Hello and welcome to Startupdates. I'm your host Daniela Musia Lemberg. We're waiting for our guest Daniel Krauss, co-founder and CEO of Flixbus. Let me introduce the format: we share founding stories. I work at KIT Founders' Forge. My co-moderator Markus Hosse is from FAU. You can ask questions in the chat. Our previous guests included Mirko Drotschmann and Daniel Jung. Today we have Daniel Krauss, who built Flixbus from a regulated market into a European success story, now in 40 countries. Flixbus was founded in 2013, has over 5,000 buses, 5,500 employees, and over 500 million passengers. It was valued at over 3 billion euros in 2021. We'll discuss his personal journey, aha moments, and learnings. Daniel, thank you for being here.
Hello. Very gladly. And thank you very much for the invitation.
Yes, thank you for accepting and for joining our date. Where are you dialing in from?
From our office in Berlin.
All right, so we have a direct line to the capital. Before we dive into your Flixbus world, I'd like to take a step back and ask: How should we imagine the young Daniel, when you were an Abiturient or aspiring student? Was there a moment when you thought, I'll do something on my own, I won't be a normal employee?
Well, what's characteristic and has always been for me is that I had a challenge with conventions. I couldn't always verbalize it, but it was clear that if something was done just because it had always been done, that never convinced me. My school career was multifaceted and adventurous, not very linear. In companies before Flix, it worked well when people were willing to answer the 'why' questions. Basically, I'm someone who tries to find out what's good for me, what I enjoy, and how to solve a problem without just doing what everyone does. That has always defined me.
Interesting. But that you really think about founding, about doing your own thing and finding solutions for problems, do you have any memory or a specific time for that?
The problem then and now in the German school system is that becoming an entrepreneur is not in the set of possibilities. People with a high school diploma consider vocational training or university. If they have a good Abitur, medicine comes to mind. Rarely does anyone think of entrepreneurship. That's why I engage with startup teams to change that. I firmly believe we need entrepreneurship and education to drive innovation, otherwise our country and humanity will suffer. To answer your question specifically: during my studies, it was rather coincidental. I always worked, knew how companies function. I built websites, repaired computers on the side. In 2005, my co-founder Andrej and I were commuting to the Swabian Alb for internships. I was answering computer questions for small businesses for pocket money. Andrej said, 'That ends now, we'll start a company. You do what you're good at, we'll charge 75 euros per hour net, I'll handle the rest.' So we started KS, for Kraus Schwimmlein IT Consulting. We made business cards from a machine at the train station. That gave us real exposure to what it means to build a company beyond just technology: bookkeeping, accounting, customer acquisition. I learned in unconventional ways. For a long time at Flix, I had a company credit card because Andrej said I couldn't be trusted with it. I used the company card for personal things and transferred the money back, which drove him crazy. Now I understand why.
Okay, that was a path. So you had a founding story before your second founding, which is what we're focusing on today. What I found interesting when I researched is that the Flixbus founding story is often described as particularly inspiring because it combines timing, courage, and business model innovation, and shows how sustainability can be a competitive and growth factor. Do you recognize yourself in that statement?
Yes, if you look at it in black and white, scientifically, it's a process and service innovation enabled by technology endogenously, and exogenously the liberalization of the market. That's the core. When you present it like that, it sounds a bit dry, but it's digestible and understandable.
Yes, but I always find stories with the word 'courage' interesting, because maybe many people today are not courageous enough and too focused on security. I also found it interesting that you worked with a bold core hypothesis that aimed at a completely new mobility behavior. Could you explain that to our viewers?
A question that was often asked: Jochen and Andre were at Boston Consulting Group, I was at Microsoft. We had good jobs, and people were shocked at what we were doing. But where is the courage? At that time I was in my late 20s, had no obligations except to myself, and I had a good job. It was always important to me not to burn bridges. If it had failed, I could have gone back to Microsoft. We were all well-educated. So the courage aspect – it felt right, but we didn't see ourselves as particularly brave. There are people who have to show much more courage in extreme situations. Founding a company is not an extreme situation. What comes after, when it's founded, can be a small extreme situation. But it's not that bad. My son always says, 'You just have to do it.'
If you say it wasn't that courageous, was there a decision or event in your company's journey that you would now say was much braver?
Yes, when we started, the hypothesis was that the bus could be a good alternative to the car and especially to the train, as seen in the US with Greyhound. So it should work in Germany. Our plan was to at least cover Germany. We weren't the only ones; about eight companies entered the market after liberalization. We fought hard, burning a lot of money. Eventually, the two largest startups, meinFernbus and Flixbus, decided to merge to avoid a third party benefiting, possibly the state railway. At that time, meinFernbus was larger than Flixbus. We decided to structure it so that formally Flixbus bought meinFernbus, but organizationally we took the best of both. That was a big step. Andre and I said, 'Let's go for it,' and offered a large sum under the hypothesis that together we could become profitable and successful. It was a hypothesis; integration could have failed. That was a moment where we showed courage. There were subsequent smaller courageous decisions. For example, we had to integrate two systems onto one platform. I said we could do it in six weeks, but we had no time for a rollback plan. I told investors professionally that we had a rollback, but we didn't. When the switch didn't work on the scheduled day, I kept saying let's try another hour, because there was no rollback. If it hadn't worked, we might not be talking now. That was courageous because you have to accept the 'courage of the gap' – as a young company you can't cover everything. That's everyday courage, which I find more beautiful. I just don't like it when people say founding a company is very brave. In Germany, not much can go wrong.
Yes, that's true. But I think there are also people who are afraid to leave a secure job. However, it's not logical because due to demographics, well-educated young people will always find a job if they are flexible. The job market is an employee's market. Even in a slight crisis, if you extrapolate, when the Boomers retire, someone has to do the jobs. So you can try something. You should also have the responsibility to close the company properly if it fails. But I'm convinced that young people leaving good schools will always find something.
What is the average age at your company? I mean, you have many employees now.
It has grown with us. When I founded, I was 28, average age was mid-20s. Now, after almost 13 years, the average age has risen to around mid-30s. We are very happy about the great loyalty. I congratulated a colleague on her 12-year anniversary today. That makes me proud. The only downside is that we all get older together. But it's also nice to experience that together. It shows trust and loyalty.
Now you went through this time with your co-founders Andrej and Jochen. How has your relationship changed over the years? It's like a marriage, with intense times where you might disagree.
Yes, thank God. Many say it's important to have co-founders, especially when skills complement each other. How would you say your relationship has changed?
First, Andre and I have known each other for almost 30 years. We went to school together, commuted to internships, played volleyball. So we largely knew what we were getting into. Nevertheless, the relationship has changed. The boundless trust and depth of the relationship have never changed; they were always excellent and remain so. But at the beginning, we did more private things together, like going to the sauna with our wives. Now, I see Andre more often than my family in terms of face time. We all have families now, so we need to invest time there. So spontaneous leisure activities don't happen as much. We've been trying to have a dinner with all six of us for a while. It's harder to plan than a papal visit. But we still make time for each other, like going for a drink or skiing. It's become more special. The key is to maintain the core: boundless trust, same goal, and regularly work on the relationship below the waterline, like an iceberg. That requires courage because it's not ordinary. I'm closer to our business environment than to Andre's children, but they are just as important to him. It's similar to a marriage: after 14-15 years, you don't have butterflies all day, but you need moments to appreciate each other. The core is what matters.
It's over at some point. But it's also okay, because being constantly in love can be exhausting. Just like the early phase of a startup is intense. Can you remember a decision that was important and you disagreed, but had to resolve it?
That's hard to say because we are all three very complementary and different, but with the same goal and boundless trust. Discussions often start from different points, which is good. But we never had to use democracy; we always found a solution. I can't remember a single time we had to override one of us. That's a great stroke of luck, but it's also work. You can't just say it's luck; it requires effort.
No, I meant the luck is that all parties are willing to work on the relationship.
Yes, exactly. We're having a couples therapy session here today. It's true that all involved must want to work on the relationship. Otherwise it becomes one-sided. Today the students learn not only about founding but also about relationships.
Exactly. You are also driven by the mission of sustainability. You want to shape the green mobility transition. Was that a mission rooted in all of you from the beginning, or did one person particularly live it?
The truth is, none of us had that thought in the first minute. In the first minute, we thought, oh, a market is opening up that is big enough to build a business. Then we thought we could do something similar to MyTaxi or Uber, same but different. That was the most important thing. Then we realized that modern diesel buses use only slightly more fuel than big SUVs, and per capita it's much better. A study from the Federal Environment Agency in 2013 showed that with assumed occupancy of over 60-70%, it's even better than train travel per capita. So we said, great, we can not only do business but also make a difference. So we have two core pillars: affordable mobility for people who were previously immobile, and sustainable mobility. Then you have to walk the talk. That's why green is the better color than blue. When people ask when we'll have Flix Air, I say I couldn't justify that to our team. Most Flixis are there because they know we do good: we bring people together socially and don't harm the environment; we substitute individual traffic.
So that aspect is also a big part of your image.
Yes, but image is secondary for me. First my organization, my people, then our customers. Image develops from that. I would never do something just for image; that's nonsense.
Since you are active in over 40 countries, was this aspect important in other countries as well, or not so much?
It varies in weighting, but you can safely say it plays a role everywhere. Even in newer countries like India, where from a Western European perspective there is still chaos and CO2 emissions. Historically, the West has contributed most to damaging the planet. But Indians have a different stringency regarding e-mobility. We have competitors in India with 100% electric bus fleets. So it's a topic everywhere, but not equally important. There is no market where it's irrelevant.
Okay. I would have liked to travel with you in 2018. I was in India for a few weeks, traveling by bus, which was very adventurous.
The bus market in India is much larger than the segment we address. In Indian terms, it's a higher class, the Volvo category. There are still buses like you remember, without windshields. But you have to start somewhere. I believe we can help move this luxury segment more into the middle segment by making it affordable and sustainable. There are still many people who have to travel without windshields. But one step at a time. India is a huge country with incredible dynamism. I love that Indians always assume tomorrow will be better than today. I miss that mindset in Germany lately. But there is still work to do.
How do you balance the safety and quality standards that Flix has with the different conditions in various countries? For example, Sweden vs. India.
There is no balance. The standards for Flix are very important, especially safety. Then service aspects like WiFi and power. The product is the same whether you board a Flixbus in Brazil, North America, India, or Australia. No compromises.
Now I think, Flix is a known brand, so bus partners might be eager to work with you. But when you started, it was probably different. You approached conservative regional bus companies as young hipsters. How did you convince them?
You're absolutely right. At the beginning, I still had the company car from Microsoft for a few months. We did a Germany tour, door-knocking. We had a database of bus companies from the Yellow Pages and sent out form letters. Thousands of companies. In the end, we convinced seven to start with us in 2013. In between, we spent months on the road, knocking on doors, and were sometimes politely or impolitely asked to leave the premises. That's how it is. It's important to say that because the pretty startup bubble often creates legends of brilliance. The partner aspect was hard groundwork. Now we have more applications than we need in some countries. The standard rejection was: 'It won't work. We've tried it before. It doesn't work. We have the train. Who are you anyway? Some BCG snobs and a Microsoft dude. We're a hundred-year-old industry, we know how it's done.' They accepted our business numbers but then asked, 'How exactly are you going to empty the toilets?' We said we had thought about it but didn't have the slide with us. So it was colorful; there wasn't one standard rejection, but many rejections.
So the partner aspect was hard. Now you have more applications than you need. What would you say convinced those seven? Were they just adventurous?
I think you started with seven commitments. What would you say convinced them? Were they just adventurous?
They thought, 'Yes, I'm in a midlife crisis, go for it. It's a people business.' That may have been the case for some. But for many, it was simply that entrepreneurial spark. You mustn't forget that the challenge for many bus companies was and still is that they are regionally organized. That means you have vacation business, school business, public sector business, which is tender business for public transport. You drive around in sticks and then it's sorted out. So you have no way to grow or generate new revenue. It was very challenging. You only compete on costs. It's as if, I've never actually run a bus company, you're only half an entrepreneur. And I think some saw an opportunity to finally get a bit of that entrepreneurial spirit back. Maybe some were in a midlife crisis. Others thought, 'These three kids are bursting with energy, it'll work out.' Exactly. And I'm now recapping who was all involved. Some had developed it themselves and could be convinced that as a partner network it would be more promising. Maybe one or two didn't even know exactly what they were signing and were caught up in it.
I also want to look at the time. I have some questions I want to ask because I'm interested and maybe everyone out there too. What I found interesting was that in 2018, you launched Flixtrain in March and at the same time started the bus network on the West Coast of the USA. That's crazy timing. Was that explicitly planned or coincidental? Serendipity is a nice term, or as my grandmother would say, 'the luck of the industrious.'
Our former Southern Europe head, Andrea, came to Munich because his wife wanted to work at Stylight, and he was basically leftover, did an internship with us, and we sent him to Milan. That wasn't planned. Italy was our first country outside Germany, then France. In 2018, we had always thought about the USA because we believed in a platform model, we had to establish a foothold early to prevent someone from copying our idea and scaling to dominate Europe. But how and when was unclear. Then serendipity: our former France head, Pierre, his wife got an offer from Apple as a designer, so he said let's go over, reluctantly put aside his Flix scepter, developed the idea on his own, came to Munich and said this is how I would start the US. We said let's go. It happened to be 2018, could have been 2017 or 2019. For trains, it was always on our mind. The Fernbus market has limits, then you automatically think of long-distance trains. But we had enough to do. Then in 2018, another startup called Lokomore filed for insolvency, and we said now there's a company similar to us, we can jointly test the hypothesis that a train is just a big bus. That opportunity arose and we seized it.
Deutsche Bahn has a mixed image in Germany, many are dissatisfied with delays and construction. Does that affect you too? You use the same tracks.
Yes, it affects us too. But a large part of the reasons why our trains are delayed, whether white or green, is not due to the infrastructure. The infrastructure needs work, it's old, we haven't invested enough. But currently, most delays are operational, which every operator has, including Flix. We try to have fewer than our competitors, but they have a lot. Looking forward, I'm optimistic about the new Bahn leadership. Every day we work to minimize operational impacts. Punctuality is largely an operational issue, not dependent on the tracks.
How do you handle criticism? I thought it was funny on your Instagram channel – you sent a critic to a football game in Bilbao with your buses and he became a fan. How do you handle crisis management and feedback?
Crisis is different. We handle it professionally as you'd expect from a passenger transport company, with standards similar to airlines. For feedback, it's like for individuals: some people defend themselves, others thank and reflect. Our approach is to be curious, understand the problem, and solve it. Sometimes we get creative publicly. Every Flixi has ridden with competitors or Deutsche Bahn, and many of us, including me, have gained appreciation for how complicated it all is. So I can still get annoyed and give feedback, but I remember there's no ill will. That mindset helps us turn negative experiences into positive ones, and sometimes that's good PR.
That was very funny. With an eye on time, we want a Q&A session so the audience can ask questions. Markus will moderate. But first, I'd like to ask you ten quick bullet questions, answered briefly from the gut. Are you up for it?