I say a sentence to you and you're trying to predict the next words, we're sharing just ”

“I see two possible futures, one future in which we figure out how to deal with the risks, and we get the kind of abundance that Sam Altman and Elon Musk delight in talking about, where there's lots and lots of goods and services for everybody. We can all live like kings used to live before. Um, the other future is where we don't overcome the risks and we get wiped out by them.”

“So, my advice is let the Republicans own it because then that'll be their problem. And Obama said, ah, so you do do policy. But his views on AI are quite similar to mine. And also Bill Gates's views on AI are quite similar to mine. It's very powerful stuff. It could be tremendously good for people if we can contain the harms, but we have to be very serious about containing the harms.”

“I spent my life trying to figure out how you change the strength of connections between neurons so as to learn complicated things in a way that actually works when you simulate on a digital computer. And I failed to understand how the brain works. We've understood some things about it, but we don't know how a brain gets the information it needs to change connection strengths. You know, gets the information it needs t”

“We need to distinguish three kinds of risk. There's risk from bad actors deliberately misusing AI. And so for a virus, AIs can now quite easily be trained to be good at designing new biological viruses. People have done that already where they just designed viruses that only attack bacteria, but that showed that they can do it. And the worry is that a terrorist or terrorist cult will release lots of nasty viruses. So”

Other executives at University of Toronto

  • Timothy Snyder, Professor of History, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto

The summary and quote tags on this profile are produced with AI assistance from verified, first-person interview transcripts, then checked by our team to confirm the speaker's identity and the accuracy of every quote. See how we verify →